logo
US judge to rule by May 14 on Rio Tinto copper project opposed by Native Americans

US judge to rule by May 14 on Rio Tinto copper project opposed by Native Americans

Reuters07-05-2025
May 7 (Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge said he will rule by May 14 on whether to block the Trump administration from transferring Arizona land to Rio Tinto (RIO.L), opens new tab and BHP (BHP.AX), opens new tab to build a major copper mine opposed by Native Americans.
The long-running and complex legal case pits the religious rights of Arizona's San Carlos Apache people against rising demand for copper for the energy transition and the geopolitics of China's wide control over the critical minerals industry.
The dispute centers on the federally owned Oak Flat Campground where many Apache worship their deities. The site sits atop a reserve of more than 40 billion pounds (18.1 million metric tons) of copper, a crucial component of electric vehicles and nearly every electronic device.
Rio and BHP's Resolution Copper project would, if built, cause a crater 2 miles (3 km) wide and 1,000 feet (304 m) deep that would slowly engulf that worship site.
U.S. District Judge Steven Logan, who ruled in favor of the land transfer in 2021, held a nearly two-hour hearing on Wednesday to consider a fresh request that he block the land transfer temporarily while the U.S. Supreme Court deliberates.
Logan, an appointee of former U.S. President Barack Obama, gave little indication as to how he would rule in the week promised but asked pointed questions about what harm the Apache could endure if the transfer were to occur before the Supreme Court rules.
He also asked for data on Rio's maintenance costs for existing Resolution assets, which a Rio executive estimated at $11 million a month.
Since 2021, courts have rejected a request by Apache Stronghold - a nonprofit group that includes the Apache and others - to block the land transfer needed for the mine. The rulings deferred to a 2014 decision made by the U.S. Congress and then-President Obama.
President Donald Trump started the land transfer in his first term, a move undone by successor Joe Biden while the issue wound its way through courts.
The U.S. Supreme Court is now considering whether to take the case. The Supreme Court has said at least 13 times it will continue to deliberate on the appeal request, an unusually long time frame.
Meanwhile, Trump last month restarted the land transfer process, with his administration aiming to complete it as soon as June 16.
The U.S. Justice Department, which has opposed the Apaches' request under both Biden and Trump, argued that Logan should stick with his 2021 ruling.
"There is no basis for this court to issue a different result here," said Erika Danielle Norman, a Justice Department attorney.
Apache Stronghold and their attorneys with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty said they were encouraged by the hearing.
"All the Apaches are asking for is to put that land transfer on hold while the Supreme Court deliberates," said Becket's Joseph Davis.
Rio Tinto said it appreciated the court's time and that Resolution is "vital to securing America's energy future, infrastructure needs, and national defense."
BHP, which owns 45% of the project to Rio's 55%, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump team officially ends Musk's ‘five things' DOGE email that drew ire and led to thousands of resignations
Trump team officially ends Musk's ‘five things' DOGE email that drew ire and led to thousands of resignations

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump team officially ends Musk's ‘five things' DOGE email that drew ire and led to thousands of resignations

The Trump administration has ditched an Elon Musk–mandated program requiring federal employees to share five workplace accomplishments every week, according to a new memo. When the billionaire was at the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency before his relationship with President Donald Trump imploded in early June, his short-lived initiative prompted widespread outrage among employees and management at federal agencies. Federal workers were ordered to email the Office of Personnel Management as part of a drive to drastically cut staff numbers. Workers who did not comply were threatened with termination. Now the federal human resources agency has informed workers that they no longer need to comply, Reuters first reported. 'At OPM, we believe that managers are accountable to staying informed about what their team members are working on and have many other existing tools to do so,' the agency's director Scott Kupor said in a statement, according to the outlet. Kupor, who took up the role at the agency in July, reportedly added that the agency would no longer be using the process internally, after he described it as 'not efficient' and 'very manual.' It was 'something that we should look at and see, like, are we getting the value out of it that at least the people who put it in place thought they were,' he said last month. The move is an indicator that the Trump administration is looking to leave the Musk–DOGE era in the past, as the tech mogul has proved increasingly unpopular following his time in government. Musk's email ultimatum went down like a lead balloon with other department heads, including FBI director Kash Patel, who sent his own email to employees to clarify where the bureau stood. 'FBI personnel may have received an email from OPM requesting information. The FBI, through the Office of the Director, is in charge of all of our review processes and will conduct reviews in accordance with FBI procedures,' Patel wrote, according to an NBC report at the time. 'When and if further information is required, we will coordinate the responses. For now, please pause any responses.' The State Department and the Justice Department also told staff to hold off on responding to Musk's ultimatum when the email landed in inboxes earlier this year. After backlash, Musk said the emails were a way of checking if employees 'had a pulse.' 'This was basically a check to see if the employee had a pulse and was capable of replying to an email,' Musk said. 'This mess will get sorted out this week. Lot of people in for a rude awakening and strong dose of reality. They don't get it yet, but they will.' The Musk–Trump bromance came to an explosive end after the Tesla CEO's time as a special government employee expired at the end of May. After staging a bizarre farewell press conference in the Oval Office, Musk began to publicly lash out at Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' Trump said that Musk was 'wearing thin' as the men traded blows on their respective social media platforms. Their feud culminated in Musk posting, without evidence: 'Time to drop the really big bomb. @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' He later deleted the post.

Trump's agriculture secretary doubles down on suggestion people should work on farms to avoid losing Medicaid
Trump's agriculture secretary doubles down on suggestion people should work on farms to avoid losing Medicaid

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's agriculture secretary doubles down on suggestion people should work on farms to avoid losing Medicaid

Americans at risk of losing their Medicaid government health coverage because of new work requirements signed into law by the Trump administration should find employment on U.S. farms, according to Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins. 'We have way too many people that are taking government program that are able to work,' Rollins said in an interview on Fox Business on Tuesday. 'This is not children. These are not disabled [people]. These are not senior citizens. These are able-bodied Americans who are taking government handouts.' In July, the Trump administration created new work requirements for Medicaid, a state-federal program providing healthcare to over 77 million mostly low-income people, as part of its One Big, Beautiful Bill spending package. Under the new requirements, passed alongside sweeping tax cuts disproportionately benefitting the rich, able-bodied people on Medicaid are required to show they have completed 80 hours of work or community service per month to maintain their coverage, with limited exceptions for parents and caretakers with young children, pregnant people, and other groups. The Congressional Budget Office, reviewing a draft version of the bill that passed the House, estimated the requirements would cause nearly 5 million people to lose coverage by 2034. Rollins has suggested that Medicaid recipients should head to the fields in the past. In July, in the face of concern that the administration's mass deportations would decimate the country's immigrant-heavy farm labor force, Rollins argued that 'more automation' and a '100 percent American workforce' could make up the losses. 'There are 34 million able-bodied adults in our Medicaid program,' he said. 'There are plenty of workers in America.' The Congressional Budget Office found that there were about 34 million working-age, non-disabled Medicaid enrollees in 2024, though analysts suggest Rollins is overstating the degree to which participants in the health program are unemployed and skimming from the government. An analysis from health policy group KFF found that there are about 26 million Medicaid-covered adults between the ages of 19 and 64 who don't receive disability benefits, and that nearly two-thirds of this group were working either full or part-time. Among the remaining portion, 12 percent said they were not working because they were caregiving, while 10 percent listed illness or disability and seven percent said school attendance kept them from working. Another study, from University of Massachusetts Boston researchers, found that among able-bodied, unemployed Medicaid recipients, almost 80 percent are female, their average age is 41, and their median individual income is $0. "It's clear based on their prior work history and family size/income that they are exceptionally poor and have likely left the workforce to care for adult children or older adults," researcher Jane Tavares told PolitiFact. "Even if these individuals could work, they would have very few job opportunities and it would come at the cost of the people they are providing care for." Other analysts point to states like Arkansas that have tried to use work requirements to cut costs and drive employment. The state, which attempted such requirements seven years ago, saw 18,000 people kicked off Medicaid rolls in the span of four months, yet saw no positive employment impact. 'There is not an epidemic of non-working able-bodied adults living high on Medicaid, despite such claims from the Trump administration,' Matt Bruenig, founder of the People's Policy Project, a progressive think tank, argued in a May op-ed in The New York Times. 'Medicaid work requirements are a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.' Among working-age Medicaid beneficiaries, about half are working, a quarter have a work-limiting disability, and an additional one-fifth will find employment or come off the program within 15 months, Bruenig said in the piece, leaving only about 6 percent of working-age Medicaid enrollees who probably can find work but haven't done so.

News Corp beats revenue estimates on digital subscription growth
News Corp beats revenue estimates on digital subscription growth

Reuters

time7 minutes ago

  • Reuters

News Corp beats revenue estimates on digital subscription growth

Aug 5 (Reuters) - Media conglomerate News Corp (NWSA.O), opens new tab topped Wall Street estimates for fourth-quarter revenue on Tuesday, driven by steady growth in digital subscriptions from its Dow Jones segment. The company benefited from rising demand for digital content at its Dow Jones division, which includes brands such as The Wall Street Journal, Barron's, MarketWatch and Investor's Business Daily. Dow Jones reported a 6.7% rise in revenue to $604 million in the quarter, compared to $566 million a year earlier. Revenue in the quarter came in at $2.11 billion, beating analysts' estimates of $2.10 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store