Cecilia Conrad
The upshot for Scott? Lever for Change identified so many promising organizations that last year she ended up more than doubling her initial pledge, giving away $640 million to 361 groups, chosen from more than 6,000 applicants.
Such is the transformative power of Conrad, a Stanford-trained economics professor-turned philanthropy executive who previously led the MacArthur Foundation's Fellows program, aka its 'Genius' grants. She founded Lever for Change in 2019 to dismantle barriers in philanthropy. 'There are donors who want to fund creative, effective organizations and creative, effective organizations who need funding but they have trouble finding each other,' Conrad says.
To date, Lever for Change, which has also advised LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, has influenced $2.5 billion in donations to more than 500 charities. And more is coming: The organization is now vetting hundreds more charities to help Melinda French Gates decide how to allocate $250 million to improve women's health. 'We exist to help donors discover new ideas, new potential," Conrad says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
DoorDash (NASDAQ:DASH) Posts Better-Than-Expected Sales In Q2, Increases Its Orders
On-demand food delivery service DoorDash (NYSE:DASH) beat Wall Street's revenue expectations in Q2 CY2025, with sales up 24.9% year on year to $3.28 billion. Its GAAP profit of $0.65 per share was 49.5% above analysts' consensus estimates. Is now the time to buy DoorDash? Find out in our full research report. DoorDash (DASH) Q2 CY2025 Highlights: Revenue: $3.28 billion vs analyst estimates of $3.16 billion (24.9% year-on-year growth, 3.8% beat) EPS (GAAP): $0.65 vs analyst estimates of $0.43 (49.5% beat) Adjusted EBITDA: $655 million vs analyst estimates of $639.8 million (19.9% margin, 2.4% beat) EBITDA guidance for Q3 CY2025 is $730 million at the midpoint, above analyst estimates of $716.1 million Operating Margin: 5%, up from -7.6% in the same quarter last year Free Cash Flow Margin: 52.2%, up from 16.3% in the previous quarter Orders: 761 million, up 126 million year on year Market Capitalization: $108.2 billion Company Overview Founded by Stanford students with the intent to build 'the local, on-demand FedEx", DoorDash (NYSE:DASH) operates an on-demand food delivery platform. Revenue Growth A company's long-term performance is an indicator of its overall quality. Any business can have short-term success, but a top-tier one grows for years. Thankfully, DoorDash's 28.2% annualized revenue growth over the last three years was exceptional. Its growth surpassed the average consumer internet company and shows its offerings resonate with customers, a great starting point for our analysis. This quarter, DoorDash reported robust year-on-year revenue growth of 24.9%, and its $3.28 billion of revenue topped Wall Street estimates by 3.8%. Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 18.9% over the next 12 months, a deceleration versus the last three years. We still think its growth trajectory is attractive given its scale and indicates the market is forecasting success for its products and services. Today's young investors likely haven't read the timeless lessons in Gorilla Game: Picking Winners In High Technology because it was written more than 20 years ago when Microsoft and Apple were first establishing their supremacy. But if we apply the same principles, then enterprise software stocks leveraging their own generative AI capabilities may well be the Gorillas of the future. So, in that spirit, we are excited to present our Special Free Report on a profitable, fast-growing enterprise software stock that is already riding the automation wave and looking to catch the generative AI next. Orders Request Growth As a gig economy marketplace, DoorDash generates revenue growth by expanding the number of services on its platform (e.g. rides, deliveries, freelance jobs) and raising the commission fee from each service provided. Over the last two years, DoorDash's orders, a key performance metric for the company, increased by 20.3% annually to 761 million in the latest quarter. This growth rate is among the fastest of any consumer internet business and indicates its offerings have significant traction. In Q2, DoorDash added 126 million orders, leading to 19.8% year-on-year growth. The quarterly print isn't too different from its two-year result, suggesting its new initiatives aren't accelerating request growth just yet. Revenue Per Request Average revenue per request (ARPR) is a critical metric to track because it measures how much the company earns in transaction fees from each request. This number also informs us about DoorDash's take rate, which represents its pricing leverage over the ecosystem, or "cut" from each transaction. DoorDash's ARPR growth has been mediocre over the last two years, averaging 3.5%. This isn't great, but the increase in orders is more relevant for assessing long-term business potential. We'll monitor the situation closely; if DoorDash tries boosting ARPR by taking a more aggressive approach to monetization, it's unclear whether requests can continue growing at the current pace. This quarter, DoorDash's ARPR clocked in at $4.32. It grew by 4.2% year on year, slower than its request growth. Key Takeaways from DoorDash's Q2 Results It was great to see DoorDash increase its number of requests this quarter. We were also happy its revenue outperformed Wall Street's estimates. Overall, this print had some key positives. The stock traded up 4.8% to $270.50 immediately following the results. Sure, DoorDash had a solid quarter, but if we look at the bigger picture, is this stock a buy? When making that decision, it's important to consider its valuation, business qualities, as well as what has happened in the latest quarter. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it's free.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Stanford University lays off 363 employees
This story was originally published on Higher Ed Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Higher Ed Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: Stanford University laid off 363 staff members last week as part of a plan to reduce its budget by $140 million for the 2025-26 academic year. In a July 31 message to campus, senior university leaders attributed the need for cuts to "a challenging fiscal environment shaped in large part by federal policy changes affecting higher education." The private California institution warned of forthcoming layoffs in June, when it extended a hiring freeze implemented in February and said it would focus capital spending on critical projects or those with external sources of funding. Dive Insight: "Ongoing economic uncertainty" has created serious challenges for the higher education sector, according to Elizabeth Zacharias, Stanford's vice president for human resources. "At Stanford, anticipated changes in federal policy — such as reductions in federal research funding and an increase in the excise tax on investment income — are expected to have significant budgetary consequences," Zacharias said in a July 31 filing with the California Employment Development Department. Like many research institutions, Stanford has suffered under the tidal wave of efforts by the Trump administration to slash federal spending on research and development — despite some of those moves being blocked in court for the time being. Changes to the endowment tax could also hit Stanford hard. In fiscal 2024, the university had the fourth-largest endowment among U.S. colleges, valued at $37.6 billion, according to research from the National Association of College and University Business Officers and asset management firm Commonfund. Before 2017, colleges did not pay taxes on their endowment earnings. That year, a GOP-controlled Congress enacted a 1.4% tax on private nonprofit colleges with at least $500,000 in endowment assets per student. But President Donald Trump's signature spending bill introduced a tiered tax based on endowment assets per student that will more than quintuple the tax for the wealthiest institutions from 1.4% to 8%. Stanford, with roughly $2.1 million in endowment assets per full-time-equivalent student, will likely pay the top rate. These shifts, combined with rising operational costs and changes to funding sources and programs, pushed Stanford to implement layoffs, Zacharias said. Stanford employs 18,000 staff and faculty, according to its website. The affected employees — about 2% of its workforce — worked in departments from across the university, ranging from student support services to libraries to donor and alumni relations, according to legal filings. In addition to 60 days of legally mandated paid notice to impacted workers, eligible employees received severance packages and career transition services, a university spokesperson confirmed Wednesday. Recommended Reading Stanford University expects layoffs in coming year
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Stanford lays off hundreds, blaming Trump policies
Stanford University has announced staffing reductions affecting 361 people, blaming the Trump administration for funding cuts. The university pointed to policies from the administration in its decision to reduce its general budget by $140 million to support operations. The drop in money will affect research funding and support increases in endowment taxes that were passed by congressional Republicans. In June, the president and provost of Stanford told the community that while they will continue to advocate for the values of the university, 'At the same time, we need to be realistic about the current landscape and its consequences. There is significant uncertainty about how federal support for universities will evolve, but it is clear that the status quo has changed.' Funding for universities has been in a turbulent situation as President Trump has threatened federal money over alleged antisemitism on campuses, transgender athletes in women's sports and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Collectively, the administration has paused billions of dollars to institutions including Harvard University, the University of California, Columbia University and the University of Pennsylvania, among others. Some schools, such as Columbia and Brown University, have been able to restore federal funding through deals with the White House, but not without agreeing to pay substantial amounts of money. Along with staff reductions, schools and departments at Stanford were asked to create plans to '[p]osition the university to be resilient as federal policy evolves.'
