
Trump says Xi ‘extremely hard' to make deal with as steel levies double
Agencies
U.S. President Donald Trump said Wednesday it was 'extremely hard' to make a deal with Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping – amid reports they might talk later this week – and as he continued to ramp up his global trade war by doubling tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.
The comments and higher levies came as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) ministers gathered to discuss the outlook for the world economy in light of the U.S. hardball approach to trade that has rattled world markets.
Trump's sweeping tariffs on allies and adversaries have strained ties with trading partners and sparked a flurry of negotiations to avoid the duties.
The White House has suggested the president will speak to Xi this week, raising hopes they can soothe tensions and speed up a trade deal between the world's two biggest economies.
However, in the early hours of Wednesday, Trump appeared to dampen hopes for a quick deal.
'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!' he posted on his Truth Social platform.
China was the main target of Trump's April 2 tariff blitz, hit with levies of 145% on its goods and triggering tit-for-tat tariffs of 125% on U.S. goods.
Both sides agreed to temporarily de-escalate in May, after the U.S. president delayed most sweeping measures on other countries until July 9.
His latest remarks came hours after his tolls on aluminum and steel were doubled from 25% to 50%, raising tensions with various partners, while exempting Britain from the higher levy.
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer held talks with EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic on the sidelines of the OECD meeting, a 38-nation grouping of mostly developed countries.
With the 27-nation EU facing the threat of 50% tariffs on its goods taking effect next month, Sefcovic said he had 'a productive and constructive discussion' with Greer.
'We're advancing in the right direction at pace – and staying in close contact to maintain the momentum,' Sefcovic wrote on the X social media platform.
The EU had warned last month that doubling the metal tariffs would undermine efforts to find a negotiated solution.
The OECD cut its forecast for global economic growth on Tuesday, blaming Trump's tariff blitz for the downgrade.
'We need to come up with negotiated solutions as quickly as possible, because time is running out,' German Economy Minister Katherina Reiche warned.French Trade Minister Laurent Saint-Martin said: 'We have to keep our cool and always show that the introduction of these tariffs is in no one's interest.' Canada, the largest supplier of metals to the United States, has called Trump's tariffs 'illegal and unjustified.'
After talks between U.K. Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and Greer on Tuesday, London said imports from the U.K. would remain at 25% for now. Both sides needed to work out duties and quotas in line with the terms of a recently signed trade pact.
'We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the U.S., U.K. steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs,' a British government spokesperson said.
The Group of Seven advanced economies – Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States – was due to hold separate trade talks on Wednesday.
Mexico will request an exemption from the higher tariff, Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said, arguing that it was unfair because the United States exports more steel to its southern neighbor than it imports.
'It makes no sense to put a tariff on a product in which you have a surplus,' Ebrard said.
Mexico is highly vulnerable to Trump's trade wars because 80% of its exports go to the United States, its main partner.
While some of Trump's most sweeping levies face legal challenges, they have been allowed to remain in place for now as an appeals process takes place.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed Tuesday that the Trump administration sent letters to governments pushing for offers by Wednesday as the July 9 deadline approached.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Welcome Qatar
4 hours ago
- Welcome Qatar
Iran-US Nuclear Deal: Trump Draws Red Line • Will Israel Strike Before It's Too Late?
Iran-US Nuclear Deal: Trump Draws Red Line • Will Israel Strike Before It's Too Late? SHARE


Welcome Qatar
4 hours ago
- Welcome Qatar
‘Bloody Americans Can't…': Iran Issues Direct Dare To Trump After New Threat Over Nuke Program
'Bloody Americans Can't…': Iran Issues Direct Dare To Trump After New Threat Over Nuke Program SHARE


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
The US has checked out. Can Europe stop Putin alone?
The United States was once Ukraine's most important ally – supplying arms, funding and political cover as Kyiv fought for its sovereignty. But today, Washington is losing interest. President Donald Trump, more at home on the golf course than in a war room, is pulling away from a conflict he no longer seems to care to understand. Trump has not hidden his disdain. He has echoed Kremlin narratives, questioned NATO's relevance and reduced Ukraine's defence to a punchline. Even his recent comment that Russian President Vladimir Putin has 'gone absolutely crazy' does little to undo years of indulgence and indifference. He has not become a credible peace broker or a consistent supporter of Ukraine. His words now carry little weight – and Kyiv is paying the price. Just last week, Ukraine launched what it called Operation Spiderweb, a coordinated series of drone strikes deep inside Russian territory. Dozens of aircraft were destroyed at airfields, and key military infrastructure was disrupted. The White House swiftly denied any US involvement. Trump responded by again threatening to 'walk away' from the war. Shortly afterwards, a second round of peace talks in Istanbul collapsed. The only agreement reached was a sombre one: the exchange of the remains of 6,000 fallen soldiers. That may help bring closure to grieving families – but it has done nothing to alter the course of the war. Trump's belated proposal – relayed by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt – that he supports direct talks between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Putin sounded more like political theatre than diplomacy. The moment had already passed. It is Trump – not Zelenskyy – who now lacks leverage. And with the US pulling back from its traditional security leadership, the burden is shifting decisively to Europe. Despite the brutality of Russia's invasion in 2022, American officials have frequently treated Kyiv as the side to pressure and Moscow as the side to appease. European leaders pushed back – but mostly with words. They posted pledges of 'unwavering support' yet hesitated to take full ownership of Europe's defence. Now, as US military aid slows and Trump continues to distance himself from the war, Europe faces a historic reckoning. For the first time in nearly 80 years, the continent stands alone. The future of NATO – the alliance created after World War II to ensure collective defence – is in question. Ukraine's ability to resist Russian aggression increasingly depends on European guarantees. Can Europe meet the moment? Can a loose coalition of willing nations evolve into a durable security bloc? And can it do so without the US? As of early 2025, Ukraine was meeting roughly 40 percent of its own military needs, according to the Centre for Security and Cooperation in Kyiv. Europe provided 30 percent and the US the remaining 30 percent. To sustain the fight, Europe must now do more – quickly. The alternative would be disastrous. The Kiel Institute for the World Economy has estimated that if Russia were to occupy Ukraine, it could cost Germany alone 10 to 20 times more than maintaining current levels of support – due to refugee flows, energy instability, economic disruptions and defence risks. One of Ukraine's most urgent needs is ammunition – particularly artillery shells. Until recently, the US was the main supplier. As American deliveries decline, Ukraine is burning through its reserves. Europe is now scrambling to fill the gap. The problem is scale. Europe's arms industry has long been underdeveloped. It is only now beginning to respond. According to European Union Commissioner for Defence and Space Andrius Kubilius, the bloc aims to produce 2 million artillery shells annually by the end of 2025. This would just meet Ukraine's minimum battlefield requirements. A particularly ambitious initiative is a Czech-led plan to procure and deliver up to 1.8 million shells to Ukraine by the end of next year. Confirmed by Czech President Petr Pavel in May and backed by Canada, Norway, the Netherlands, Denmark and other countries, the effort is one of the few on track to make a meaningful impact – if it arrives on time. Germany has also moved beyond donations. In late May, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius signed an agreement with his Ukrainian counterpart, Rustem Umerov, to cofinance the production of long-range weapons inside Ukraine, tapping into local industrial and engineering capacity. The United Kingdom remains one of Kyiv's most dependable allies. On Wednesday, London announced a new 350-million-pound ($476m) drone package – part of a broader 4.5-billion-pound ($6.1bn) support pledge. It includes 100,000 drones by 2026, a substantial increase on previous commitments. But war is not waged with weapons alone. Financial and economic power matter too. Trump recently told Fox News that US taxpayer money was being 'pissed away' in Ukraine. The remark was not only crude – it was also misleading. Since 2022, the US has provided about $128bn in aid to Ukraine, including $66.5bn in military assistance. Meanwhile, the EU and its member states have contributed about 135 billion euros ($155bn), including 50 billion euros ($57bn) in military support, 67 billion euros ($77bn) in financial and humanitarian aid, and 17 billion euros ($19.5bn) for refugee programmes. The UK has added another 12.8 billion pounds ($17.4 billion). These are not gifts. They are strategic investments – meant to prevent far higher costs if Russia succeeds in its imperial project. Europe has also led on sanctions. Since 2014 – and with renewed urgency since 2022 – it has imposed 17 successive rounds of measures targeting Russia's economy. None has ended the war, but each has taken a toll. On May 20, one day after a reportedly warm call between Trump and Putin, the EU and UK unveiled their most sweeping sanctions package yet. It included nearly 200 vessels from Russia's so-called shadow fleet, used to smuggle oil and circumvent global price caps. Some estimates, including AI-assisted modelling, suggest the sanctions could cost Russia $10bn to $20bn per year if loopholes are closed and enforcement holds. Even partial implementation would disrupt Moscow's wartime revenue. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas was clear: 'The longer Russia wages war, the tougher our response.' Europe is beginning to back that promise with action. From drones to shells, sanctions to weapons production, the continent is finally moving from statements to strategy – slowly but steadily building the foundations of Ukrainian resilience and Russian defeat. But this momentum cannot stall. This is no longer just Ukraine's war. The US has stepped aside. Europe is no longer the backup plan. It is the last line of defence. If it fails, so does Ukraine – and with it, the idea of a secure, sovereign Europe. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.