Germany summons China's ambassador after a military plane is lasered over Red Sea
The maritime surveillance aircraft was part of the EU mission Aspides, which is intended to better defend civilian ships against attacks by Houthi rebels based in Yemen. It was lasered earlier this month 'without any reason or prior contact' by a Chinese warship that had been encountered several times in the area, the German Defense Ministry said.
'By using the laser, the warship accepted the risk of endangering people and material,' a spokesperson for the Defense Ministry said, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with government policy.
The ministry said that as a precaution, the aircraft's mission was aborted. It landed safely at the base in Djibouti and the crew is in good health, it said. The aircraft has since resumed its operations with the EU mission in the Red Sea.
The German Foreign Office said in a post on X that 'endangering German personnel and disrupting the operation is entirely unacceptable.'
China's spokespeople did not comment immediately Tuesday.
The EU mission only defends civilian vessels and does not take part in any military strikes. The southern part of the Red Sea is deemed a high-risk zone.
On Tuesday, Yemen's Houthi rebels continued an hourslong attack targeting a Liberian-flagged cargo ship in the Red Sea, authorities said, after the group claimed to have sunk another vessel in an assault that threatens to renew combat across the vital waterway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Houthis now becoming more emboldened after sinking two ships in Red Sea
The fact that so many countries in the region did not assist the ships quickly in order to deter the Houthis shows that it is not a priority. The Iranian-backed Houthis are emboldened after sinking two ships last week in the Red Sea. They also killed several members of one ship's crew. Now the question is, why did the Houthis suddenly target these ships, and will they attack more? The Houthis claim they target ships linked to Israel or those that have docked in Israel's ports or will do so in the future. However, the terrorist organization has also targeted more than 70 ships since they began their attacks in November 2023, many of which have nothing to do with Israel. The first ship targeted, the Magic Sea, had 22 crew members who were all rescued. The ship was attacked by a swarm of small, fast craft, and then by kamikaze drones. Later, another ship called the Eternity C was attacked. Both ships sank. The Eternity C saw several of its crew killed and missing. It had 25 people on board. It appears that 10 crew members were rescued by other ships, but others were kidnapped by the Houthis. These incidents happened around 51 nautical miles off the coast of Yemen in the middle of the Red Sea in international waters. The Houthis clearly planned these long-range attacks; it would have taken the Houthi small attack craft – skiffs with engines on them – hours to reach these ships depending on how fast they were traveling, and it would have taken them time to zero in their drones to attack as well. The Houthis also boarded the ships and then blew them up in what was a complex mission. It's not easy to stop a large cargo ship that is making speed. It is also not easy to disable it and then board it. Yet this took place over a period of two or three days, while seemingly no navy units tried to help. The Wall Street Journal described the attack: 'Two ships desperately tried to fight off Houthi attacks. Help never arrived.' There is no more poignant a conclusion to this disaster than the WSJ headline. Why did no one assist these ships? An international coalition called Prosperity Guardian had been assembled in November 2023 to prevent these attacks and help ships in distress. The US also attacked the Houthis in mid-March to try to stop their attacks. Where was the US Navy that has assets within the Central Command's area of operations? What about other navies, such as the British, French, or Chinese? There are naval assets in this area. Could they have reached the site in time? Usually, US Carrier Strike Groups have had several destroyers, cruiser escorts, and other ships with them. Currently the USS Carl Vinson and USS Nimitz are supposed to be somewhere in the Arabian Sea or Indian Ocean. It's not entirely clear where they are; however, US Central Command published footage of the Vinson launching F-18s on July 11. On July 12 the US Navy also published a photo of an F/A-18 launching from the USS Nimitz. The carriers were also photographed together by CENTCOM on July 8. The US naval ships can usually make in excess of 30 knots, meaning in a day they could sail more than 600 nautical miles. They also have aircraft that can fly around 1,500 mph. This would give the US and other navies that ability to assist the ships in the Red Sea. So why has this not been a priority? There are also foreign naval and air force assets in Djibouti usually. This is relatively close to the area where the ships were sunk. Overall, the fact that so many countries in the region did not assist the ships quickly in order to deter the Houthis shows that it is not a priority. The Houthis seem to know this, and they feel they have impunity. The question now is whether they will feel emboldened to do more attacks.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Merz's Domestic Stumbles Show His Power Base Is Under Strain
Chancellor Friedrich Merz spent the first weeks of his tenure bolstering Germany's standing on the global stage, but domestically he's stumbled, casting doubt on his ability to implement economic reforms. The latest blow was the failure to elect three new judges to Germany's top court. Votes in the lower house of parliament — which should have been procedural since the ruling parties agreed on the justices in advance — were pulled at the last minute on Friday after it became clear that Merz's conservatives weren't going to fully support a candidate proposed by the co-ruling Social Democrats.
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
China Blasts US Ally Over Spying in Air Defense Zone
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China has accused Japan—a United States treaty ally in Northeast Asia—of sending spy planes to its so-called Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) over the contested East China Sea. The remarks from Beijing come after Tokyo said YS-11EB intelligence-gathering aircraft had experienced close aerial encounters with Chinese planes while conducting surveillance over the region last week. Newsweek has reached out to the Japanese Defense Ministry for further comment via email. Why It Matters Japan forms part of a defensive island line known as the First Island Chain under a U.S. containment strategy that aims to restrict China's military activities in its immediate waters, including the East China Sea, which lies off China's eastern coast and separates it from Japan. The East Asian neighbors have two ongoing disputes in the East China Sea: one over the sovereignty of the uninhabited Senkaku island group—administered by Tokyo but claimed by Beijing as the Diaoyu Islands—and the other over energy exploration in the region. In 2013, China established an ADIZ—for the purpose of identification and early warning—over international waters in the East China Sea, outside its territorial airspace. The zone overlaps with those of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, a Newsweek map shows. What To Know In a statement released on Sunday, Jiang Bin, spokesperson for China's Defense Ministry, claimed that Japan Air Self-Defense Force reconnaissance aircraft had entered China's ADIZ in the East China Sea multiple times for what the official called "close-in reconnaissance." Regarding the close aerial encounters between Japanese and Chinese aircraft that occurred on Wednesday and Thursday, the Chinese spokesperson defended the actions taken by his country's military. "Chinese aircraft responded by verifying, identifying, following, and monitoring [the Japanese aircraft]," the spokesperson said, adding that those actions were "fully justified, reasonable, professional, and standardized." The Chinese aircraft involved on both occasions were identified by Japan as JH-7 fighter-bombers. The Chinese official said the Japanese military's close-in reconnaissance and interference were the "root causes" of air and sea safety risks affecting the two militaries. China's Defense Ministry has not yet released any footage or images of the close aerial encounters. It remains unclear how close the Japanese YS-11EB aircraft were to China's territorial airspace, which extends 13.8 miles from its East China Sea coastline. A Chinese JH-7 fighter-bomber flies close to a Japanese YS-11EB intelligence-gathering aircraft over the East China Sea on July 9, 2025. A Chinese JH-7 fighter-bomber flies close to a Japanese YS-11EB intelligence-gathering aircraft over the East China Sea on July 9, 2025. Japan's Defense Ministry Japan has been closely monitoring China's military activities around the First Island Chain, including the recent tracking of two Chinese aircraft carriers in the broader Western Pacific Ocean, during which Chinese fighter jets intercepted a Japanese patrol aircraft in early June. What People Are Saying Jiang Bin, spokesperson for China's Defense Ministry, said in a statement on Sunday: "We hope that the Japanese side will work with the Chinese side to create a proper atmosphere for the stable development of bilateral relations." Japan's Defense Ministry said in a statement on Thursday of the Chinese interceptions: "Such an unusual approach by Chinese military aircraft could provoke an accidental collision." What Happens Next Japan is likely to continue its spy flights over the East China Sea as disputes with China remain unresolved. Aerial encounters between the two sides are expected to occur again.
