logo
Goat for the vote: Mandurah mayor hopeful's meaty promise

Goat for the vote: Mandurah mayor hopeful's meaty promise

Perth Now5 days ago
Nominations for Mandurah's October mayoral election haven't opened yet, but already one hopeful is making some big meaty promises.
During a recent visit to Peel Community Kitchen, Cr Ahmed Zilani promised to donate half a tonne of goat meat if elected mayor every year he remains in office.
The councillor visited the kitchen to donate a full goat — about 15kg of meat — when he made the promise.
Cr Zilani shared more details on social media, adding it would be 'at no cost to ratepayers. This will be arranged through external sources, not council funds'.
While goat meat might seem weird or scary to some, it is a popular source of protein in South Asian countries.
Australia is also the world's biggest exporter, despite only a third of Australians saying they have tried it.
The taste can be similar to lamb or beef, depending on the cut.
The community kitchen relies on food donations and feeds hundreds of people who are homeless, on the pension or down on their luck.
Peel Community Kitchen revealed they used the meat to make a goat curry with rice.
Cr Zilani made similar donations to the kitchen in the past, including 20kg of lamb meat in 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Nominations for WA's local government elections open in August.
Cr Zilani was contacted for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Older Aussies back increased superannuation tax
Older Aussies back increased superannuation tax

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Older Aussies back increased superannuation tax

Most older Australians support increasing taxes on high superannuation balances. The federal government is controversially hoping to lift taxes on super balances above $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent in a move predicted to impact about 0.5 per cent of savers. Despite outcry from the opposition, about 57 per cent of seniors endorse the change, according to a survey of 3000 people aged 50 and older conducted by National Seniors Australia for the Super Members Council. The results appear to track with broader public sentiment on Labor's bill, Super Members Council CEO Misha Schubert said. "There seems to be broad Australian understanding about the importance of equity and sustainability in the super system, and a strong sense of fairness as the starting point," she told AAP. While a significant majority of those surveyed believed the super system was strong and sustainable, comparatively fewer thought it was equitable. Women, those with poorer health and Australians with less formal education had lower levels of confidence in its fairness, the report found. Many of these demographics do not have equal access to the benefits of superannuation because of a lack of employment opportunities or disrupted work histories. But overall, older Australians almost universally understand the importance of super with 89.5 per cent believing it must be saved for retirement. Just one in four supported early release of funds beyond current rules. But the coalition has continued to push a housing plan that would allow first-time home buyers to access up to $50,000 from their super to put down a deposit, despite protests it would raise house prices and leave savers worse-off in the future. "Policy ideas that propose early release are dangerous and they make Australians poorer," Ms Schubert said.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese 'raises eyebrows' in Washington by shying away from US in John Curtin address
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese 'raises eyebrows' in Washington by shying away from US in John Curtin address

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese 'raises eyebrows' in Washington by shying away from US in John Curtin address

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's decision to downplay the US alliance in a major address has rattled the diplomatic relationship amid an AUKUS review, defence spending tensions and criticism from the Trump administration. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has 'raised eyebrows' in the United States at a time of growing disunity, sparking further concerns about his relationship with Washington. In his weekend address at the 80th anniversary of former prime minister John Curtin's death, Mr Albanese distanced Australia from its history as a close ally of the US. He said that Australia would pursue its interests as a 'sovereign nation' and not be 'shackled to the past', after Mr Curtin led the country through WWII as a close ally of the US. Mr Albanese declared the US alliance should be seen as a 'product' of Mr Curtin's leadership in foreign, but not the 'extent' of it. 'Curtin's famous statement that Australia 'looked to America' was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another,' Mr Albanese told the John Curtin Research Centre. 'It was a recognition that Australia's fate would be decided in our region.' The comments have been interpreted by policy experts as a rhetorical step away from the US alliance, and risk being seen in Washington as a signal of diplomatic divergence. Former Trump senior advisor Christian Whiton weighed in on the Prime Minister's speech, telling Sky News that it would be met with "skepticism" by the US. 'I think you have to look at it as sort of a globalist, soft on China signal,' Mr Whiton said on Sunday. 'Maybe it's one that the United States invited because, you know, the review of AUKUS is sort of an own goal situation; it's a little unclear." Mr Whiton added that the Australian-US relationship was enduring and that the two countries' shared history was "more important than any verbiage back and forth" "There's a lot of mixed messages going on," he said. Retired major general of the Australian Army Mick Ryan also told Sky News that Mr Albanese's speech would "raise eyebrows in the US capital". "There was a huge amount of enthusiasm for talking down any threat whatsoever posed by China (in the speech)," Mr Ryan said. "The fact that the US wasn't mentioned, not just in the current concept, but also its great contribution to Australia's defence in the Pacific War will really affect many of our friends in the United States." It comes as the AUKUS agreement has come under review by the US Pentagon, a defence pact that was set up to enhance US involvement in securing the Indo-Pacific region. Nationals deputy leader Kevin Hogan warned on Sunday that Mr Albanese had failed to prioritise the US relationship since President Donald Trump was elected in November 2024. 'Given the importance of that country, not just on the economic relationship we have, but the national security relationship, it should be (embarrassing) to all Australians,' Mr Hogan said. 'We know the US is doing a review into AUKUS as well, and the fact our two leaders haven't had a chat and Albanese hasn't been able to secure that is absolutely embarrassing.' — Anthony Albanese (@AlboMP) July 5, 2025 Tensions rise following AUKUS friction The fallout from Mr Albanese's speech followed weeks of growing strain in the trilateral AUKUS security pact after the US Pentagon ordered a review of the deal. A US defence official said the review would ensure the pact met President Trump's 'America First' agenda, amid criticism of Australia's comparatively low level of defence spending. That decision came before Australia and the UK adopted what critics described as 'ambiguous' positions on President Trump's recent strikes against Iran. Mr Albanese waited 24 hours before his government issued a carefully worded statement that stopped short of endorsing the US strikes, calling instead for 'de-escalation' and 'dialogue'. That response was branded 'flat-footed' by the opposition, with acting shadow foreign affairs minister Andrew Hastie saying Mr Albanese 'should have stood up and spoken to the Australian people'. 'Sending out a government spokesman to make a brief comment about one of the biggest events to happen in the last five years was not good enough,' Mr Hastie said at the time. The perceived reluctance to back US action in the Middle East likely deepened concerns in Washington over Australia's reliability as an ally. The Trump administration has been publicly frustrated by the Albanese government's resistance to increasing defence spending to 3.5 per cent requested by USDefence Secretary Pete Hegseth. The Albanese government has committed to spending 2.3 per cent of GDP by 2033, far shy of the 5 per cent agreed to by NATO allies by 2035. PM dismisses concerns Despite the mounting concerns, Mr Albanese has downplayed the idea of a rift between Australia and the US. Speaking at the Sky News/The Australian's Economic Outlook forum on Friday, he insisted that he was 'not worried' about relations with the United States. He said he was confident in getting a meeting with President Trump, even after their scheduled meeting at the G7 in Canada was abruptly cancelled. President Trump then failed to follow up with a phone call, despite speaking with other world leaders, and no meeting has been booked in since. 'I'm not worried by someone making an understandable decision, which he did, to return to Washington,' Mr Albanese said of the cancelled meeting on Friday. 'Of course, we will have meetings. There will be a range of meetings between now and the end of the year with President Trump.'

Slade Brockman: More regulation would strangle WA gas industry and Australian economy
Slade Brockman: More regulation would strangle WA gas industry and Australian economy

West Australian

time3 hours ago

  • West Australian

Slade Brockman: More regulation would strangle WA gas industry and Australian economy

It is no coincidence that Labor's default response to a gas supply crisis has always been the same tired three-card trick. First, blame the previous government. Then blame the market. Lastly, regulate, regulate, regulate. If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. The WA gas industry is one of the greatest economic success stories in modern Australian history — built here, by us, with no handouts, no apologies and minimal bureaucracy. In the past, while the Eastern States drowned in red-tape and ideology, WA quietly powered ahead. Our gas sector was made possible by bold leadership, not red tape interference from Canberra. The Brand and Court Liberal governments, from the late 1950s and into the 1980s, had the foresight to back this industry, not stifle it. They unlocked the vast resources of our State and set the foundation for WA to become the economic engine room of the nation. This wasn't achieved through over-regulation or endless reports and reviews. It was achieved by risk-takers, backed by massive private investment, and enabled by governments smart enough to get out of the way. In oil and gas especially, companies faced decade-long lead times, volatile markets, and complex offshore challenges — and they still delivered for our State and our nation. They poured hundreds of billions into the WA economy, built world-class infrastructure, and attracted generations of skilled workers. Woodside — now one of Australia's most important energy companies — was born of that pro-development environment. And our WA gas industry pays its way. In 2023, Woodside alone paid $5 billion in taxes and levies. Since 1984, the North West Shelf Project has returned over $40 billion in royalties and excise — including approximately $18b to WA — all while creating thousands of high-wage, long-term jobs. This is a success story built not on regulation but on vision, genuine enterprise and belief in the future. Sadly, the creeping tendrils of regulation have slowly wrapped themselves around the WA industry, making the future far less certain than it should be. According to the Government's own regulator, AEMO, WA could face gas shortages as early as 2028, with a real risk of shortfalls by 2030. Unbelievable. And what's Chris Bowen's solution to this? More regulation. More intervention. More of what caused the problem in the first place. That's his clever answer to government-induced shortages! Ideologically-driven governments and inner-city Eastern States think-tanks have been targeting the very industry that powers our nation — literally gaslighting Australians while their own States struggle to keep the lights on. They demonise gas while depending on it. They regulate it to strangle the industry out of existence, all the while pretending that renewables alone will fill the gap. Let's be blunt: if Labor's current policies had been in place in the 1970s, there would be no gas industry, no iron ore boom, no royalties, and no economic powerhouse in WA today. And if we let that short-sighted regulatory approach win, the next wave of economic development will never come. Just more red tape, more shortages, more excuses. Eastern States Labor governments have been strangling their own industries, banning new gas projects, and driving up energy costs — while hard working Australian families pay the price. WA cannot afford to import their failure. We cannot afford to be governed by the same timid, regulatory mindset that has left the east coast short of gas and long on excuses. The future demands more energy — not less. And cheaper, more reliable energy at that. Whether it's mining critical minerals, growing the service economy, or hosting power-hungry industries like advanced manufacturing and artificial intelligence, energy is not optional. It is the foundation for prosperity. WA was built on hard work, courage, and the freedom to develop. That formula has never let us down. We don't need more regulation. We need to defend what works. Less interference, more development. That's how we keep the lights on, and our future bright. Slade Brockman is a Liberal Senator for WA

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store