logo
I just tested the perfect mic for content creators — and there's a reason why you see it in so many TikTok videos

I just tested the perfect mic for content creators — and there's a reason why you see it in so many TikTok videos

Tom's Guide5 days ago

Rode consistently makes some of the best microphones, and the new Wireless Go Gen 3 is no different. A worthy upgrade from the Go Gen 2, the Gen 3 has better wireless range, 32-bit float recording (up from the 2's 24-bit), a massive 32GB of on-board storage in each transmitter, headphone monitoring, GainAssist, and so much more.
Yes, it's true: the Go Gen 3 definitely deserves its place as one of the most iconic wireless mics. While there are still a few little annoyances (for example, opening the Rode Central app stops recordings midway and the high-pass filter isn't super adept at noise cancellation), the Wireless Go Gen 3 is a fantastic set of compact mics.
So is it worth the $329 price? It depends who you are — if you're a content creator looking for the best of the best without dropping $$$, then it's certainly for you. Keep reading to find out the full story in this Rode Wireless Go Gen 3 microphone review.
Price
$329 / £279
Connectivity
USB-C, TRS, lightning
On-board storage
32GB (40 hours)
Range
850 feet / 260 meters
Max SPL
123.5
Audio resolution
196kHz, 32-bit
Frequency response
20 Hz – 20 kHz
Microphone type
Condenser
Battery life
7 hours
Polar pattern
Omnidirectional
Weight
1.2 ounces (RX and TX), 3.6 ounces altogether
Dimensions
1.8 x 1.7 x 0.8 inches
Colors
Various: I tested black
The Rode Wireless Go Gen 3 costs a pretty hefty $329 from Amazon U.S., making it $20 pricier than its predecessor the Wireless Go Gen 2. Surprisingly, the Gen 3 comes in a huge range of colors: I tested black, but it also comes in white, red, purple, blue, and more. I've never seen a mic with this much range before, so it's a welcome departure from mundanity.
On Amazon U.K., the Wireless Go Gen 3 has an RRP of £279, but has been around £230 since April. Right now, I'm unsure why there's such a price difference between the U.S. and U.K. However, I think $329 is still a pretty decent price for a microphone of this quality.
If you want the most basic Rode wireless mic, I'd suggest the $149 Wireless Micro. It's basically just the Wireless Go Gen 3 but with a much more beginner-friendly usage and slightly reduced quality audio. Even so, for amateurs or beginners, there's nothing better. Conversely, if you need a fully professional mic, then check out the Rode Wireless Pro ($399).
The Rode Wireless Go Gen 3 looks pretty much like every other wireless RX and TX set, but that doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the design. The transmitters and receiver are the same size: just 1.7 x 1.8 inches. The microphones also come with a soft pouch for easy transportation, which is also roomy enough to fit the USB-C, lightning, TRS cables, and dead cats.
On the receiver, the controls are as follows: Volume (mic gain) buttons, channel buttons, and the Ø button for connection. The transmitters have one button for pairing or recording, and an Ø button for muting and marking (which I struggled to get working — more on that in the 'Features' section below). Both transmitters and the receiver also have a clip, which I found incredibly useful for on-the-fly recording. There's also a 3.5mm output on the RX for live monitoring and 3.5mm inputs on each TX for additional lav mics.
I quite like the RX's bright LED screen. It's a little brighter than the Shure MoveMic 88+'s screen (which I still liked), but a decent amount smaller. In future versions (I know the Gen 3 has literally just been released), I'd like to see this screen even bigger, and maybe even controllable via touch for even easier usability.
There's also a dead cat for wind resistance. I found this really efficient for pop reduction when carrying out my plosive testing, so I'd recommend using it to mitigate pops with interviewees who perhaps don't have the best microphone etiquette. Unlike the Sennheiser Profile Wireless, the dead cat didn't distort audio clarity.
First off, one of the most impressive features is the 850-foot wireless range. This makes it a touch longer than the Sennheiser Profile Wireless' ($299) 800 feet. The Rode Wireless Go Gen 2 ($299) has a max range of around 650 feet, so this is a major improvement on the previous iteration.
Another major improvement is the massive 32GB onboard storage — 40 hours of 32-bit recording. On the Gen 2, this is 40 hours of 24-bit float recording, which means the Gen 3 has higher memory. You can still export at 32-bit on the Gen 2, though.
While the Gen 3 has improved range and memory over the Gen 2, it also carries over one of the Gen 2's most helpful features: Safety Channel mode. This mode automatically records a second track at -10dB, so if your first recording is too loud or distorted, you've got a backup. Enabling this feature is easy: simply activate it in the Rode Central app.
Even when I was trying to shout loudly into the mic and distort it, my recordings were reasonably salvageable thanks to GainAssist. I definitely would place my trust in this mic, even when recording in noisy environments.
Due to the 32-bit float recording, even tracks from loud environments are easy to edit in post. I tested this with both whispered speech and shouted speech. I was able to amplify my whispered recordings without losing any quality.
Incredibly, the recording still sounded clear and crisp. In fact, all the recordings you'll hear in the 'Audio quality' section were amplified in Audacity. Then, I held the mic way too close (think complete microphone newbie) and talked loudly into it. I was, again, able to save this in Audacity.
One of the most interesting features is the customizable 'Ø' button. This button can be configured to mute the mic, or place a 'marker' in the on-board recording. Markers can be used for noting in long audio files where you need to trim, edit, or cut, amongst other reasons. It basically makes your life easier in post.
I was expecting this marker to place a beep sound in the recording, but nothing happened. I've reached out to Rode for assistance, but have yet to receive a response. I'll come back to update this review once I hear back.
Another fantastic feature is the Camera Preset. This is an automatic, premade setting that links up with a number of cameras. You can load these presets into your RX (via Rode Central desktop only) and then enable when the mics are set up with your camera. Unfortunately, this is limited to new and popular cameras: my Canon Rebel T3i is too old now.
Finally, battery life. The Go Gen 3 has 7 hours charge in each TX, and you can buy a charging case (to up the overall charge to 21 hours) for $89 from Amazon U.S.. This is a pretty good battery life, but other wireless mics come with a charging case, like the Sennheiser Profile Wireless.
As with the Rode Wireless Micro, the Wireless Go Gen 3 works with the Rode Central app. This app is very straightforward and easy to use: I had no problems navigating it during testing.
As you can see from the three screenshots above, the camera preset settings has a huge range of cameras, from Canon, to GoPro, to Panasonic and more. You can also customize channel gain and split or merge the TXs, and configure settings like the Ø buttons.
As you can record in 'Split' or 'Merged', be aware that you will need to re-merge the mics if you turn one off. The first time I used the Go Gen 3, I didn't realise this and was left with a stereo recording only on one channel. I had to fix it in post, which was easy, but a little annoying.
Thankfully, due to the 32-bit float recording quality, my recordings were never distorted even with a lot of fiddling in Audacity. The tracks were crisp, clear, and faithful to my voice, even when I had an ambient noise track playing in the background. Here you can listen to all my standardized audio testing clips.
As with all mics I test, I recorded clips of tongue twisters (to analyze plosive and fricative performance), ambient noise clips to test the high-pass filter, alongside generic spoken tests.
Plosives
Here you can listen to the Rode Wireless Go Gen 3's ability to record plosive (B, P, D sounds) sounds without popping. To get the best result, I used the dead cat here.
As you can tell from the audio clip above, the Go Gen 3's quality was pretty excellent. There were no loud pops thanks to the dead cat. A word of warning, though: I would recommend using said dead cat, as when I repeated this test sans-muff the recording was quite poppy.
Fricatives/sibilance
Fricatives are soft, airy sounds like F and Z, and sibilance refers to S sounds (like a snake). I recorded myself saying a couple of S-heavy tongue twisters.
As you can hear above, the sibilance performance was really impressive. There's no unsavory hissing whatsoever, and I was really trying to do my best imitation of an angry snake here. I would have no reservations about interviewing even the most serpentine of guests with this mic.
Ambient noise performance
As with the Wireless Micro, the Wireless Go Gen 3 doesn't really have an 'ambient noise reducer' like some of the best Shure microphones. It's got a high-pass filter, which basically blocks noises below a certain threshold (75Hz or 100Hz). For these clips, I used the 75Hz.
This is with the high-pass filter enabled.
You can still hear quite a decent amount of background noise. Sure, my voice is still audible, but this might require a few hours in post-production if you want it completely silent.
This is the same clip without the high-pass filter.
See, there's not much difference between the two clips. It's definitely because the Wireless Go Gen 3 doesn't have an ambient noise reducing technology like Shure's proprietary 'Denoiser' (which is excellent). It's just a high-pass filter, so better to use for wind and quiet interference.
In the future, I'd like to see Rode release an AI traffic/speech reducer, so post-production would be easier if recording in very loud environments. Still, it's not awful… just not mind-blowing.
The Wireless Go Gen 3 is a worthy upgrade from Gen 2. You get higher quality recordings, more onboard storage, a range of new features like GainAssist, a charging case, and live headphone monitoring.
On top of these extra features, the mic's recording quality is fantastic — of course it is, it's Rode. You'd expect it to be brilliant. My only qualm is that the high-pass filter isn't hugely adept at minimizing ambient noise. For a mic that's so often used as a street interviewing mic, I'd expect it to have much more advanced ambient noise reduction in future.
However, if you're a content creator looking to upgrade your professionalism, of course it has to be the Rode Wireless Go Gen 3. There's a reason this mic is everywhere in TikTok videos.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Samsung HW-S801D Ultra Slim soundbar review: One for the Samsung TV owners
Samsung HW-S801D Ultra Slim soundbar review: One for the Samsung TV owners

Tom's Guide

time2 days ago

  • Tom's Guide

Samsung HW-S801D Ultra Slim soundbar review: One for the Samsung TV owners

The Samsung HW-S801D Ultra Slim soundbar could be one of the best soundbars if you already have a Samsung TV and are looking to expand your Samsung ecosystem. But for everyone else? I don't think the S801D is worth it. Let me explain — it's just a 3.1.2 channel setup for $900, whereas you can get the 9.1.4 channel Sonos Arc Ultra for just $100 extra. One of the best-value soundbars is the Polk Signa S4, which has a 3.1.2 setup for just $399. When you put it into perspective, I find it a little strange that the Samsung S801D is priced so highly. But if you have a Samsung TV, I still think it's worth it. I'll explain everything in this Samsung HW-S801D Ultra Slim Soundbar review. Price $899 / £549 Connectivity micro HDMI eARC, Bluetooth, Optical Weight Soundbar: 3.1 pounds / Subwoofer: 14.1 pounds Dimensions Soundbar: 1.4 x 1.5 x 45.6 inches / Subwoofer: 9.3 x 9.4 x 9.3 inches Colors Black, white Subwoofer Yes Dolby Atmos Yes Channel 3.1.2 The S801D Ultra Slim soundbar's MSRP is priced at $899 on the Samsung U.S. website, but it's often sold for around $750 on Amazon U.S.. In the U.K., it's a much more palatable £549 on Samsung U.K.. I'm unsure why there's such a price discrepancy between the U.S. and U.K., but in the U.K. you're getting a much better deal. The S801D was released in 2024 in both countries, replacing the previous 2022 S800D model. I think $899 is an extremely high price for this soundbar: for just an extra $100, you can get one of Samsung's best soundbars, Q800D. Alternatively, you can get the Sonos Arc Ultra for an extra $100 (yes, it doesn't come with a subwoofer, but its standalone bass is very good). Where the S801 sets itself apart is its super slim design: I'd only recommend this if you're low on space. One of the best aspects of the S801D is the design. As it's an Ultra Slim soundbar, it's kind of a given that it's just 1.4 inches high and 1.5 inches deep. This would be a perfect soundbar for compact spaces, or if you'd like to mount the soundbar flush to the wall. Given the 45-inch length, this soundbar would pair best with a 65-inch TV. Any smaller than that and I think the soundbar would look a little ridiculous. The S801D looked seamless with my Panasonic MZ1500 4K OLED. Other than being slim, the S801D looks like any other soundbar. It comes in white or black (I tested white), with grated speakers. There are buttons on top (mic, volume) and the remote feels well-made, much better than the Bose Smart Soundbar remote. The subwoofer is pretty heavy at 14.1 pounds, but it's easy to set up thanks to the wireless connection. I was able to control the volume via the Smart Things app and the remote control. Smart Things is actually very handy — not only can you control volume, but you can control treble, bass, and listening modes. I'll chat about it more in the 'App' section below. As you'd expect with Samsung smart home products, the S801D uses the Smart Things app. I already have this app as I have a Samsung washing machine, and I'm currently testing a Samsung vacuum. It's actually surprisingly rewarding to see my ecosystem grow. I love that you can name all of your products — Samsung recommends names like 'Living Room Soundbar' but of course you can enter anything, regardless of how silly. Here you can see the listening mode selection, toggles for SpaceFit Sound Pro and Active Voice Amplifier (which I couldn't take advantage of as I didn't have a Samsung TV), and Samsung's explanation page for all of its features. Connecting to Bluetooth is also super straightforward in the app — simply click 'Pair' in the top left corner and connect in your phone's settings. This is one of the most straightforward smart home apps I've ever used. One of the most impressive upgrades from the S800D is Q-Symphony, which is improved sound room calibration. Unfortunately, this requires a Samsung TV, so I was unable to test this. The S801D also has 'SpaceFit Sound Pro', which is supposed to calibrate audio based on your surroundings. Again, this is only compatible with Samsung TVs, so I couldn't test this either. If you're not sensing a theme, you will be now. The S801D has wireless Dolby Atmos — but only if you have a Samsung TV, and compatible separate surrounds. I still got decent Dolby Atmos surround sound with just the soundbar and subwoofer, though, so I'd say this isn't a major loss. Even without access to these features, the sound quality was still great. It's just a major shame that I couldn't actually test any of these features. I assume they're good, but I can't say for certain. It's very disappointing that Samsung restricted these flagship features to its TVs, but I can understand why, of course. If you don't have a Samsung TV, I'd recommend skipping this soundbar for now, and getting something a little less restricted like the Sonos Arc Ultra. One of my main problems with the S801D is that the HDMI output is a micro-HDMI port. When I saw this, I was utterly perplexed. Why? Just why? It's not because the soundbar is so slim, because there's a big enough space for a proper HDMI port. This means that if you lose the original cable (or want to upgrade to an 8K cable), you have to buy another one from Samsung. There will also be quality loss. As with all soundbars I test, I watched a series of movies and TV shows, and listened to music. I watched 'Top Gun: Maverick', 'The Wild Robot', 'A Complete Unknown' on 4K UHD Blu-Ray, 'Stranger Things' on Netflix, and various music genres on Qobuz. It was like the center channels and the surround channels (inside the soundbar itself) were out of sync. First, I watched 'Top Gun: Maverick'. It brings me great sadness to report that this movie sounded utterly terrible on the S801D. It sounded so bad that I had to make sure the soundbar wasn't broken. I switched out the 'Top Gun: Maverick' DVD for 'The Wild Robot', and the sound was fine. Confused, for good measure I connected it up to another TV, and again, the sound was fine. I played 'Top Gun: Maverick' again, and the issue persisted. It was like the center channels and the surround channels (inside the soundbar itself) were out of sync. When I turned the center channel down to volume 0, the audio sounded normal, if tinny. Then, when I returned to the original volume, the sound was again out of sync. The soundbar was playing on the 'Surround' audio setting. I tried it again with the DTS Virtual X and it sounded fine. I assume there's something in 'Top Gun: Maverick''s mix that the 'Surround' setting didn't like — I'd recommend switching between modes to iron out sound issues. The splashing sound effects sounded as if they were coming from beside me rather than in front of me. After the 'Top Gun' disaster, I played 'The Wild Robot'. I experienced no out-of-sync audio with this movie. I cycled through the audio settings (aforementioned surround, game, standard, adaptive, DTS Virtual X). After selecting surround, the audio was immersive and rich, and I could hear all of the rustling of fur and feathers. When the goose character was swimming, the splashing sound effects sounded as if they were coming from beside me rather than in front of me. I could hear bubbles and low-frequency water sounds perfectly in this scene. Lastly, I watched 'A Complete Unknown'. As this is a musical movie, I was excited to see how the S801D would be able to handle music-heavy scenes. There's a scene where a janitor kicks a bucket, and the sound of the bucket scraping across the floor was so loud that I jumped. It was a little incongruous in the previously relaxed soundscape, so I kept my ear out for similar moments. In the scene where two characters converse in a diner, the cash register rings, cutlery clinks, and telephone rings were clear and immersive without overpowering the main sound. To test the TV sound, I watched 'Stranger Things' on Netflix. The version of Netflix I have doesn't have Dolby Atmos, so it was a good way to evaluate the S801D's ability to play standard, basic TV shows. 'Stranger Things' sounded great, with balanced, even volume across the synth-heavy soundtrack and dialogue. I could hear low-frequency sounds like leaves rustling, bike wheels whirring, and breathing. Generally, soundbars aren't really expected to have audiophile-level sound quality. Even so, I wanted to give the S801D a fair shot. I connected to my phone via Bluetooth (one of the easiest Bluetooth pairings I've ever done using the Smart Things app) and played 'Boom Baby Bloom' by Wolf Alice. In the DTS Virtual X sound mode, the song sounded awful — extremely tinny and small, like a deluge of tin cans raining down from the sky. I switched to 'standard' sound mode, and it improved, but only just. When I listened to 'Let It Happen' by Tame Impala I found much of the same — incredibly tinny and weak sound. This was majorly disappointing as the soundbar had performed (mostly) well in the movie and TV tests. I switched to 'Surround' and the music expanded a little, but still poor. 'Game' and 'Adaptive' sound modes didn't do much, either. My working theory is that the Bluetooth music connection mustn't use the subwoofer, so the music is left incredibly treble-heavy, which makes it sound tinny. I could still increase or decrease the sub volume in the Smart Things app, but this only affected the sound minutely. There are many things to like about the S801D, but that doesn't mean it's free of problems. For most of the flagship features, you need a Samsung TV. It's very expensive for what it is — 3.1.2 channel with an MSRP of $899. Seeing as you can get the Polk Signa S4 (3.1.2 channel, and my favorite soundbar + subwoofer for value) for just $399, or spend an extra $100 for the Sonos Arc Ultra (9.1.4 channel), I just think the S801D is too expensive. On a half-price sale? Sure, it's worth it. It sounds great and is super compact. But full price? You're better off with something else.

Neewer Basics BR60 5" Ring Light review
Neewer Basics BR60 5" Ring Light review

Tom's Guide

time2 days ago

  • Tom's Guide

Neewer Basics BR60 5" Ring Light review

The Neewer Basics BR60 5' is a cheap and easy way to improve selfies, videos, or online video calls. It's certainly one of the best ring lights I have tested . The design is focused on being as functional as possible, making it incredibly easy to operate. The added attachments of a clip and tripod make it convenient for any situation. It brings out the real world colour typically lost when taking pictures, especially when using the front facing camera on my phone. The only caveat is that the ring light has to be plugged in to work and doesn't come with a battery power option. This means while it is lightweight and easy to walk around with, it isn't entirely portable without a power bank in tow. However, the need to be plugged in does mean you are sure to have consistent lighting for whatever you are doing. You can find out more in my full Neewer Basics BR60 5' Ring Light review. Price $21/£19 Dimensions 5.7 x 5 x 1.1 inches Weight (with clip) 4.6 ounces Weight (with tripod) 6.6 ounces Number of LEDs 60 Maximum illumination 450Lx/0.5m Accessories Clip, Mini tripod CRI (color rendering index) 97+ Color temperature 3000-6000K The Neewer Basics BR60 5' Ring Light is available at Amazon U.S. for $21 and Amazon U.K. for £19. The price is slightly higher ($29) if purchased directly from the Neewer website, but you'll get a one-year warranty as a bonus. In fact, you can extend this further by signing up to the company's newsletter if you're so inclined.. You're paying a little extra, sure, but you get the added peace of mind of a warranty period which for some is worth the cost. The design of the Neewer Basics BR60 5' Ring Light is exactly that — basic. But not in a bad way. It eliminates any fuss that comes with an awkward set up and is super straightforward to use. The entire body is plastic with metal threads at the base to attach to the tripod. The tripod itself is easy to attach, and the legs fan out for stability. There is also a clip which slides into the bottom of the ring light. This clip allows a tilt of up to 170° so I was able to adjust the light exactly how I needed it even when it was in a fixed position. The clip can be attached to anything less than 1' thick. I was able to easily attach it to my mirror while doing my makeup, on my laptop for work calls, and my phone for selfies. The clip has a gap on one side which perfectly fits over the camera on my phone and laptop. So it doesn't obscure the camera view when attaching the light, which I have had happen with other phone light attachments I have used in the past. The light needs to be plugged in at all times and comes with a built-in six foot USB-A cable which is also where the controls are. There is a USB-A to USB-C adapter included though and this meant I was able to plug it in to my MacBook which only has USB-C ports. The controls for the Neewer Basics BR60 5' Ring Light are extremely easy to get on with. It seriously couldn't be any simpler. Attached to the built-in charging cable is a control pad. The power button turns the light on and off when plugged in and there is a mode button which cycles through the light's six modes. My personal favorite of these modes is the warm light as I found this looked the most natural and added some warmth to my face. The settings then become cooler as you cycle through them. There are plus and minus buttons to alter the brightness of the light with 10 levels of adjustment. This makes the light extremely customizable — there is something for every scenario. Having been disappointed with the performance of small ring lights in the past, I am pleased to say that I was blown away by the Neewer Basics BR60 5' Ring Light. I seriously think it changed my face for the better during selfies and now I get why the Kardashian Instagram game is so strong. The light has a CRI (color rendering index) of 97+. A higher CRI means that the light ensures that objects and subjects appear true to their original colour, and lower values indicate more color distortion. This is measured on a scale of 0-100. So this light having such a high reading is a great sign, and I found that, with the light on, I looked more like what I would see in the mirror as opposed to in my phone camera in natural lighting. With all the settings to cycle through on the light, the color temperature of the light ranges from 3000K to 6000K. The lower values are the warmer tomes and higher values are cool tones. Both are necessary for different types of photography as cooler lights are often better in a studio setting, or just depending on what your own style calls for. To test out how the light works for every day use I used the tripod to set it up next to my mirror to do my makeup for the day. This is one of the uses recommended by Neewer so I wanted to check if it made me do it better. I was able to have far more attention to detail and found I could see the colors better and get a better idea of how everything was blending. It was pretty gloomy outside on my testing day so the natural lighting was dull so it was a good opportunity to get some natural light tones. It is easy to see why makeup artists use ring lights when working on clients, I'll definitely be adding this to my daily routine. I also used it to take some selfies, since this is probably one of the most likely use cases for this product. And it massively improved the visual quality and made me look more polished and professional on camera. Both of the above images were taken using the front facing camera of my iPhone 14. The first image is taken with the ring light on the warm light mode. It is clear that the light enhanced my features while brightening my complexion. The second image is taken in natural lighting in front of a window with the same camera and is very dull and there is a lot more noise in the image. The ring light made everything sharper. In a society where everything is documented, the Neewer Basics BR60 5' Ring Light is an essential addition for anyone's home or office setup. The color reading index rating is high and it is evident from the images I took that it brings out real world color on camera, which usually dulls the color. It also worked incredibly well to reduce noise in the image by creating sharper lines. Unfortunately you do need to be near a power outlet or have some sort of portable charger with you to turn the light on since it is not battery powered. This means you're quite limited with movement when using it, but on the flip side you'll never get caught out by a dead battery. At only $21, this ring light is an affordable way to improve your selfie or video calling game.

Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer review
Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer review

Tom's Guide

time4 days ago

  • Tom's Guide

Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer review

The Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer is unlike any air fryer I have tried before. The draw is one large tray that can be converted into a dual basket fryer. Sounds good on paper, but this setup didn't suit me. The air fryer is easy to use and has presets, like most of the best air fryers, to make setting up cooking times that much faster. And it is fast since it uses RapidAir Plus Technology which forces the air to circulate around the fryer. However, I found the large tray awkward to use when split in two as I couldn't give the food a quick shake without disturbing the other side. The contents at the top of the basket also cooks faster when the tray is split in two. You can find out more about how I got on in my full Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer review. Price £159 Capacity 7.5QT Weight 5.8kg Dimensions 17.2 x 11.9 x 11.6 inches Controls Touch sensitive buttons Modes 6 presets Temperature range 104 - 392°F Unfortunately, for any Americans looking to upgrade their trusty air fryer, the Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer is currently only available for purchase in the U.K.. The air fryer is priced at £159 on Amazon U.K., but can also be purchased directly from the Philips online store for £133. If you would rather have an air fryer with two fixed drawers, the Philips 3000 Dual Zone air fryer is priced at £179/$199 and also has the rapid air technology but has two fixed trays. It is currently unclear whether the FlexDrawer style air fryer will become available in the U.S. but we will update this page when we find out more. The Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer has more of a basic design when compared to other models like the Philips Air Fryer 3000 Series and the Philips 3000 Dual Zone — but the FlexDrawer is designed to be a cheaper offering. The air fryer has a plain matte black finish with a glass finish on top for the touch screen controls. It has a cooking temperature range of 104 - 392°F, so it is perfect for a range of cooking needs. It has six preset cooking modes, including frozen potato snacks, steak, chicken, muffins, vegetables, and reheat. I was most impressed with the muffin preset, as it gave a perfect bake. The FlexDrawer means that the air fryer can be turned into one large tray or two compartments, with the addition of a divider in the middle. However, the two compartments are conjoined, and I found this to be really inconvenient. Usually when making tater tots I would take the tray out and give them a shake to make sure they were cooked evenly. But since I was using the other compartment to cook pizza at the time I couldn't do that, and the tots ended up being crispier on top. When the large tray is split into two sections, the temperature and cooking time can be altered independently for each, and they can be synced or matched. To switch between the single or dual zone settings is easy with a click of the 'XXL' basket button. The two compartments are far smaller than a normal air fryer drawer. The total capacity is 7.5 quarts, so each tray is about 3.75 quarts. This is about the same as the Ninja Foodi Dual Zone Air Fryer, which also splits one large tray in two. However the 1000 Series has less cooking room than the dual basket fryer I'm used to, like the Ninja Dual Zone Air Fryer. The large tray has two handles on either side of the drawer, and while this was easy to pull out, it was a little awkward to maneuver compared to the usual pull out drawers with the handle on the front. That being said, for cooking larger things like fish or a whole chicken, the option for a larger tray is perfect to cater to both needs. The cord at the back of the Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer is very short at about two feet, so the unit has to sit next to a power outlet. There is storage on the back of the fryer to wrap the cord if you need to store the fryer elsewhere though. The Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer did a great job at evenly cooking my food, but I still prefer the results I got from the Philips Air Fryer 3000 Series (which is available for purchase in the U.S.) as I felt the RapidAir Technology worked better in a single basket setting. Both air fryers use RapidAir Plus Technology. This means the base of the air fryer basket has a star shape with peaks and troughs that aid the circulation of air through the tray. The FlexDrawer Air Fryer has two of these star shapes to cover both compartments. I cooked some frozen sausage rolls, and each one was evenly cooked on the top and bottom without the need to flip them over thanks to the RapidAir Technology. This is the most even cook I have achieved when testing out air fryers. I was also impressed at the puff from the pastry — further testament to how even the cook was. I cooked some frozen tater tots to test the frozen potato snacks preset on the air fryer. They were finished cooking in just 12 minutes and were crispy on the outside and fluffy on the inside. I did notice that the tots on top of the basket were slightly more browned, but I couldn't combat this since the basket is hard to shake anyway because of how large it is, and I had a small pizza in the other half of the basket. The cheese on top of the pizza was pretty well done, but still tasted fine. Despite this, the air fryer was able to cook the pizza base all the way through. The Philips 3000 Series was able to cook the pizza without burning the cheese so I think the FlexiDrawer may have let in some heat from where the tots were cooking. The cooking zones are described as independent by Philips, but since the zones are conjoined, there is bound to be some heat transfer. The air fryer was able to perfectly cook halloumi sticks in just six minutes at 320°F using the timer and temperature control for the independent zone. The air fryer is incredibly quick and works well for cooking party food for big groups of people when you need to keep up with demand. Needless to say, everyone in the office loved these. To see how the air fryer worked with hard vegetables I cooked some butternut squash and zucchini croquettes. The veggies became really tender and stayed juicy. The outside crisped up nicely to hold it all together. These only took 12 minutes to be perfectly cooked. Let me start by saying, these turned out to be the ugliest muffins ever… but they were so good! Now that we are past their looks, I'll tell you that they were perfectly cooked with a slight crunch on top and moist in the middle while using the muffin preset on the air fryer. Despite appearances, they lasted all of three minutes in the office and had glowing reviews! Clean-up with the Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer is very easy. The whole tray is dishwasher safe so you can save on washing up by hand. I decided to wash it by hand as I think the entire tray of the FlexDrawer is far too big to justify taking up space in the dishwasher. The fryer has a non-stick coating so with a little dish soap and a wipe it was sparkling again — no scrubbing required. The cord wraps around the back of the air fryer for easy storage and at only 5.8kg it is light enough to pick up and move when not in use. While the Philips 1000 Series FlexDrawer Air Fryer is easy to set up and operate, I don't think the flex drawer is for me. While it is a great space saver as you get a large tray and two smaller baskets in one, it is just awkward to use. The basket is hard to shake since it is so large anyway, but you also can't check how one side of the dual tray is doing without disturbing the other since they are conjoined. That being said, the air fryer is fast and the RapidAir Technology works well to evenly cook the contents, but when the tray is split the top of the tray cooks much faster.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store