The rest of the world struggles to restrain Israel
Away from the war zones of the Middle East, Israel finds itself fighting other battles. Judges at the International Criminal Court in The Hague rejected Israel's request to withdraw arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant, who are both wanted for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity carried out under their watch in the aftermath of Hamas's Oct. 7, 2023, strike on southern Israel. In a bid to pressure the international court, the United States has placed sanctions on some ICC judges and prosecutors.
Advertisement
Earlier this week, Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar went to Brussels for meetings with European counterparts. He emerged, in his words, victorious, having achieved 'an important diplomatic feat' of persuading the European Union to avoid adopting punitive measures against Israel. Kaja Kallas, the EU's top diplomat, said the bloc was keeping 'options on the table' but would not pursue mooted sanctions that it was considering after an earlier EU assessment found Israel possibly in breach of human rights commitments.
Advertisement
But rights advocates were frustrated, given the scale of the humanitarian disaster in Gaza and Israel's documented stifling of aid into the flattened territory. The EU's acquiescence, suggested Amnesty International's Agnès Callamard, would be 'remembered as one of the most disgraceful moments in the EU's history' and was 'a cruel and unlawful betrayal of the European project and vision.'
The governments of Ireland, Spain, and Slovenia are the three European nations that have been outspoken in their criticism of Israel and spearheaded the attempted reckoning in Brussels. They are pressing ahead with their own measures to show their disapproval of Israel's conduct of the war, which has severely depleted Hamas but also destroyed Gaza and killed tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians, including many children.
Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez accused Israel of carrying out a 'genocide' earlier this month. Irish lawmakers are advancing legislation banning trade with Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, much to the anger of some US officials. And Slovenia declared two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers as personae non gratae, banning them from the country. 'This kind of measure is the first of its kind in the European Union,' Slovenian foreign minister Tanja Fajon said. 'We are breaking new ground.'
There's reason to be cynical about the efficacy of such attempts by small countries. In Europe, the governments of Britain, France, and Germany remain far more reluctant to confront Israel in similar fashion, while French President Emmanuel Macron's efforts to revive international momentum toward the creation of a Palestinian state seem to be fizzling out.
Advertisement
Israel's boosters in the United States can shrug and smirk. 'An unstated reason for Europe's particular animus toward Israel over the decades is that the continent's leaders secretly resent Israel's willingness and ability to regularly defend itself through tough military action,' mused veteran Washington wonk Robert D. Kaplan, 'something Europe's elites never had even to countenance, and arguably couldn't manage.'
Kaplan and his ilk were unlikely to be impressed by a summit that took place earlier this week in Bogotá, where delegations from 30 countries convened to pressure Israel to end its war in Gaza, as well as its occupation of the West Bank. The session of The Hague Group was cohosted by South Africa, which is leading a genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, and the left-wing government of Colombia. It concluded Wednesday with 12 countries agreeing to implement a set of measures to 'restrain' Israel. These include a denial of arms to Israel, banning of ships transporting such arms, and reviews of public contracts with companies linked to Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories.
A scan of the list of the countries that immediately signed on may suggest Israel's leadership isn't quite shaking in its boots: Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Indonesia, Iraq, Libya, Malaysia, Namibia, Nicaragua, Oman, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and South Africa. But the conference's backers argued that it's a first step in a global shift.
Advertisement
'For too long, governments have been too afraid of the consequences of angering the United States to risk taking action to uphold international law,' Annelle Sheline, a former State Department official who attended the proceedings in the Colombian capital, told me. 'This is about more than Israel and Palestine, this is about a new multilateralism taking shape to replace the old system.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gold Rises With US Interest-Rate Cuts and Tariff Agenda in Focus
(Bloomberg) -- Gold rose as traders assessed differing views from US Federal Reserve officials on how President Donald Trump's tariff agenda will impact inflation. Why the Federal Reserve's Building Renovation Costs $2.5 Billion Milan Corruption Probe Casts Shadow Over Property Boom How San Jose's Mayor Is Working to Build an AI Capital The precious metal was up 0.5% to near $3,366 an ounce after Fed Governor Christopher Waller advocated for a rate cut last week and Governor Michelle Bowman also expressed an openness to a reduction. Meanwhile, their colleagues remained more cautious due to the risk of persistent inflation triggered by tariffs. Lower borrowing costs tend to benefit gold as it doesn't pay interest. The divergence comes as Trump keeps up the pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell — whose term as chair expires in May 2026 — with the White House evaluating candidates to succeed him and pledging to pick someone who will cut rates. The president also pushed back on a Wall Street Journal report that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent advised him markets would react badly if he fired Powell. On the trade front, European Union officials are set to meet as early as this week to formulate a plan to respond to a possible no-deal scenario with the US. Investors will be watching for progress on talks with a raft of trade partners ahead of Trump's Aug. 1 deadline for imposing so-called reciprocal tariffs. Gold has climbed more than a quarter this year, with geopolitical tensions and concerns about dollar-denominated assets sparking flight to the haven asset. The precious metal has been trading within a tight range over the past few months, as investors wait for a clearer sense on global trade talks, the path for rate cuts and the impact of tariffs on the global economy. Spot gold was up 0.5% at $3,368.35 an ounce as of 1:35 p.m. in Singapore. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index edged lower. Silver, platinum and palladium all rose. --With assistance from Yihui Xie. A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border Thailand's Changing Cannabis Rules Leave Farmers in a Tough Spot Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All What the Tough Job Market for New College Grads Says About the Economy ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Washington Post
30 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Hamas facing financial and administrative crisis as revenue dries up
TEL AVIV — Hamas is facing its worst financial and administrative crisis in its four-decade history, facing stiff challenges in mustering the resources needed to continue fighting Israel and ruling Gaza. With its coffers depleted, Hamas's military wing can no longer adequately pay the salaries of its fighters, though it is still able to recruit teenage boys for missions like keeping lookout or placing explosives along Israeli military routes, according to Oded Ailam, who is a former high-level Israeli intelligence officer, and current Israel Defense Forces officers. The group has also been unable to replace the well equipped tunnels and underground command centers that Israeli forces have destroyed in their bid to uproot Hamas. Before he was killed in an airstrike two months ago, Hamas military commander Mohammed Sinwar had been forced to take refuge in a one-room hideout 30 feet below a hospital in southern Gaza. The spartan bunker was a far cry from the vast underground complex that the Israeli military said it found earlier in the war farther north, which included spacious white-tiled rooms, a blast-proof door, mechanical ventilation and ample space to accommodate weapons stockpiles. 'Hamas is not rebuilding their tunnels, they're not paying their highly trained fighters, they're only surviving,' Ailam said. Nor can the Hamas administration meet the payroll of police and ministry employees in Gaza, where the group has been the governing authority since 2007, or continue to pay death benefits to the families of fighters killed, according to Ailam, a local Palestinian policeman and two other Gazans. Ibrahim Madhoun, a Gazan analyst close to Hamas, said that the group had not prepared for more than a year of war and has been forced to adopt austerity measures, such as cutting administrative costs and salaries, while trying to maintain some basic services — for instance, by setting up emergency committees that provide basic local services such as garbage collection and management of generator fuel — and thus some semblance of governing authority. To pick up some of the slack, Madhoun said, Hamas also relies on efforts of the local community and the 'strong social network that helps absorb the shocks.' Hamas officials did not respond to requests for comment about the group's financial health. Hamas and Israel are currently negotiating over a possible 60-day ceasefire, with Israel seeking to ensure that it can maintain pressure on Hamas and the militant group looking for a lifeline. All sides say the talks are making progress, but an agreement remains elusive. Earlier in the war, Hamas relied on taxes imposed on commercial shipments and the seizure of humanitarian goods, according to Gazans and current and former Israeli and foreign officials. According to a Gazan who has worked at the border, plainclothes Hamas personnel routinely took inventory of goods at the Rafah crossing, until it closed last year, and at the Kerem Shalom crossing, though it was under IDF control. They also surveyed warehouses and markets. Most of the Palestinians interviewed for this story spoke either on the condition of anonymity or that only their first name be used, for fear of reprisal by Hamas. The United Nations, the European Commission and major international aid organizations have said they have no evidence that Hamas has systematically stolen their aid, and the Israeli government has not provided proof. Hamas profited 'especially off the aid that had cost them nothing but whose prices they hike up,' said a Gazan contractor who has worked at Gaza's border crossings during the war. Over nearly two years, he said, he saw Hamas routinely collect 20,000 shekels (about $6,000) from local merchants, threatening to confiscate their trucks if they did not pay. He recalled that civil servants for the Hamas-led government said several times that they would kill him or call him a collaborator with Israel if he did not cooperate with their demands to divert aid. He said he refused. But he added that he knew at least two aid truck drivers who he said were killed by Hamas for refusing to pay. When Israel imposed a siege on Gaza in March, shortly before breaking a two-month ceasefire with Hamas, most of those shipments came to a halt. Hamas officials did not respond to requests for comment about accounts that it has taxed or impounded commercial shipments, stolen humanitarian aid or extorted local businessmen. Hamas triggered the devastating war in Gaza by attacking Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people and taking about 250 others back into Gaza as hostages. Since then, the Israeli military campaign has killed more than 58,000 people, mostly women and children, Gazan health authorities say. An Israeli military official said Hamas has lost 90 percent of its leadership and 90 percent of its weapons stockpiles over the course of the conflict. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the news media. In the early phase of the war, Hamas had rushed to stash cash and supplies underground, but those have run short. In March 2024, the Israeli army said that it confiscated more than $3 million from the tunnels beneath al-Shifa Hospital, in northern Gaza, according to a statement in the IDF's WhatsApp group. But Hamas has profited off commercial trade and humanitarian aid, netting hundreds of millions of dollars, according to two Israeli military officials and an Israeli intelligence official, who all spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive findings. For instance, the officials said, Hamas seized at least 15 percent of some goods, like flour, and aid vouchers that international agencies had intended to provide to hungry Gazans. These officials said some of that was given to Hamas personnel and supporters while the rest was sold to make money. Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib, a Palestinian American who leads the advocacy group Realign for Palestine, said that Hamas repeatedly modified its strategy for profiting off aid and commerce while counting on the humanitarian crisis to bring the war to an end. 'Hamas's strategy relied on the suffering of Gazans,' said Alkhatib. 'But when this strategy failed, it foolishly doubled down on this approach, in large part because it had nothing else in its toolbox to deal with Israel's ferocious reaction to Oct. 7 and the world's inability to stop it.' 'Hamas sees aid as its most important currency,' said a man from Deir al-Balah, in central Gaza, who helps manage the distribution of aid. He said that while most of the population had to scrape for water and food, people affiliated with Hamas had been gifted boxes of aid meant for wider distribution. The IDF, citing intelligence, says the aid organizations targeted by Hamas have included U.N. agencies and NGOs. The Israeli government has used allegations of widespread Hamas theft to justify draconian restrictions on humanitarian assistance entering Gaza and to justify bombing aid depots. Some far-right members of the Israeli government have said these restrictions are useful in pressuring Hamas into making negotiating concessions and in turning Gaza's population against Hamas. Israel has not provided public proof that Hamas has systematically stolen aid brought into Gaza under the U.N. system, and despite requests from The Washington Post to officials in the IDF, the Israeli Foreign Ministry and the prime minister's office, no evidence has been provided to substantiate reports of widespread diversion of U.N. food aid. Nor has Israel privately presented proof to humanitarian organizations or Western government officials, even when they have pressed for evidence, according to interviews with more than a dozen aid officials and several current and former Western officials. Carl Skau, deputy executive director for the U.N.'s World Food Program, one of the main providers of flour in Gaza throughout the war, said in an interview that systematic aid diversion by Hamas 'has not been an issue for us so far in the conflict.' WFP previously reported three instances of looting of its supplies during 21 months of war. 'We have mitigating measures that we have drawn lessons from over the past 40 years operating in these kinds of complex environments with armed groups,' he said. 'We are putting all those mitigating measures in place.' Officials from several major international aid organizations have also said that there has been no systematic diversion of their aid by Hamas and that they have robust procedures for tracking aid as it enters Gaza and is distributed. An Egyptian official briefed on intelligence, however, said that Hamas had indeed stolen some of this food aid. 'Hamas is trying to use the aid to survive. It's happening,' said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the news media. Among the group's demands in negotiations with Israel over a new ceasefire deal is the reopening of Gaza's borders and the surging of humanitarian aid — partly to alleviate the severe shortage of food that has turned public opinion against Hamas, but also to revive its cash flow, said an official familiar with the talks who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive deliberations. 'One of the reasons that Hamas is pushing for a return to the old system is that they have guys in all of the warehouses,' said a Western official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the news media. The presence of employees of the Gaza government allows Hamas to regulate and monitor market activities, as well as tax or seize some of the supplies at times, said a high-level Israeli official. Until commercial shipments into Gaza were suspended in October, Hamas taxed these imports at the border and, if traders refused, commandeered a portion of their trucks and sold their contents to Gazan merchants, according to a Gazan economic reporter. He said that before the war, 'fuel and cigarettes were the highest taxed and most profitable items for the Hamas government in Gaza,' adding that revenue data has been difficult to access. A Gazan businessman said Hamas had imposed a tax of a least 20 percent on many goods. But the group also would take control of trucks carrying high-demand goods like flour, which could sell for up to $30 for a kilogram, and steal fuel meant for aid groups. Fuel supplies have produced high revenue for Hamas during the war, with the group both taxing and seizing fuel stored at gas stations for sale, said an Israeli military official who spoke on the condition of anonymity in accordance with military protocol. In addition to taxing goods, Hamas also made money by allowing associated merchants to sell imported staples like sugar and flour at inflated prices without fear of being punished for price gouging, according to the IDF, which cited an internal Hamas document obtained by the military. The Gazan economic reporter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation, confirmed that these merchants are allowed to sell goods at inflated prices. He said Hamas would at times constrain supply on the market by ordering others to withhold distribution for several days, thus forcing up prices. When Israel resumed the war in March, Hamas saw its revenue tumble as imports and aid shipments into Gaza largely were reduced to a trickle. The establishment in May of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation — a food assistance program backed by the U.S. and Israel whose operations have been overshadowed by the repeated fatal shooting of Palestinians seeking aid at its centers — has deprived Hamas of earlier revenue, the Israeli military official said. As Hamas has come under growing military and financial pressures, it has become increasingly repressive in a bid to show it is still in control. Gazans interviewed for this story spoke of growing fear of retribution. In videos posted since this spring on social media by a Hamas-linked unit formed to dole out punishments, masked gunmen are shown beating up and shooting the legs of men accused of stealing aid. Gazans said Hamas is also seeking to intimidate those critical of the group. Last month, for instance, Mowafeq Khdour, 31, was robbed and brutally beaten by dozens of armed Hamas men after he spoke out publicly against Hamas, his brother Mahmoud said over WhatsApp. As Hamas adopts harsher policies, the group's popularity is falling, said Rami, a 40-year-old employee of the Hamas-run government who spoke on the condition that only his first name be used out of concern for his safety. He said the anger on Gaza's streets is markedly different from the optimism earlier in the conflict, when 'we believed we were on the brink of liberating Palestine or achieving a major victory in the war,' especially with Hamas and its allies holding about 250 people hostage. 'Israel's actions are undeniably criminal, but Hamas's poor judgment and failure to account for the war's aftermath have also contributed significantly to this disaster,' Rami said. Balousha reported from Hamilton, Ontario. Miriam Berger and Lior Soroka in Tel Aviv contributed to this report.
New York Times
31 minutes ago
- New York Times
Explained: Why England will not take a knee before Euros semi-final after racial abuse of Jess Carter
This is an updated version of an article originally published on July 17. England players past and present have said not enough is being done to address racism in football. On Sunday, England announced they will not take the knee before their European Championship semi-final against Italy on Tuesday after defender Jess Carter spoke out about the online racist abuse she has been subjected to during the tournament. Advertisement The 27-year-old posted on Instagram on Sunday: 'From the start of the tournament, I have experienced a lot of racial abuse. Whilst I feel every fan is entitled to their opinion on performance and result, I don't agree or think it's ok to target someone's appearance or race.' England, who have taken the knee before all their games at these Euros as a gesture protesting systematic racism and police brutality towards Black people, will now not do so on Tuesday in solidarity with Carter's experience. The FA said before the tournament the decision to take the knee in Switzerland was 'player-led but with the full support from the FA'. Carter's words, as well as her confirmation she would be stepping back from using social media, were supported by her team-mates, the England head coach Sarina Wiegman, European football's governing body UEFA, as well as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the National Women's Soccer League and Gotham, Carter's club team. The Football Association (FA) also confirmed it had contacted UK police and social media platforms. 'We play football because we love the sport; we love playing,' England defender Lucy Bronze said at a press conference on Sunday. 'We do love connecting with our fans, social media is a great way to do that, but we don't need it. I think that's something that the platforms should be very aware of; nobody needs social media if you want to carry on in sport. 'It is sad that players are missing out on so many of these great messages. Someone like Jess, she's had an amazing tournament. I think she was one of our best players in the Netherlands game. She should be able to see messages from fans… 'It is sad that players are having to choose between this rollercoaster that social media sends us on.' England's players have decided that the message from kneeling is not being heard and that more needs to be done. Former England international Anita Asante shared a post supporting Carter, saying that it should not fall on Black and Brown people to answer the problem of racism. She said, 'Nothing will be done until it hits the powers that govern the game financially.' Enough is enough. — Anita Asante (@NicenNeetz) July 20, 2025 FIFA president Gianni Infantino posted a message to his Instagram on Sunday: 'We stand with Jess. We stand with every player and every individual who has suffered from racist abuse. No player should be discriminated against in any way, they should be free to be at their very best on the pitch.' Infantino also mentioned FIFA's Social Media Protection Service, aimed at using AI technology to help players avoid abuse online through a multistep process. Advertisement 'We will continue to collaborate and support confederations, FIFA Member Associations and their players,' Infantino said. 'In this instance, we will be offering our support with any further action required, as well as sharing data for appropriate action to be taken against any perpetrators.' Reiterating the England squad's desire to see more done to tackle racist abuse, Bronze said: 'There are small changes. You see people being held accountable, whether that's online, in stadiums. You do see bans happening. It's just not enough,' Bronze said. 'That's the point. Not enough is being done. There are small changes being made. If you look back 100 years to 50 years to 20 years to 10 years, there's always small steps forward, but that's the problem. 'It's always a small step. We don't want it to be small steps anymore.' Here, The Athletic explains what taking the knee means, the history behind it, and why Carter's experience has led to her England team-mates deciding not to do so on Tuesday. On Sunday, the England defender posted the following statement on Instagram. 'A message to the fans… From the start of the tournament I have experienced a lot of racial abuse. Whilst I feel every fan is entitled to their opinion on performance and result I don't agree or think it's ok to target someone's appearance or race. 'As a result of this I will be taking a step back from social media and leaving it to a team to deal with. 'As ever I am grateful for all of the support from the genuine fans but I am taking this measure to protect myself in a bid to keep my focus on helping the team anyway I can. 'Hopefully speaking out will make the people writing this abuse think twice so that others won't have to deal with it. 'We have made some historic changes with this Lionesses squad that I am so proud to be a part of and my hope is that by speaking out about this it will make another positive change for all. 'I'm now looking forward and focusing on putting all of my energy into helping my team.' Following Carter's statement on Sunday, Bronze spoke to journalists in a press conference while the Lionesses released a statement explaining that they would remain standing and not take the knee before the semi-final against Italy on Tuesday. 'We feel as a collective, is the message as strong as it used to be?' Bronze said. 'Is the message really hitting hard? Because it feels like it's not if these things are still happening… more needs to be done in football and society.' Bronze added: 'We want it to be: 'this is happening, there is change, and this is unacceptable'. There are no more small steps.' 'It is clear we and football need to find another way to tackle racism,' a statement from the Lionesses squad read. 'No one should have to endure such vile abuse, be that in football or any walk of life. Those behind this online poison must be held accountable.' Posting on X after the statement from Carter, Asante, who won 71 caps for England, spoke about being asked for interviews on the subject. 'I've spoken so many times publicly on this and nothing changes,' she said. Advertisement 'I always get asked: 'how can we solve racism?' but as Black and Brown people, we don't have the access to the levers of power and therefore we don't have the ability to dismantle the structures that uphold racism. 'Racism existed before social media and it will exist after it. It's in the stands, it's in the game & until action is taken seriously it's left to players and people in football, both on and off the pitch, to protect themselves. 'But let me be clear, the truth is that nothing will be done until it hits the powers that govern the game financially. 'I'm proud to be Black and l've had immense pride and privilege to represent England but how much more racist abuse do we have to take before serious action is taken? It goes without saying that I am sending all my support and love to Jess today. I stand with you, the team and others as always.' British Prime Minister Starmer said: 'There is no place for racism in football or anywhere in society. I stand with Jess, the Lionesses, and any players who have suffered racism, on and off the pitch.' Anti-discrimination group Kick It Out said it stands with Carter against'sickening behaviour' and, in a statement, pointed to social media companies needing to do more to combat racist abuse. 'Social media companies have failed to prevent exposure to this toxicity, and football must continue to use its collective power to hold them to account … More urgency is needed from everyone involved.' Taking the knee is a gesture designed to protest against systematic racism and police brutality towards Black people, and was popularised in football in 2020 following the killing of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, by a white police officer in the United States in May of that year. Taking the knee in sport can be traced back to American football quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who did it during the traditional performance of the U.S. national anthem before an NFL game — players and coaches on the two teams usually line up to attention along opposite sides of the field for this — when with the San Francisco 49ers in September 2016. After remaining seated on the 49ers' bench during the anthem at a game the previous month, Kaepernick had explained: 'I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses Black people and people of colour.' The FA said the team's choice to take the knee had been communicated to UEFA, European football's governing body and the organisation that runs the tournament. 'It's been something the team have done for several years,' the FA added. Premier League players took the knee following football's return from three months of covid-enforced lockdown in June 2020 and Women's Super League (WSL) teams then did the same during that competition's 2020-21 season. While the Premier League announced in August 2022 that players would stop kneeling before every match and instead 'select significant moments' to do so, WSL sides have continued the practice. It is often greeted by applause from supporters in the stands. Advertisement England's men's side took the knee before all their matches at the delayed 2020 European Championship. This was both applauded and booed by sections of the England fanbase, while several prominent MPs from the then-ruling Conservative Party voiced their opposition to it, including the home secretary at that time, Priti Patel. Team GB's women's football team, whose squad consisted solely of England players, confirmed their intention to perform the gesture at the similarly-delayed 2020 Olympic Games hosted by Tokyo, Japan that same summer. Explaining the decision, head coach Hege Riise said: 'The players and staff have been taking the knee at club and international level for over a year now, and we were all united in our decision to continue doing whatever we can to raise awareness of racism and discrimination in all its forms, standing in unity and solidarity with all those whose lives are affected. 'We are clear that taking the knee is an important symbol of peaceful protest against discrimination, injustice and inequality.' England's women have continued to take the knee since, including at the 2022 European Championship and the following year's World Cup. Taking the knee was seen frequently at the Euros in England three years ago, with teams including the Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden and Austria all doing it too. Germany and England both took the knee before facing one another in the final at Wembley. This summer, France, the Netherlands and Wales all joined opponents England in taking the knee in those three group-stage matches. However, these sides did not do it in their other Group D fixtures against one another. Sweden also took the knee before playing England in their quarter-final last week. Both host nation Switzerland and opponents Iceland took the knee before their Group A fixture on July 6, but it has not been commonplace at matches during the tournament. Teams must let UEFA know beforehand if they intend to take the knee and it is then incorporated into the 'running order' for the match, the governing body says. The history of English women's football in terms of racial issues is a complex one. In 2017, the FA apologised to forward Eni Aluko and midfielder Drew Spence after Mark Sampson, manager of the women's national team between 2013 and 2017, was found to have made racially discriminatory remarks towards the two Black players in two separate incidents. Advertisement A number of England players voiced their support for Sampson before his dismissal, with members of the team running to the touchline to celebrate a goal by Nikita Parris against Russia with him in September 2017 amid the allegations. Parris, who is also Black, publicly apologised to Aluko in 2020. Women's football in England has also been criticised for its lack of diversity, particularly over the past decade. There were six Black and mixed-race players called up for the 2007 World Cup by the team's Black manager Hope Powell, but just three in the 2022 European Championship-winning squad, by which time current boss Sarina Wiegman was in charge. Four players selected by Wiegman for this tournament are Black or mixed race — Khiara Keating, Carter, Lauren James and Michelle Agyemang. A lack of diversity is something the team themselves have acknowledged. 'Within the squad, this is an important issue and we're all aware of it,' England captain Leah Williamson told BBC Sport in 2022. 'There's nothing that we can do right now to change it.' She added: 'We want to make it as inclusive as possible. We don't ever want anybody to think it's not their game because of the way they look or the colour of their skin.' Defender Lotte Wubben-Moy also told the BBC: 'I'm not going to sit here and say I feel any hardship. I'm White. I have such a massive privilege and I acknowledge that, which is part of the reason why I feel like I have such a responsibility also to push for more change to allow young, Black, Asian; any child to be able to see someone like them playing football.' (Top photos: Getty Images)
