‘Unreliable' UK not told in advance about Israel's attack on Iran
The UK was not officially informed about Israel's attack on Iran before it happened and provided no support to the mission, it is understood, highlighting the deteriorating relationship between the two countries.
Diplomats said it appeared Israel no longer considered the UK to be a 'reliable partner' after Sir Keir Starmer placed sanctions on two far-right Israeli ministers this week.
Military planners inside the Ministry of Defence were braced for the strikes on Thursday night. However, the UK appeared to have been cut out of the loop on the operation, despite being involved in previous strikes.
• US urges UK to reverse sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers
An emergency Cobra meeting has been held to discuss the threat to British citizens in Iran and Israel. There is an ongoing review of whether the embassy should remain open in Tehran.
The prime minister's spokesman confirmed 'the UK did not participate in Israel's strikes overnight', and MoD sources were quick to dispute any suggestion that the RAF had taken part in any military action to knock out Iranian drones. A senior government source said: 'They've clearly made the calculation [that] we are not a reliable partner.'
David Lammy, the foreign secretary, had been due to travel to Washington DC on Friday, but the meeting was cancelled at the last minute.
The United States said it was not involved in the attack, describing the Israeli action as unilateral, although that is likely to change if US personnel are targeted in the region.
• Israel-Iran latest: further explosions heard at Fordow nuclear site
In April last year, the UK deployed RAF Typhoons to help shoot down drones fired by Iran. The UK was also involved to a more limited extent last October during a ballistic missile attack by Tehran.
On Monday, the government was concerned enough to hold a 'war game', led by Lammy, in which departments played out the possibility of a massive Israeli attack on Iran. Military personnel are understood to have taken part. A military source said the primary concern in London was for the safety of British citizens currently in Tehran, and British citizens in Israel. There are also fears that British shipping could be targeted by the Iran-backed Houthi rebel group in Yemen.
The senior government source said the UK was having to 'walk a diplomatic tight rope' and the priority was the staff in Tehran.
The UK government has hardened its stance on Israel and Starmer said earlier today: 'The reports of these strikes are concerning and we urge all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently. Escalation serves no one in the region. Stability in the Middle East must be the priority and we are engaging partners to de-escalate. Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy.'
Earlier in the week the far-right ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich were banned from entering the UK and will have any assets in the UK frozen as part of the measures announced by Lammy. The sanctions were imposed over 'repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities' in the occupied West Bank.
Starmer was expected to discuss the attacks with Netanyahu in a call on Friday. A Downing Street spokesman said the UK was prepared to take 'every diplomatic step' to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Iran tried to fire 1,000 missiles at Israel but could only muster 100
As Israeli missiles rained down across the country, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, reportedly summoned his national security council for an emergency meeting. There was only item on the agenda: how strongly would – or could – the Islamic regime respond? Iran's military planning was already in disarray. Israel had killed its four most senior general in the meticulously executed opening salvoes of its campaign. Many of the country's first-line air defences and missile bases lay in smouldering ruins. The supreme leader was cautious. He wanted revenge, certainly, but warned that acting hastily could misfire. Others cautioned against provoking a wider war that might draw in the United States, especially now that Iran's ability to defend itself had been severely compromised. Doing too little risked the perception of meek capitulation. An order was given to launch a barrage of up to 1,000 ballistic missiles in a massive show of force intended to prove that Iran was far from a spent force. But in the end, Iran only managed to launch 100 missiles as Israeli strikes had disrupted efforts to move missiles from storage to launchpads quickly. There is no question that Iran's opening barrage brought destruction. Israel's multi-layered air defences, backed by US firepower, intercepted many missiles in the skies above Israel's cities – but not all. At least three people were killed and 21 more injured, according to Israel's emergency services. Iran's used half as many ballistic missiles as it launched last October in retaliation for the assassination Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader, and Israel's incursion into southern Lebanon. But writing Iran off would be premature. Its long-range missile bases have reportedly been destroyed, but by no means all. It may be conserving ammunition in anticipation of a drawn-out campaign. Even with smaller salvos, it can clearly inflict significant casualties. Analysts suggested Iran's primary targets appear not to be Israel military sites but civilian population centres. Tehran has spent years preparing for an Israeli assault, but it is fighting from a far weaker position than it would have liked. Its 'long arm' – the far-flung network of proxy groups meant to encircle Israel in a 'ring of fire' – may not have been amputated but it has been fractured in multiple places. Hezbollah, once the most potent weapon in Iran's deterrence arsenal, has been so badly crippled that it cannot respond – and most likely does not wish to. Its surviving leaders are still seething over what they see as Iran's failure to aid them beyond October's missile strikes, widely viewed within the movement as performative. The fall of the Assad regime in Syria, the main conduit for Iranian weapons, has also severely hampered Hezbollah's efforts to rearm. Hamas, largely leaderless and fighting for its survival, is incapable of inflicting meaningful damage. Even a renewed Houthi campaign against international shipping in the Red Sea would do little to hurt Israel directly. Iran must therefore look to itself and it is unclear whether the mullahs can match their rhetorical bombast with meaningful military results. Tehran certainly appears to have fared worse in the opening salvos. The loss of so many of many senior officers and scientists stemmed from a startling miscalculation. Convinced that Israel would not strike before Iranian nuclear negotiators had met their US counterparts in Oman on Sunday, Khamenei's generals chose to sleep in their own beds rather than in safe houses – a fatal decision. Likewise Gen Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of Iran's aerospace forces, convened a meeting of his senior staff in defiance of a directive banning just such gatherings. All were killed. Those in the military and political hierarchy who remain alive will be looking at last year's Hezbollah precedent with considerable unease. Israel systematically eliminated almost ever single one of the group's top commanders, culminating in Nasrallah himself. Such is Israel's intelligence prowess that many analysts assume Iran's senior leadership has been penetrated and that even Khamenei himself may not be safe. These are hardly ideal conditions in which to plan a war.
Spectator
35 minutes ago
- Spectator
Netanyahu wants to topple the Iranian regime
Last night, the Middle East witnessed its fiercest clash yet as Israel and Iran traded blows. A daring Israeli operation, orchestrated by Mossad and the Israeli Air Force (IAF), obliterated Iran's top military commanders, including IRGC leaders, and struck ballistic missile sites and nuclear facilities. Iran initially retaliated with a barrage of drones, all of which were shot down. It then escalated its attack, firing over 200 ballistic missiles targeting civilians. Several missiles hit the densely populated cities of Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan, and Rishon Lezion, killing three civilians and wounding over 75. Unlike Iran's barrages last year, which inflicted minor damage, this assault overwhelmed Israel's defences. A lot less help from allies also meant that more missiles hit Israel. Israel's response is unrelenting. The IAF is hammering military targets deep inside Iran, aiming for maximum destruction. This is no isolated strike but the opening phase of a campaign to dismantle Iran's nuclear program and long-range missile capabilities. According to reports in the Israeli media, Israeli assessments indicate the attacks on Natanz and Isfahan have set Tehran's nuclear ambitions back several years. But this time, Israel's ambitions go beyond diminishing Iranian military capabilities. In a defiant address, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called on Iranians to overthrow their regime. Having helped free Lebanon from Hezbollah's iron grip, and Syria from President Assad's murderous regime, Israel hopes to achieve the same in Iran, for the benefit of Israel, the Iranian people, and for greater stability in the Middle East. For Israel, this is a fight for survival. Iran's leaders, from Ayatollah Khamenei to IRGC commanders, have repeatedly vowed to annihilate the Jewish state, pursuing nuclear weapons to match their genocidal rhetoric. Years of Israeli covert operations – sabotage, targeted killings – delayed Tehran's progress, but diplomatic efforts, including faltering US-Iran talks, failed to halt it. Israel's strategy extends beyond destruction As former Mossad chief Meir Dagan once warned, Israel would act only with 'a sword upon its neck'. That moment has arrived. Israel struck alone, though US President Donald Trump, despite initial reluctance, bolstered defences, and Jordan helped intercept drones. Germany and France, despite reservations over Israel's conduct in Gaza, have affirmed its right to self-defence. The UK's response has been tepid. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy's calls for de-escalation and 'stability' rang hollow. A nuclear Iran guarantees the opposite. Britain's hesitancy is perplexing when restraining Tehran's oppressive regime aligns with the interests of any nation valuing peace. Israel's strategy extends beyond destruction. By decapitating Iran's military and targeting its nuclear infrastructure, Jerusalem hopes to sow discord, sparking a revolution to topple the theocracy. The risks are immense: Iran's missile barrages could escalate, bringing more casualties and destruction. Prolonged conflict may isolate Israel further than the war in Gaza has, too. Iran now has a decision to make: continue attacking Israel and risk more destruction, or limp back to talks with President Trump from a position of weakness. Israel has no faith in a nuclear deal, a measure that has been tried, tested and failed. It wants the Americans join the attacks against Iran's fortified bunkers. The UK and its allies must back Israel's resolve, not with platitudes but with unwavering support. They also need to ramp up security for Jewish communities that will undoubtedly be targeted by Iran-backed terrorists. A nuclear Iran threatens global peace: stopping it now is not just Israel's fight, but the world's.
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Lammy set for further talks with counterparts as Iran and Israel exchange fire
It comes after conversations with representatives from Iran, Jordan and Saudi Arabia as well as European foreign ministers on Friday. Meanwhile, Iranian state media said Tehran has warned the US, the UK and France not to help Israel stop Iran's strikes, according to reports. Iran launched missile and drone strikes on Israel overnight after a series of Israeli attacks on the heart of Tehran's nuclear programme and armed forces. Tehran's UN ambassador said 78 people had been killed and more than 320 wounded in the attacks, while Tehran's response was said to have killed at least three and wounded dozens. Speaking to broadcasters on Friday evening, Mr Lammy said: 'I spoke to my Iranian counterpart today to urge restraint at this time and calm. I recognise that this is a moment of grave peril in the Middle East.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump called for 'diplomacy and dialogue' in a call on Friday, amid a diplomatic flurry from western nations to try to calm the conflict. Sir Keir Starmer with Donald Trump (Carl Court/PA) Sir Keir had earlier urged his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu to de-escalate and work towards a 'diplomatic resolution'. A Cobra meeting of high-level ministers was convened on Friday afternoon to discuss the situation. The same is not expected on Saturday but Whitehall officials were expected to be meeting. The conflict was ignited by early morning Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear bases on Friday. Israel said the barrage was necessary before Iran got any closer to building a nuclear weapon, although experts and the US government have assessed that Tehran was not actively working on such a weapon. Iran retaliated with waves of drones and ballistic missiles, with explosions lighting up the skies over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Sir Keir is set for discussions with other world leaders at the G7 summit in Canada next week. Tensions between Israel, the US and Iran have escalated in recent weeks, amid negotiations over the Iranian nuclear deal, which is aimed at preventing the country from developing nuclear weapons.
