logo
Coverage of Colossal's Dire Wolf De-Extinction

Coverage of Colossal's Dire Wolf De-Extinction

The announcement of the world's first de-extinct dire wolves generated substantial media coverage, with outlets bringing different perspectives to this groundbreaking scientific achievement. From science-focused publications to mainstream news organizations, the story captured widespread attention and sparked conversations about de-extinction technology and its implications. First Reactions: Between Wonder and Skepticism
When Colossal Biosciences announced in April 2025 that they had successfully brought back dire wolves , media reactions blended amazement with careful examination of the scientific claims.
Rolling Stone magazine ran the headline '12,000 Years Later, Dire Wolves Are Back,' featuring an interview with author George R.R. Martin to contextualize the scientific achievement alongside the dire wolf's pop culture fame. The magazine described seeing the ivory-furred pups via video as 'both adorable and awe-inspiring, noting their pointed snouts and golden eyes that harken back to Ice Age hunters.'
Complex Media took an enthusiastic approach, declaring that 'dire wolves are officially back' and marveling that 'these are actual, giant, genetically accurate, scientifically verified dire wolves walking the Earth again' – not CGI or fantasy, but 'science that reads like science fiction.' The publication described the achievement as mind-bending, quoting: 'Wait, this isn't just a GoT promo? Nope. This is very real,' and calling it perhaps 'the most bonkers science story of the year.' Science-Focused Coverage
TIME magazine provided one of the most in-depth scientific examinations of the achievement. Science editor Jeffrey Kluger, who was granted access to meet the Colossal pups at a secure location, detailed the 'deft genetic engineering' behind the de-extinction in a feature titled 'The Science Behind the Return of the Dire Wolf.'
TIME underscored how Colossal's team 'deciphered the dire wolf genome, rewrote the genetic code of the common gray wolf to match it, and…brought Romulus, Remus, and their sister Khaleesi into the world.' The article also highlighted the broader significance: Colossal's success suggests that other extinct animals might soon follow, and it demonstrates new methods that could aid species conservation.
The New Yorker also covered the story, publishing an article titled 'The Dire Wolf is Back' that explored the scientific and ethical dimensions of the achievement. This coverage reportedly broke an embargo on the announcement, releasing information before Colossal was fully prepared to share all supporting research documentation. Scientific Publications and Expert Commentary
Scientific publications approached the story with appropriate rigor, examining the technical achievements and their implications for conservation biology.
The announcement coincided with the publication of a research paper titled 'On the ancestry and evolution of the extinct dire wolf,' which provided scientific context for the de-extinction effort. This paper, showing that Colossal's team had generated '3.4× and 12.8× paleogenomes from two well-preserved dire wolves dating to > 13,000 and > 72,000 years ago,' offered the scientific community detailed data about the genomic work underlying the achievement.
CRISPRMedicineNews published Colossal's detailed press release, which included expert commentary from scientists such as Dr. Christopher Mason, who called the achievement 'transformative' and 'an extraordinary technological leap in genetic engineering efforts for both science and for conservation.' Terminology and Framing Debates
Some media coverage engaged with questions about terminology and whether the genetically modified gray wolves should properly be called 'de-extinct dire wolves.' Science communicator Hank Green produced videos examining this question, suggesting that while the achievement was scientifically remarkable, it might be more accurate to describe the animals as genetically modified gray wolves rather than resurrected dire wolves.
This nuanced examination prompted Dr. Beth Shapiro, Colossal's Chief Science Officer, to respond with clarifications about how the company defines de-extinction. Referencing the IUCN Species Survival Commission's definition of de-extinction as 'the process of creating an organism that resembles an extinct species,' Shapiro acknowledged the terminology complexities while emphasizing the practical conservation applications of the technology.
'If you want to call these gray wolves with 20 genetic edits reflecting dire wolf traits, you can totally do that. You can call them proxy dire wolves or Colossal's dire wolves. No issue here,' Shapiro noted, adding that the purpose of the work was to advance conservation biotechnology rather than debate terminology. Conservation Angles
Some media coverage focused particularly on the conservation implications of the achievement. Outlets highlighted Colossal's parallel announcement about successfully cloning critically endangered red wolves using the same technology developed for the dire wolf work.
This aspect received somewhat less attention than the dire wolf announcement itself, despite its immediate conservation relevance. As Hank Green noted in a follow-up video titled 'Everyone Ignored Colossal's Bigger Wolf News,' the red wolf cloning achievement potentially represents a more direct contribution to ongoing conservation efforts.
Conservation-focused publications emphasized how the technologies developed for de-extinction could be applied to prevent extinctions of currently threatened species. The techniques used for the dire wolf, particularly the non-invasive blood cloning method, were highlighted as potentially valuable tools for preserving genetic diversity in small populations. Indigenous Perspectives
Some media coverage included indigenous perspectives on the dire wolf de-extinction. Mark Fox, Tribal Chairman of the MHA Nation, was quoted describing the dire wolf's return as 'more than a biological revival' but rather a symbol that 'carries the echoes of our ancestors, their wisdom, and their connection to the wild.'
This angle enriched the media narrative by acknowledging cultural and spiritual dimensions of species restoration beyond the purely scientific aspects, though such perspectives generally received less prominence than the technical achievements. Visual Presentation
The visual component of media coverage played a significant role in how the story was perceived. Photographs and video footage of the white-furred wolf pups created powerful imagery that made the abstract concept of de-extinction tangible for audiences.
Media outlets frequently juxtaposed these images with artistic renderings of prehistoric dire wolves or with still images from Game of Thrones featuring the fictional dire wolves, visually connecting the scientific achievement to both paleontological understanding and pop culture familiarity. Celebrity Engagement
The involvement of celebrities and well-known figures added another dimension to media coverage. George R.R. Martin's role as a Colossal investor and cultural advisor created natural hooks for entertainment publications covering the story.
Other notable Colossal advisors mentioned in coverage included actors Seth Green and Joe Manganiello, and football star Tom Brady, who was quoted saying: 'The dire wolf will not only break into the pop culture zeitgeist, it will also raise awareness of what is possible in science which will inspire kids of all ages.'
This celebrity component helped broaden the story's reach beyond science-focused audiences to entertainment and general interest media, increasing public awareness of both the dire wolf achievement and de-extinction technology more broadly. Ethical and Technical Discussions
More specialized coverage delved into the ethical and technical aspects of de-extinction. These pieces often referenced the IUCN Species Survival Commission's guiding principles on de-extinction, examining how Colossal's approach aligned with established conservation frameworks.
Technical discussions highlighted the achievement of implementing 20 precise genetic edits in a living vertebrate – a new record that demonstrates significant advances in multiplex genome editing capabilities. These discussions emphasized how Colossal carefully selected which dire wolf genes to implement, prioritizing animal welfare by avoiding genetic variants that might cause health problems. Bridging Science and Culture
The most nuanced media coverage recognized that the dire wolf de-extinction represents both a scientific milestone and a cultural moment. By resurrecting an animal that bridges paleontological history and popular imagination, Colossal created a story that resonates on multiple levels.
This multidimensional quality of the story likely contributed to its broad media appeal, allowing different publications to emphasize the aspects most relevant to their audiences while still conveying the fundamental scientific achievement.
The diversity of media perspectives on the dire wolf de-extinction reflects the multifaceted nature of the achievement itself – at once a technical breakthrough, a conservation innovation, a cultural touchpoint, and a philosophical milestone that challenges conventional understandings of extinction as a permanent condition.
THE LIBRARIANS: THE NEXT CHAPTER Series Premiere Recap: (S01E01) And the Deadly Drekavac
RELATED 5 Great Books About Libraries and Librarians
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Calcium Deposition Can Increase Osteoarthritis Risk
Calcium Deposition Can Increase Osteoarthritis Risk

Medscape

time2 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Calcium Deposition Can Increase Osteoarthritis Risk

Calcium crystal deposition may be a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis (OA), according to a new study. In an analysis including more than 6400 middle-aged to older adults, individuals with knee chondrocalcinosis were 75% more likely to develop knee OA than those without the condition at baseline. Because knee chondrocalcinosis and OA are often observed together, it is commonly considered a feature of the OA disease process, said Jean W. Liew, MD, an assistant professor of rheumatology at Boston University, Boston, and coauthor of the study. 'This study suggests that calcium crystal deposition is a cause of knee OA rather than just a consequence,' she told Medscape Medical News . The analysis included data from two independent cohorts: the Rotterdam Study (RS) and the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST). RS enrolled individuals aged 55 years or older residing in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. MOST, which recruited participants from Birmingham, Alabama, and Iowa City, Iowa, enrolled adults aged 50-79 years with preexisting knee OA or at increased risk for OA due to overweight status, knee injury, or knee symptoms. Researchers examined the association between baseline knee chondrocalcinosis, measured via x-ray, and development of radiographic knee OA over time. Radiographic knee OA was defined as a Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KLG) ≥ 2 or if the individual had undergone knee replacement at follow-up. The analysis, published online on August 5, 2025, in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases , included 3737 individuals from the RS cohort and 2750 individuals from the MOST cohort. At baseline in the RS cohort, 76.1% of participants had no signs of radiographic knee OA (KLG = 0), and 4.3% had knee chondrocalcinosis. For the MOST cohort, 68.5% had no signs of radiographic knee OA, and 5.0% had knee chondrocalcinosis at baseline. The analysis found that knee chondrocalcinosis increased the risk for incident radiographic knee OA after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. The pooled odds ratio (OR) between both groups was 1.75 (95% CI, 1.25-2.27; P < .001). There were no cases of regression of chondrocalcinosis during follow-up, which suggests that chondrocalcinosis does not resolve over time, Liew and colleagues wrote. In a subgroup analysis including only individuals with KLG of 0 at baseline, the results were similar (OR = 1.77; 95% CI, 1.04-3.01; P = .035). More severe chondrocalcinosis was also associated with increased risk of developing knee OA. Commenting on the study for Medscape Medical News , Sara Tedeschi, MD, MPH, noted that these findings 'strongly suggest that [chondrocalcinosis] is a risk factor for the new development of osteoarthritis in people who don't currently have radiographic osteoarthritis.' Tedeschi is the head of crystal-induced arthritic diseases at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. 'One of the unique features of this paper,' she said, 'is that they were able to look at knees that had chondrocalcinosis at baseline but no osteoarthritis at baseline and were able to follow them forward' with years of follow-up data. Treatment Options Liew now wants to explore whether treatments for inflammation related to calcium crystal deposition could also help prevent or delay progression of OA in this subset of patients. 'It's time to look at designing studies focused on this subgroup of people (with chondrocalcinosis on imaging) and testing whether treatments that work for crystal-associated arthritis like gout or calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease would also work for knee OA,' she said. 'Hints of such benefits have appeared in previous cardiovascular randomized controlled trials of colchicine, where patients receiving the drug had a lower risk of joint replacement as a secondary outcome,' noted Tedeschi. It's 'one interesting therapy to consider' for potential future trials, as are other anti-inflammatory medications like interleukin-1 inhibitors, she added.

How tech pinpoints urban heat islands and makes cooling projects easier
How tech pinpoints urban heat islands and makes cooling projects easier

Fast Company

time33 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

How tech pinpoints urban heat islands and makes cooling projects easier

It's summer, and it's been hot, even in northern cities such as Boston. But not everyone is hit with the heat in the same way, even within the same neighborhood. Take two streets in Boston at 4:30 p.m. on a recent day, as an example. Standing in the sun on Lewis Place, the temperature was 94 degrees Fahrenheit (34.6 degrees Celsius). On Dudley Common, it was 103 F. Both streets were hot, but the temperature on one was much more dangerous for people's health and well-being. The kicker is that those two streets are only a few blocks apart. The difference epitomizes the urban heat island effect, created as pavement and buildings absorb and trap heat, making some parts of the city hotter. A closer look at the two streets shows some key differences: Dudley Common is public open space sandwiched between two thoroughfares that create a wide expanse of pavement lined with storefronts. There aren't many trees to be found. Lewis Place is a residential cul-de-sac with two-story homes accompanied by lots of trees. This comparison of two places within a few minutes' walk of each other puts the urban heat island effect under a microscope. It also shows the limits of today's strategies for managing and responding to heat and its effects on public health, which are generally attuned to neighborhood or citywide conditions. Even within the same neighborhood, some places are much hotter than others owing to their design and infrastructure. You could think of these as urban heat islets in the broader landscape of a community. Sensing urban heat islets Emerging technologies are making it easier to find urban heat islets, opening the door to new strategies for improving health in our communities. While the idea of reducing heat across an entire city or neighborhood is daunting, targeting specific blocks that need assistance the most can be faster and a much more efficient use of resources. Doing that starts with making urban heat islets visible. In Boston, I'm part of a team that has installed more than three dozen sensors across the Roxbury neighborhood to measure temperature every minute for a better picture of the community's heat risks, and we're in the process of installing 25 more. The Common SENSES project is a collaboration of community-based organizations, including the Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative and Project Right Inc.; university researchers like me who are affiliated with Northeastern University's Boston Area Research Initiative; and Boston city officials. It was created to pursue data-driven, community-led solutions for improving the local environment. Data from those sensors generate a real-time map of the conditions in the neighborhood, from urban heat islets like Dudley Common to cooler urban oases, such as Lewis Place. These technologies are becoming increasingly affordable and are being deployed in communities around the world to pinpoint heat risks, including Miami, Baltimore, Singapore, and Barcelona. There are also alternatives when long-term installations prove too expensive, such as the U.S.'s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration volunteer science campaign, which has used mobile sensors to generate onetime heat maps for more than 50 cities. Making cooler communities, block by block Although detailed knowledge of urban heat islets is becoming more available, we have barely scratched the surface of how they can be used to enhance people's health and well-being. The sources of urban heat islets are rooted in development—more buildings, more pavement, and fewer trees result in hotter spaces. Many projects using community-based sensors aspire to use the data to counteract these effects by identifying places where it would be most helpful to plant trees for shade or install cool roofs or cool pavement that reflect the heat. However, these current efforts do not fully capitalize on the precision of sensors. For example, Los Angeles's massive investment in cool pavement has focused on the city broadly rather than overheated neighborhoods. New York City's tree planting efforts in some areas failed to anticipate where trees could be successfully planted. Most other efforts compare neighborhood to neighborhood, as if every street within a neighborhood experiences the same temperature. London, for example, uses satellite data to locate heat islands, but the resolution isn't precise enough to see differences block by block. In contrast, data pinpointing the highest-risk areas enables urban planners to strategically place small pocket parks, cool roofs, and street trees to help cool the hottest spaces. Cities could incentivize or require developers to incorporate greenery into their plans to mitigate existing urban heat islets or prevent new ones. These targeted interventions are cost-effective and have the greatest potential to help the most people. But this could go further by using the data to create more sophisticated alert systems. For example, the National Weather Service's Boston office released a heat advisory for July 25, 2025, the day I measured the heat in Dudley Common and Lewis Place, but the advisory showed nearly the entirety of the state of Massachusetts at the same warning level. What if warnings were more locally precise? On certain days, some streets cross a crucial threshold—say, 90 F—whereas others do not. Sensor data capturing these hyperlocal variations could be communicated directly to residents or through local organizations. Advisories could share maps of the hottest streets or suggest cool paths through neighborhoods. There is increasing evidence of urban heat islets in many urban communities and even suburban ones. With data showing these hyperlocal risks, policymakers and project coordinators can collaborate with communities to help address areas that many community members know from experience tend to be much hotter than surrounding areas in summer. As one of my colleagues, Nicole Flynt of Project Right Inc., likes to say, 'Data + Stories = Truth.' If communities act upon both the temperature data and the stories their residents share, they can help their residents keep cool—because it's hot out there.

Pediatric Sleep Screener Boosts Diagnoses, Referrals
Pediatric Sleep Screener Boosts Diagnoses, Referrals

Medscape

time33 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Pediatric Sleep Screener Boosts Diagnoses, Referrals

Children's poor sleep is associated with obesity, academic problems, suicide attempts, and other mental health concerns, but the issue is not consistently addressed in pediatric primary care. A new well-child-visit screening tool for primary care clinicians (PCCs) appears to help boost diagnosis and referrals, according to findings from a study published in JAMA Network Open . Ariel A. Williamson, PhD, with The Ballmer Institute for Children's Behavioral Health, University of Oregon, Portland, Oregon, and colleagues tested an electronic, age-based sleep screener that evaluated infant bed sharing, snoring three nights a week, short sleep time, perceived sleep problems, and adolescent daytime sleepiness. The researchers conducted a retrospective, observational case-control study in the Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania primary care network of 31 practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey; 27 in suburban/rural settings and four in metropolitan settings. During implementation, 204,872 patients completed the screening, with adoption in 89.5% of all well-child visits. The screening indicated that 9.7% of patients had frequent snoring, 12.2% had sleep problems, and 34.4% had insufficient sleep. Bed sharing was reported for 6.5% of infants and 14.7% of adolescents reported daytime sleepiness. The identification of sleep problems was followed by provision of family education resources. Sleep Disorder Diagnosis 64% More Likely With Screener Compared with the pre-implementation period, at well-child visits with a completed sleep screener, PCCs were significantly more likely to make a sleep disorder diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.56-1.73), order a polysomnogram (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 2.32-3.20), and refer to sleep clinics (OR, 6.48; 95% CI, 5.03-8.34) or otolaryngology (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 3.95-5.02). Rupali Drewek, MD, a pediatric pulmonologist and co-medical director of the Sleep Medicine Program at Phoenix Children's in Phoenix, who was not involved with the study, told Medscape Medical News the screener is promising and its proactive approach — even in children with no obvious symptoms — allows for earlier intervention and improved quality of life. 'Sleep problems affect up to half of children at some point,' she said, 'yet they are rarely addressed unless parents bring them up. Implementing a standardized screening tool during routine pediatric visits ensures systematic identification of issues that might otherwise go unnoticed. Taking action early can lead to better health, better school performance, and less stress for families and the healthcare system.' Adding a new screening tool should fit easily into a regular checkup without slowing workflow substantially, she said. 'It offers a scalable, low‑cost solution to reach millions of children.' Educating the medical team will be important to successful implementation, she said. 'Everyone on the care team needs to know how to read the results and what to do next if a child's answers show there might be a sleep problem.' Lessening Healthcare Inequities In an accompanying editorial, Sarah M. Honaker, PhD, with the Department of Pediatrics at Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, and Stephen M. Downs, MD, MS, with the Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University in Winston Salem, North Carolina, said the screener, 'offers a refreshing departure from this pattern of asking PCCs to know more and do more. [T]his is an opportune time to study the implementation of systems that will support PCCs in providing evidence-based care.' The editorialists wrote that the broad screening at well-child visits could help lessen healthcare inequities. They noted that children from minoritized backgrounds with a lower socioeconomic status are more likely, for instance, to have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and are less likely to receive timely, evidence-based care. 'For example, Black children are two to four times more likely to have OSA and less likely to receive a [polysomnogram] referral,' they wrote. One of the main unanswered questions, Honaker and Downs wrote, is how much the educational components help once the problems have been identified and whether guidance about sleep duration results in actual improvements in sleep duration. A key strength of the work is replicability in other health systems, with individual adaptations, the editorialists noted. '[T]he system designed by Williamson and colleagues offers an excellent starting point for other healthcare systems seeking to support PCCs in prevention, identification, and management of pediatric sleep disruption,' they wrote. Williamson reported receiving honoraria from the National Sleep Foundation, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and Wesleyan University and an honorarium and travel support from The Pennsylvania State University, outside the submitted work. This study was supported by the Possibilities Project at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Honaker reported receiving consulting fees from Covington LLC; grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; equity ownership of For Dreamers LLC; and grants from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation outside the submitted work. Downs reported that he is the co-creator of the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) software and cofounder of Digital Health Solutions LLC, which licenses CHICA. Drewek reported no relevant financial relationships.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store