logo
Energy experts warn about energy dependence after European power outages as Labor Left pushes for more demanding climate targets

Energy experts warn about energy dependence after European power outages as Labor Left pushes for more demanding climate targets

Sky News AU11-05-2025

Concerns have mounted in Australia about the risks of over-relying on renewable energy, following power outages across Europe that have been blamed on grid instability and a lack of baseload power.
Recent blackouts in Spain, Portugal and France left more than 55 million without energy and forced the government to declare a national emergency.
Spanish businesses, households, mobile networks, roads, trains, airports, schools and healthcare facilities had power shut down for hours.
The traffic lights went black as traffic jams stretched out for kilometres, and pedestrians had to wave down cars to safely cross the street.
Residents could not search for what went wrong online, nor send text messages or make phone calls to loved ones.
As Spanish President Pedro Sanchez struggles to avoid taking responsibility for his decision to phase out nuclear energy in favour of renewables, the ramifications of the energy transition have become increasingly clear.
Senior Policy Analyst at the Centre for Independent Studies Zoe Hilton said that while it was not yet certain what went wrong, it was clear what made the grid vulnerable in the first place - the high penetration of intermittent renewables.
'Only a few weeks ago, Spain reached 100 per cent wind and solar generation for the first time,' Ms Hilton told Sky News.
'As coal has been phased out over the past several years, wind and solar accounted for 43 per cent of Spain's annual generation in 2024.
'The remaining electricity supply is provided by nuclear, gas and hydro—but not enough to maintain the same level of stability enjoyed by grids without intermittent renewables.'
Ms Hilton explained that electricity grids rely on dispatchable baseload power - such as coal, gas, hydro and nuclear, all of which have big spinning turbines.
These spinning turbines help to maintain what is called 'grid inertia' as a byproduct of their generation, which helps to ensure the grid's stability.
In contrast, dispatchable power - especially photovoltaic solar - cannot supply the kind of inertia that is needed, leaving the energy grid more vulnerable.
The CIS energy expert used the analogy of a Jenga Tower.
'Replacing a dispatchable generator with intermittent renewables is like taking a block out of the Jenga tower—you can only take so many before the whole thing is vulnerable to collapse,' she said.
'Just like Spain, we're playing a game of Jenga with our electricity grid … even the tiniest nudge can send the whole thing tumbling.
The developments come as the Labor Environment Action Network has demanded the Albanese government increase its climate targets for 2035.
The demands call for the government to cut emissions by 70 per cent from 2005 levels, and would effectively require the grid to reach more than 90 per cent renewable energy in 10 years.
Executive Director of the Institute of Public Affairs Scott Hargreaves, another energy expert, warned about the consequences of relentlessly pursuing such high dependence on renewables.
'The lesson for Australia is simple—the Spanish blackouts are the new normal under net zero,' he told Sky News.
'All over the world energy security and particularly grid stability has been overlooked in the rush to renewables.'
'The Spanish blackouts have again proved that you cannot run an advanced nation without secure and reliable energy, yet this is the future facing Australians.
'We have been testing Australia's electricity market to the point of destruction for over a decade. Well-informed observers increasingly agree that physical system failure is now looming.'
Mr Hargreaves pointed to the fact that state governments have had to begin extending the lifespans of coal-fired power stations, including in Yallourn, Victoria and Eraring, NSW.
'The federal government has set a target of 82 per cent (by 2030). This target is not realistic or achievable and reality will hit well before then,' he said.
Despite this, federal Labor has re-committed to its renewables efforts, as it pursues its goals of an energy grid powered by about 95 per cent renewables by 2050.
So far, the government's intermediate 2035 target has not been set, as Mr Albanese awaits advice from the independent Climate Change Authority.
Figures of the Labor Left, including those sponsored by Labor's Environment Action Network, continue to demand the government set higher targets, and faster.
'I'd like to see (targets) as strong as possible. I'm not going to give you a number because we need to see that advice,' Labor MP Jerome Laxale told Sky News last week.
'It's huge to be given another three years on this and to continue the renewable energy rollout is something that's really important for certainty, particularly for energy transition.
'We've done an enormous amount in three years, got renewable energy up to 40 per cent of the grid, approved 80 projects, grid scale renewable energy projects.
'There's more in the pipeline that will see renewable energy go up, which is what has popular support amongst Australians and we need to make it work.'
The experts, and federal opposition, warn that doing so without sufficient baseload power would place Australia at similar risks to Spain.
Liberal MP Melissa Price, whose electorate of Durack spans vast parts of WA, expressed concern about imminent energy shortfalls in the next decade.
"The Australian Energy Market Operator... forecasts an energy shortfall in WA of 391 MW in 2027-28, growing to 2880 by 2033-34,' she told Sky News.
"This is serious. That is why we must be clear eyed about the limitations of some proposals.
'The so-called 'green hydrogen solution' – which is being promoted heavily across the Midwest region here in WA – simply won't cut it.
'Much of the hydrogen energy proposed in WA is destined for export and will do nothing to support or stabilise our own grid."
Liberal Senator Dave Sharma also told Sky News that the opposition needed to offer a 'realistic energy policy' as his party recovers from its election loss.
He said that energy policy should 'not be so headstrong or ideologically blinkered that it's going to introduce volatility or price uncertainty' into the power system.
Key members of the Coalition have begun steeling themselves for a fight over nuclear power, insisting its credentials will become 'even more compelling' by the 2028 election.
There have been calls inside the party to dump the nuclear proposal following the election defeat, but many argue it remains the most viable option for Australia.
'We need to be very careful about making rash decisions,' Nationals leader David Littleproud said of the forthcoming debate.
'Regional Australia should have a future that isn't littered with transmission lines, solar panels and wind turbines.'
He maintains the Coalition must be technologically agnostic.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Get over there PM': Anthony Albanese urged to visit Trump
‘Get over there PM': Anthony Albanese urged to visit Trump

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Get over there PM': Anthony Albanese urged to visit Trump

Nationals Senator Matt Canavan highlights Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's lack of engagement with US President Donald Trump amid China's increased presence in the region. 'Why hasn't he gone over to Washington, DC, to meet the leader of our most important ally,' Mr Canavan told Sky News host Rowan Dean. 'Only a few months ago, we had the Chinese navy circumnavigate our continent, we had the Chinese navy conduct live fire exercises under a civilian flight path. 'And the Prime Minister's had zero engagement with our most important ally. 'Get over there PM.'

'More punches to come': Bitter feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump predicted to develop even further
'More punches to come': Bitter feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump predicted to develop even further

Sky News AU

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

'More punches to come': Bitter feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump predicted to develop even further

A feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump has exploded this week, but a US commentator believes there may yet be "more punches to come". A war of words erupted between the pair after Musk, who finished his tenure with the administration overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency, lashed the leader of the free world's signature "big beautiful bill" which would unleash trillions in tax cuts and slash spending. Musk this week hit out, describing the bill as a "disgusting abomination" and criticised those who voted for it after it was passed by the House of Representatives last month. United States President Donald Trump has threatened to cut off government contracts with companies owned by Elon Musk in retaliation. Trump claimed Musk was angry because the bill removed an electric vehicle tax break, introduced by Joe Biden which benefited his company Tesla. Co-host of Steve Bannon's War Room Natalie Winters told Sky News' Rowan Dean she believes there will be 'more punches' to come amid the public arguments between the pair. 'I definitely think this is going to evolve,' Ms Winters said on Friday. 'MAGA diehards, who I think are sort of trying to come to terms and understand where exactly they fall in MAGA diehards overwhelmingly are going to be on President Trump's camp. 'On principle, this bill, Elon is sort of in the right.' Musk continued to attack Trump on social media on Thursday, going as far as alleging the President's name is in the Epstein files. The New York Post's Washington correspondent Diana Glebova said the allegation was a "bombshell" claim but that there may be more to the story than what the public knows. "We don't know the extent that Trump is, of course, involved in these files. They haven't been released, and it is up to the Department of Justice to release them," she told Sky News' Steve Price. "We haven't seen those yet. But the White House said today that Musk's claim was nothing new, that Trump was on the flight logs. But of course we don't the whole story here, so we'll just have to see. "I mean, for Musk to know this information, that would be really interesting if there is something there. Again, the White House is denying that there's a (story) there right now." Glebova said the Democrats would be enjoying the "drama" between Trump and one of his biggest supporters throughout the campaign. She added that Musk would be short on support, having potentially put some Republican supporters offside with his remarks about the President. " I think Democrats are eating this up because, you know, it's drama. It's exciting. And I don't think that many people are supporting Musk right now," she said. He lost a lot of his support from Democrats when he joined Trump on the campaign trail and we saw all those protests against Tesla. You know, he was getting death threats. They were going after his vehicles, like lighting them on fire. "The Republicans were supporting Musk because he was so close to Trump, his right-hand man. But now that Musk has departed from Trump, I mean, I don't know who's supporting him right now."

‘Progressive patriot' PM faces his call to arms
‘Progressive patriot' PM faces his call to arms

The Age

time3 hours ago

  • The Age

‘Progressive patriot' PM faces his call to arms

'In today's Australia, the new default should be that patriotism is a love of country that is democratic and egalitarian. It is something that includes those of different races and backgrounds,' he wrote in this masthead a couple of weeks ago. 'With his political authority unquestioned, Albanese has an opportunity to craft a nation-building agenda. The significance is more than just national. At the moment, parties of the centre-left are struggling to find compelling alternatives to Trumpist populism.' Albanese's defiance of America doesn't come out of nowhere. It rings a Labor bell. It resonates with the decision by Labor's celebrated wartime leader, John Curtin, to defy Australia's great and powerful friend of his time, Britain. 'I'm conscious about the leadership of John Curtin, choosing to stand up to Winston Churchill and say, 'no, I'm bringing the Australian troops home to defend our own continent, we're not going to just let it go',' Albanese said last year as he prepared to walk the Kokoda Track, where Australia and Papua New Guinea halted Imperial Japan's southward march of conquest in World War II. Defiance of allies is one thing. Defeat of the enemy is another. In a moment of truth-telling, the Chief of the Defence Force, Admiral David Johnston, this week said that Australia now had to plan to wage war from its own continental territory rather than preparing for war in far-off locations. 'We are having to reconsider Australia as a homeland from which we will conduct combat operations,' Johnston told a conference held by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. 'That is a very different way – almost since the Second World War – of how we think of national resilience and preparedness. We may need to operate and conduct combat operations from this country.' He didn't spell it out, but he's evidently contemplating the possibility that China will cut off Australia's seaborne supply routes, either because it's waging war in the Taiwan Strait or South China Sea, or because it's seeking to coerce Australia. 'The chief of the defence force is speaking truth,' says Professor Peter Dean, co-author of the government's Defence Strategic Review, now at the US Studies Centre at Sydney University. 'There's a line in the Defence Strategic Review that most people overlook – it talks about 'the defence of Australia against potential threats arising from major power competition, including the prospect of conflict'. And there's only one major power posing a threat in our region.' History accelerates week by week. Trump, chaos factory, wantonly discards America's unique sources of power and abuses its allies. China's Xi Jinping and Russia's Vladimir Putin are emboldened, seeing America's credibility crumbling. Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer, alarmed at the rising risks, this week declared a campaign to make Britain 'battle ready' to 'face down Russian aggression'. Loading He plans to enlarge the army, commission up to a dozen new nuclear-powered submarines jointly built with Australia under AUKUS, build six new munitions factories, manufacture 7000 long-range weapons, renew the nuclear warheads on Britain's strategic missiles, and put new emphasis on drones and cyberwar as war evolves daily on the battlefields of Ukraine. Starmer intends to increase defence outlays to the equivalent of 2.5 per cent of GDP with an eventual target of 3 per cent. Ukraine's impressive drone strike on Russia's bombers this week knocked out a third of Moscow's force, with AI guiding the drones to their targets. The Australian retired major-general Mick Ryan observes that Ukraine and Russia are upgrading and adapting drone warfare weekly. 'The Australian government has worked hard to ignore these hard-earned lessons and these cheaper military solutions,' he wrote scathingly in this masthead this week, 'while building a dense bureaucracy in Canberra that innovative drone-makers in Australia cannot penetrate in any reasonable amount of time.' At the same time, the FBI charged two Chinese researchers with attempting to smuggle a toxic fungus into the US. It's banned because it can cause mass destruction of crops. A potential bioweapon, in other words. What would John Curtin do today? 'Curtin, like Albanese, was from the left of the Labor Party,' says Dean. 'He was not an internationalist, he was very domestic focused.' Indeed, he was an avowed Marxist who believed that capitalism was in its late phase and bound to fail, leading to world peace. He abandoned his idealism when confronted by the reality of World War II. 'He realised that a leader has to lead for his times. He had to bend his interests from the domestic sphere to the international.' Curtin famously wrote that, after Britain's 'impregnable fortress' of Singapore fell to the Japanese in just a few days, Australia looked to America as its great and powerful friend. 'Albanese can't repeat that,' observes Dean, 'because there's no one else to turn to.' 'A modern John Curtin,' says the head of the National Security College at ANU, Rory Medcalf, 'would take account of the strategic risk facing the unique multicultural democratic experiment of Australia. He'd unite the community and bring the trade unions, industry, the states and territories together in a national effort. 'It's certainly not about beating the drums of war, but we do need a much more open conversation about national preparedness. Australia might be directly involved in war, but, even if we aren't, we will be affected indirectly [by war to our north] because of risks to our fuel security, risks to the normal functioning of the economy and risks to the cohesion of our society. Is there scope to use national cabinet' – which includes the states and territories – 'to talk about these issues?' And the defence budget? Albanese is dismissive of calls to peg spending by set percentages of GDP. Apply that to any other area of the budget and you'd be laughed out of the room. The prime minister prefers to decide on capability that's needed, then to fund it accordingly. How big a gun do you need, then find money to pay for it. Medcalf endorses this approach of deciding capability before funding, but says that risk should come before both. 'And if you look at risk first, it will push spending well above 2 per cent of GDP and much closer to 3 or 4 per cent.' Regardless of what the Americans say or do. Do they turn out to be dependable but demanding? Or uselessly absent? 'Australia will need to spend more either way,' says Medcalf. 'The only future where we don't need to increase our security investment is one where we accept greatly reduced sovereignty in a China-dominated region.' Dean applauds the government's success in building stronger defence relationships with countries ranging from Japan to Indonesia and PNG, and Foreign Minister Penny Wong's diplomacy in the Pacific islands and South-East Asia. In the next couple of weeks, Albanese will travel to Canada for a G7 summit, and to hold his first in-person meeting with Trump either there or on a trip to chaos central, Washington. Dean describes it as 'is a real moment for him to set out his vision for international affairs, should he choose to use it'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store