China urges global consensus on balancing AI development, security
His remarks came just days after US President Donald Trump unveiled an aggressive low-regulation strategy aimed at cementing US dominance in the fast-moving field, promising to "remove red tape and onerous regulation" that could hinder private sector AI development.
Opening the World AI Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai on Saturday, Li emphasised the need for governance and open-source development, announcing the establishment of a Chinese-led body for international AI cooperation.
"The risks and challenges brought by artificial intelligence have drawn widespread attention... How to find a balance between development and security urgently requires further consensus from the entire society," the premier said.
He gave no further details about the newly announced organisation, though state media later reported "the preliminary consideration" was that it would be headquartered in Shanghai.
The organisation would "promote global governance featuring extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits", state news agency Xinhua reported, without elaborating on its set-up or mechanisms.
At a time when AI is being integrated across virtually all industries, its uses have raised major questions, including about the spread of misinformation, its impact on employment and the potential loss of technological control.
In a speech at WAIC on Saturday, Nobel Prize-winning physicist Geoffrey Hinton compared the situation to keeping "a very cute tiger cub as a pet".
To survive, he said, you need to ensure you can train it not to kill you when it grows up.
- Pledge to share AI advances -
The enormous strides AI technology has made in recent years have seen it move to the forefront of the US-China rivalry.
Premier Li said China would "actively promote" the development of open-source AI, adding Beijing was willing to share advances with other countries, particularly developing ones.
"If we engage in technological monopolies, controls and blockage, artificial intelligence will become the preserve of a few countries and a few enterprises," he said.
Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu warned against "unilateralism and protectionism" at a later meeting.
Washington has expanded its efforts in recent years to curb exports of state-of-the-art chips to China, concerned that they can be used to advance Beijing's military systems and erode US tech dominance.
Li, in his speech, highlighted "insufficient supply of computing power and chips" as a bottleneck to AI progress.
China has made AI a pillar of its plans for technological self-reliance, with the government pledging a raft of measures to boost the sector.
In January, Chinese startup DeepSeek unveiled an AI model that performed as well as top US systems despite using less powerful chips.
- 'Defining test' -
In a video message played at the WAIC opening ceremony, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said AI governance would be "a defining test of international cooperation".
The ceremony saw the French president's AI envoy, Anne Bouverot, underscore "an urgent need" for global action and for the United Nations to play a "leading role".
Bouverot called for a framework "that is open, transparent and effective, giving each and everyone an opportunity to have their views taken into account".
Li's speech "posed a clear contrast to the Trump administration's 'America First' view on AI" and the US measures announced this week, said WAIC attendee George Chen, a partner at Washington-based policy consultancy The Asia Group.
"The world is now clearly divided into at least three camps: the United States and its allies, China (and perhaps many Belt and Road or Global South countries), and the EU -- which prefers regulating AI through legislation, like the EU AI Act," Chen told AFP.
At an AI summit in Paris in February, 58 countries including China, France and India -- as well as the European Union and African Union Commission -- called for enhanced coordination on AI governance.
But the United States warned against "excessive regulation", and alongside the United Kingdom, refused to sign the summit's appeal for an "open", "inclusive" and "ethical" AI.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
ActionSA says it won't invite 'unnecessary instability' to Tshwane Municipality with regards to ANC's bid to remove city manager
JOHANNESBURG - ActionSA said it won't invite "unnecessary instability" to the Tshwane Municipality when asked if it will support the African National Congress's (ANC) push to remove the city manager. The ANC in Tshwane has launched a public campaign to remove Johan Mettler, claiming there were discrepancies with his appointment as city manager. ActionSA held a media briefing on Tuesday on its ongoing participation within the ANC-led multiparty coalition government in Tshwane. ActionSA member and Tshwane mayor, Nasiphi Moya, said the city was engaging the provincial and national COGTA departments around the possible "non-compliance" of the city's senior managers. "This issue of non-compliance we're talking about for these section 56 managers, it's an issue of the constitution of the panel. The regulation says you must have one councillor (on the panel) but in all these interviews, and I'm talking about interviews that happened in 2022/2023, there were two councillors that were part of the panel." ActionSA national chairperson, Michael Beaumont, said the party believed in the separation between political and administrative issues in government. "As a party, we have ventilated our issue on the matter. It is a matter, and particularly in light of our view that we should not invite unnecessary instability in a city that's starting to move forward for the first time in a long time."
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
China's Belt and Road shifts focus to Africa with record-breaking investments
Africa received $30.5 billion in construction contracts — up from just $6.1 billion a year ago — and $8.5 billion in direct investments China's transactions with Africa through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) surged to $39 billion in the first half of 2025, outpacing all other regions and reflecting the Asian superpower's global infrastructure foreign policy pivot toward mineral-rich and high-growth potential African states. Countries on the continent received $39 billion in construction and direct investment from Beijing during this period as China looked to secure critical resources and forge new geopolitical alliances amid According to a recent Africa received $30.5 billion in construction contracts — up from just $6.1 billion a year ago — and $8.5 billion in direct investments. The Middle East came in second with $19.4 billion worth of Chinese investment. Nigeria emerged as the top beneficiary, securing $21 billion in construction deals, primarily focused on oil and gas processing infrastructure, followed by Saudi Arabia with $7.2 billion, the United Arab Emirates with $7 billion, Tanzania with $3.6 billion and Indonesia with $2.1 billion. BRI is not merely an economic endeavour 'but a geopolitical instrument, wielding influence through structured dependency', policy analyst Siseko Maposa told the Mail & Guardian. 'China's growth hinges on strategic alliances with mineral-rich states, financing critical infrastructure to establish supply-chain footholds that bolster its manufacturing dominance. The acceleration of BRI reflects countermeasures against global economic volatility, especially as the US and EU shift trade and investment to consolidate their own interests,' Maposa said. Since its launch in 2013, the BRI has reached cumulative engagement of $1.308 trillion across 150 countries that have signed cooperation agreements with China. This includes $775 billion in construction contracts and $533 billion in non-financial direct investments. But the 2025 data shows a shift in both scale and strategy — with Africa emerging as China's biggest investment venture. In the first half of 2025, Chinese energy-related investments reached $42 billion globally — the highest ever recorded in any six-month period, said the report. A significant portion of this went to oil and gas projects in Nigeria, while green energy saw $9.7 billion in new investments in solar, wind and waste-to-energy projects across the continent. Maposa said energy is a determinant to development, which further complicates Africa's development landscape. (Graphic: John McCann/M&G) 'African states still face barriers in attracting sustainable financing. China's model, unlike Western financing, which often comes with rigid conditionalities, offers more flexibility, which makes China a pragmatic partner. But African governments must ensure BRI terms support domestic value chains and promote debt transparency.' The minerals and metals sector saw a similar investment leap, with $24.9 billion in total BRI investment in the first half of 2025 — surpassing the previous annual record. Around $10 billion was channelled into processing infrastructure on the continent — a development that seems to align with local mineral beneficiation. Securing access to the continent requires elevated foreign direct investment and the shift toward value addition is becoming central to African policy, said Lauren Johnson, a senior research fellow at the South African Institute of International Affairs. 'African governments have moved in a direction of 'resource nationalism' which requires investors to invest in processing in-country for access to the minerals amid competition with the USA and Europe,' Johnson told the M&G. She said global developments, such as Donald Trump's political resurgence in the US and ongoing tension with the EU, have made finding new growth markets essential for China. 'China has already diversified investments into agriculture, such as soybeans in Angola and Ethiopia,' Johnson said. Maposa argued that, while the BRI serves as China's global infrastructure blueprint, African states should avoid framing it as a binary against Western alternatives like the US-backed Lobito Corridor — a rail project linking Angola, Zambia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo to facilitate mineral exports. He added that the focus should be on 'financing models that reinforce state sovereignty, interconnectedness and sustainable development, principles enshrined in the right of nations to self-determination'. 'Rather than treating these as adversarial, Africa should leverage their distinct value: the BRI offers scale, whereas Lobito provides specificity,' said Maposa. 'Where BRI diversifies infrastructure, Lobito's mineral-specific investments could model targeted, lower-risk partnerships if governed by African industrial priorities.' As China's footprint expands, concerns have grown about debt sustainability and the potential erosion of sovereignty. But Johnson said these fears need to be contextualised within responsible borrowing frameworks, adding that borrowing must always be for growth-generating investments. 'The core principle is that the rate of growth the investment will generate should be higher than the interest rate on the debt, ' she said. The real test, Johnson added, is how well African countries can align foreign capital with domestic development strategies. 'Equivalently, the race to secure important minerals should prove to African countries which nation is the better investor.' Maposa warned, however, that unless African states negotiate better terms, they risk remaining locked in 'perpetual extraction economies'. 'The race to the bottom is no abstraction,' he said. 'Major powers are actively courting resource-rich African states, often locking them into perpetual extraction economies. These dynamics trap African nations in a developmental paradox. True sustainability demands progression from raw mineral exports to value-added beneficiation, yet the prevailing system incentivises continued dependency on primary commodity production.' Johnson said African governments need to consider each case carefully and look at the opportunities — with both immediate and long-term goals in mind.
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Citrus growers call on president to urgently intervene about 30% US tariff
While other industries can wait for government to negotiate the US tariff down, citrus growers could be stuck with boxes of rotten fruit. With mere days to go before Friday, when the US tariff of 30% on South African goods kicks in, the Citrus Growers' Association of Southern Africa wrote to President Cyril Ramaphosa, calling on him to urgently intervene on behalf of rural communities in the Northern and Western Cape, where citrus exported to the US is grown and where livelihoods rely on the US-SA citrus trade. 'This week, with the tariff deadline on Friday, is one of great anxiety for the citrus growers in the Western and Northern Cape. These two provinces annually export about 7 million cartons of citrus to the US,' Dr Boitshoko Ntshabele, CEO of the Citrus Growers' Association of Southern Africa (CGA), says. The association has asked Ramaphosa to urgently facilitate an extension of the current 10% US tariff beyond 1 August, which would allow for negotiations to reach a mutually beneficial trade agreement. The CGA also requested that, if a general extension of the deadline is not possible, an urgent request for a specific extension for seasonal fresh produce should be secured. 'Seasonal fresh produce is perishable and cannot be stored for extended periods like other trade products. We just passed the midpoint of the 2025 export season, which means that hundreds of thousands of cartons of citrus are ready in packhouses to be shipped to the US over the next few weeks. The implementation of a 30% tariff on 1 August will mean most of this fruit will be left unsold.' ALSO READ: Experts question if SA has a plan for US tariffs, Tau says here it is SA citrus growers no threat to US farmers—no reason for US tariff of 30% South African citrus growers do not pose a threat to US growers or jobs, as they sustain demand when local US citrus is out of season, benefiting US consumers. 'Citrus as a source of nutrition also helps to keep America healthy. Should we not be able to secure a favourable trade deal or the concession for fresh produce, local job losses before the next season will be a certainty,' Ntshabele says. Gerrit van der Merwe, chairman of the CGA, says being a grower in Citrusdal, he is very worried about the effect the tariffs will have on the town and the wider Cederberg municipality. 'Citrus forms the economic heart of the area. 'Not just farmers and farm workers will feel the impact, as local businesses and even the funding of social support programmes will be affected too. The social fabric of some rural towns in the Western and Northern Cape is threatened. 'Local growers also say a 30% tariff will not only stifle future growth but lead to the eventual destruction of between 500 and 1 000 ha of land that would simply become unprofitable.' ALSO READ: Trump tariffs implemented in same week SA citrus growers pack for US export Letter to the president about US tariff In the letter to the president, the CGA highlighted that, while much focus has been placed on market diversification in the past few weeks as a general answer to the trade turmoil, certain realities must be considered. 'Citrus is grown for designated markets, each with their own precise market and plant health specifications. Therefore, it is not easy to simply divert citrus from the US and find a new market. Should some citrus be diverted away from the US, the diversion could very well depress the price in these markets through oversupply, negatively impacting the entire Southern African citrus industry. 'The citrus industry has the potential to create 100 000 additional jobs by 2032 because of new plantings, but for this to be realised, we require the expansion of every market—including the US, China, India, the European Union, and others,' the CGA says in the letter. Ntshabele says while the CGA acknowledges measures of progress made in the US trade negotiations, it is of the opinion that more direct and active contact with the US is necessary before the 1 August deadline. ALSO READ: Devastating impact of US tariffs on SA automotive sector even before implementation US tariff much worse than losing Agoa status Arthur Kamp, chief economist at Sanlam Investments, says South Africa's direct trade exposure to the US is relatively modest but not insignificant. In 2024, goods exports to the US amounted to R156.8 billion (7.6% of total South African goods exports and 2.1% of GDP). The US announced a 30% tariff increase for South Africa. 'After taking the 25% US import tariff increases on aluminium, steel, and motor vehicles into account, while also adjusting for exclusions, we estimate the overall effective US tariff increase for South Africa is likely to be less than 20%.' However, he points out that this is still a large increase and is likely to cause a sharp decrease in South African exports to the US, including motor vehicles. 'We note that vehicle exports to the US were already significantly down last month, indicating manufacturers readjusting and finding new markets for finished goods, as total vehicle exports were up by 3%. 'While some exclusions may also be rescinded, it is important to understand that the impact will be far greater than losing our AGOA (African Growth and Opportunity Act) status alone. 'Downward revisions to South Africa's gross domestic product (GDP) forecast for 2025 should result, while combined with heightened geopolitical risk, the effect on business sentiment and investment could be more pronounced, particularly given South Africa's dependence on the US for foreign capital, especially portfolio capital, which is highly liquid.'
