
Asylum seeker wins immigration appeal to have case reheard after changing his nationality from Iranian to Afghan halfway through the case
The migrant initially told the Home Office that he left Iran 'illegally' and if he returned would be in danger of persecution because he was an ethnic and religious minority.
However, this claim was dismissed.
He later appealed the matter, claiming he was actually from Afghanistan and had been forced to leave due to problems his family faced with the Taliban.
The unnamed migrant said if he were to return he would suffer a decline in his mental health which would breach his human rights.
A hearing with a First-tier Tribunal judge took place but due to an 'administration oversight', the migrant and his solicitors did not attend and so his appeal was dismissed.
He has since appealed this decision and an Upper Tribunal judge has now ruled that his case should be reheard because his in-person evidence was of 'critical importance' to testing credibility.
The Upper Tribunal heard the man arrived in the UK in August 2012 and claimed asylum the following month.
File image: The migrant initially told the Home Office that he left Iran 'illegally' and if he returned would be in danger of persecution because he was an ethnic and religious minority
His claim was refused in 2015, and despite his attempts to appeal the decision, he was unsuccessful after it was found that he 'lacked credibility' and 'failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution in Iran'.
The man remained in the UK and in July 2021 told the Home Office that he feared persecution upon return to Iran on account of his Baluch ethnicity, his Sunni Muslim faith, and the fact that he had left Iran illegally.
He stated that his brother's involvement in smuggling activities would place him at risk if he returned, and that his 'serious underlying mental health conditions' would impact his reintegration into Iran, which he claims would breach his human rights.
The tribunal said that he submitted a witness statement in advance of an appeal hearing which spoke of an alternative reason why he needed protection.
The judgement said the man 'now claims to be a national of Afghanistan' and had left the country when he was 17.
He stated that he had left Afghanistan due to problems his family faced with the Taliban, and told of how his father, brother, and sister still live there.
The man then explained that he left Afghanistan in 2011 before travelling to Iran, Turkey, and then the UK.
The judgment states: 'He stated that, upon claiming asylum in the UK, he falsely asserted Iranian nationality out of fear of being returned to Afghanistan.
File image: The unnamed migrant said if he were to return he would suffer a decline in his mental health which would breach his human rights
'He now claims that, if returned to Afghanistan, he would face ill-treatment at the hands of the Taliban.'
The man again said that his mental health issues would constitute 'very significant obstacles' to his reintegration in Afghanistan, and so his removal would breach his human rights.
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Sara Anzani decided that the matter should be heard afresh by the First-tier Tribunal.
The judge said: 'This was a protection appeal in which the [man's] credibility was central to the determination of the claim, thereby rendering his oral evidence of critical importance.
'Furthermore, there was evidence before the Tribunal of the [man's] documented mental health difficulties, which required careful consideration in the context of procedural fairness.
'The Judge's reasoning fails to reflect adequate engagement with these issues, or with the question of whether the appeal could be fairly and justly determined in the [man's] absence.
'For these reasons, I find that the Judge did not address all relevant material considerations and failed to properly assess whether refusing the [man's] readjournment request would compromise his right to a fair hearing.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Why we had a revolution': US politician in heated dustup with Farage in London over free speech and Trump
A confrontation between a Maryland congressman and the head of the UK's Reform Party grew heated on Wednesday as the right-wing party leader refused to hear any criticism of Donald Trump uttered in his presence. Rep. Jamie Raskin and other Democrats were in London this week as part of a bipartisan congressional delegation to discuss the Online Safety Act. Members of both major US parties believe the act violates First Amendment protections for US companies and unfairly targets American tech firms by extension. Raskin is one of the Democratic Party's most skilled communicators in the House and was an impeachment manager during the second trial of Donald Trump in 2021. A longtime foe of the US president, Raskin's opening remarks touched on the Trump administration's wide-ranging assault on the First Amendment, which top officials have contended (falsely) does not apply to noncitizens, including legal green card holders. Those remarks drew a furious response to the congressman, according to Raskin, from Nigel Farage — leader of the U.K.'s conservative Reform party who, in 2024, was a vocal supporter of the third Trump campaign as he'd been for the president's two prior runs. 'We're not here to talk about Donald Trump,' Raskin quoted Farage as scolding him. According to the congressman, the conversation devolved further from there, with Farage labeling him 'pig-headed.' The Maryland Democrat said he responded: 'This is why we had a revolution against you guys.' The congressman went on to tell Politico that Democrats believed there were good and bad aspects to the Online Safety Act, and were eager to discuss it with UK lawmakers. 'We thought there were some very good things in the Online Safety Act, and there might be some problematic things,' he told the news outlet. Of Farage, he added: 'I think the intervention of Democrats who don't have a dog in that fight was maybe too much for him to handle.' A handful of other Democratic representatives confirmed the exchange to Politico. Two of them, Reps. Jasmine Crockett and Eric Swalwell, labeled the Reform Party chief a 'manbaby' in their own statements to the outlet. 'This manbaby was not feeling it. … He was gonna pigeonhole the conversation into only things that he wanted to discuss, and anything else was gonna be shut down, because that's what free speech, I guess, looks like to him,' Crockett told Politico. Swalwell added that Farage appeared 'unhinged' in the meeting. Raskin's ties to the Revolutionary War are more direct than those of his colleagues. His district includes Montgomery County, a jurisdiction named after Revolutionary War general Richard Montgomery, who was Irish-American. Maryland, in general, retains a number of town, city and county names closely tied to British monarchs and aristocrats. The congressman even quipped to Politico that one of the Republican members of the delegation told him afterwards he enjoyed Raskin's quip at Farage. Raskin underwent treatment for cancer in 2023 after being diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma. He was one of a successive chain of Democrats who sought in various bids to challenge the party's 'old guard' for leadership in the Trump era; in 2024, he launched a bid for the top-ranking spot on the Judiciary committee against Jerry Nadler. In a sign of the strength of his ties to both party leadership and progressives, the elder Nadler stepped aside and Raskin took over with support of Nancy Pelosi backing his leadership bid. Separately on Wednesday the Maryland congressman announced a lawsuit against the Trump administration for blocking legally-permitted congressional oversight visits of ICE detention facilities, joined by a dozen other House Democrats.


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘It's time to pay up', says Starmer in late payments crackdown
Firms which persistently pay their suppliers late are set to face fines worth potentially millions of pounds as the Prime Minister warned that 'it's time to pay up'. Sir Keir Starmer has said 'too many hardworking people are being forced to spend precious hours chasing payments' in a process which he described as 'exhausting'. As part of a drive to support small businesses, the Government is set to unveil plans to give the small business commissioner bolstered powers to fine large companies which persistently pay their suppliers late. The commissioner will also receive new powers to enforce a rule that customers must pay their supplier within 30 days of receiving a valid invoice, unless otherwise agreed, with spot checks to help identify breaches. Upcoming legislation will also introduce maximum payment terms of 60 days, reducing to 45 days. 'From builders and electricians to freelance designers and manufacturers — too many hardworking people are being forced to spend precious hours chasing payments instead of doing what they do best – growing their businesses,' Sir Keir said. 'It's unfair, it's exhausting and it's holding Britain back. 'So, our message is clear, it's time to pay up. 'Through our small business plan, we're not only tackling the scourge of late payments once and for all, but we're giving small business owners the backing and stability they need for their business to thrive, driving growth across the country through our plan for change.' The crackdown on late payments is part of a wider Government package and sits alongside a move to pump £4 billion of financial support into small business start-ups and growth. This is set to include £1 billion for new firms, with 69,000 start-up loans and mentoring support. 'This country is home to some of the brightest entrepreneurs and innovative businesses in the world, and we want to unleash their full potential by giving them back time and money to do what they do best – growing our local economies,' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said. 'Our small business plan – the first in over a decade – is slashing unnecessary admin costs, making it easier for businesses to set up shop and giving SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) the financial backing they need.' Andrew Griffith, the Conservative shadow business secretary, said: 'Cracking down on late payments will be welcome for small business but will mean nothing for the 218,000 businesses that have closed under Labour. 'The reality for businesses under Labour is a doubling of business rates, a £25 billion jobs tax and a full-on strangulation of employment red tape. 'Only the Conservatives are on the side of the makers and will support businesses across Britain to create jobs and wealth.'


BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
ceqyx35d9x2o (GIF Image, 1 × 1 pixels)
BBC Prime Minister Mark Carney has said Canada will recognise a Palestinian state in September, making it the third G7 country to do so in recent days. Carney said such a move would depend on reforms including commitments by the Palestinian Authority to fundamentally reform its governance and to hold general elections in 2026 without Hamas and to demilitarise the territory. His announcement comes a day after the UK announced it would recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agreed to a ceasefire and other conditions. Last week, France said it will also formally recognise a Palestinian state. Most countries - about 139 in all - formally recognise a Palestinian state. At Wednesday's news conference, Carney said "the level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable and it is rapidly deteriorating". He added that Canada had long been committed to a two-state solution as part of a negotiated peace process, but said that "this approach is no longer tenable". Carney has been under pressure in recent days to address Palestinian statehood. Nearly 200 former Canadian ambassadors and diplomats signed a letter on Tuesday calling on him to recognise a Palestinian state. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version. You can receive Breaking News on a smartphone or tablet via the BBC News App. You can also follow @BBCBreaking on X to get the latest alerts.