logo
Andrew Cuomo Can Still Save New York City

Andrew Cuomo Can Still Save New York City

Who can save New York from Zohran Mamdani, the callow Democratic mayoral nominee who would bankrupt the city economically with socialism and morally with antisemitism? Not Curtis Sliwa, the Republican nominee, who received less than 28% of the vote in 2021 against Eric Adams. Not Mayor Adams himself, who didn't even seek renomination as a Democrat and is running as an independent.
Perhaps counterintuitively, the city's best hope is former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who lost the primary to Mr. Mamdani. Mr. Cuomo also is running as an independent.
Ironically, Mr. Cuomo owes his primary loss to a bill he signed as governor in 2019. Before then, New York City held its Democratic mayoral primary in September, and if no candidate got 45%, the top two finishers faced each other in the runoff. The 2019 law moved the primary to June, when turnout was sure to be lower, and introduced 'ranked-choice voting,' a difficult-to-understand system that effectively disfranchises voters who can't figure it out. As a result, the primary became easy to game.
Under the old system, even if Mr. Mamdani had finished first in a September primary, which is doubtful, he would have faced a runoff that would have fully vetted his extreme views.
Mr. Cuomo can still give him that runoff. Turnout in city general elections has been dropping—only 23% in 2021—so there are millions of voters who could get involved and stop Mr. Mamdani before it's too late.
Democratic Party leaders have to rally behind the best Democrat in the race. They should abandon Mr. Mamdani's Democratic Socialists and affirm that the Democratic Party stands for funding the police, protecting citizens, improving schools, creating good jobs, and making the city affordable through economic growth.
Mr. Cuomo is a lifelong mainstream Democrat. But he is a builder and a doer—look at the new LaGuardia Airport—and he knows something about how to create affordable housing from his stint as secretary of housing and urban development. He was elected governor three times, and he apologized for the events that led to his resignation in 2021.
Why Mr. Cuomo and not Mr. Adams? In every poll conducted since the primary, the mayor barely breaks double digits. He has very high unfavorable ratings—61% in an American Pulse Research poll conducted a month ago. Mr. Cuomo has a significant base, and in head-to-head matchups either leads Mr. Mamdani widely (50% to 35% in a July 7-8 HarrisX poll) or effectively ties him (Mr. Cuomo leads 42% to 41% in a July 18-20 Wick poll). Mr. Mamdani beats Messrs. Adams and Sliwa in head-to-head matchups.
Mr. Mamdani has high negative ratings—43% in the Wick Poll and 45% in HarrisX. Except for one outlier, Mr. Mamdani doesn't get over 50%, and his RealClearPolitics average (in a four-way contest) is 35%.
New York's mayor needs experience and leadership ability. Mr. Cuomo has more than any other candidate, and he is the best hope for saving the city.
Mr. Penn was a pollster and adviser to Bill and Hillary Clinton, 1995-2008. He is chairman of the Harris Poll and CEO of Stagwell Inc. Mr. Stein served as New York City Council president, 1986-93.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Cuts Deal With Rupert Murdoch Related To WSJ Lawsuit Over Epstein Story
Trump Cuts Deal With Rupert Murdoch Related To WSJ Lawsuit Over Epstein Story

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Cuts Deal With Rupert Murdoch Related To WSJ Lawsuit Over Epstein Story

Donald Trump and Wall Street Journal owner Rupert Murdoch on Monday struck a deal related to the president's lawsuit against the paper over its publication of a story detailing a 'bawdy' birthday message Trump allegedly wrote to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. While Trump had initially sought to have Murdoch deposed swiftly, citing, in part, his advanced age and long-standing health issues, the president has now agreed to remove that request, according to a Monday court filing first reported by Politico's Josh Gerstein. Trump sued Murdoch, the Journal's publisher and the reporters who authored an article the newspaper published last month reporting that the president wrote a lewd message to Epstein as part of an album British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell compiled for the disgraced financier's 50th birthday in 2003. Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Trump has denied writing the letter, attacking the newspaper for publishing its story and taking legal action over the report. Monday's agreement stipulates that until the 'Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is adjudicated, the Parties agree not to engage in discovery.' The filing, though, notes that if the defendants' motion fails, Murdoch shall be deposed in person within 30 days of that decision. The document states that Murdoch has three days from when the court approves the agreement to provide Trump with a sworn declaration describing his current health status. 'Defendant Murdoch has further agreed to provide regularly scheduled updates to [Trump] regarding his health, including a mechanism for him to alert [Trump] if there is a material change in his health,' the document states. 'Failure to provide updates in the agreed-upon manner as set forth in the Abatement Agreement shall result in an expedited deposition of Defendant Murdoch.' Trump last week told reporters Murdoch wanted to settle the case. 'They are talking to us about doing something but we'll see what happens,' Trump said. 'Maybe they would like us to drop that, so we'll see ... yeah, they're having, they want to settle it.' 'When I get treated unfairly, I do things about it,' he added. Related... Trump Wants Murdoch Swiftly Deposed Over Epstein Story Because Of Age And Health Trump Sues WSJ Reporters, Murdoch For Libel After Epstein Birthday Card Story Trump Lashes Out At Rupert Murdoch Over WSJ Epstein Bombshell

Sen. Tammy Duckworth demands answers from FAA on airplane evacuation safety
Sen. Tammy Duckworth demands answers from FAA on airplane evacuation safety

CBS News

time17 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Sen. Tammy Duckworth demands answers from FAA on airplane evacuation safety

Following the dramatic video of an American Airlines flight evacuating on a Denver runway last month, Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois is sending a letter to new FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford demanding answers on evacuation safety. "The FAA needs an evacuation standard that reflects the reality of flying today," Duckworth told CBS News in a statement. "The American people deserve to know whether the FAA is taking this responsibility seriously and complying with the law to ensure the flying public can be safely evacuated from an aircraft during an emergency." Duckworth, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Aviation Subcommittee, is concerned about the ability to evacuate an airliner in 90 seconds or less. "Video showed passengers exiting with carry-on bags and, according to at least one passenger, the process took 10 to 15 minutes — the latter estimate exceeding FAA's 90 second evacuation standard by 10 times," she wrote in her letter to Bedford. The senator is seeking details about three recent evacuations. The FAA and National Transportation Safety Board are currently investigating after American Airlines Flight 3023, traveling from Denver to Miami, experienced a landing gear issue during takeoff with 173 passengers and six crew members on board. The Boeing 737 Max 8 was going nearly 150 mph when the pilots slammed on the brakes. As passengers used emergency exit slides to evacuate, flames could be seen coming from the landing gear on July 26. "We heard a loud boom, and I said 'That's not good,'" passenger Mark Tsurkis recounted. "Most of the people evacuated safely, except a few people who decided to take their luggage with them and that kind of, you know, that endangered others and endangered them." In April, a Delta A330 in Orlando experienced an engine fire, prompting passengers to evacuate. Kyle Becker, who was sitting in row 35, said he opened the window as soon as he heard people yell "fire!" "There was a fire on the engine," Becker told CBS News senior transportation correspondent Kris Van Cleave at the time. "[It] was a little scary… just never had happened to me before. Start thinking, like, OK, what are the next steps. Trying to remain calm." This incident also prompted an FAA investigation. And in March, another American Airlines Boeing 737 experienced a fire stemming from an engine issue while it was parked at a gate at Denver International Airport. Passengers filled the wing of the plane trying to escape the smoke. "Everyone was screaming, 'There's a fire. There's a fire,'" Helen Prager, who was on the plane, recalled. "Literally at the gate and I was screaming, 'Get the doors open.'" The FAA and NTSB are looking into the fire. "While FAA has yet to disclose how long any of the referenced passenger evacuations took, these incidents once again raise serious questions about FAA's 90 second evacuation standard as well as FAA's assumptions about how evacuations occur in real world conditions (such as the assumption every passenger will comply with instructions to deplane without carry-on bags)," Duckworth wrote in her letter. She wants the FAA to disclose how long the evacuations took and how many passengers took their bags with them, as well as how many children, seniors and passengers with disabilities were on board each of the flights. The senator is also seeking an update on evacuation testing that Congress mandated the FAA complete within one year of the FAA's reauthorization bill passing. That deadline passed in May. The updated testing was to replace a series of tests the FAA conducted in 2019 that did not include any real-world scenarios such as luggage in the cabin and passengers who were children, seniors or not able-bodied. Last year, Duckworth told CBS News she did not believe she could get off a plane during an emergency in under 90 seconds. "Not at all confident, not at all confident. I often fly where I'm not wearing both my artificial legs," said Duckworth, who lost both of her legs while serving in the Iraq War. "I don't think it's realistic anymore. … Conduct a real test and let's see what the realistic standard is." Duckworth asked the FAA to respond to her letter by Aug. 12. "We need answers. Are the current [plane] evacuation standards, are they adequate?" former NTSB chair and CBS News transportation safety analyst Robert Sumwalt said. "It's definitely time for the FAA to go back and reassess what standards they're using for evacuations. It's been almost 35 years since those standards were published." Kathryn Krupnik contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store