logo
A Kerala bellwether is voting. Why CM Pinarayi Vijayan has staked all in Nilambur

A Kerala bellwether is voting. Why CM Pinarayi Vijayan has staked all in Nilambur

The Print4 hours ago

In the by-poll, Shoukath faces a formidable challenge from the Left Democratic Front (LDF)'s M Swaraj. The ruling Left Front has unleashed a no-holds barred campaign spearheaded by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, driving home the significance of the by-election to their fortunes.
In Nilambur, none of the people seem to refer to Shoukath by his name, or even the famous Aryadan surname: It's always Bapputty, his nickname from childhood. For sure Shoukath might pass off as a 40-year-old even today, but he has turned 61 this year, breaking out after waiting forever in the wings, behind his father and Congress stalwart Aryadan Muhammed.
Bapputty…Bapputty…, an old man with a dishevelled look calls out to Aryadan Shoukath—the United Democratic Front candidate in the much-hyped Nilambur by-election—as his campaign vehicle makes his way through Vazhikkadavu. Shoukath disembarks and gives the man a hug, whispers something in his ear, and moves on. With assembly elections just a few months away, the 19 June by-poll has truly become a bellwether.
Anvar's failed gambit
The mercurial PV Anvar adds colour to the contest. Afterall, his resignation as the Left-backed independent triggered the election in the first place. When Anvar resigned earlier this year, he had pledged his support for the UDF – only to fall out when the Congress nominated his arch-nemesis, Aryadan Shoukath, as its candidate. Both Shoukath and Anvar are close relatives, as Shoukath's mother, PV Mariyumma, comes from Anvar's 'Puthen Veetil' family at Edavanna.
After his resignation, Anvar initially recommended Malappuram District Congress Committee (DCC) president VS Joy, a Christian face, as a UDF candidate. Anvar was casting two birds with one stone—aside from his hatred for Shoukath, he wanted to ensure that Joy wouldn't become a hindrance for him if he decided to contest from the neighbouring Thiruvambady in 2026. The Congress saw red when Anvar went on a tirade against Shoukath in his typical manner, which resulted in the UDF closing its door on him for the time being.
While Anvar is back in the fray, the original cause behind his resignation—the slew of allegations he had made against Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan—is not on top of his poll agenda anymore. Anvar's goal is limited to playing spoiler and ensuring the defeat of Shoukath, thus proving his utility to the UDF in the run-up to the 2026 assembly election.
A random visitor to the Nilambur constituency might walk away with the impression that Anvar is the frontrunner. The moneybags politician has put up several hoardings, despite being decimated in terms of feet on the ground. Nilambur is a rare instance of a constituency where the Congress has more cadres on the ground than the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M). Along with ally Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) and its well-oiled party machinery, the UDF has more than matched the Left campaign blitzkrieg.
Also read: Kerala has an education crisis. Student migration has doubled since 2020
The Aryadan Muhammed factor
Aryadan Muhammed, who contested eleven elections between 1965 and 2016, is still very much a factor in this constituency, tucked away in the foothills of the Western Ghats. Nilambur is the only constituency in the Muslim-majority Malappuram district where the community doesn't constitute an absolute majority.
Aryadan Muhammed, mononymously called Aryadan, was a most unique politician. He took on the Islamists and Muslim orthodoxy from within the UDF, playing a balancing role to the IUML brand of identity politics. He had utility not just for the Congress, but even beyond it. Aryadan didn't hesitate to take on the IUML when it came to larger issues involving the Muslim community. And he was even more vehement in his criticism of the communal elements within the Muslim fold, such as preacher Abdul Nasar Madany, the Popular Front of India, and the Jamaat-e-Islami.
The secular image that Aryadan bore ensured that he kept winning from Nilambur, despite the IUML cadres not always being on the same page. Aryadan's aversion to the IUML (and the Communists) is rooted in his childhood experiences.
Aryadan's eldest brother, Alawi Haji, was a leader within the Muhammad Ali Jinnah-led All-India Muslim League (AIML) at a time when Malappuram was witnessing demands for a 'Moplahstan' (along the lines of Pakistan).
Their father was an unlettered timber merchant, and young Aryadan came to be enchanted with the Indian National Congress. In an interview with me in 2021, Aryadan told me how his antipathy to the Communists began: 'On August 15 1947, as a bunch of us were marching with the Indian flag, another procession with a smattering of black and red flags came from the opposite direction. It was led by Communist leaders TK Madhavan and Kunjunni. They refused to acknowledge India's Independence'.
Also read: Kerala Congress is now left of Left. And confused
Shoukath's long apprenticeship
Aryadan Shoukath is very much in the mould of his father. A late bloomer of sorts, Shoukath was initially into script-writing and grassroots politics. His later stints as the president of the Nilambur Panchayat and chairman of the Nilambur municipality won him plaudits from the Left government. He also won awards and accolades for his socially-conscious films. The theme of his movies – such as Paadam Onnu: Oru Vilapam (2003), and Daivanamathil (2005) – exposing the Jamaat-e-Islami and casting the orthodoxy in poor light, brought him the ire of fundamentalist elements.
Shoukath's long wait for a Congress ticket to the assembly seemed to end in 2016, when the senior Aryadan bowed out of electoral politics. All those waiting to strike back at Aryadan, however, got their chance to accomplish that—by defeating his son on the plank of anti-dynastic politics. Shoukath's election loss to Anvar gradually brought a subtle change of approach to Shoukath's politics, with his attack on fundamentalists becoming less frequent.
Shoukath was overlooked for the Nilambur ticket in 2021, and Oommen Chandy's death emboldened his detractors further. With VS Joy shifting his loyalties to the KC Venugopal camp and forming an axis with AP Anil Kumar, Shoukath began to get sidelined in Malappuram.
Also read: Pinarayi Vijayan's double-speak on women's security needs to be called out
Shoukath's temptations
Nevertheless, Shoukath and his faction kept themselves busy by organising parallel programmes, and eventually brought themselves on a collision course with the party last year. Shoukath, perhaps, was warming up to the CPI-M. According to some sections of Kerala media, he was exploring his options beyond the Congress, with the Marxists ever willing to appropriate him. Earlier this year, while Shoukath was recuperating from a leg injury, I visited him at his home, located right in the middle of Nilambur town.
He stridently ruled out the possibility of contesting as a Left-backed independent if the Congress went ahead with Joy—even if the Marxist leaders in Malappuram thought otherwise. A restive Shoukath had already 60 at the time, and knew at the back of his head that the by-election was his last bus to becoming the people's representative of Nilambur. It was evident that Shoukath had gone softer on the Marxists, unlike his father, who remained a die-hard anti-Marxist until his death in 2022.
Matters came to a head in April as the by-poll approached, with VS Joy's name gaining an upper hand over Shoukath's. Congress had nearly fixed Joy as part of a strategy to address the Syro-Malabar Church's displeasure with it over the Munambam issue. Journalists in Nilambur told me that the CPI-M sent feelers to Shoukath at this stage, with the party allegedly deputing its former Thrippunithura legislator and Nilambur-native M Swaraj to handle it.
However, with the appointment of Sunny Joseph as state chief, replacing K Sudhakaran, Shoukath pipped Joy to the Congress ticket. And, in an ironic twist, Swaraj was nominated by the CPI-M to take him on in Nilambur.
Also read: CPI-M is damaging Kerala with its petty politics. God's own country to 'mini-Pakistan'
The importance of being M Swaraj
Unlike Aryadan Shoukath, who has lived all his life in Nilambur, M Swaraj has spent most of his life outside it. Swaraj's elevation as state secretary of the Students Federation of India (SFI) in 2005 coincided with Pinarayi Vijayan's capture of the state organisation, in the wake of the Malappuram state conference. Swaraj never hid his admiration for Vijayan, perhaps even modelling himself on the Kannur strongman. He was fielded from Thrippunithura in 2016, against minister K Babu, who was then facing allegations in the bar bribery scandal.
Swaraj emerged a giant-killer in the election, even if a ministry remained out of bounds. His arrogant ways didn't go down too well with the people of Kochi, though, and K Babu was able to exact his revenge in 2021. That defeat left Swaraj shaken, and for some strange reason, he seemed to hold the media in Kerala responsible for his loss. Until the swift rise of Vijayan's son-in-law Mohammed Riyas, many in the Left ecosystem had marked Swaraj out as a potential future CM.
After that, as Swaraj's well-wishers might argue, he has been picked on unfairly. This is especially evident from the remarks targeting him in the CPI-M state conference in Kollam earlier this year. This was seen as a political move designed to fasttrack Riyas into the CPI-M Central Committee, although it didn't eventually materialise for other reasons. This is a far cry from Swaraj's heady days, when he called for VS Achuthanandan's 'capital punishment' – expulsion in Marxist lingo – at the 2012 CPI-M state conference held in Thiruvananthapuram.
Despite the enthusiasm around his candidature, there are whispers in the Left ecosystem about Swaraj's uncertain future in case he loses this election. In normal course, the CPI-M simply doesn't possess enough political votes in Nilambur constituency to ensure its win. However, this is anything but a normal election, with many variables, including PV Anvar.
Also read: Did media & Left stoke Islamophobia in MEC 7 fitness controversy? Facts say otherwise
Anvar's chances
PV Anvar is essentially aiming to emerge as a spoiler for Aryadan Shoukath, thereby proving his worth to the UDF, where he still hopes to find a perch in the run-up to the 2026 assembly election.
Anvar initially claimed at a press conference that he had 25,000 votes in the constituency, but that is a tall order. Realistically, Anvar is looking to cross 15,000 votes. The Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI)'s Sadik Naduthodi contesting as an independent—and Anvar getting allotted the 'scissor' symbol which was assigned earlier to the SDPI in Nilambur—might suggest a covert understanding to transfer votes.
Then, there is Jamaat-e-Islami. From the day of Anvar's public rebellion against the Left, the Jamaat and its media outfits such as MediaOne have been his biggest cheerleaders. There is a reason for that, though. Many of the allegations that Anvar raised against the Left were Jamaat's talking points over the years. 'Out of Focus', a show on MediaOne, remains steadfast in its support for Anvar.
Therefore, even if the Welfare Party of India—the Jamaat's political wing—might publicly extend its support to the UDF, it is very likely that its cadres would vote en masse for Anvar. Even then, polling figures over the years suggest that both the SDPI and Jamaat cannot fetch Anvar more than 7,500 votes in Nilambur.
Also read: Kerala Left is becoming indistinguishable from Right—turncoats, ideological erosion, hypocrisy
BJP's Christian outreach
One reason for the Left fielding M Swaraj over independent faces was ensuring that its political votes remained intact and did not shift to Anvar.
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had initially mulled staying out of the contest, given that it has a really poor record in the constituency. However, it later fielded a defector from the Kerala Congress (Joseph), Mohan George. George, an advocate by profession, took membership of the BJP the day after he was named candidate. He is also a former office bearer of the Syrian Marthoma Church in the constituency, where the Marthomites number around 6,000.
Essentially, Mohan George's candidature is an extension of the BJP's experiment of chipping away at the Christian vote bank of Congress. However, the Christians in Nilambur, who number around 40,000 as of 2011, are more political than the ones in central Kerala. The move comes with its own risk — the BJP faces the prospect of some of its Hindu votes going to the CPI-M, given Swaraj's Nair credentials. In fact, the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha's support for the Left is being seen in this light.
If the BJP ends up a poor fourth behind Anvar, it will turn out to be a massive embarrassment for Rajeev Chandrasekhar in his first test as state president.
Also read: There's no questioning 'Captain' Vijayan in Kerala—not even his oversized role in LDF's defeat
IUML's predicament
That the IUML has no representation in the Nilambur municipality is a strange phenomenon. The legacy of the cold war between the IUML and Aryadan Muhammed is primarily responsible for this. Unlike elsewhere in Malappuram, where the Congress plays second fiddle to the IUML, Nilambur is very much an exception. The senior Aryadan always found ways to win – and win handsomely despite the IUML's reluctance to support him. Naturally, there were apprehensions about the two parties matching their wavelengths at the beginning of the campaign.
Despite initial hiccups – such as the IUML's Panakkad Thangals being conspicuous in their absence at the UDF convention – the cadres seemed to get their act together. Shoukath enjoys massive goodwill in the constituency, and knows a lot of people by name, underscoring his people connect. Nilambur is part of the Wayanad Lok Sabha constituency, and Shoukath's roadshow with Priyanka Gandhi Vadra turned out to be a hit.
Meanwhile, Pinarayi Vijayan remains the star campaigner of the Left despite turning 80, and took time out to address rallies in every panchayat in the constituency. With massive anti-incumbency at play, a win against all odds in Nilambur will be the harbinger of a third term and deflate the Congress. However, the Left is aware that victory won't come easy this time.
A parallel can be drawn between Swaraj's campaign and a rising P Sreeramakrishnan's in 2006, where the Marxist party seemed to pull out all stops—only to lose by over 18,000 votes.
This election is much closer, with the delimitation of constituencies in 2009 also boosting the Left's prospects. Add to that the damage that Anvar might inflict on the UDF and the BJP votes the Left might attract. These factors make the election a really unpredictable affair.
Anand Kochukudy is a Kerala-based journalist and columnist. He tweets @AnandKochukudy. Views are personal.
(Edited by Zoya Bhatti)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IndiGo flight faces technical glitch at Raipur airport, passengers including former CM, mayor stuck for 40 minutes
IndiGo flight faces technical glitch at Raipur airport, passengers including former CM, mayor stuck for 40 minutes

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

IndiGo flight faces technical glitch at Raipur airport, passengers including former CM, mayor stuck for 40 minutes

Representative image RAIPUR: An IndiGo flight from Delhi to Raipur encountered a technical fault on Wednesday, causing panic and distress among passengers as they were unable to exit the aircraft for nearly 40 minutes after landing at Swami Vivekananda Airport. The door of the flight, which had safely touched down at Raipur Airport, couldn't be opened due to technical malfunction, leaving the passengers trapped inside. The flight landed on time at 2.25 pm but couldn't disembark passengers due to malfunction. Among the passengers were prominent figures such as former Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel, Congress MLA Chaturi Nand, and Raipur Mayor Meenal Chaubey, who were all aboard the flight. The delayed door opening led to a moment of panic for some passengers, who grew anxious as the minutes passed, Meenal Choubey told TOI. She said that the cabin crew informed the passengers that the monitor had not received the command to open the door connected to the aero-bridge. Choubey said that though they could see the ground crew and everything outside normal, the passengers obviously panicked waiting for so long inside the aircraft due to the locked door. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like One of the Most Successful Investors of All Time, Warren Buffett, Recommends: 5 Books for Turning... Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Click Here Undo TOI tried contacting Raipur airport director and aviation secretary but they didn't attend calls and were not available for comments. TOI spoke to the IndiGo spokesperson in New Delhi who said, 'IndiGo flight 6E 6313, operating from Delhi to Raipur, experienced a delay in opening the aircraft door upon arrival on June 18, 2025, due to a minor technical issue. Following standard safety procedures, the door was opened after necessary checks were completed.' 'We sincerely regret any inconvenience caused and appreciate our customers' patience and understanding. At IndiGo, passenger safety and adherence to protocol remain our highest priorities,' the spokesperson said. Congress MLA Chaturi Nand, who was traveling with her husband, shared her experience of the incident. She explained that after the flight landed in Raipur, the door failed to open due to technical difficulties. Her husband, along with other passengers, became quite anxious during the delay. She also highlighted the heightened anxiety, stating that many passengers were on edge following the recent Air India incident in Ahmedabad. 'People were a little scared, especially after the Ahmedabad accident, which added to the tension inside the flight,' said the MLA.

Congress in Telangana gave award to Razkar—a propaganda film that demonises Muslims
Congress in Telangana gave award to Razkar—a propaganda film that demonises Muslims

The Print

timean hour ago

  • The Print

Congress in Telangana gave award to Razkar—a propaganda film that demonises Muslims

What did shock me and many others, however, was the Congress-run Telangana government giving Razakar an award at the inaugural Gaddar Telangana Film Awards, under the 'Environment/Heritage/History' category. So when Razakar bagged the Best Cinematography and Best Debut Director awards at the 15th Dada Saheb Phalke Film Festival 2025—again, not surprising. It hardly surprised anyone that the movie Razakar: The Silent Genocide of Hyderabad was produced by Telangana BJP leader Gudur Narayan Reddy. After all, the propaganda film was intended to push the narrative that Muslims in the erstwhile state of Hyderabad attacked Hindus before its annexation into the Indian Union on 17 September 1948. Balladeer Gaddar, a former Naxalite turned activist who fought for Telangana statehood, is a name long associated with the Left in the state. He was linked with everyone who was ideologically opposed to Hindutva and right-wing politics. So the Congress has left many puzzled by awarding a film produced by a BJP leader. What's even more striking is that AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi—who called Chief Minister Revanth Reddy an 'RSS Anna'—has remained silent on the matter. So why is this movie winning an award a problem? For starters, its portrayal of Muslims is a terrible caricature of the community in the state, and it distorts the facts of what happened in the days leading up to Hyderabad's annexation. I tried to watch the movie—but I had to walk out halfway because I simply couldn't take any more. The false portrayals of everything were just too disturbing. Also read: Revanth Reddy is battling a series of PR disasters in Telangana. Gachibowli to HYDRAA What happened in 1948 One of the most ignored aspects of Hyderabad's history growing up was information about the annexation of the erstwhile Hyderabad state. Formed in 1724 as a Mughal vassal state by the Asaf Jahi Nizams, the last Nizam of Hyderabad was Mir Osman Ali Khan, who ruled from 1911 to 1948. The state was one of the largest in India—around 82,698 square miles—including present-day Telangana, five districts of Maharashtra, and three of Karnataka (including Bidar and Gulbarga). It was relatively peaceful, thanks to a treaty with the British East India Company in 1798 and later with the British Crown, under which the Nizams enjoyed semi-autonomous rule. But as independence approached, things changed. Osman Ali Khan—like a few other princely rulers—wanted to stay independent. That became a problem in 1947. But what is often missed is that, even before that, by 1946, peasants in Telangana had started mobilising under the banner of the Communist Party of India (CPI) against extreme feudal oppression. Also read: Kharge on same page as BJP on Telangana's 'Liberation Day' row? 'Hyderabad got azaadi on 17 Sept 1948' The Telangana Rebellion 'Vetti Chakiri'—or bonded labour—was the norm. Thousands of peasants and lower-caste people were forced to slave for Jagirdars (land revenue collectors) who controlled around 60 per cent of the state. Many of these landlords were from dominant Hindu castes. Muslims made up about 10 per cent of the state's population. The Telangana Armed Struggle, a peasant uprising, began in 1946, a year before independence, and lasted until 21 October 1951, when the CPI officially called it off. Hyderabad was annexed on 17 September 1948, when the Indian government under Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru sent in the Army after negotiations failed. The military action was also partly driven by fears that the CPI might take control of Telangana (a fact documented in historical records). One major trigger was the rise of the Razakars in 1947—a paramilitary group led by Qasim Razvi, then head of the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM). A fanatic, Razvi used the group to terrorise opponents of the Nizam's rule and to attack Hindus. Also read: Modi govt's Hyderabad 'Liberation' Day reopens old wounds. KCR's 'Integration' wiser approach Razakar's propaganda What the Razakars did was horrendous, and many families in Telangana still remember being attacked. That is a fact. But it is also a fact that many Muslims, both inside and outside the government, opposed the Razakars and supported a peaceful transition. Some, like the noted Urdu poet and revolutionary CPI leader Makhdoom Mohiuddin, actively fought the feudal system as part of the Communist-led resistance. The movie Razakar, however, entirely omits this part—especially the CPI-led Telangana armed struggle. Its entire focus is on the Razakar group, which it exploits to paint Muslims in a negative light. This one-sided narrative is partly the result of earlier governments suppressing historical truths, creating a vacuum that others now fill with propaganda. And that's the point. Since Telangana's formation, the BJP has been demanding official recognition of 'Hyderabad Liberation Day'—a phrase meant to imply the state was 'liberated' from Muslim rule. But Osman Ali Khan, after 1948, continued to serve as Rajpramukh (Governor) for a few years, and lived peacefully until his death in 1967. The film essentially claims that Hindus were oppressed and killed by Muslims during the annexation. But it entirely leaves out the brutal, caste-based feudal slavery that Dalits and other oppressed classes suffered at the hands of dominant-caste Jagirdars. Even some Congress leaders in the state were caught off guard by the award. 'They've been blaming our party—blaming Nehru—for the delay in Hyderabad's annexation. So by giving this movie an award, what message are we sending out?' a senior Muslim Congress leader told me. No one else seems to have an answer either. But the BJP seems to be quietly smiling in a corner. Unfortunately, instead of confronting history with facts and nuance, we now have a film that distorts the truth and sows seeds of communalism in Telangana. Yunus Lasania is a Hyderabad-based journalist whose work primarily focuses on politics, history and culture. He tweets @YunusLasania. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)

Former MLA Kakasaheb Patil dead
Former MLA Kakasaheb Patil dead

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

Former MLA Kakasaheb Patil dead

The former Congress MLA Kakasaheb Patil died in Belagavi on Wednesday. He passed away after a brief illness. He was 70. He was admitted to the KLE Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital. His wife died a few years ago. He is survived by a son and a daughter and some family members. He was a Congress MLA from Nippani in 1999, 2004 and 2008. But he lost the next Assembly elections. The Maratha leader was considered a follower of the former Union Minister Sharad Pawar. Congress leaders in the district depended on his leadership to get Maratha votes for the party. He was deeply involved in local cooperative societies and sugar factories. He completed BA from Dev Chand College in 1975. He continued to live in Walki, his native village near Nippani, on the Karnataka-Maharashtra border even after retirement from politics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store