Undergraduate Degree in Entrepreneurship and Innovation (BBA)
The curriculum integrates entrepreneurial thinking as its core focus, combining academic learning with practical exposure to venture creation, innovation frameworks, and industry mentorship. Students engage in hands-on projects, startup ecosystem immersion, and skill-building initiatives aligned with national innovation and enterprise development goals.
This program aims to equip students with the knowledge, tools, and experience to navigate and lead within emerging business landscapes while fostering an entrepreneurial mindset from the undergraduate level.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
32 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Engineers India slips after Q1 PAT slides 29% YoY to Rs 65 cr
Engineers India declined 1.02% to Rs 199 after the company reported a 28.6% fall in consolidated net profit to Rs 65.40 crore on a 39.5% increase in revenue from operations to Rs 870.36 crore in Q1 FY26 over Q1 FY25. Profit before tax came in at Rs 97.28 crore for the June 2025 quarter, marking a 22.7% year-on-year increase. Total expenses rose 38.74% to Rs 809.43 crore during the quarter compared with Rs 583.43 crore in Q1 FY25. Construction materials and equipment stood at Rs 78.15 crore (up 42.53% YoY), while employee benefits expenses stood at Rs 250.58 crore (up 3.55% YoY) during the period under review. On the segmental front, revenue from consultancy & engineering projects was Rs 421.34 crore (up 17.12% YoY), and revenue from turnkey projects was Rs 449.02 crore (up 70.03% YoY) during the period under review. Engineers India (EIL) is an engineering consultancy and technology licensing company in the fields of hydrocarbons, petrochemicals, fertilizers, metallurgy, ports & terminals, and other sectors of industry, having a DSIR-recognized R&D center. As of 31 March 2024, the Government of India held a 51.32% stake in the company.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
CU first in state to allow dual degree courses
Kozhikode: Calicut University (CU) became the first university in Kerala to allow students to pursue two degree (UG/PG) programmes at the same time. The academic council approved the decision on Wednesday and formed a six-member committee to suggest how to implement the move. The committee includes Rasheed Ahmed as academic convener, along with PP Pradyumnan, K Pradeep Kumar, P Sushanth, T Muhammed Saleem and Sabu T Thomas. The decision follows a UGC notification on June 5, 2025, which allows students to pursue two academic programmes simultaneously. Under UGC guidelines, students can take up two full-time programmes in physical mode if class timings do not clash. They can also choose one full-time physical programme along with another in distance/online mode. A third option allows students to pursue both programmes through distance or online mode, provided the institutions are approved by UGC or relevant statutory bodies. Syndicate member Rasheed Ahmed P, who proposed the initiative, said the move is intended to support students' diverse interests and talents. He said it will allow students to combine disciplines such as science, social science and humanities, helping them broaden their academic background and improve career prospects through a wider set of skills. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo "We are planning to launch the programme this academic year. Though two full-time degrees may not be available this year, full-time students would be able to enroll for distance education courses once the order is issued," he added. Meanwhile, CU would have to draw up the modalities to ensure that exam dates won't clash. The academic council also decided not to approve the admission of a student who had joined a degree course at Oriental School of Hotel Management, Vythiri, Wayanad, without the mandatory Plus Two qualification. The syndicate has been asked to take action against the institution for granting this unauthorized admission in 2014–15. The council also discussed a 2011 case in which a student of BSc Electronics course submitted a forged certificate before passing the exam. The forgery was discovered when the certificate, created for job purposes, was submitted to CU for verification. The same student later passed the exam through revaluation and applied for the original degree certificate. The council recommended that the degree should not be awarded. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Hindu
17 hours ago
- The Hindu
Explained: Higher Education Commission of India and its vision, structure, tools and roll-out
India's higher education system is poised for its most significant transformation since independence with the establishment of the Higher Education Commission of India (HECI), a unified regulatory body that will replace the fragmented oversight of University Grants Commission (UGC), All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE). Drawing lessons from successful education systems in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, China, and Nordic countries, HECI promises to address decades of quality concerns while maintaining the system's massive scale. From crisis in quantity to a revolution in quality For over three decades, India's higher education expansion focused on increasing the Gross Enrolment Ratio, leading to a proliferation of institutions that prioritized numbers over excellence. Today, the system grapples with acute faculty shortages, with many universities operating on part-time staff, outdated curricula that haven't evolved with industry needs, and poor research output that barely registers on global metrics. Education policy experts note that the creation of thousands of institutions occurred without building the necessary ecosystem for quality. The result is a system where many departments struggle to attract students, and employers increasingly question the relevance of graduates entering the workforce. The current regulatory architecture, with UGC handling general education, AICTE overseeing technical institutions, and NCTE managing teacher education, has operated in silos with overlapping mandates. This fragmentation has led to regulatory confusion, with institutions often receiving conflicting directives and quality assurance remaining largely paper-based rather than outcome-focused. HECI's foul-pillar architecture The new commission will operate through four specialized verticals, each addressing specific systemic requirements: The National Higher Education Regulatory Council (NHERC) will serve as the unified regulatory body, replacing multiple approval processes with streamlined oversight. Using technology-driven monitoring systems similar to those employed in China's education governance, NHERC will track institutional performance in real-time rather than relying on periodic paper submissions. The National Accreditation Council (NAC) will revolutionize quality assurance by focusing on student outcomes rather than input metrics. Drawing from the UK's Teaching Excellence Framework and the U.S. regional accreditation model, NAC will evaluate institutions based on graduate employment rates, research impact, and industry collaboration. The Higher Education Grants Council (HEGC) will transform funding from the current input-based model to performance-driven allocation. Similar to the UK's Research Excellence Framework, funding will be tied to measurable outcomes including research quality, student satisfaction, and societal impact. The General Education Council (GEC) will modernize curricula through the National Higher Education Qualification Framework, ensuring global compatibility while maintaining local relevance. This approach mirrors the European Qualifications Framework's success in facilitating student mobility and international recognition. Learning from global success stories The HECI's design incorporates proven strategies from education systems that have successfully balanced access with excellence: From the United States, India will adopt the principle of institutional autonomy coupled with rigorous accountability. High-performing institutions will receive graded autonomy in curriculum design and faculty recruitment, while maintaining compliance with national quality standards. The United Kingdom's experience with the Office for Students provides a template for unified regulation. The UK's shift from multiple regulatory bodies to a single oversight authority has streamlined processes while maintaining quality through transparent evaluation systems. Germany's integration of industry and academia offers a model for addressing employability concerns. The German system's emphasis on applied research and industry partnerships has created one of the world's most competitive economies, with graduates seamlessly transitioning from education to employment. China's strategic approach to higher education development provides insights for managing scale. Through initiatives like Project 985 and the Double First-Class program, China has created world-class institutions while rapidly improving overall system quality through targeted investment and performance-based funding. Nordic countries demonstrate that equity and excellence can coexist through democratic governance structures and strong public investment, ensuring quality education remains accessible to all socioeconomic groups. Implementation strategy: AI-powered regional governance The HECI will implement reforms through a four-phase approach, anchored by cutting-edge technology and decentralized governance to manage India's vast educational landscape: Phase 1: Digital Infrastructure and Regional Network Establishment The foundation of HECI's success lies in its AI-powered monitoring ecosystem. A centralized National Education Intelligence Platform (NEIP) will serve as the nerve centre, processing real-time data from over 40,000 institutions through automated feeds covering student enrolment, faculty performance, research output, and financial metrics. Technology officials involved in HECI's development emphasize that the AI-driven system will identify quality concerns before they become systemic problems, representing a shift toward proactive rather than reactive oversight. To address India's geographical complexity, HECI will establish six Regional Education Excellence Centres (REECs) covering North, South, East, West, Northeast, and Central regions. Each REEC will operate with significant autonomy while maintaining connectivity to the national platform, ensuring local responsiveness without compromising national standards. The AI-driven dashboard system will provide multi-level insights: National Dashboard: Macro-level trends, policy impact analysis, and cross-regional comparisons Regional Dashboards: State-specific performance metrics, resource allocation efficiency, and local industry alignment Institutional Dashboards: Real-time performance indicators, predictive alerts for quality concerns, and peer benchmarking Student/Parent Portals: Transparent access to institutional performance, placement records, and comparative analysis tools Machine learning algorithms will analyse patterns across institutions, identifying early warning signs of declining quality, predicting enrolment trends, and recommending resource allocation adjustments. The system will process over 500 data points per institution monthly, generating actionable insights for administrators at all levels. Phase 2: Regional Excellence Centres and AI-Enhanced Quality Assurance Each REEC will function as a semi-autonomous hub, staffed by education experts familiar with regional languages, cultural contexts, and economic patterns. This decentralized approach addresses the critical challenge of managing quality oversight across India's diverse states. Regional education administrators emphasize that centralized monitoring from Delhi cannot effectively capture the nuances of education delivery across diverse states like Kerala and Rajasthan. The regional centres will ensure that quality assurance is both rigorous and contextually appropriate. AI-powered quality assurance will revolutionize institutional evaluation. Natural language processing will analyse student feedback in multiple regional languages, while computer vision systems will assess infrastructure quality through satellite imagery and uploaded photographs. Predictive analytics will identify institutions at risk of quality decline 6-12 months in advance. Phase 3: Innovation Ecosystems and Industry Integration Regional innovation hubs will be established within each REEC, creating technology corridors that connect universities with local industries. AI systems will match research capabilities with industry needs, facilitating automatic partnership recommendations and tracking collaboration outcomes. Blockchain technology will secure credential verification, while AI-powered skill matching platforms will connect graduates with employment opportunities, providing real-time feedback on curriculum relevance. Phase 4: Autonomous Governance and Predictive Management Advanced AI systems will enable predictive resource allocation, identifying emerging skill demands through labour market analysis and recommending curriculum adjustments. Automated performance tracking will trigger graduated autonomy levels, with high-performing institutions receiving increased freedom while struggling ones receive targeted intervention support. Technology-Enabled Regional Monitoring: The NEIP Advantage The National Education Intelligence Platform represents India's most ambitious educational technology initiative, designed specifically to address the challenges of monitoring quality across a subcontinent-sized system. AI-powered early warning systems Advanced machine learning algorithms continuously analyse over 500 performance indicators per institution, generating predictive alerts for quality deterioration. The system identifies patterns such as declining faculty retention, dropping student satisfaction scores, or poor placement rates before they critically impact institutional performance. Data scientists working on the NEIP project report that AI systems can predict which institutions will face accreditation challenges 18 months before traditional evaluation methods would identify the problems. This early warning capability enables targeted interventions rather than reactive penalties. Regional centres receive customized dashboards highlighting institutions requiring immediate attention, with AI-generated intervention recommendations based on successful turnaround cases from similar institutions. Natural language processing capabilities enable the system to analyse feedback in 22 official languages, ensuring no regional voice is lost in translation. Blockchain-secured credential system To combat degree fraud and ensure authentic quality verification, HECI will implement a national blockchain-based credential system. Every certificate, from diplomas to transcripts, will be cryptographically secured and instantly verifiable by employers worldwide. This system will automatically flag institutions with suspicious credential patterns, while providing employers with real-time verification of candidate qualifications. The technology will also track graduate employment outcomes, creating a feedback loop that informs curriculum development and institutional performance assessment. Challenges and critical success factors Despite technological sophistication and constitutional protection, the HECI faces significant implementation challenges that require careful management: Digital divide and capacity building Not all institutions have the technological infrastructure to support real-time data integration. HECI will invest ₹5,000 crore in digital infrastructure development, providing tablets, internet connectivity, and training to faculty across all affiliated institutions. Regional centres will establish technology support teams providing 24/7 assistance to institutions struggling with digital integration. A phased rollout will begin with technologically advanced institutions before expanding to rural and resource-constrained colleges. Change management and cultural transformation Higher education researchers at leading policy institutes identify the fundamental challenge as transforming institutional mindset from compliance-based regulation to outcome-focused governance. This transformation requires cultural change at every level, from regulators to institutional leaders to faculty members. Each regional centre will include change management specialists working directly with institutional leadership to facilitate smooth transitions. Comprehensive training programs will help existing regulatory staff adapt to new systems and performance metrics. Resistance from entrenched interests Opposition from existing regulatory bodies and vested interests within institutions could slow implementation. HECI's strategy includes gradual integration of current UGC, AICTE, and NCTE staff into new roles, providing career advancement opportunities rather than displacement. The sheer scale of transformation—affecting over 1,000 universities and 40,000 colleges—requires unprecedented coordination. Regional centres will phase implementations state-by-state, learning from early successes and adapting strategies based on ground realities. Measuring success against global benchmarks HECI's effectiveness will be evaluated against international standards across multiple dimensions: Academic quality indicators will track improvements in international university rankings, research output and citation impact, graduate employment rates, and international student attraction. System efficiency measures will monitor completion rates, faculty-student ratios, resource utilization, and digital governance effectiveness. Innovation metrics will assess industry-academia collaboration volume, patent applications, startup creation rates, and international research partnerships. Recognizing that educational quality requires stability beyond electoral cycles, HECI's governance structure incorporates multiple layers of protection against political interference: Constitutional autonomy architecture The HECI will be established through a Constitutional amendment, similar to the Election Commission's protected status. The commission's autonomy will be legally enshrined with specific provisions preventing arbitrary dismissal of commissioners and ensuring fixed tenures that overlap electoral cycles. Constitutional law experts emphasize that education policy cannot be subject to changing government priorities, necessitating institutional firewalls that protect educational decision-making from political pressures. The commission's leadership structure will feature staggered five-year terms for commissioners, with appointments made by a collegium comprising the Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, Chief Justice of India, and representatives from the academic community. This multi-stakeholder approach ensures no single political entity can control the commission. Financial independence mechanisms To prevent budget manipulation as a tool for political control, the HECI will receive constitutionally guaranteed funding equivalent to 1.5% of GDP, automatically adjusted for inflation. This finding can be enhanced considering the finances available for education based on the priorities of the country. A separate Education Development Fund, managed by an independent board, will ensure long-term financial sustainability without dependence on annual budget allocations. Regional centres will have protected budgets allocated through transparent formula-based distribution, preventing regional favouritism or politically motivated fund diversions. AI-driven budget allocation algorithms will ensure resources reach institutions based on performance metrics rather than political considerations. Transparency and accountability frameworks Real-time public access to all HECI decisions, performance data, and resource allocation will create unprecedented transparency. Blockchain-secured decision logs will maintain permanent, tamper-proof records of all commission activities, making retrospective political interference easily detectable. An independent Parliamentary Education Committee, with representation from all parties, will provide oversight without operational interference. This committee will review HECI's performance annually but cannot override specific educational decisions or alter the commission's autonomous status. Industry response and stakeholder expectations Industry leaders have welcomed HECI's emphasis on employability and industry integration. Technology companies report having to invest heavily in training fresh graduates because their academic preparation doesn't match industry requirements. HECI's focus on outcome-based education and industry collaboration is expected to significantly improve graduate readiness for employment. International education partners are also optimistic about enhanced collaboration opportunities. Several foreign universities have expressed interest in expanding partnerships with Indian institutions under the new regulatory framework, citing improved quality assurance and transparent governance structures. Student organizations have cautiously welcomed the reforms while emphasizing the need for adequate representation in governance structures. Student leaders stress the importance of ensuring that student voices are heard throughout this comprehensive transformation process. The government plans to introduce HECI legislation in the upcoming parliamentary session, with a technology-first implementation strategy designed for India's scale and complexity: 2026-2027: Foundation phase Constitutional amendment passage and HECI establishment National Education Intelligence Platform development and testing Regional Excellence Centres infrastructure development AI dashboard pilot programs in 100 institutions across six regions 2027-2028: Regional rollout Full NEIP deployment with real-time monitoring capabilities Regional centres operational with localized quality assurance teams Blockchain credential system launch Migration of 25% of institutions from legacy regulatory systems 2028-2029: Scale and integration Complete transfer of functions from UGC, AICTE, and NCTE AI-powered quality assurance fully operational International partnership integration through digital platforms Performance-based funding mechanisms activated A transition committee comprising education experts, technology leaders, and international consultants will oversee the gradual transformation. Unlike traditional bureaucratic transfers, HECI's implementation will be data-driven, with AI systems tracking transition success and identifying bottlenecks in real-time. International partnerships with education authorities in the UK, Singapore, and Canada will provide technical assistance, particularly in AI system design and regional governance models. Estonia's e-governance expertise will inform digital infrastructure development, while Finland's education quality frameworks will guide regional adaptation strategies. Long-term vision: Global education hub The HECI represents more than administrative restructuring—it embodies India's ambition to become a global education destination. By 2030, the government aims to attract 500,000 international students and establish at least 20 Indian universities in global top-500 rankings. Government officials describe this as India's transformative moment to convert its higher education system from a domestic necessity into a global asset. The HECI will ensure that Indian degrees earn worldwide respect while serving national development objectives. The reform's success could position India as a major player in the global knowledge economy, creating high-quality jobs, driving innovation, and contributing to national competitiveness in the 21st century. As India embarks on this ambitious transformation, the world will be watching to see if the country can successfully balance the competing demands of access, quality, and relevance while managing the complexities of one of the world's largest education systems. The HECI experiment, if successful, could provide a model for other developing countries grappling with similar challenges in higher education reform. (The author is retired professor at IIT Madras)
