More people making losses when selling their homes
Photo:
RNZ / REECE BAKER
The number of people making losses when they sell their homes is at the highest level since 2014, property data firm Cotality says, and Auckland sellers are being hit particularly hard.
In three months, there was $128,362,612 lost by sellers.
Cotality has released its latest Pain and Gain report, which shows the proportion of sellers making a loss or a gain on sales across the country.
In the second quarter of this year, 89.4 percent of sellers made a gross profit - 10.6 percent made a loss. This does not include the cost of the sale, such as real estate commission.
But in Auckland, the number losing money increased to 15.9 percent. In Tauranga, it was 13.2 percent and Wellington 11.9 percent.
Christchurch had the smallest proportion of loss-making sales, at 4.9 percent.
Cotality chief property economist Kelvin Davidson said it reflected
how much prices had fallen
in Auckland, and the higher number of apartments, which were more likely to lose money.
The median profit among those who sold for a gain was $279,000. That is well down on the $440,000 median gain recorded during the 2021 peak, but higher than anything recorded before the end of 2020.
The median loss was $52,500.
Combined, the total gain made by sellers in the quarter was $4.9 billion.
Cotality chief property economist Kelvin Davidson.
Photo:
SUPPLIED
Davidson said the length of time that someone had owned a property played a big part in whether they made a gain or a loss.
"Almost 50 percent of the loss-making resales in the three months to June had been held for less than three-and-a-half years."
Those who made a gain had held their properties for 9.4 years.
Davidson said that was the longest hold period for a gain since the mid-1990s.
He said the weakness in property values could be
encouraging some owners to hold for longer
to allow gains to accumulate.
"In other cases it may just reflect the fact that in a quiet market a lot of sellers simply have to wait longer for a deal to be achieved.
"Indeed, some property owners may also just be choosing to hold for a bit longer if they're uncertain about their job prospects or don't want to pay transactions costs such as an estate agent's commission or conveyancing fees as regularly. In addition, lending restraints such as the loan to value ratio rules may have kept more people where they are for longer."
He said investors could sometimes choose when to make a move but owner-occupiers were often driven by life events.
It was not always a bad thing to move in a soft market, he said.
"You might get less than what you might like for your own house but you may well get a bargain on the next one.
"You might come out better off."
He said there were hints that some sellers were choosing to take their properties off the market rather than accept a disappointing price.
Wellington real estate salesperson Mike Robbers said he was seeing that.
He said separating couples would sometimes put a house on the market, and then when offers came in lower than they wanted,
one person would buy the other out instead
.
Standalone houses were less likely to sell for a loss.
Almost 34 percent of apartments sold for less than they were bought for.
Investors' experience was very similar to that of owner-occupiers, at 10.7 percent of sales making a loss compared to 10.1 percent for owner-occupiers. Investors had slightly larger gains when they made a profit and slightly bigger losses.
In Auckland, 17 percent of investors were making a loss.
Gareth Kiernan, chief forecaster at Infometrics, said the current downturn was so far shorter than one recorded from 1998 to 2001 and from 2008 to 2012.
But he said there were signs that people who bought in the peak might have to hold on longer than in previous downturns to get back to neutral.
"It's worth noting that house prices are currently still sitting about 13 percent below their 2021 peak. At the same stage of the cycle, 13 quarters after the December 1997 and December 2007 peaks, house prices were only 2.0 percent and 5.5 percent below those respective peaks. In other words, although the 1998-2001 and 2008-2012 loss-making periods were getting close to ending by this stage of the cycle, this time around we're still a long time away from everyone not facing a loss when selling property. Our current house price forecasts could see people in 2030 who bought at the peak of the market in 2021 still be making a loss if trying to sell. In the context of the NZ housing market experience of the last 75 years, that would be an incredibly long time to still be making a loss."
Davidson agreed the downturn was "fairly prolonged".
"The current cycle is deeper - in the GFC prices only fell about 10 percent peak to trough. This time they were down closer to 17 or 18 percent, we're three-and-a-half years into the cycle and nowhere near the peak. This has been a deeper and more drawn out episode. In some ways we're only halfway through or even less.
"It's taking longer to accumulate gains and I guess it's also taking longer to avoid losses."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Who's running for Auckland's mayoralty?
Eleven people are going up against incumbent Wayne Brown to be the mayor of Auckland. Photo: RNZ / Diego Opatowski Eleven people are going up against incumbent Wayne Brown to be the mayor of Auckland this local elections. While Auckland councillor Kerrin Leoni has emerged as Brown's main challenger, there are still a number of lower-profile candidates vying for the city's top job. This year's contenders include a former political party leader, someone who is running for mayor in Auckland and Christchurch, and a university student. RNZ asked lower-profile candidates, who could be contacted, for one sentence explaining why they want to be mayor and one sentence stating a policy of theirs they want Aucklanders to know about. Six responded. Eric Chuah. Photo: Supplied Dr Chuah, a former strategist for Peter Dunne and the United Future Party, stood as a candidate in the Auckland electorate of Maungakiekie in the 2023 general election. He told RNZ he is over 61. He now had his sights set on the Auckland mayoralty and was going after what he considered to be unnecessary spending, like the CBD's million-dollar Christmas tree . Why do you want to be mayor? "Ensure reduction of excessive spending, transparency and accountability in council tendering process and staff recruitment where proper systems of management, operational and decision making are implemented to ensure fulfilment of Auckland Council's Long-Term Plans and not reacting to situations with ad-hoc solutions and stop gap measures creating long term problems as Auckland Council debt has increased from $11 billion to $14 billion, a $3 billion debt increase in 3 years and rates have increase [sic] 40% in 3 years where a house priced at $1.4 million has a $4000 rate and $1000 water rates with a projected 48% increase in 2026, stated by an Auckland Councilor [sic] in last Governance meeting on July 31st 2025." Policy "Reviewing, auditing past expenditures in contract awards, tendering systems, allocation of ratepayers monies via adopting and implementing, transparency, accountability systems of staff recruitment, management systems of the various CCOs (Council Controlled Organizations) such as AT (Auckland), so as to reduce unnecessary operational costs while maintaining jobs, unnecessary expenditure such as $1 million Christmas tree (Dec.2024), $1 million toilet and $1.2 billion road cone spent from 2020-2025 of which $400-$500 million could be overspent." Ted Johnston. Photo: Supplied The lawyer and former leader of the New Conservative Party is having another crack at the mayoralty after getting hit with an egg during a mayoral candidate debate in 2022. This time around, the 64-year-old has honed in on the city's traffic woes. Why do you want to be mayor? "I am seeking the Mayoralty as, no other candidate has solutions for Auckland's growing problems, and I cannot implement these crucial reforms, otherwise." Policy "A vastly expanded, efficient and inexpensive public rail system is crucial to bolster Auckland's economy and development, as well as to lower congestion and costs for all Aucklanders." Rob McNeil. Photo: Supplied McNeil is running under the Animal Justice Party banner. On the party's website, it stated the animal advocate loved long walks on the Auckland CBD waterfront. Why do you want to be mayor? "I will ensure animals have a voice in Auckland's decision-making, recognising the intrinsic link between animal welfare, environmental health, and human well-being. Lasting progress begins with local councils committed to protecting the interconnected web of all life." Policy "Among other policies for Aucklanders, we're fighting for mandatory funded desexing of dogs and cats - to stop the preventable deaths of thousands of animals while reducing council costs and community." Ryan Pausina. Photo: Supplied Pausina was an Auckland mayoral candidate in 2022. He told RNZ he is 48-years-old and a product developer. Why do you want to be mayor? "For starters, I have defined for the first time in history who should be the mayor of Auckland, out of all of us, who should be the mayor is determined by expertise in the fields of science relative to city works, city management and city civics, of which, that one person is required to serve for that role." Policy "Static speed-bump phase-out is a fun one, every time a vehicle slows down and passes over a speed bump, then accelerates away, a tiny teaspoon of petrol is wasted and in Sweden, they have created a speed bump technology to govern speed without wasting fuel or energy and annoyance in the process." Jason Pieterse. Photo: Supplied Pieterse told RNZ he is a 24-year-old engineering student doing his honours at AUT, making him the youngest of the bunch. Why do you want to be mayor? "I am running for mayor because I want to drive forward changes that support and improve the lives of every resident that calls this city home." Policy "I would have to say my most interesting policy is a housing proposal that would make near all housing costs much more affordable and accessible." Peter Wakeman. Photo: Supplied The 64-year-old described himself as a former passenger jet pilot. He is also running for mayor of Christchurch this local elections. A candidate with his name has run for mayor of Christchurch in almost every election since 1998. Why do you want to be mayor? "Wakeman is standing for Mayor in Auckland and Christchurch to be more effective in achieving Government policy that puts more money in everyone's pockets." Policy "Get more money into circulation by getting central Government to replace GST with Financial transaction tax (FTT) to reduce all of our costs of living and creation of debt free money by RBNZ." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
'Frustrated locals' lash out: Tauranga parking meters vandalised
One of four Tauranga City Council parking machines that has been vandalised, shortly before the expansion of paid parking in the city, which applies from 18 August. Photo: Supplied/ LDR - Alisha Evans A map showing the new paid parking and time limited zones in Tauranga, Photo: Supplied/ Tauranga City Council "Frustrated locals" have vandalised parking machines in Tauranga in an attempt to stall the expansion of paid parking, a business owner believes. Four Tauranga City Council parking terminals have been damaged in the past 10 days and will each cost about $2000 to fix. Rutherford Signs director Matt Batchelor believed the two machines on Glasgow Street and Third Avenue were damaged with hammers. "Frustrated locals have now resorted to vandalising the new, very expensive-looking paid parking terminals with hammers in an effort to delay progress [of paid parking]." Paid parking is scheduled to begin for areas on the fringe of the city centre on Monday 18 August. It was meant to start on 4 August but was delayed a fortnight to allow time for residents' permits to be implemented. One of four Tauranga City Council parking machines that was vandalised recently. Photo: Supplied/ LDR - Alisha Evans On-street parking between the eastern end of Fourth Avenue and Park Street, north of the city's centre, will cost $1 an hour for the first two hours and $2 for every subsequent hour until 5pm, to a maximum of $10 on weekdays. New two-hour parking limits also apply to some streets on the fringe of the city centre, as far south as Eighth Avenue. Batchelor said his Glasgow Street business did not have enough parking for his staff, and they were looking to him to cover the cost. If he were to cover their parking, it would cost $14,400 a year, when things were "already tough", he said. Unlike the city centre, the area of Glasgow Street and First, Second and Third avenues west was primarily industrial, not retail. "The only people being financially penalised here are the business owners and their staff." Council city centre infrastructure lead Shawn Geard said the estimated cost to repair each machine was $2000 because the machine head would need replacing. A machine on Dive Crescent and one on Devonport Road had also been damaged, he said. The cost of a new machine was $11,500 for a cash machine and $9200 for a contactless card-only machine. Damaged machines would not delay the new paid parking zones, he said. The council appreciated that decisions around paid parking could often result in frustration, but people needed to know vandalising machines did not have an impact on parking enforcement. "Rather, it adds an additional cost to council, and makes it more difficult for residents, workers, customers and visitors to conveniently pay for parking. "For any person who chooses to express their frustration in this manner, we have CCTV cameras operating throughout the city centre. "Any instances of wilful/intentional damage will be investigated and, where applicable, reported to the police." A report was filed with police about the vandalism of the Devonport Road machine, and reports would be filed for the three other machines, Geard said. He hoped the replacement parts would arrive so the machines would be working by Monday. People could pay for parking through the PayMyPark app if the machines were not working. Anyone who had an issue with the app should contact the council, Geard said. The council could not guarantee parking meters would work at all times because of situations such as vandalism. "If someone parks within a paid parking area, they will still need to ensure they make payment, which may mean needing to find the nearest undamaged meter." A variety of people, including workers, customers and visitors, used Glasgow Street and First, Second and Third avenues, Geard said. The extension of paid parking into those areas was to ensure regular turnover of the on-street parks to improve access for everyone. The council aimed to achieve 85 percent occupancy across all its parking, Geard said. This supported high use but allowed people to find parks when they wanted one. City centre workers were encouraged to use parking buildings, off-street options, or consider public transport and active travel modes such as cycling and walking. Police said anyone who saw property being damaged or vandalised should call 111 if it was happening now, or 105 if it was after the fact. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Can my father's partner take his house?
RNZ's money correspondent Susan Edmunds answers your questions. Photo: RNZ Got questions? RNZ is launching a new podcast, No Stupid Questions with Susan Edmunds, next month. We'd love to hear more of your questions about money and the economy. You can send through written questions, like these ones, but - even better - you can drop us a voice memo to our email questions@ What happens if my father owns a house, but now has a partner for several years who moved in to the house and has put the power in her name to prove she's lived there for a certain time. If my father dies before her with no will, will she get the house or us kids? Justine Wood is a specialist trustee at Public Trust and helped me answer your question. Basically, when someone dies without a will, it's referred to as "dying intestate". That means specific legislation comes into play that determines who will get which bits of the person's estate. That means the partner may well be entitled to a share of the house. "Based on the family circumstances you've outlined, the partner may be entitled to receive the personal chattels, such as vehicles, furniture and jewellery, the first $155,000 of the estate and a third share of the remainder of the estate," she said. "This will depend on the couple meeting the legal criteria of having a de facto relationship at the time. The remaining two thirds of anything left would be distributed equally between his children. "Administering an estate when there is no will can be costly and take longer to sort out. Having a will helps your family understand what you'd like done with your estate after your gone - and it makes the process of managing your passing less stressful on loved ones." The Administration Act defines de facto relationship in line with the Property (Relationships) Act. This said a de facto relationship is a couple who are at least 18, living together as a couple and not married or in a civil union. Things that might be taken into account are the duration of the relationship, the nature and extent of common residence, whether there is a sexual relationship, the degree of financial interdependence and dependence, ownership of property, the degree of mutual commitment to a shared life, the care and support of children, performance of household duties and the reputation and public aspects of the relationship. It would make sense for your father to draw up a will. Even with a will, his partner may have rights under the Property (Relationships) Act - they may need to sign a contracting out agreement if he wants to ensure that the property is left to you. Are there any disadvantages in keeping KiwiSaver funds there in KiwiSaver after retirement age? Is it best to fill the forms now and take some, if not all? There really is no disadvantage to leaving your money in KiwiSaver once you're retired, if that's what makes the most sense for you at the moment. It would be a good idea to get some advice on the funds your money is invested in, though. Depending on how much you've got in your KiwiSaver, it might make sense to divide it up and invest it in a few different funds. You might have some in a conservative or even cash fund that you can tap into if you need it in the near term, for unexpected bills or things like that, some in a balanced fund for the medium term and then some money in a growth fund for the longer term. The growth fund will probably bump around a bit but should deliver better returns overall, which might help make your money last longer through your retirement. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.