Delhi Court Closes POCSO Case Against Former WFI Chief Brij Bhushan Singh
Last Updated:
A Delhi court has accepted the cancellation report in the POCSO case against ex-WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh after the complainant withdrew her statement.
Delhi's Patiala House Court on Monday accepted the cancellation report filed by Delhi Police in a Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) case against ex-WFI chief and former MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh.
Singh also appeared before the court as his cancellation report was accepted by Special Judge (POCSO) Gomati Manocha, while the complainant was also called to record and verify statements in the case.
On May 17, the court had summoned the complainant wrestler, who had accused Brij Bhushan of sexual harassment when she was a minor.
The Delhi Police had previously filed a cancellation report in June 2023 after the victim withdrew her statement.
During court proceedings on August 1, 2023, the complainant and her father expressed satisfaction with the police investigation, and had not opposed the closure report in the case.
Later, Public Prosecutor Atul Srivastava informed the media that both the complainant and her father had appeared before the court, confirming their satisfaction with the police investigation and not challenging the cancellation report filed by the Delhi Police.
The cancellation report was initially filed by the Delhi Police on June 15, 2023, in the POCSO case against Brij Bhushan.
On July 4, the same year, the Patiala House Court issued a notice to the complainant and her father.
In a related case, a charge sheet was filed in Rouse Avenue Court regarding sexual harassment allegations against Brij Bhushan and Vinod Tomar. The court has ordered charges to be framed against both individuals, directing the trial to commence and statements from prosecution witnesses to be recorded.
The proceedings were initiated against Singh and Tomar under Sections 354, 354A, and 354D of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for sexual harassment, and against Tomar under Sections 109, 354, 354A, and 506 IPC.
Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, a former BJP MP, has consistently rejected the allegations made against him by the wrestlers.
First Published:
May 27, 2025, 10:46 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pocso case: Proceedings against Indian Institute of Science assistant prof to continue
Bengaluru: The high court has refused to quash legal proceedings against an assistant professor at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru, who is facing trial under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act. The case stems from an incident on Sept 30, 2018, during a birthday party of the accused's daughter. It is alleged that during a 'Ghost House' game held in a dark room, the professor inappropriately touched a 10-year-old girl who was among the guests. Following a complaint from the child's father, Jalahalli police filed a chargesheet against him. The accused has denied the allegations, claiming that he merely stepped in to control the children's play. He argued that the complaint was lodged to harass him and cited several procedural flaws in the investigation. These included the similarity of witness statements, alleged irregularities in the court's cognisance of the case, the absence of a medical examination of the child, and inordinate delays in the trial process. However, the additional state public prosecutor countered that around eight children had come forward with similar accounts of inappropriate conduct by the accused, underscoring the need for a full trial. A fter reviewing the case materials, Justice M Nagaprasanna acknowledged the uniformity in the witness statements recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Yet, he held that even a single credible account is sufficient to warrant a trial under the Pocso Act. He also stated that the lack of medical examination does not invalidate the prosecution's case if other substantial evidence is available. The court underlined that Sections 7 and 8 of the Act define sexual assault as involving inappropriate touching of a child's private parts. It concluded that, if proven, the allegations against the accused would fall squarely within these legal provisions. The court added that the consistency in witness statements is an issue to be addressed during the trial, not a valid reason for dismissing the case at the pre-trial stage. Given that the matter has been pending since 2018, the high court directed the trial court to expedite the case and complete proceedings within three months.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Espionage case: Hisar court rejects YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra's bail plea
A Hisar court on Wednesday denied bail to YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, who was arrested last month on espionage charges. A day earlier, Jyoti's lawyer Kumar Mukesh had filed the bail application and the matter was placed before judicial magistrate first class Sunil Kumar today, who rejected the bail plea. On June 9, the court extended her judicial custody by two weeks till June 23. On May 26, Jyoti was sent to 14-day judicial custody by the court. Talking to HT over the phone, her lawyer Kumar Mukesh said that he had objected to the sections imposed against Jyoti Malhotra in the first information report (FIR). 'As the investigation is currently underway in the case, the police were against her bail plea. After hearing both sides, the court rejected the bail plea. She went to Pakistan High Commission in Delhi in 2023 and at that time, the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was in force but the Hisar police booked her under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Act, which was Section 124-A (sedition ) under the IPC at that time. This section was kept in abeyance, which is why she can't be prosecuted this,' Kumar added. He said that the FIR was registered on the basis of her questioning on May 15, which is not legally permissible because a person can't become a witness against himself/herself. 'The police could not place any evidence which proves that she was involved in spying. The Hisar superintendent of police (SP) himself said that she had no access to any military or defence related information but she has connections with some Pakistani operatives. If they have not recovered any information from her possession related to sharing sensitive information, then Sections 3 (spying) and 5 (communicating secret information to unauthorised individuals) of the Official Secrets Act, should be dropped from the FIR. The police should provide call details with such operatives. The police will have to prove that any of her Pakistani contacts are intelligence operatives,' he added. Travel blogger Jyoti, 33, a resident of Hisar, was arrested on May 16 for allegedly sharing sensitive information with Pakistani operatives.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Khanna police arrest two in fake documents scam.
Ludhiana: The Khanna police have arrested two accused involved in fake documents scam. The accused have been identified as Surjit Singh of Durgapur village in Nabha of Patiala, now in Azad Nagar, Khanna, and Mahima Singh of Khandoli village in Patiala district. According to the police, recoveries from the accused included nine forged Aadhar cards, one forged official stamp of naib tehsildar Bhado, a fake stamp of BDPO, one fake property valuation certificate, and one forged land deed. The SSP Khanna, Dr Jyoti Yadav, stated that on Tuesday, during patrolling near the main gate of police station city Khanna, police received a tip off that a group of individuals, including Surjit Singh, Mahima Singh, Harvinder Singh of Moga, Shamsher Khan, Rajvir Singh, and Harmit Singh (all residents of Bhado), were engaged in preparing and using forged documents to register land transactions fraudulently in various tehsils. She added that it was also revealed that Surjit Singh fabricated an official stamp of the naib tehsildar of Bhado. Police said acting swiftly on the information received, they apprehended Surjit Singh, who had come to Khanna Tehsil to "carry out" a fake registry. They added that a case was registered under the relevant sections of the IPC at police station city, Khanna, and a preliminary investigation was initiated. Meanwhile, the SSP Khanna suggested that during preliminary questioning of accused Surjit, he revealed that in a minimum of 20-22 cases, such fake documents were used to fill bail bonds for bail. The police said that efforts were ongoing to nab the other accused in the case.
