If you get ‘the ick' often, you probably possess this negative personality trait — study says
The term that refers to the feeling of disgust from something a romantic partner does, says or even wears has gone viral on social media in recent years.
And according to a study published in Personality and Individual Differences, those who experience this feeling often might possess personality traits that indicate narcissism.
For the study, researchers analyzed 74 men and 51 women, ranging in age from 24 to 72. They asked the participants if they knew what getting the ick meant and if they've ever experienced it.
The study then measured the 'likelihood of experiencing the ick in response to specific behaviors, completed personality assessments and answered questions about their dating experiences,' according to Psy Post.
Regarding the personality assessments participants took part in, those who showed narcsictic behavior were more likely to negatively react to a person's imperfections — especially if it contracticed what they want in a potential romantic partner.
The results of the study also indicated that women experience the ick more often compared to men — which isn't surprising considering adult females are 'more sensitive to grossness than males,' according to a scientific dive by NatGeo.
The results of the study indicated that women experience the ick more often compared to men.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
'Anything we are averse to, that we want to avoid, or that we shrink back from — including the ick — is controlled by this area of the brain [called the habenula],' Dr. Kyra Bobinet, a California behavioral neuroscientist and author of 'Unstoppable Brain,' told Fox News Digital.
'This area of your brain is scouting for anything that's not going to work out for you,' she said. 'It has a negativity bias.'
As a result, people will either immediately (26 %) or eventually (42%) end things with someone over an ick that turned them off, according to the Personality and Individual Differences study.
'This area of your brain is scouting for anything that's not going to work out for you,' said Dr. Kyra Bobinet.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
While many daters are quick to get rid of a potential suitor because of their quirks, study author Eliana Saunders said that people should take icks with a grain of salt and maybe think twice before completley writing off someone.
'While this feeling of disgust could be a valid marker of mate incompatibility, it could also be a symptom of high sensitivity to disgust, narcissism, other-oriented perfectionism, etc.'
'Before dumping a partner because their feet dangle when they sit in a chair, we should think critically about why we're feeling 'icked' out. Ask yourself: Is this something I truly can't deal with, or am I being overly critical? Is this 'ick' their fault, or is it mine?''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
33 minutes ago
- New York Post
Beware these 5 signs of a ‘highly invasive' brain cancer — patients typically survive only 15 months
That stinks! A 57-year-old UK father of four recently made headlines when he revealed the bizarre clue that preceded his Stage 4 glioblastoma diagnosis — a 'strange sweet caramel smell.' 'We didn't think much of it,' said Costa Fantis's 27-year-old son, Antonio. 'We definitely didn't know it was a symptom of something so serious.' Before two-time Grammy winner Michael Bolton, 72, was diagnosed with glioblastoma in 2023, he experienced confusion, balance issues, nausea and severe headaches. 5 Michael Bolton performs on stage in 'The Wonderful World of Disney: Magical Holiday Celebration,' which taped in November 2023. He was diagnosed with glioblastoma the following month. ABC via Getty Images The tumor, which occurs when supportive cells in the brain grow and divide uncontrollably, is extremely aggressive and deadly. Most patients survive only 14 to 16 months after diagnosis. 'What makes glioblastoma particularly difficult to treat is its highly invasive nature — it spreads microscopic cancer cells deep into surrounding brain tissue, making it impossible to remove completely with surgery,' Dr. Joseph Georges, a neurosurgeon based in Phoenix, told The Post. Georges shares five early glioblastoma warning signs — and how a specialized cell therapy may prolong patient lives. What are the risk factors for glioblastoma? About 14,500 new glioblastoma cases are diagnosed annually in the US. 5 Dr. Joseph Georges, a neurosurgeon based in Phoenix, reveals five early glioblastoma warning signs — and how a specialized cell therapy may prolong patient lives. The average age of diagnosis is around 64 — the cancer tends to affect adults 45 to 70 years old. Exposure to ionizing radiation as part of radiation therapy for other cancers and certain genetic disorders, such as Turcot syndrome and Lynch syndrome, can increase glioblastoma risk. However, most cases 'occur spontaneously in individuals without risk factors,' said Georges, an assistant professor of neurosurgery at the University of Arizona College of Medicine and Banner University Medical Center-Phoenix. What are the symptoms? Symptoms depend on the tumor's location within the skull. They may include headaches, confusion, seizures, speech difficulty or weakness on one side of the body, Georges said. In Bolton's case, his daughters noticed unusual behavior during a family bowling night in the fall of 2023. 5 This is a scan of a grade 4 glioma brain tumor that's about the size of a tennis ball. Caters News Agency He had bowled out of turn and fallen out of his chair. He was diagnosed a few weeks later. Fantis's tumor appears to have developed in the temporal lobe, which plays a crucial role in processing smells. How is it diagnosed? The tumor can be identified with a CT scan or MRI, and the diagnosis confirmed with a tissue biopsy. 'Several factors influence how long a person might live with glioblastoma,' Georges said, 'including their overall health, neurological function at diagnosis, age and how well they respond to treatments such as surgery, radiation and chemotherapy.' The molecular characteristics of the tumor — like whether it has mutations — can affect the prognosis. How is glioblastoma treated? Metastatic brain tumors — tumors that start elsewhere in the body and spread to the brain — tend to form masses that are better defined than glioblastomas and that can be surgically removed more easily. 'Glioblastoma's diffuse growth pattern, genetic complexity and resistance to standard treatments make it one of the most challenging brain tumors to treat,' Georges noted. 'Complete removal is usually not achievable due to the tumor's infiltrative nature.' 5 Glioblastomas can be identified with a CT scan or MRI, and the diagnosis confirmed with a tissue biopsy. angkhan – Surgery is often followed by radiation therapy to eliminate residual tumor cells and delay progression and chemotherapy to enhance the effectiveness of radiation. Despite this multi-pronged strategy, Georges admitted that 'glioblastoma generally has a poor prognosis due to its aggressive biology and treatment resistance.' How can DOC1021 help? Georges said he has seen better outcomes with an individualized approach. He was the principal investigator of a Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating Dubodencel, also known as DOC1021, which harnesses the power of the patient's special immune cells, called dendritic cells. The cells are exposed to the unique antigens of the tumor outside the body. 'Once trained, the cells are multiplied and then returned to the patient, where they help the immune system launch a targeted attack against the cancer,' Georges said. 'Because this approach uses the patient's own immune cells and doesn't require genetic modification, it offers a highly personalized and comprehensive way to address the complexity and variability of glioblastoma.' 5 These before-and-after brain scans show glioblastoma resolution with DOC1021. The Food and Drug Administration granted fast-track designation to DOC1021, developed by Diakonos Oncology, to treat glioblastoma and pancreatic cancer. Some patients in the DOC1021 Phase 1 trial are approaching 24 to 36 months of survival. 'Early clinical results from the trial showed a 12-month overall survival rate of 88%, markedly higher than the approximately 60% typically seen with standard of care,' Georges said. New Jersey resident Pamela Goldberger, 65, underwent brain surgery, six weeks of chemotherapy and radiation, six weeks of the cell therapy and a year of chemo maintenance as part of the DOC1021 Phase 1 trial. Now, she is back to playing tennis several times a week 2½ years after her diagnosis. 'I'm living my best life right now, and I'm not restricted by not being able to do anything that I would want to do,' she recently told Fox News Digital. The Phase 2 clinical trial is underway — it's expected to be available at 20 US sites.
WIRED
2 hours ago
- WIRED
The Black Market for Fake Science Is Growing Faster Than Legitimate Research, Study Warns
Aug 11, 2025 5:00 AM A small but growing number of academics are improperly taking credit for articles, citations, and authorships, allowing them to appear prestigious without having conducted their own research. Imagen conceptual de un científico con intenciones de engaño. Photograph: Getty Images A new study by researchers at Northwestern University has set off alarm bells about the future of academic research, warning that the publication of fraudulent science is growing at a faster rate than that of legitimate research. Over the last four centuries, an implicit contract has been established between scientists and states: in exchange for producing knowledge useful for economic and social development, governments and other benefactors offer researchers stable careers, good salaries, and public recognition. This model, similar to that of a commercial enterprise, has proven to be efficient and has been replicated in most regions of the world. However, recent research published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) reveals that, in recent years, this system—composed of researchers, academic institutions, government agencies, private companies, and dissemination platforms—shows signs of breaking down. The authors argue that due to the large scale and specialization of contemporary science, the contribution of each actor is no longer evaluated by the intrinsic merit of their work, but by quantitative indicators, such as the number of research papers published, how often articles are cited by other research, university rankings, or by awards and other recognitions obtained. 'These indicators have rapidly become targets for measuring institutional and personal impact, which has generated unbridled competition and growing inequality in the distribution of resources, incentives, and rewards,' the authors warn. This in turn has led to the proliferation of fraud in some quarters of the scientific community, as researchers look for quick ways to acquire indicators of success. 'The use of numerical metrics to evaluate projects and professionals … encourages the search for shortcuts,' says Pere Puigdomènech, president of the Committee for Research Integrity in Catalonia (CIR-CAT) in Spain. The types of fraud detected range from the creation of fictitious research, to plagiarism, to the buying and selling of authorship and citations in papers. A Mafia That Threatens Scientific Integrity Northwestern's research shows that cases of fraud are often not isolated incidents, but rather the result of complex networks that operate systematically to undermine the integrity of science. The research team behind this paper, led by Luis A. N. Amaral, professor of Engineering Science and Applied Mathematics at Northwestern's McCormick School of Engineering, reached this conclusion after analyzing large volumes of data on retracted publications, editorial records, and image duplication. Sources included major aggregators of scientific literature—such as Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and OpenAlex—as well as lists of journals removed from these databases for violating quality or ethical standards. In addition, data on retracted articles flagged by the investigative website Retraction Watch, comments on the science-paper review site PubPeer, and editorial metadata (editor names and submission and acceptance dates) were also collected and analyzed. This analysis highlighted the work of 'papermills'—unscrupulous organizations that mass-produce low-quality manuscripts and sell these, sometimes through intermediaries, to academics looking to publish material quickly. These papers often contain falsified data, manipulated or copyright-infringed images, plagiarized content, and even absurd or physically impossible claims. 'These networks are essentially criminal organizations, acting together to fake the process of science,' Amaral said in a statement published by Northwestern University. The researchers warn that more and more scientists are engaging with these networks, where they are not only acquiring articles, but also citations and authorship positions in papers, allowing them to appear prestigious without having conducted their own research. To delve deeper into the phenomenon, the team developed a parallel project aimed at detecting articles coming from these papermills. An automatic analysis system was used on a large body of materials-engineering research and related sciences to identify authors who incorrectly reported the instruments used in their studies, a potential giveaway of a piece of research being fraudulent. The experiment uncovered fraudulent articles even in prestigious journals such as PLOS ONE. It also detected a strategy in which these papermills seek out defunct journals to usurp their names or websites, giving the appearance of legitimacy to fake publications they then release under those titles. 'Intermediaries connect all the parties. You need someone to write the article, people willing to pay to appear as authors, a magazine willing to publish it, and editors who will accept it,' Amaral says. 'Millions of dollars are invested in this process.' To curb this threat, the Northwestern researchers propose a number of measures: strengthening the scrutiny of editorial processes, implementing more effective methods to detect false research, developing better understanding of the networks that facilitate these practices, and radically restructuring the incentive system in science. The researchers stress that the scientific community itself must strengthen its oversight mechanisms to preserve its integrity, a challenge that becomes even more urgent with the eruption of artificial intelligence in the production and dissemination of knowledge. 'If we're not prepared to deal with the fraud that's already occurring, then we're certainly not prepared to deal with what generative AI can do to scientific literature,' warned Reese Richardson, a postdoctoral researcher at the McCormick School of Engineering and first author of the Northwestern study, in a statement. 'We have no clue what's going to end up in the literature, what's going to be regarded as scientific fact and what's going to be used to train future AI models, which then will be used to write more papers.' This story originally appeared on WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish.
Buzz Feed
11 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
6 Things Kids Notice Without Adults Realizing It
Kids are often more observant than many adults give them credit for. It's not just what we say to them directly that they're absorbing; it's how we talk about ourselves and others, what we say to others about them and how we behave, too. We asked experts what sorts of things children pick up on that adults don't always realize they're noticing. This list isn't designed to be judgmental; rather, it's a reminder that we can all bring a little more awareness to our day-to-day interactions. 1. How you feel about your partner, co-parent or their other caregivers. Fg Trade / Getty Images You may think you're being subtle when you roll your eyes at your partner or shoot your father-in-law a dirty look. But kids can catch those nonverbal cues, said clinical psychologist Jazmine McCoy, who goes by @TheMomPsychologist on Instagram. They're also capable of picking up on criticism or negative remarks about the other parent or caregivers in their life, even when you may try to mask them as jokes or sarcasm, she told HuffPost. 'Kids notice these dynamics, so try your best to speak highly of the other parent and caregivers around your child — even if they're in another room,' McCoy said. 'They probably still can hear you.' This is important regardless of your relationship with these people. Why? It helps the child feel safe, confident and cared for, more emotionally connected to their caregivers and less anxious, McCoy said. She offered a few examples of the kinds of things you'd want your child to overhear you saying about the other adults in your kid's life: 'Wow, Mommy planned a fun adventure for us!' or 'This dinner came out great. Daddy is a great chef!' or 'Aww, this looks like such a great memory you had with grandma. It was so nice of her to take you there.' 2. How you feel about your body. Fg Trade / Getty Images Children are 'astutely aware' of how adults talk about their own bodies and other people's bodies, said registered dietitian Alyssa Miller of the @ Instagram account. And they can read our body language, too. 'They can pick up on subtle — and not-so-subtle — actions, drawing conclusions about bodies,' she told HuffPost. 'They learn what is considered good and bad, desirable and undesirable.' They observe the way you look at yourself in the mirror and can make inferences from that. They notice if you never wear a bathing suit at the pool, if you delete lots of pictures of yourself or avoid getting in front of the camera altogether, Miller said. 'Adults are constantly showing kids how to view their own bodies through their everyday actions,' she said. 'Think about it: No baby or toddler is embarrassed by their belly, their thighs or their height until they hear comments or witness someone else being insecure about it.' 3. What you actually value. Fg Trade / Getty Images 'Kids notice what you actually value based on what you say and do. This is sometimes different from what you say you value,' said clinical psychologist Laura Markham, author of Peaceful Parent, Happy Kids and founder of the site Aha! Parenting. For example, you might tell your kid that sports are really about teamwork, learning new skills and having a good time with your friends. 'But then when you pick them up after the game, your first question is, 'Who won?'' Markham told HuffPost. You've probably told your child time and time again how important it is to be honest, 'but then you have them fib about their age to get a cheaper entrance fee at the amusement park,' she added. Children learn values by observing your behavior and then drawing conclusions about what you believe is important, Markham said. 'Regardless of what you consciously teach them, your children will emerge from childhood with clear views on what their parents really value, and with a well-developed value system of their own,' she added. 'We need to articulate our values to ourselves and then our kids ― not just once, but over and over, applying those values to the daily dilemmas our child faces.' 4. Your self-compassion (or lack thereof). Fg Trade / Getty Images 'One thing I've noticed time and again is that while different kids have different temperaments, their ability to give and receive grace and compassion often mirrors the adults around them,' Miller said. If your child is beating themself up over a mistake at school, you might comfort your child by imploring that they not take it so hard. But if you have a tendency to handle setbacks in this manner, too, your child has taken note of that. 'Kids pick up on how adults handle mistakes, their self-talk, unrealistic expectations and perfectionistic tendencies,' Miller said. 'Many people who lack self-compassion or are hard on themselves inadvertently teach kids to be critical and harsh with themselves,' she said. 'Conversely, adults who are gentle with themselves, admit mistakes and move past them teach kids resilience and to use mistakes as learning opportunities.' 5. Your relationship with food. Fg Trade / Getty Images Kids are paying attention to the eating habits of the adults in their lives as well as the way they speak about food. Parents and other caregivers 'directly influence' the food choices children make and the beliefs they develop about foods, Miller said. 'Innocent comments like 'Those are dangerous' around a plate of cookies, labeling foods as 'good' or 'bad,' skipping meals or expressing guilt about eating are all observed and internalized by children,' she added. Over time, such comments and behaviors shape a child's relationship with food, 'potentially leading to unhealthy eating habits or attitudes,' Miller said. 'Research shows that kids tend to eat the same foods their parents do, both as children and as adults,' she said. 'By modeling a balanced and positive approach to food, adults can help children develop healthy eating habits and a healthy relationship with food.' 6. How you talk about your kid to other adults. Fg Trade / Getty Images Let's say your child just had an epic meltdown at Target. When you get home, you fill in your partner about what just happened in the form of sarcastic comments about the ' amazing morning you two just had' or jokes about the incident, thinking it's probably going over your kid's head. 'They may not know what it all means, but they can pick up the fact that you think negatively about what happened, and this can negatively impact their self-esteem and relationship with you,' McCoy said. When you're talking to a friend, relative or co-parent, whether on the phone or in person, about something that happened with your kid, be mindful about the language you use, McCoy advised. 'Speak to the lesson learned or how you solved the problem versus focusing on the mistake or problem,' she said. 'Pretend you're talking to your child and speak to your partner about your child how you would to them directly.' HuffPost.
