
Why South Korea's New Leader May Be On A Collision Course With Donald Trump
The new South Korean president, Lee Jae-myung, calls himself a foreign policy 'pragmatist'. He says he is driven by South Korea's national interest, rather than ideology, and has spoken of his desire to improve relations with China and North Korea.
Under the former president, Yoon Suk Yeol, South Korea's relationship with these countries came under increasing strain. Yoon adopted a confrontational stance toward North Korea, and openly sided with Washington in its rivalry with Beijing. Lee's vision may bring his government into conflict with the Trump administration.
On the campaign trail, Lee sought to dispel doubts about his commitment to the longstanding military alliance between the US and South Korea. He repeatedly described Seoul's relationship with Washington as the 'basic axis of our diplomacy'.
But he signalled that there would be some rebalancing of relations under his leadership, stressing that South Korea should not rely solely on the US. This reflects the fundamental belief of liberal politicians in South Korea. While acknowledging the importance of ties with the US, they want a more balanced relationship with other regional powers like China.
Lee says closer relations with China will occur within the framework of South Korea's alliance with the US. But, with Washington and Beijing battling for global influence, this is still likely to become a major point of tension with the US. The Trump administration has taken a hawkish approach towards China and wants its allies to do the same.
Lee, for his part, has stated that South Korea should not be forced to choose between the US and China, saying: 'We should not put all our eggs in one basket'. And he has signalled that his government will resist efforts by Washington to draw South Korea into any conflict with China over Taiwan or territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
The Lee government clearly has a delicate balancing act ahead when it comes to the two superpowers. Trump has previously criticised the amount South Korea pays for the US forces stationed on its soil, while recent reports suggest he is considering the withdrawal of about 4,500 US troops from the country.
Relations with Pyongyang
Another of Lee's pressing foreign policy issues is how to deal with the North Korean threat. Yoon's government avoided dialogue with the North and encouraged the spread of outside information across the border.
Over the past decade, in response to North Korea's improved nuclear and missile capabilities, public opinion in South Korea has shifted in favour of developing an independent nuclear weapons programme.
This is not a strategy the Lee government will pursue. The Democratic party, of which Lee is a member, has historically advocated a policy of engagement and peaceful coexistence with North Korea.
From 1998 to 2008, and then again from 2017 to 2022, liberal governments in South Korea pursued a so-called 'sunshine policy' towards the North. The goal was to reduce tension through engagement, with the ultimate goal being to create the conditions for unification.
In his inaugural address on June 4, Lee said his government would deal with North Korean aggression with 'strong deterrence' – referring to the military alliance with the US. But he also elaborated on the need to again reopen channels of communication with North Korea to deliver peace through talks and cooperation. He added: 'Peace is always cheaper than war'.
In a signal of his intent for renewed engagement with the North, Lee has nominated the former unification minister, Lee Jong-seok, as chief of the National Intelligence Service. Lee Jong-seok was the architect of South Korea's policy towards the North between 2003 and 2008, during the presidency of Roh Moo-hyun.
However, the geopolitical landscape has changed in recent years. In January 2024, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un declared South Korea an 'enemy' nation and said the North would no longer be working toward reunification. North Korea has since then stopped any contact with the South and has ceased any economic collaboration.
South Korea's sunshine policy had seen the development of projects such as the Kaesong Industrial Complex, which involved South Korean businesses establishing factories in North Korea and employing North Korean workers.
North Korea is a foreign policy issue in which the Trump administration and the Lee government may pursue similar objectives. Trump has also signalled that he is seeking to renew dialogue with North Korea, and has hinted at the possibility of future summits to discuss a nuclear agreement.
Trump's first term saw him become the first US president to meet with a North Korean leader while in office, though he ultimately made no progress in restraining North Korea's nuclear programme.
Kim is very unlikely to be responsive to efforts by either country to engage in dialogue. North Korea has forged a close partnership with Russia in recent years, which has even seen it send troops to fight against Ukraine, and no longer considers engagement with the US or South Korea necessary.
It is instead banking on making significant advances in military technology. Russian assistance has reportedly already contributed to improvements in North Korea's missile guidance systems, while Russia has also supplied North Korea with advanced air defence systems.
The new Lee government faces a very challenging international environment. The North Korean threat is growing, the US security guarantee is weakening, and it will have to resist Trump's attempts to draw South Korea into a regional military network to contain China. How it meets all of these challenges will become clear in the months and years ahead.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
'It could have gone nuclear': Trump again claims he 'stopped India-Pakistan war'; doubles down on trade angle
US President Donald Trump (PTI photo) US President Donald Trump on Friday once again claimed that he played a key role in stopping a possible war between India and Pakistan - a conflict he said might have gone nuclear if not for his intervention. Speaking to reports on Air Force One, Trump said he used trade as a tool to get both sides to halt hostilities immediately. "You know, I did something that people don't talk about, and I don't talk about very much, but we solved a big problem, a nuclear problem potentially with India and with Pakistan. I spoke to Pakistan, I spoke to India, they have really great leaders, but they were going at it, and they could have gone at it nuclear," US President said. He explained that both countries stopped their attacks after he warned them the US would suspend trade if the fighting continued. "Both nuclear countries, strong nuclear countries, and I talked about trade and said, 'We're not doing trade if you guys are going to be throwing bombs at each other.' They both stopped, and I stopped that war immediately. It was going much further, and hopefully, it would not go to nuclear, but it might have gone to nuclear. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo In fact, it might have gone to nuclear in the next round, but we stopped it, and I'd like to commend the leaders of both countries, Pakistan and India. " Trump's version of events got a rare endorsement from Moscow. Russian President Vladimir Putin 's aide Yury Ushakov backed Trump's claim, saying his direct involvement helped end the conflict - something that even came up in a phone call between Trump and Putin. "The Middle East was discussed, as well as the armed conflict between India and Pakistan, which has been halted with the personal involvement of President Trump," Ushakov said. The US president's comments, however, stirred diplomatic pushback. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor , who is leading an all-party delegation to the US, said they addressed Trump's mediation claims directly with US Vice President JD Vance. "The meeting with Vice President Vance was outstanding, very good, very clear. I think we made our position amply clear on this question of mediation, and Vice President Vance fully understood our points," Tharoor said. Trump has made similar claims in the past, especially after India carried out Operation Sindoor -- precision strike on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK) on May 7, in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack. India later responded to Pakistani military aggression with airbase strikes. Eventually, tensions eased after Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) contacted his Indian counterpart and agreed to stop further action.


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
US suspends nuclear equipment exports to China amid trade war escalation
The US in recent days suspended licenses for nuclear equipment suppliers to sell to China's power plants, according to four people familiar with the matter, as the two countries engage in a damaging trade war . The suspensions were sent to companies by the US Department of Commerce , the people said, and affect export licenses for parts and equipment used with nuclear power plants . Nuclear equipment suppliers are among a wide range of companies whose sales have been restricted over the past two weeks as the US-China trade war shifted from negotiating tariffs to throttling each other's supply chains. It is unclear whether a Thursday call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would affect the suspensions. The US and China agreed on May 12 to roll back triple digit, tit-for-tat tariffs for 90 days, but the truce between the two biggest economies quickly went south, with the US claiming China reneged on terms related to rare earth elements , and China accusing the US of "abusing export control measures" by warning that using Huawei Ascend AI chips anywhere in the world violated US export controls. On Friday, Trump said US and Chinese officials would meet again on June 9. The US Department of Commerce did not respond to a request for comment on the nuclear equipment restrictions. On May 28, a spokesperson said the department was reviewing exports of strategic significance to China. "In some cases, Commerce has suspended existing export licenses or imposed additional license requirements while the review is pending," the spokesperson said in a statement. US nuclear equipment suppliers include Westinghouse and Emerson . Westinghouse, whose technology is used in over 400 nuclear reactors around the world, and Emerson, which provides measurement and other tools for the nuclear industry, did not respond to requests for comment. The suspensions affect business worth hundreds of millions of dollars, two of the sources said. A spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington said Xi emphasized on his call with Trump that both sides should make good on the agreement reached in Geneva on May 12. China has been "earnestly" executing the agreement, the spokesperson, Liu Pengyu, said in a statement on Friday. "The US side should acknowledge the progress already made, and remove the negative measures taken against China," the statement said. China's rare earth export controls are in line with common practice and not targeted at specific countries, it added. They also coincide with Chinese restrictions on critical metals threatening supply chains for manufacturers worldwide, especially America's Big Three automakers. China has granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers for the US automakers, Reuters reported on Friday. Reuters could not determine whether the new restrictions were tied to the trade war, or if and how quickly they might be reinstated. Department of Commerce export licenses typically run for four years and include authorized quantities and values. But many new restrictions on exports to China have been imposed in the last two weeks, according to sources, and include license requirements for a hydraulic fluids supplier for sales to China. Other license suspensions went to GE Aerospace for jet engines for China's COMAC aircraft, sources said. The US also now requires licenses to ship ethane to China, as Reuters reported first last week. Houston-based Enterprise Product Partners said Wednesday that its emergency requests to complete three proposed cargoes of ethane to China, totaling some 2.2 million barrels, had not been granted. Enterprise said a May 23 requirement for a license to sell butane to China, in addition to the ethane, was subsequently withdrawn. Dallas-based Energy Transfer said it was notified on Tuesday about the new ethane licensing requirement, and planned to apply and file for an emergency authorization. Other sectors that have been hit with new restrictions include companies that sell electronic design automation software such as Cadence Design Systems.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Who is James Fishback? Doge architect steps away the moment Musk feuds with Trump; says 'it's time for Tesla CEO to apologize'
James Fishback James Fishback, the principal architect of the "DOGE checks" initiative, announced on Friday his withdrawal from the movement following Elon Musk's criticism of Donald Trump and demanded that Tesla CEO apologise to the President. "I believed in Elon Musk's vision to shrink government and make it work better for Americans. I'm proud of the DOGE Dividend proposal I developed and will keep working with the administration to return savings to taxpayers." Fishback said. "The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the President, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That's disappointing, but okay. What's not okay is his baseless personal attacks against President Trump," he added. Praising President Trump, Fishback said that he is a once-in-a-century leader. He also said that the president won the popular vote, the Electoral College, and all seven swing states by championing the priorities in his Big Beautiful Bill which Musk said that he wants to 'kill.' President Trump has shown grace and patience at a time when Elon's behavior is disappointing and frankly downright disturbing, Fishback said and demanded aplology from Musk. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2 BHKs starts at ₹ 72.6 Lakh | No Floor rise | Zero PLC Mahindra Happinest Tathawade Get Quote Undo He said, "It's time for Elon to apologize to the President and his family, cool off, and get back to work on inventing the future at Tesla and SpaceX." Who is James Fishback? The founder of the investment firm, aged 30, was raised by a bus driver and a Colombian immigrant. He left Georgetown University to start a hedge fund when he was 21, as reported by MarketWatch. According to the LinkedIn profile, in his professional journey includes working at Greenlight Capital in 2021, followed by establishing Azoria in 2023, where he currently holds the CEO position. Additionally, he leads Incubate Debate, a non-profit organisation helping secondary school students develop debating skills. Currently, he is involved in legal proceedings with Greenlight Capital. The company claims he misrepresented his position, whilst he has filed a countersuit for defamation. In December, he visited Trump's Mar-a-Lago to introduce Azoria Meritocracy ETF, which aims to invest in S&P 500 companies avoiding diversity, equity and inclusion practices. He has connections with former DOGE representative Vivek Ramaswamy and appeared on his podcast in November, Newsweek reported. Regarding the origin of the "DOGE Dividend" proposal, he revealed to Newsweek that the concept occurred to him during sleep. He stated, "It came to me in a dream. I woke up and called our Head of Research at Azoria, and we drafted the proposal during a two-hour lunch at Capital Grille." His "DOGE Dividends" concept aligns with his broader perspective of governmental rewards for citizens who identify wasteful expenditure. He stated, "... DOGE can save even more and as a result deliver an even bigger DOGE Dividend check to hard-working Americans." The proposal indicates that approximately 79 million American households could receive direct payments for reporting inefficiencies, potentially leading to increased savings. Sceptics suggest that while the plan is ambitious, it could potentially increase inflation and might be perceived as politically motivated rather than genuine financial reform. Fishback, who established a self-described "free thinking" investment company, rose to prominence amongst conservatives when he suggested distributing $5,000 stimulus payments to American taxpayers, which would be funded through DOGE's anticipated government savings. Despite never officially becoming part of DOGE, Fishback's "DOGE checks" concept received endorsement from Musk on X and caught Trump's attention, who showed interest in a "DOGE dividend." In December, Fishback introduced his anti-woke investment fund at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate.