
Suspected Fort Stewart shooter charged, one victim was his 'intimate partner'
ATLANTA – Army prosecutors filed attempted murder charges Aug. 12 against a sergeant on allegations he shot five fellow soldiers and tried to shoot a sixth at Fort Stewart, Georgia, on Aug. 6.
One of the victims was an "intimate partner" of the defendant, Sgt. Quornelius Radford, according to Michelle McCaskill, spokesperson for the Army Office of Special Trial Counsel. (USA TODAY customarily withholds the names of victims in alleged cases of domestic violence.)
Radford also faces an array of specifications (akin to counts in civilian courts) under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, according to Maj. Charlie Egan, spokesperson for the 3rd Infantry Division. They are:
Radford could not be reached for comment and court records for his case are not available in the docket.
Investigators say that on Aug. 6, the 28-year-old automated logistical noncommissioned officer shot five soldiers at his Fort Stewart workplace – the company operations facility of the 703rd Brigade Support Battalion. Radford used a personal handgun, according to Brig. Gen. John Lubas, who commands Fort Stewart and the 3rd Infantry Division.
Radford will remain jailed in Charleston, South Carolina, in the Naval Consolidated Brig Charleston until his trial, Egan said. The military justice system does not use cash bail. Instead, it weighs whether a member is likely to flee or harm others in determining whether to keep a person in custody during the court-martial process.
The domestic violence charge offers a possible indication of how prosecutors might explain Radford's motive. At an Aug. 7 ceremony honoring soldiers who intervened in the shooting, Army officials declined to comment on Radford's motive. The Army's Criminal Investigation Division did not respond to questions for this story.
More: How six Fort Stewart soldiers jumped into action when a colleague opened fire
Radford was experiencing personal issues before the shooting. His father, Eddie Radford, told The New York Times that his son had complained about racism at his workplace at Fort Stewart and wanted to transfer from his unit. The sergeant also faced an Aug. 20 court date in Liberty County, Georgia, for a DUI arrest in May.
Contributing: Michael Loria
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Three Colombian soldiers killed in attack with explosive-laden drones
Three soldiers have been killed in a drone attack in south-west Colombia, which authorities have blamed on a dissident rebel group. The devices dropped explosives on members of Colombia's navy and army, who were manning a checkpoint on the Naya River. Four other members of the security forces were injured in the attack. Drone attacks have become increasingly common in recent years in Colombia: in 2024, 115 such attacks were recorded in the country, most of them carried out by illegal armed groups. In January, the government said it was putting a plan into place to prevent such attacks by beefing up its anti-drone technology, in order to better detect and "neutralise" drones. The latest deadly attack happened near Buenaventura, a city on the Pacific coast which is a hotbed for drug trafficking. Army officials gave the names of the three victims as Wilmar Rivas, Andrés Estrada and Dario Estrada. Off-shoots of the Farc rebel group, which refused to sign a peace deal negotiated by the guerrilla group's leaders in 2016, have a strong presence in the area. The rivers in the region are often used to transport cocaine - the main source of income for illegal armed groups - and weapons. Military officials said one of the groups under the command of a man known as Iván Mordisco was behind Tuesday's drone attack. Mordisco walked out of peace talks with the government in April 2024, and the dissident rebel factions he leads engage in criminal activities such as the extortion of farmers and landowners, illegal mining and cocaine trafficking. Targeted attacks on Colombian security forces leave 27 dead in two weeks Colombian soldiers killed in ambush by drugs gang


NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
Sonya Massey shooting prompts Illinois law requiring disclosure of police recruits' backgrounds
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Illinois law now requires that prospective police officers approve the release of personal background records in response to last summer's shooting of Sonya Massey, an unarmed Black woman, in her home by a sheriff's deputy who had responded to her call for help. Gov. JB Pritzker on Tuesday signed the legislation, which requires disclosure of everything from job performance reports to nonpublic settlement agreements. It resulted from indiscretions that came to light in the background of Sean Grayson, the ex-sheriff's deputy charged with first-degree murder in the case. Pritzker, surrounded by Massey's family in the state Capitol, said the first-in-the-nation law should serve as an example for other states as he let Massey's 'spirit guide us to action.' 'Our justice system needs to be built on trust,' the Democrat said. 'Communities should be able to trust that when they call the police to their home, the responding officer will be well-trained and without a history of bias or misconduct, and police officers should be able to trust that they are serving alongside responsible and capable individuals.' The legislation was sponsored by Sen. Doris Turner, a Springfield Democrat and friend of the Masseys, and Chicago Democratic Rep. Kam Buckner, who noted that Thursday marks the 117th anniversary of the three-day Race Riot in Springfield that led to the founding a year later of the NAACP. Who is Sonya Massey? Massey, 36, was a single mother of two teenagers who had a strong religious faith and struggled with mental health issues. In the early morning of July 6, 2024, she called 911 to report a suspected prowler outside her home in the capital city of Springfield, 201 miles (343 kilometers) southwest of Chicago. Grayson and another deputy searched but found no one. Inside Massey's house, confusion over a pot of hot water Massey picked up and her curious response to Grayson — 'I rebuke you in the name of Jesus' — which the deputy said he took to mean she wanted to kill him, prompted him to fire on Massey, hitting her right below the eye. What prompted the legislation? The 31-year-old Grayson was 14 months into his career as a Sangamon County Sheriff's deputy when he answered Massey's call. His arrest two weeks later prompted an examination of his record, which showed several trouble spots. In his early 20s, he was convicted of driving under the influence twice within a year, the first of which got him kicked out of the Army. He had four law enforcement jobs — mostly part-time — in six years. One past employer noted that he was sloppy in handling evidence and called him a braggart. Others said he was impulsive. What does the law require? Those seeking policing jobs must sign a waiver allowing past employers to release unredacted background materials, including job performance reports, physical and psychological fitness-for-duty reports, civil and criminal court records, and, even otherwise nonpublic documents such as nondisclosure or separation agreements. 'It isn't punitive to any police officer. The same kind of commonsense legislation needs to be done nationwide,' James Wilburn, Massey's father, said. 'People should not be able to go from department to department and their records not follow them.' The hiring agency may see the contents of documents sealed by court order by getting a judge's approval, and court action is available to compel a former employer to hand over records. 'Several departments need to pick up their game and implement new procedures, but what's listed here (in the law) is what should be minimally done in a background check,' said Kenny Winslow, executive director of the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police, who helped negotiate the proposal. Would the law have prevented Grayson's hiring? Ironically, no. Most of what was revealed about Grayson after his arrest was known to Sangamon County Sheriff Jack Campbell, who was forced to retire early because of the incident. Campbell was aware of Grayson's shortcomings and, as a result, made him repeat the state's 16-week police training course. Even an incident that didn't surface until six weeks after the shooting — a dash-cam video of Grayson, working as a deputy in a nearby county, ignoring an order to halt a high-speed chase and then hitting a deer with his squad car — would not have disqualified him, Campbell said at the time. 'We can't decide who they do or don't hire, but what we can do is put some parameters in place so that the information will be there and the right decision can be made,' Buckner said. What's next? Grayson, who also faces charges of aggravated battery with a firearm and official misconduct, has pleaded not guilty and is scheduled to go to trial in October.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Judge orders service dog out of Mobile courtroom
MOBILE, Ala. (WKRG) — A service dog was ordered out of a federal court room in Mobile, and the dog's owner isn't happy with the reason he got from the judge. Fight at Mobile lounge ends in assault charge Kris Allfrey is an Army veteran and suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder. He's also the trainer for his wife's service dog, Dewey. In July, the Ohio couple was in Mobile so both could testify in an ongoing legal matter stemming from a previous vacation to the Gulf Coast. They were set to testify on different days. When it was Allfrey's turn, he didn't think there would be an issue bringing along Dewey. 'His three primary tasks are he alerts her to seizures. He alerts both of us, or gets us out of it, when we get into PTSD episodes, and he attempts to calm us when we have anxiety,' Allfrey explained. He says problems arose once the animal's presence was brought to U.S. District Court Judge Terry Moorer's attention. A court transcript shows Judge Moorer acknowledging the dog as Allfrey's wife's service animal, not his, and says 'to make arrangements for whatever needs to be done' to see that Dewey is removed from court. An attorney responded, saying, 'As a service dog in training, a trainer has the right to take him into this facility under the Americans with Disabilities Act.' Judge Moorer replied, 'It is my courtroom.' 'All of a sudden he's telling me I have to take the dog out even though the dog is assisting me in giving clear and concise testimony and not getting worked up,' Allfrey recalled. As to not delay proceedings, Judge Moorer did allow Allfrey to continue that day's testimony with Dewey present but said if the trial continued, 'he needs to find someone else to tend to the dog.' Allfrey now wants a different judge to preside over the case. Mobile McDonald's assault: 1 arrested after unprovoked attack, police say News 5 contacted Judge Terry Moorer's office. The person who answered pointed us to the court clerk. That person said they could not offer a legal opinion on what happened with Allfrey and the service dog. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword