North Texas mothers on opposing sides of school choice issue share their perspectives
As legislation providing public funds for students to attend private schools inches closer to the governor's desk, North Texas parents both for and against shared their thoughts on the controversial bill.
Carla Behlen is against the Education Savings Account program, also known as ESAs. She has two children within Coppell ISD, and said public education is more welcoming and the best fit for them.
Greta Alexander supports ESAs. She has a teenage daughter and recently took custody of a granddaughter with learning differences. She dismissed critics of ESAs who claim they will mainly benefit wealthy families already sending their children to private schools; she said she makes $35,000 a year and private education gives her kids a better life.
In an interview with Lacey Beasley, both women talk about the pros and cons of the program and the hope they share for a better education system in Texas.
The following conversation was lightly edited for clarity.
Carla Behlen: I think it's setting a priority with funding that says a private school student is worth $10,000 to the state, and a public school student is worth less than $7,000 to the state. I have two kids in middle school, and they are at different middle schools, even within my school district. One, she was built for school. She's, you know, thriving in that environment. It's been really great. The other one was starting to struggle, and we were able to move him to another school that had a deeper fine arts program and a deeper theater program, where he has really just been able to take off and thrive there. If it was not for that school, we would be in a really different place with that kid.
Greta Alexander: Private school was a must because of my own experience at high school, if I could go back that far. I was pregnant at 17, and by the time I graduated, I was pregnant again and I was crying out for help. My mom was a single parent. Two jobs. I had no one at school to talk to either. It was kind of like being in a box, you know? I think that's the difference for me to have somebody that's able to pay more attention. We have some great teachers in public school, but unfortunately, they can't be attentive to everyone when they have 25 or 30 kids in one room.
Lacey Beasley: The average student would receive about $10,000. Do you think that's enough to send a student to private school?
Alexander: The private school that we attend now is $11,000, so I think that that's more than enough.
Behlen: So if it's $11,000, that's great if you happen to have one that's in that range in your backyard. The average one by us is closer to $20,000 to $25,000 a year. That does not include activity fees, uniform fees, getting your kid to and from school.
Alexander: We have this myth that parents that send their kids to private school are rich, and that's not the case. I'm not rich. You know, I'm $35,000 a year, if that, and that's stretching it. It's not just rich people that are trying to send their kids to a private environment. There's parents like me that didn't have an opportunity when we were growing up, and we see a better opportunity for our kids.
Beasley: A lot of private schools are faith based, and there's a little bit of a debate of should taxpayer dollars go to religious schools? Do you want your kids to learn religion in school?
Alexander: Yes. Yes I do.
Behlen: I have a real problem with public dollars going to that. By law, your public schools are not teaching religion and are open to families of all faiths, all backgrounds, all identities, all kids and all disabilities. My husband teaches in a public school and is a Christian. However, that is separate from his from his teaching identity. He is not teaching religion. He's teaching math.
Beasley: Do either of any of your children or grandchildren benefit from special needs services?
Alexander: My granddaughter has a 504 [plan, which provides accommodations for students with learning differences] right now.
Beasley: With her going to private school with the 504 plan, does the school seem accommodating?
Alexander: Yes. They already have kiddos in place right now that they're accommodating with that service, so she's going to be fine.
Beasley: It takes a lot of research on the parent behalf to find, if they do have a child with special needs, they need to research the correct school for them, the best needs for their child if they want a faith-based school. A lot of it falls on the parent to research.
Behlen: I wish, and I hope that the program primarily helps families who would not otherwise be able to go to private school, if that's what they wish. My concern is that most of that money is not going to go that way. I am appreciative that the legislature put a 20% cap on families making over $160,000 accessing it. That cap expires in two years.
Alexander: If we want to really look at what's public schools doing, not all of them, but the ones that are in Fort Worth now. I know everybody's seen the mayor. She's fighting for kids to learn how to read. I know kiddos right now that's getting ready to graduate high school. They can't read, and it breaks my heart. You know, it breaks my heart because they're in a public setting.
Behlen: I agree. Let's fix it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
A look at the wins rural Texas scored in this year's legislative session
There were big wins for rural Texas this legislative session as lawmakers dedicated more funding to health care, struggling farmers and emergency management. More than 3 million Texans live in rural pockets strewn across the state, from the Piney Woods in East Texas to far-flung corners in the Panhandle. However, people in rural communities are more likely to lack access to basic necessities, have a dearth of hospitals and struggle to find money for infrastructure needs. Lawmakers took strides to close those gaps this year. Some proposals did not go through, including a bill that would have prioritized applications for broadband projects that expand to underserved and unserved communities. However, there are other changes that stand to improve conditions for rural communities. Texas schools can expect an additional $8.5 billion in public education funding. House Bill 2, sponsored by state Rep. Brad Buckley, R-Salado, gives public schools money for teacher and staff salaries. The money will also be used for training and preparing teachers, special education, safety requirements and early childhood learning. Texas has an excess of 5.5 million students attending 1,200 public school districts. The boost is expected to help financially stagnating school districts recover from their shortages, including budget deficits, keeping up with competitive salaries and operating costs. Chris Stanley, board president of the Ector County School District in the oil-and-gas producing region of the state, said he was pleased to see lawmakers pass a public school funding package in tandem with the voucher program. The district is running with a $24 million deficit to educate its 33,000 students. Stanley said the district will benefit from the extra money. However, Stanley said it was just the start to addressing the needs of public schools. 'In no way is it over,' Stanley said. Legislators also passed a private school voucher school program called the Education Savings Account, a $1 billion program that allows families to use public dollars to pay for private schools. Parents and educators have said the program could adversely affect public schools. Lawmakers addressed a flurry of water issues plaguing Texas communities this session, and some of their solutions will directly benefit rural areas. Senate Bill 7, a sweeping bill by state Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, calls for more money to go toward rural Texas. The bill allows for money from the Texas Water Fund to be allocated to the Rural Water Assistance Fund, which provides small, rural water utilities with financing for water and wastewater projects. The bill also requires the Texas Water Development Board to ensure a portion of the money is used in rural areas. Lawmakers also expanded what type of projects qualify for funding through the state. This is helping South Texas officials in their two-year long quest to obtain the funding for a project that would reuse water in their drainage system. Senate Bill 1967 allows drainage projects that capture floodwater, treat it and distribute it as a new source of water to qualify for funding through the Flood Infrastructure Fund. Gov. Greg Abbott has signed the bill into law. The bill also allows drainage districts to qualify for funding through the Water Loan Assistance Program, even if they don't have historical data about water use or provide retail water service directly to consumers. While these changes to the Texas Water Code will help officials in Hidalgo County get started on construction for their project, it also helps drainage districts across the state fund similar projects. Texas lawmakers took several steps to address problems with rural health. This includes a bill that provides more support for rural hospitals. Experts say it could have helped prevent the closure of a hospital in East Texas during the legislative session. The Mid Coast Medical Center closed down its operations in Trinity, a town of about 2,400 that is 90 miles north of Houston, citing financial concerns. Rural hospital closures slowed in Texas after the state saw an influx of federal funding for rural health care as part of the national response to COVID-19. The funding has ended, but inflation hasn't, leaving many rural hospitals with tough financial choices. House Bill 18, by Rep. Gary VanDeaver, R-New Boston, is known as the Rural Health Stabilization and Innovation Act. It seeks to give more support for rural hospitals by creating a State Office of Rural Hospital Finance to provide hospitals with technical assistance. Lynn Cowles, the health and food justice director for Every Texan, a public policy institute in Texas, said the bill is good but requires a lot of oversight and monitoring. 'We do want to make sure that the bill's emphasis on administrative improvements and training is going to serve the bill's intent and not line pockets for consulting firms,' Cowles said. The bill also creates a Rural Hospital Financial Vulnerability Index and Needs Assessment, which will evaluate the financial health of rural hospitals, along with a Rural Pediatric Mental Health Care Access Program and other measures. Under the bill, each hospital's reimbursement rates will be updated every two years. John Henderson, CEO of the Texas Organization of Rural & Community Hospitals, said the bill was the most significant rural health legislation in a 'generation.' He said the Medicaid rate protection, pediatric behavioral health and other changes will help rural communities. 'Because these things are now in statute, rural hospitals can count on it,' Henderson said. 'Rather than worry about uncertainty related to renewals or budget cycles.' Rural emergency services will also get a boost from lawmakers. House Bill 3000 by state Rep. Ken King, R-Canadian, addresses the lack of resources for rural emergency services, which largely happens because of tight budgets that keep medical departments from affording equipment. The bill establishes a grant program for qualified rural counties to purchase ambulances as a way to strengthen emergency services and improve response times. Texas farmers will soon have access to additional state support, thanks to a bill by Sen. Stan Kitzman, R-Pattison. House Bill 43 expands both the Young Farmer Grant Program and Young Farmer Interest Rate Reduction Program, which provide money to farmers. Age restrictions were eliminated from the grant program, making the money eligible to all farmers. Changes to the interest rate reduction program will allow anyone in agriculture to apply for loans up to $1 million at an interest rate of 2%. Under the current program, only 18 to 46 year-olds can only apply for $500,000 loans at a 5% interest rate. The age restrictions were also eliminated from the grant program, which was limited to 18 to 46-year-olds. Under the bill, grantees could receive up to $500,000 while paying a 10% match. Currently, grantees can only receive $20,000 and have to fully match the grant. Businesses essential to agriculture, like cotton gins, are also now eligible to apply under the bill Kitzman said the goal is to help producers who are sitting in a tough economy to hang on. Uncertain markets, inflation and growing competition for land have made it difficult for farmers to operate. Rodney Schronk, a fifth-generation farmer from Central Texas whose family has grown cotton, corn and other commodities, tipped his hat to lawmakers for helping agriculture. 'So hopefully it's enough money that maybe — maybe — there'll be some farmers that are able to survive these difficult times,' Schronk said. As his son prepares to take over the family business, Schronk sees how the bill's expanded funding opportunities could help establish more stability in their own farm. In the coming years it may open the door to actually purchase land, rather than just lease it. Lawmakers also passed a bill directing the state's emergency division to establish a disaster recovery program. Authored by Rep. Trent Ashby, R-Lufkin, House Bill 3010 makes new money available to certain counties, cities and colleges when extreme weather devastates infrastructure. The bill does not include a specific amount. Counties must have fewer than 100,000 residents to apply for this funding, which will be administered by the Texas Division of Emergency Management. To be eligible, the cost of restoring destroyed infrastructure must exceed 10% of what the county collects in state and local sales taxes. Applications must include an estimate of the total cost of the repairs and evidence that the project does not qualify for federal assistance. Leon County Judge Byron Ryder said the money will help counties like his address the immediate aftermath of natural disasters, such as flooding and hurricanes. He said counties often have to dip into their penny-pinched budgets to keep themselves afloat while they wait for the Federal Emergency Management Agency to reimburse the damages. That reimbursement is not guaranteed. Ryder said the county, with roughly 16,000 residents, has spent upwards of hundreds of thousands on previous hurricane and flooding damages, part of which has not been reimbursed. 'We're on our own for the first 72 hours [of a disaster],' Ryder said. 'Everything is spent, and then we hope we get reimbursed by FEMA.' Another bill by Rep. David Spiller, R-Jacksboro, seeks to eliminate the disparities between rural and urban firefighting and rescue capabilities. The bill requires Texas A&M Engineering Service to conduct a study that evaluates the disparities and provide recommendations on how to improve it. Another requirement is that the study considers several factors, including available funding for personnel and equipment and the number of qualified candidates to fill new or vacant positions. The study is to be submitted by Dec. 1, 2026 to the governor, lieutenant governor and speaker of the House. Lawmakers also passed a slew of bills aimed at preparing the state for wildfires and mitigating the damage. The package of legislation includes 10% of money in the Rural Volunteer Fire Department Assistance program to go to volunteer firefighters at risk for wildfires. Disclosure: Every Texan and Texas Organization of Rural & Community Hospitals (TORCH) have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Yahoo
23-05-2025
- Yahoo
GOP Tax Bill Touts 'Trump Accounts' Giving $1,000 To Newborns — But Experts Say It Wouldn't Do Much For Parents
As the One Big Beautiful Bill Act makes its way to the Senate, one piece of the proposed bill is still stirring heated debate among parents and caregivers. This part of the proposal aims to grant every newborn in the United States a $1,000 government-funded savings account — framed as an investment in the future of America's children. Supporters claim the initiative, backed by prominent conservative lawmakers, would promote financial independence and reduce long-term reliance on government aid. But economic experts and policy analysts are sounding the alarm, warning that the bill could deepen inequality, strain federal resources and divert attention from more effective ways to help lower-income children. 'As a parent I just have to laugh,' said Rebecca Schroeder from Florida. 'This is not what we want or need, nor what we asked for. We need real policy that makes having children affordable and equitable, not this overly patriotic political move. It feels icky to me.' Under the new bill, children born between Jan. 1, 2025, and Jan. 1, 2029, would receive the $1,000 deposit in an account, which would be invested in financial markets. Parents and loved ones can contribute to these accounts as well. Once the children are grown, they could withdraw the money to use for education, the down payment on a home, or capital to start a business. Previously known as 'Money Accounts for Growth and Advancement' or 'MAGA Accounts' — the Trump Accounts are not unlike a 529 college savings plan, explains Ted Callahan, a financial tax analyst with Intuit. 'The earnings on these accounts grow tax-deferred, which isn't all that different from a typical brokerage account,' he said. 'But other similar options to these accounts already exist.' Some of these already existing accounts include Coverdell Education Savings Account (ESA). Like a 529, it offers tax-free growth and tax-free withdrawals for qualified education expenses, including both K-12 and higher education. Another alternative is a custodial account, such as a UGMA (Uniform Gifts to Minors Act) or UTMA (Uniform Transfers to Minors Act) account. These accounts don't have contribution limits, though large contributions may be subject to gift taxes. Unlike 529s and ESAs, custodial accounts can be used for any purpose that benefits the child, not just education. 'Each account type has its own pros and cons, so the right choice depends on your savings goals, how much control you want over the funds, and your tax situation,' said Callahan. If the bill passes as drafted, parents would be able to contribute up to $5,000 a year to the Trump Account and the balance would be invested in a diversified fund that tracks the U.S. stock index. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) who spearheaded the effort, said the accounts give children 'the miracle of the compound growth, the ability to accumulate wealth, which is transformational.' This comes on the heels of the Trump administration considering a $5,000 'baby bonus' gift to any woman who gives birth, which was lambasted by parents, commentators and policymakers alike for being a shortsighted bandaid for the true mental and financial stress parents are under. Though 'baby bond'-style legislation exists in numerous states already, tax experts are wary of this federal iteration. Callahan says he understands the goal behind the accounts, but doesn't necessarily see them as more or less beneficial than what already exists. This is because people can only contribute post-tax income to the accounts, and gains in the accounts would also be taxed when money was withdrawn. 'This makes this just a regular investment account with no real tax advantage,' said Callahan. 'If you want to really help parents, you would almost need to have an annual amount deposited in the accounts that were tax exempt, and that amount would need to be very significant given the increase in the cost of living, and then educate children in schools about these accounts once they are old enough so they can understand how investing works.' In the end, while the Trump Accounts were introduced with the promise of supporting American families, both tax experts and many parents remain unconvinced of their true value. Critics point out that the one-time payment structure falls short of addressing long-term financial needs like child care, health care, or education. At the same time, analysts argue that the broader tax plan surrounding the accounts primarily benefits high-income earners, with limited and temporary relief for middle- and lower-income households. As the policy takes effect, its real-world impact will ultimately determine whether it meets its stated goals — or adds to a growing divide in how tax benefits are distributed. 'We just want quality healthcare and to know that when we send our son to school he's safe,' said Schroeder. 'These accounts are not the answer, and I really wish they'd spend more time focusing on what matters to parents.' Donald Trump Openly Selling Access To Those Who Put The Most Cash In His Pocket Trump's Post About Taylor Swift Is So Immature, We Needed Child Psychologists To Explain What If We Just Gave People Enough Money To Live On?
Yahoo
22-05-2025
- Yahoo
Kendall vows to give young people ‘chances and choices' for a better life
The Work and Pensions Secretary has vowed young people will have 'chances and choices' to build a better life as she launched a £45 million scheme, the day after she gave a speech defending welfare cuts. Liz Kendall visited Liverpool's Anfield Stadium on Thursday to announce the programme to support thousands of 18-21-year-olds into education, work and training. Ms Kendall said the scheme would 'make sure every young person is earning or learning and gets the chances and choices they deserve to build a better life'. The Leicester West MP said it was 'moving' to meet young care leavers at the football stadium, where a careers fair was taking place. She said she met one woman who was helped by charity Thrive after her mother died and now had an apprenticeship in construction. 'If you've just lost your parents, trying to cope with that, let alone build a life, can feel overwhelming and that is the real difference, that this funding will help to give more young women like that the chances and choices they deserve for a better future,' she said. The visit came the day after Ms Kendall gave a speech defending plans to cut £5 billion in welfare reforms. Speaking on Thursday, she told the PA news agency: 'For people who can work, they need opportunities to do so and, for too long, people have been written off, condemned to a life on benefits, given no help and support and that's not good enough. 'We are spending too much money on the costs of failure.' She said the Government was funding new skills and training. She did not answer whether scrapping the two-child benefit cap would be looked at but said the Government would be publishing a 'bold and ambitious' child poverty strategy. She added: 'There is a lot, lot more to do, but we are absolutely determined to drive down poverty and drive up opportunity to give people the chance of a better future.' The proposed welfare cuts have been criticised by charities and 100 Labour MPs are reported to have signed a letter urging ministers to scale back the plans. Ms Kendall said: 'I think the British people want people who can work to work and I think they want people who can never work to be supported. That's what we're doing.' The investment announced in Liverpool is part of the Government's youth guarantee and will see the region, along with areas in the West of England, Tees Valley, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, West Midlands, East Midlands and two parts of London, receive £5 million investment to become a 'trailblazer' and match young people to job or training opportunities. Mayor of the Liverpool City Region Steve Rotheram, who was at the event in Anfield, said: 'When I travel across our region, I feel fortunate to meet some of the best and brightest young people in the country. 'But, for too long, too many of them have been held back from getting on in life, not because of a lack of talent, but by a lack of opportunity – and I have made it my mission to put that right.' Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'The Youth Guarantee is a genuine game-changer for young people in England. 'I'm delighted Liverpool is leading the way as one of our trailblazers – ensuring every young person has support to develop essential skills for work and life at the critical early stage of their careers. 'Every young person deserves the best life chances — and we won't stop until everyone has a level playing field to succeed.'
