Singular seals US deal to roll out 3D medical imaging platform
Singular Health has added a feather to its cap by securing a US$1.3 million (A$2M) commercial deal with United States healthcare group Provider Network Solutions (PNS). The company has also raised $8 million to bankroll a national rollout of its AI-driven 3D medical imaging platform across the US.
Singular says three major challenges continue to hobble the US healthcare system - redundant medical imaging, slow disease detection and fragmented access to patient data.
The company's 3D medical imaging platform - dubbed 3DICOM MD - has been purpose-built to solve these issues by streamlining access to medical scans across multiple servers, thereby reducing duplication, saving time, cutting costs and improving outcomes. It has also already been cleared for diagnostic use in the US.
The new contract follows a year-long collaboration with PNS that started with a memorandum of understanding in November last year. The project has now evolved into a full-blown rollout backed by both parties.
The breakthrough deal will see Singular push out its US$800 (A$1230) platforms to 1000 doctors within the PNS network. PNS manages more than 3.7 million patients stretched across Florida, Texas and Puerto Rico.
The deal also attracts an additional success fee of US$500,000 (A$768,000) when PNS signs off on the satisfactory integration of its AI model and centralised image repository.
A successful implementation could potentially leverage PNS's partner network in 30 additional states and open the door to a much larger-scale nationwide rollout.
Singular says the landmark deal is a massive shot in the arm, giving it a solid beachhead in the lucrative US healthcare market ahead of a much bigger national push. The company is eyeing a jaw-dropping US$19 billion (A$29.2B) annual market opportunity, with 1.3 million doctors typically linked to 19 separate managed service organisations.
To support its growth strategy Singular has also locked in firm commitments for a heavily supported $8 million placement at 35 cents per share, which is a modest 4.6 per cent discount on its recent trading average.
The company says the capital raising attracted strong interest from institutional investors and high-net-worth backers, with both PNS and existing investor Marin & Sons tinning up to support the placement.
PNS chief executive officer and founder Dr Jose Pelayo praised the technology as a smarter, more efficient way to fix duplicate imaging.
With a strong war chest, now sitting at nearly $13 million after the latest capital raising, powerful allies and a proven tech platform now gaining traction in the world's largest healthcare market, Singular Health may be about to rewrite the rules on medical imaging – in 3D.
Is your ASX-listed company doing something interesting? Contact:
matt.birney@wanews.com.au
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
2 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Future Fund ditches Dexus as manager of its Melbourne Airport stake
Nick Lenaghan edits the property section, which covers all aspects, from residential real estate and housing and construction to commercial property – office, retail, industrial – and major ASX-listed developers and real estate investment trusts.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Snubs, subs and Trump: Albanese's NATO dilemma
Between the US review of the AUKUS submarine deal, the imposition of tariffs on Australian exports, and a call from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for Australia to almost double defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, the Australia-US relationship is in relatively poor state of repair at the leader-to-leader level. Loading There are risks for Albanese in spending just a couple of days in Canberra before getting back on the plane to be in The Hague for next Tuesday's summit, only to potentially be embarrassed by missing out again on a meeting with the unreliable president – though the risk is not as great as it might at first seem. The Australian prime minister will walk straight into a debate about US demands that European NATO members lift their defence spending to as much as 5 per cent – not a conversation Albanese will want to be part of, given Hegseth's comments and the fact that we currently spend about 2 per cent. And while some members of the government (and plenty of Australians) do not like Trump and think chasing a meeting amounts to kowtowing, they are wrong. The United States is Australia's most important security partner, it will be for the foreseeable future, and no matter who is in the White House, the Australian prime minister needs a strong personal relationship with the president. The federal opposition and other government critics sniff an opportunity to damage the prime minister, whether he stays in Australia and avoids a possible cancellation or if he goes and misses out again. This will not guide the prime minister's decision. At the leader-to-leader level, personal relationships are enormously consequential – they can be the 5 per cent extra that secures a tariff concession or a bigger quota of beef exports. Britain's Starmer, Canada's Mark Carney and Italy's Giorgia Meloni, to give just three examples, have all secured benefits for their nations by moving early to meet the 47th president. Albanese is lagging, but the situation is reparable. Loading Even if Trump doesn't turn up, or if he were to cancel on Albanese again, the benefit of being there outweighs the risk. As Trump's sudden departure from the G7 reminded America's allies (as if any reminder were necessary), there are at least another three years of living in an 'America First' world – which only increases the importance of multilateral organisations. US allies have two choices: they can wring their hands about America's absent leadership, or they can get on with the quiet rebuilding of international institutions. Starmer and Macron are two leaders who have signed up to that rebuild. Albanese is another, though he knows the US relationship needs a patch and paint. Two moments at the G7 summit highlighted the benefits of turning up this week, and of going again next week. The first came just after 9am on the final day of the summit when Carney welcomed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. In his low, even voice, Zelensky outlined the latest carnage visited on Kyiv by the Russians. The capital had been smashed, he said, with 138 people injured and another 12 killed by murderous drones. But the point was not the death toll. Rather, it was the quiet dignity with which Zelensky spoke and the fact that it was face-to-face, allowing a moment for each leader to look the other in the eye. Upon such moments, friendships are forged and alliances are built. The second moment came a few hours later, during the 'family photo' of world leaders. As Albanese joined world leaders on stage, he walked straight up to Zelensky and, without saying a word, the pair embraced. That gut-instinct moment, more than any words the prime minister spoke at the summit, mattered. One of Albanese's greatest strengths over more than three decades in politics has been his ability to build and maintain a broad web of personal relationships. He's a 'relationships guy' in much the same way that Trump has been throughout his careers. Albanese and Trump will get a chance to look each other in the eye some time soon, whether it is in Holland, at the UN General Assembly in September, or at some other moment in the not-too-distant future. At that point, the questions over the relationship are likely to evaporate. As he landed back in Australia in the early hours of Thursday morning, Albanese had not made up his mind on whether to attend the summit. My tip is that if Albanese travels to Holland he will focus, at least in his public comments, on the importance of the global rules-based order, regardless of what the president does.
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Snubs, subs and Trump: Albanese's NATO dilemma
Between the US review of the AUKUS submarine deal, the imposition of tariffs on Australian exports, and a call from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for Australia to almost double defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, the Australia-US relationship is in relatively poor state of repair at the leader-to-leader level. Loading There are risks for Albanese in spending just a couple of days in Canberra before getting back on the plane to be in The Hague for next Tuesday's summit, only to potentially be embarrassed by missing out again on a meeting with the unreliable president – though the risk is not as great as it might at first seem. The Australian prime minister will walk straight into a debate about US demands that European NATO members lift their defence spending to as much as 5 per cent – not a conversation Albanese will want to be part of, given Hegseth's comments and the fact that we currently spend about 2 per cent. And while some members of the government (and plenty of Australians) do not like Trump and think chasing a meeting amounts to kowtowing, they are wrong. The United States is Australia's most important security partner, it will be for the foreseeable future, and no matter who is in the White House, the Australian prime minister needs a strong personal relationship with the president. The federal opposition and other government critics sniff an opportunity to damage the prime minister, whether he stays in Australia and avoids a possible cancellation or if he goes and misses out again. This will not guide the prime minister's decision. At the leader-to-leader level, personal relationships are enormously consequential – they can be the 5 per cent extra that secures a tariff concession or a bigger quota of beef exports. Britain's Starmer, Canada's Mark Carney and Italy's Giorgia Meloni, to give just three examples, have all secured benefits for their nations by moving early to meet the 47th president. Albanese is lagging, but the situation is reparable. Loading Even if Trump doesn't turn up, or if he were to cancel on Albanese again, the benefit of being there outweighs the risk. As Trump's sudden departure from the G7 reminded America's allies (as if any reminder were necessary), there are at least another three years of living in an 'America First' world – which only increases the importance of multilateral organisations. US allies have two choices: they can wring their hands about America's absent leadership, or they can get on with the quiet rebuilding of international institutions. Starmer and Macron are two leaders who have signed up to that rebuild. Albanese is another, though he knows the US relationship needs a patch and paint. Two moments at the G7 summit highlighted the benefits of turning up this week, and of going again next week. The first came just after 9am on the final day of the summit when Carney welcomed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. In his low, even voice, Zelensky outlined the latest carnage visited on Kyiv by the Russians. The capital had been smashed, he said, with 138 people injured and another 12 killed by murderous drones. But the point was not the death toll. Rather, it was the quiet dignity with which Zelensky spoke and the fact that it was face-to-face, allowing a moment for each leader to look the other in the eye. Upon such moments, friendships are forged and alliances are built. The second moment came a few hours later, during the 'family photo' of world leaders. As Albanese joined world leaders on stage, he walked straight up to Zelensky and, without saying a word, the pair embraced. That gut-instinct moment, more than any words the prime minister spoke at the summit, mattered. One of Albanese's greatest strengths over more than three decades in politics has been his ability to build and maintain a broad web of personal relationships. He's a 'relationships guy' in much the same way that Trump has been throughout his careers. Albanese and Trump will get a chance to look each other in the eye some time soon, whether it is in Holland, at the UN General Assembly in September, or at some other moment in the not-too-distant future. At that point, the questions over the relationship are likely to evaporate. As he landed back in Australia in the early hours of Thursday morning, Albanese had not made up his mind on whether to attend the summit. My tip is that if Albanese travels to Holland he will focus, at least in his public comments, on the importance of the global rules-based order, regardless of what the president does.
