Rare Breed Triggers Unveils Advanced FRT Series: A New Era in Firearm Precision and Performance
Rare Breed Triggers has released an updated lineup of its Forced Reset Triggers (FRT), including the original FRT-15, and the more advanced E3, L2, and L3 models—each offering improvements in weight, stability, and performance. These triggers are designed for civilian gun owners, tactical professionals, and collectors. As of a recent federal court ruling, Rare Breed's triggers are legal to purchase and own at the federal level, though users are advised to check local regulations.
Fargo, ND - April 17, 2025 - Rare Breed Triggers is proud to announce the latest evolution of its Forced Reset Trigger (FRT) lineup, designed to deliver unparalleled speed, precision, and reliability for firearm enthusiasts, tactical professionals, and collectors alike.
Introducing the FRT Series:
Legal Status and Compliance:
As of July 23, 2024, a federal court ruling in Texas determined that Rare Breed's FRT-15 and Wide Open Triggers (WOTs) are not classified as machine guns under the National Firearms Act (NFA). This decision affirms the legality of these triggers at the federal level for individuals and entities not prohibited from possessing firearms. However, it's important to note that some states have independent regulations that may restrict the possession of forced-reset triggers or similar devices. Therefore, prospective buyers are strongly encouraged to consult their local laws to ensure compliance.
About Rare Breed Triggers:
Founded in Florida and now based in Fargo, North Dakota, Rare Breed Triggers has been at the forefront of innovation in firearm components. With a commitment to quality and performance, Rare Breed continues to lead the industry in developing cutting-edge trigger systems.
For more information or to purchase the FRT series, please visit Rare Breed Triggers.
Media Contact
Company Name: Rare Breed Trigger
Contact Person: Tim Larson
Email: Send Email
Phone: 7193724116
Address:2715 Delta Pl
City: Colorado Springs
State: Colorado
Country: United States
Website: https://rarebreedtriggerus.com/
Press Release Distributed by ABNewswire.com
To view the original version on ABNewswire visit: Rare Breed Triggers Unveils Advanced FRT Series: A New Era in Firearm Precision and Performance
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
3 days ago
- Bloomberg
Supreme Court Ruling in Mexico Gun Case Fails to Absolve the US
A few days ago, it was shaping up as a bad week for gun manufacturers at the US Supreme Court. On Monday, the justices refused — for the moment, at least — to entertain challenges to state laws banning the AR-15 and other semiautomatic rifles. But on Thursday, the court unanimously tossed a lawsuit by the government of Mexico seeking damages from multiple US firearm manufacturers for the harm their guns have caused within its borders. First, a quick word about the lawsuits that the justices announced this week they would not hear. In a pair of landmark decisions in 2008 and 2010, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects the right to own firearms 'in common use' — in those cases, handguns. The decisions have been controversial, but they're the law of the land, so gun control advocates have since shifted their attention to semiautomatic weapons. About 10 states ban or tightly restrict possession of the AR-15, which happens to be the most widely owned rifle in the country. The lower courts have upheld the ban. The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeals, although I think Justice Brett Kavanaugh was correct when he wrote that the court will be forced to revisit the question in the next term or two.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court blocks Mexico's $10B lawsuit alleging US gunmakers have fueled cartel violence
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a $10 billion lawsuit Mexico filed against top firearm manufacturers in the U.S. alleging the companies' business practices have fueled tremendous cartel violence and bloodshed. The unanimous ruling tossed out the case under U.S. laws that largely shield gunmakers from liability when their firearms are used in crime. Big-name manufacturers like Smith & Wesson had appealed to the justices after a lower court let the suit go forward under an exception for situations in which the companies themselves are accused of violating the law. But the justices found that Mexico hadn't made a plausible argument that the companies had knowingly allowed guns to be trafficked into the country. 'It does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted,' Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the court's opinion. Mexico had asked the justices to let the case play out, saying it was still in its early stages. The case began in 2021, when the Mexican government filed a blockbuster suit against some of the biggest gun companies, including Smith & Wesson, Beretta, Colt and Glock. Mexico has strict gun laws and has just one store where people can legally buy firearms. But thousands of guns are smuggled in by the country's powerful drug cartels every year. The Mexican government says at least 70% of those weapons come from the United States. The lawsuit claims that companies knew weapons were being sold to traffickers who smuggled them into Mexico and decided to cash in on that market. The companies reject Mexico's allegations, arguing the country's lawsuit comes nowhere close to showing they're responsible for a relatively few people using their products to commit violence. A federal judge tossed out the lawsuit under a 2005 law that protects gun companies from most civil lawsuits, but an appeals court revived it. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston found it fell under an exception to the shield law for situations in which firearm companies are accused of knowingly breaking laws in their business practices. That exception has come up in other cases, including in lawsuits stemming from mass shootings. Families of victims of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, for example, argued it applied to their lawsuit because the gunmaker had violated state law in the marketing of the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting, in which 20 first graders and six educators were killed. The families eventually secured a landmark $73 million settlement with Remington, the maker of the rifle. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
Supreme Court blocks Mexico's $10B lawsuit alleging US gunmakers have fueled cartel violence
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a $10 billion lawsuit Mexico filed against top firearm manufacturers in the U.S. alleging the companies' business practices have fueled tremendous cartel violence and bloodshed. The unanimous ruling tossed out the case under U.S. laws that largely shield gunmakers from liability when their firearms are used in crime. Big-name manufacturers like Smith & Wesson had appealed to the justices after a lower court let the suit go forward under an exception for situations in which the companies themselves are accused of violating the law. Mexico had asked the justices to let the case play out, saying it was still in its early stages. The case began in 2021, when the Mexican government filed a blockbuster suit against some of the biggest gun companies, including Smith & Wesson, Beretta, Colt and Glock. Mexico has strict gun laws and has just one store where people can legally buy firearms. But thousands of guns are smuggled in by the country's powerful drug cartels every year. The Mexican government says at least 70% of those weapons come from the United States. The lawsuit claims that companies knew weapons were being sold to traffickers who smuggled them into Mexico and decided to cash in on that market. The companies reject Mexico's allegations, arguing the country's lawsuit comes nowhere close to showing they're responsible for a relatively few people using their products to commit violence. A federal judge tossed out the lawsuit under a 2005 law that protects gun companies from most civil lawsuits, but an appeals court revived it. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston found it fell under an exception to the shield law for situations in which firearm companies are accused of knowingly breaking laws in their business practices. That exception has come up in other cases, including in lawsuits stemming from mass shootings. Families of victims of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, for example, argued it applied to their lawsuit because the gunmaker had violated state law in the marketing of the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting, in which 20 first graders and six educators were killed. The families eventually secured a landmark $73 million settlement with Remington, the maker of the rifle. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at
