
Sex worker 'terrified' by plans for new prostitution law
At 17-years-old, Alice (not her real name) was sacked from her job in a call centre.Her home environment was difficult. She had no CV and few employment options.A friend had been involved in sex work and had made "a lot of money". Alice decided to go down a similar road.Now in her 30s, she's still involved in sex work, though she balances it with other job opportunities.But Alice believes a potential change in the law in Scotland will make her "terrifyingly" unsafe.
Alba MSP Ash Regan is introducing a bill that would make it an offence to pay for sexual services. It's an approach often referred to as the "Nordic Model".The former SNP leadership candidate argues that challenging men's demand for prostitution will help to protect women.
Regan says that "buying sexual access to a human being is a form of male violence", and she's determined to see the law reformed.As things currently stand paying for sex is not illegal in Scotland.But some activities which are sometimes connected– such as running a brothel, loitering in a public place to buy or sell sex or persuading someone to take up prostitution – are against the law.Regan also wants to see women involved in selling sex offered "exit alternatives" and a legal right to support. And she wants to see any previous convictions for soliciting repealed.But these proposals have split those who want to keep sex workers safe.Alice explains that the internet has changed the landscape for what she calls "full-service sex workers" (people who exchange sex for money).She says there are now more opportunities for those selling sex to "screen" potential clients.This can involve asking to see photo ID before meeting a client, asking for a link to their social media or even requesting references from other sex workers.It's not a failsafe process, but it can help to check whether people are who they claim to be.But she is concerned about the potential change in the law in Scotland.
Most of Alice's unease around the bill revolves around safety. She insists "there's a difference between good clients and bad clients".If buying sex is criminalised, then she fears that the "good clients" will disappear and "you'll just be left with people who don't care about you as they don't care about breaking the law"."I would assume that anyone who doesn't care about breaking the law is more likely to be dangerous", she says.She worries that a change in the law would make screening clients harder, as anyone who's still willing to buy sex illegally won't be willing to share their details.Alice argues that all these factors combine to mean that Ash Regan's proposals would make her "terrifyingly" less safe."My body would become a crime scene, wouldn't it? So why would I go to the police? I wouldn't even go to the police now," she says.Alice believes that further decriminalisation is what would ultimately make her safer, providing her with more protections and enabling a better relationship with the police.But Regan's proposal is to offer a route out of sex work for someone like Alice. Is that a prospect that appeals to her?Alice is sceptical.She thinks this sounds like swapping sex work for a minimum wage job, which she says "doesn't really change why people end up choosing to do sex work in the first place".
Ash Regan is unwilling to tolerate the status quo.She argues that it's fundamentally "a system of exploitation and violence" that affects the most vulnerable women in society.The Alba MSP describes her bill as "a departure from the failed approach of decriminalising the sex trade without addressing the root cause and consequences of commodifying human beings: demand."The most effective way to do this, she argues, is to criminalise those who are paying for sex.She's promised to "confront the injustice of commercial sexual exploitation head-on." And she has the backing of a number of women's groups in doing so.However, there's also a campaign that's been specifically set up to oppose her proposals, with sex workers stressing safety concerns.The debate about how to legislate with regards to selling sex is a contentious one.Even the term "sex worker" is rejected by some, including Regan.This all highlights how sensitive this debate could become, with different camps passionately believing that their own approach is the right one.And every person involved in this world will have their own unique story and set of circumstances.It's rare to have someone like Alice willing to do an interview and speak so frankly – but she does not speak on behalf of every sex worker in Scotland.Regan has the support of other individuals who have previously been involved in sex work.
If her bill was to become law, Scotland would not be the first place in the UK to criminalise the buying of sex.It has been a crime to pay for sex in Northern Ireland since 2015.A 2019 independent review by Queen's University Belfast found that the law did not appear to have the desired effect.Despite a tightening up of the law, sex workers reported increased demand for their services and it found that more sex workers were advertising online.Researchers added that sex workers felt "further marginalised and stigmatised".The report concluded that the change in the Northern Irish law had "minimal effect on the demand for sexual services."But there are those – like Ash Regan – who believe that reform can quash demand, make women safer, and provide alternative employment opportunities.This debate could ultimately go nowhere in the foreseeable future.With a Scottish election due in 2026, bills that don't complete their parliamentary journey in that timeframe will fall by the wayside.Opposition towards this bill remains. And MSPs will now have to think about where they stand on this issue, if they haven't done so already.Its biggest obstacle could yet be time.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
21 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Findlay: Tories will save £650m – and use the cash to cut taxes for Scots
He will insist there is a need to 'urgently streamline bloated government' at Holyrood. The party leader will outline plans for a Taxpayer Savings Act, promising this will save £650 million by 'cutting red tape, getting a grip on spending, and harnessing business expertise'. Mr Findlay will also tell the Scottish Conservative Party conference in Edinburgh about plans to establish a Scottish Agency of Value and Efficiency. The Scottish Tory leader has accused SNP ministers of wasting money 'on an industrial scale' (Jane Barlow/PA) This would be run by business leaders, he will tell the conference, who would then be 'tasked with wielding a claymore on waste'. The Scottish Tory leader has already accused First Minister John Swinney and his Government of wasting money 'on an industrial scale'. In his keynote speech to the conference – his first since becoming leader north of the border last year – he will say that 'putting a stop to wasteful spending is top of our agenda'. Mr Findlay will tell party supporters: 'We need to urgently streamline bloated government. 'Improving services means treating people's money with respect.' He will say £650 million that could be saved as a result of a Taxpayer Savings Act would be used 'to bring down people's taxes', adding: 'By doing that, we would start to restore trust.' Great to be at Murrayfield stadium for Scottish Tory conference. 🏴🇬🇧 Not been so much excitement since Taylor Swift was here 🤩#SCC25 — Russell Findlay MSP (@RussellFindlay1) June 13, 2025 Mr Findlay will also promise the Tories would 'shut down quangos that don't deliver value' and 'tackle the SNP's culture of cronyism through strict new rules on public appointments'. He will pledge a future Conservative government at Holyrood would seek to reduce both the number of ministers and special advisers. He is then expected to say: 'We would introduce a Scottish Agency of Value and Efficiency, run by business leaders. People in the real world who know how to get things done. 'They would be tasked with wielding a claymore on waste.' Another proposal will be for an Accountability and Transparency Index, with Mr Findlay saying this would 'shine a light on every organisation that receives public money, and would begin to dismantle the SNP's toxic era of secrecy'. Scottish public finance minister Ivan McKee said: 'The Scottish Government is making real progress in reforming the public sector: the number of Scottish public bodies under Government control has shrunk from 199 in 2007 to 131. 'However, we know there is more to do, which is why I will soon unveil our public service reform strategy. 'Unfortunately, this work has been made more difficult by the UK Government's decision to pursue Brexit, which in 2023 alone led to an estimated cut in public revenues of about £2.3 billion. 'Most Scottish taxpayers already pay less income tax than they would elsewhere in the UK.'


Times
21 minutes ago
- Times
‘Unreliable' UK not told in advance about Israel's attack on Iran
The UK was not officially informed about Israel's attack on Iran before it happened and provided no support to the mission, it is understood, highlighting the deteriorating relationship between the two countries. Diplomats said it appeared Israel no longer considered the UK to be a 'reliable partner' after Sir Keir Starmer placed sanctions on two far-right Israeli ministers this week. Military planners inside the Ministry of Defence were braced for the strikes on Thursday night. However, the UK appeared to have been cut out of the loop on the operation, despite being involved in previous strikes. • US urges UK to reverse sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers An emergency Cobra meeting has been held to discuss the threat to British citizens in Iran and Israel. There is an ongoing review of whether the embassy should remain open in Tehran. The prime minister's spokesman confirmed 'the UK did not participate in Israel's strikes overnight', and MoD sources were quick to dispute any suggestion that the RAF had taken part in any military action to knock out Iranian drones. A senior government source said: 'They've clearly made the calculation [that] we are not a reliable partner.' David Lammy, the foreign secretary, had been due to travel to Washington DC on Friday, but the meeting was cancelled at the last minute. The United States said it was not involved in the attack, describing the Israeli action as unilateral, although that is likely to change if US personnel are targeted in the region. • Israel-Iran latest: further explosions heard at Fordow nuclear site In April last year, the UK deployed RAF Typhoons to help shoot down drones fired by Iran. The UK was also involved to a more limited extent last October during a ballistic missile attack by Tehran. On Monday, the government was concerned enough to hold a 'war game', led by Lammy, in which departments played out the possibility of a massive Israeli attack on Iran. Military personnel are understood to have taken part. A military source said the primary concern in London was for the safety of British citizens currently in Tehran, and British citizens in Israel. There are also fears that British shipping could be targeted by the Iran-backed Houthi rebel group in Yemen. The senior government source said the UK was having to 'walk a diplomatic tight rope' and the priority was the staff in Tehran. The UK government has hardened its stance on Israel and Starmer said earlier today: 'The reports of these strikes are concerning and we urge all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently. Escalation serves no one in the region. Stability in the Middle East must be the priority and we are engaging partners to de-escalate. Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy.' Earlier in the week the far-right ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich were banned from entering the UK and will have any assets in the UK frozen as part of the measures announced by Lammy. The sanctions were imposed over 'repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities' in the occupied West Bank. Starmer was expected to discuss the attacks with Netanyahu in a call on Friday. A Downing Street spokesman said the UK was prepared to take 'every diplomatic step' to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons.


Sky News
23 minutes ago
- Sky News
Palpable anger as both sides of assisted dying debate gather in Parliament Square
Finger jabbing, the frenetic shaking of heads and the competitively loud chanting to drown out the opposition are all symptoms of rising tensions. The two sides of the assisted dying debate clashed on Parliament Square Garden as parliament worked through amendments on Kim Leadbeater's controversial bill. The sides have not shared the same space before, not intellectually, nor emotionally, nor physically. But on Friday, they stood uncomfortably close together, mostly squaring up to each other because neither side could afford to give an inch to the other. The pink-wearing supporters of the bill usually have the green lawns opposite Big Ben to themselves. The black-wearing opponents of the proposed legislation usually stand with their tombstone placards much further down towards Jewel Tower. But they decided to decamp to Parliament Square on the penultimate day ahead of the final vote next week. As the months have passed, the discourse has become increasingly bitter. There is a lot at stake for both sides, and the anger is palpable. Doctors have been publicly falling out with each other, each side accusing the other of spreading misinformation. Even some of the Royal Colleges have become embroiled in rows with sections of their membership calling out their leadership. And the emotion outside parliament was reflected inside the Commons when Liberal Democrat MP Caroline Voaden (South Devon), whose husband died of oesophageal cancer, warned MPs about the language being used. Assisted dying, she said, was not the same as "murder and killing". But those words, and stronger, were plastered across placards held by opponents of the bill outside parliament. Expect the language to become more incendiary, more accusatory in the weeks to come. In seven days, we will learn which side has won.