What is Issue 2 on Ohio's May 6 ballot?
(WJW) — The only statewide issue up to Ohio voters in the May 6 primary election would allow the state to continue issuing bonds to fund major infrastructure projects at the local level.
Issue 2 would amend the Ohio Constitution to allow the state to issue general obligation bonds to help local governments pay for capital improvement projects like roads and bridges, wastewater treatment systems, storm water management and more through the State Capital Improvement Program.
How to vote early in Ohio's May 6 primary election
The issue does not levy a new tax on Ohioans, since bonds are part of state budget planning, according to the sponsoring lawmakers.
But Ohioans' tax dollars would continue to pay down the debts incurred by local governments that take advantage of the program, according to the Ohio Ballot Board. The new debts could take up to 30 years to repay.
The program itself is nothing new. Ohio voters first approved it in 1987 and re-approved it through three separate constitutional amendments since then — the most recent in 2014. The last amendment will sunset on July 1.
The upcoming issue also raises the annual limit for state-issued bonds from $200 million to $250 million, or $2.5 billion over the amendment's 10-year authorization. The program started out at $120 million per year.
The program has funded nearly 19,000 projects since it began and each dollar funded by the program typically leverages $2 to $3, Linda Bailiff, director of the Ohio Public Works Commission, testified before a Senate committee in November, in favor of the resolution to create the ballot issue.
Cleveland voters to cast ballots at new voting locations
The project review committee administering the program awarded the city of Cleveland more than $9 million in 2024 and about $8 million in 2023, according to James DeRosa, director of the Mayor's Office of Capital Projects.
'This represents a significant source of funding for the city to address aged infrastructure while facing the challenges of uncertain revenue streams and ever-rising project costs,' he testified before the Senate committee in November, also in favor of the resolution.
The issue was added to the primary election ballot through a bipartisan joint resolution adopted in the last General Assembly, which saw near-unanimous support in both chambers.
The measure can be approved with a simple majority vote. A vote for 'yes' on the May 6 ballot is a vote to renew the 38-year-old program for another 10 years. A 'no' vote is a vote not to renew the program.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans call on Michigan State Police leadership to resign following no confidence vote
Michigan State Police | Susan J. Demas Several Republicans in the Michigan House and Senate on Wednesday called for the director and chief deputy director of the Department of State Police to resign. The call for State Police Director James Grady and Chief Deputy Director Aimee Brimacombe to step down followed a weekend announcement from the Michigan State Police Troopers Association and the Michigan State Police Command Officers Association that said the two groups took a nearly unanimous no-confidence vote against the agency's leadership. Calls for their resignations came from Michigan Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt (R-Porter Township), who is a Republican candidate for governor, state Sen. Jim Runestad (R-White Lake), who is the chair of the Michigan Republican Party, and state Rep. Mike Mueller (R-Linden). Department spokesperson Shanon Banner in a statement defended Grady and his leadership team, whom she said 'provide unwavering support to department members and are proud of the public safety services delivered every day to the public and our law enforcement partners across the state.' The no confidence vote follows a year's worth of discontent between the troopers' association and their leadership. Troopers filed an ethics complaint against Grady and Brimacombe in January. A handful of troopers also filed lawsuits against Brimacombe questioning her leadership, as well. Grady was appointed as director of the department following the departure of former director Joseph Gasper. Nesbitt said the vote of no confidence was a damning indictment on the agency's current administration. 'It is undeniable that this is the absolute worst leadership our state police has ever seen and completely unacceptable for the troopers and public they serve,' Nesbitt said in a statement released Monday. 'There needs to be a change at the top and that change needs to happen immediately. Col. Grady must step down or the governor must relieve him of his duties.' Runestad questioned how Grady and Brimacombe could continue in their roles after more than 1,000 troopers voted against their leadership. 'It has become alarmingly clear that Col. Grady and Lt. Col. Brimacombe's failed leadership has disparaged the reputation of the Michigan State Police,' Runestad said in a statement. 'I demand they step down immediately and urge the governor to relieve them of their duties if they do not resign voluntarily.' Mueller, a former law enforcement officer who has been investigating issues with State Police's leadership and other controversies at the individual post level, said troopers spoke loudly this weekend. 'They have no confidence in the current leadership. It is corrupt, dishonest, and doesn't keep the best interest of its own troopers in mind,' Mueller said in a scathing statement. 'If they have any shame, Grady and Brimacombe should resign right now.' In response, Banner said it has been a priority for Grady to conduct in-person visits to department worksites to listen to member feedback. 'During these visits, he's engaged in meaningful conversations, including seeking input from the membership about morale and opportunities for areas of improvement,' Banner said. 'Under Colonel Grady's leadership, the department has continued to invest in better training and professional development opportunities, updated equipment and improved technology. Further, dozens of new troopers joined the ranks last month and this year's proposed budget includes pay raises for troopers and sergeants.' Banner added that Grady remains committed to the department and 'is focused on moving the department forward while maintaining the department's proud tradition of service through excellence, integrity and courtesy.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ethics panel: Lawson can serve as Senate president while leading teachers union
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — The R.I. Ethics Commission decided Tuesday it is not a conflict for Rhode Island's newly elected Senate president to hold that role while she is simultaneously serving as president of one of the state's biggest teachers unions. Senate President Valarie Lawson, an East Providence Democrat, also serves as the president of the National Education Association Rhode Island (NEARI), which represents about 12,000 members in 75 collective bargaining units across the state. The 58-year-old was elected to her new position in the Senate in April after her predecessor, Dominick Ruggerio, died at the age of 76. Lawson sought an advisory opinion from the Ethics Commission asking whether she was allowed to hold her current elected position and her union job. In a 7-1 vote on Tuesday, the panel determined she could. Commission member Hugo Ricci Jr. was the only no vote. 'What is before us is the undeniable power that the president of the Senate or the speaker of the House has,' Ricci said. 'This is unique.' Ricci wanted to continue the matter to investigate what other states have done in similar situations, but the motion failed. Commission Chairman Lauren Jones said the panel can only apply Rhode Island statutes and regulations. 'What other states do in this context is really irrelevant to our situation,' Jones said. 'You've got to call balls and strikes as you see them, according to what vests you with the authority to call the balls and strikes,' member Frank Cenerini added. 'I think, with all due respect, we're drifting away from the central issues in this matter.' In a statement, Lawson said she was pleased that the commission 'affirmed the standard' she had been using when she served in less senior Senate positions. 'It helps to distinguish between a vague notion of a perceived, general conflict and an actual, specific conflict requiring recusal under the Code of Ethics,' Lawson said. 'Further, it ensures that one does not have to be retired or independently wealthy to serve in this role. 'This decision supports the operation of our legislative body as the framers intended: a part-time, citizen legislature comprised of a diverse membership from all walks of life, who can draw from their varied experiences to best serve the public,' she added. Common Cause Rhode Island Executive Director John Marion told 12 News he was glad to see that Lawson sought the advisory opinion, which he called an 'unusual' request because it's more typical that legislators would ask whether they can participate in specific legislation. 'The Ethics Commission's opinion that Lawson is not prohibited from holding both roles is not surprising and is consistent with past precedents,' Marion said. 'Common Cause Rhode Island believes the commission's advisory opinion is somewhat naive because it didn't explore the full range of powers exercised by the senate president. It did not examine the full scope of agenda-setting and appointment powers.' Marion said Common Cause expects that it is 'likely' that Lawson will likely need to come before the commission again on specific legislation in the future. Alexandra Leslie (aleslie@ is a Target 12 investigative reporter covering Providence and more for 12 News. Connect with her on Twitter and on Facebook. Ted Nesi contributed to this report. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
