Citizens for Judicial Fairness Slams Excessive Delaware Chancery Fees Following New Stanford Report
The findings were highlighted in The New York Times' DealBook newsletter, and arrive as more companies continue to question Delaware's value as the 'gold standard' for corporate law.
Citizens for Judicial Fairness released the following statement in response to the study:
'This study confirms what we've been saying for years: Delaware's Chancery Court is more interested in enriching lawyers than serving shareholders or protecting everyday investors. Two judges, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick and Vice Chancellor Travis Laster, are responsible for a majority of these outrageous fee awards, and must be reined in so that litigants in Delaware's courts can have reasonable fee expectations. The pattern is clear: corporate insiders and well-connected firms are cashing in while Delaware's reputation burns. Delaware lawmakers can't look the other way anymore. These payouts aren't normal, and they aren't defensible. They're part of a system that's increasingly out of step with every other court in America. It's time for serious reform – and if Delaware won't fix it, the market will.'
The Stanford paper shows that two judges alone account for over 60% of the supersized awards, which often exceed ten times the base legal fee. In some cases, lawyers were paid nearly $50,000 an hour after inflation adjustment. No federal judge has ever come close to authorizing these kinds of fees.
Citizens for Judicial Fairness has long advocated for transparency, common-sense reform, and balance in the state's corporate legal system, and has warned that if left unchecked, judicial overreach will drive companies, jobs, and corporate revenue out of Delaware.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Financial Expert: 4 Reasons I'm in Favor of ‘No Buy July'
No-spend challenges have become all the rage on TikTok, with financial influencers everywhere advocating consumers swear off discretionary spending for a set period of time — typically, a full month. First, there was No Spend January. Then came Frugal February. The latest iteration? No Buy July. Many have criticized spending challenges over what they call the promotion of 'deprivation culture.' In other words, cutting out all nonessential spending may be unsustainable because it makes people feel deprived — which could further encourage spending binges in the months immediately before and/or after. Learn More: Read Next: Annamaria Lusardi, director of Stanford University's Initiative for Financial Decision-Making, told the The New York Times that July is a particularly bad month for a no-spend challenge given summer is often allocated for relaxation. July could be 'more challenging than at other, more structured times of the year.' In general, however, more financial experts support than oppose the practice, regardless of time of year. While Leslie H. Tayne, finance and debt expert and founder of Tayne Law Group, likened No Buy July to a strict diet, she agreed with certified financial planner (CFP) and content director at SuperMoney, Andrew Latham, that No Buy July is more about disruption than deprivation. 'It's just a month after all,' stated Latham. Some proponents even argue taking up a spend challenge in July is an effective, bi-annual check-in for assessing progress on any financial new year's resolutions you may have made. Here are four reasons Tayne and Latham support No Buy July. No Buy July Helps Consumers Take Inventory of Tiny Expenditures' Financial Drain It's easy to inventory that you spent $2,000 on a new laptop; it's harder to inventory where the heck the rest of your money went. This is because spending a few dollars on Starbucks lattes and Jamba Juice smoothies every few days may not register as a money suck in the moment — but, over 30 days, all those small purchases add up. No Buy July helps individuals realize how much more money they would have at the end of every month if they cut back on these tiny expenditures. 'A lot of the time, consumers believe they are only spending a few dollars here and there on unnecessary items, but when they take a moment (or a month in this case) to cut out that spending, it can be eye-opening to see the impact of what feel like small purchases on their finances,' stated Tayne. Latham agreed taking a 30-day pause gives people an opportunity to reassess their spending, furthering encouraging 'reflection and intentionality.' Most people are surprised by how many unnecessary, impulse buys they accrue. Consider This: No Buy July May Help Increase Savings This one admittedly sounds kind of obvious, but that doesn't make it any less important to point out. A huge perk of No Buy July is that individuals can pay themselves at the end of the month with the savings they accrue. 'Put it into a high yield-savings account,' stated Tayne. 'Interest rates are still decent where this option allows the consumer to not only increase their savings but also get a return on investment.' And who doesn't love a two-fer? No Buy July May Promote Debt Repayment As a financial attorney focused on helping clients pay down debt, Tayne is particularly adamant that clients allocate funds toward a debt sum instead of spending money on unnecessary items. By cutting back spending, No Buy July helps clients prioritize credit card debt and student loan balances that will come back to bite them in the long run over their desire for superfluous items that just feel good to purchase in the short term. 'Many clients I see struggle with managing debt from impulse spending, a lack of tracking debt, along with seasonal splurges, so taking the time to cut that spending type out entirely and instead paying down debt can help reduce the overall debt sum tremendously, along with a mental break from increased bill balances,' stated Tayne. No Buy July Gives Consumers a Sense of Pride People often know what they have to do to help their finances, but finding the motivation to actually do it can be particularly difficult. Which is why sometimes you have to trip the system and create your own momentum. Completing a no-spend challenge can make clients feel proud of themselves, 'which can increase motivation to continue on a successful path towards learning better financial habits,' stated Tayne. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years This article originally appeared on I'm a Financial Expert: 4 Reasons I'm in Favor of 'No Buy July' Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Former Stanford football coach Troy Taylor sues ESPN for defamation
Former Stanford head coach Troy Taylor filed a defamation lawsuit Wednesday against ESPN and one of its reporters over a March investigative story that led to his dismissal. The suit, filed in the Northern District of California, alleges that reporter Xuan Thai published 'repeated defamatory statements about Taylor, knowing full well that the statements were false, for the purpose of smearing Taylor's reputation and injuring him in his profession.' Advertisement The Athletic obtained a copy of the complaint, which the Sacramento Bee first reported. General manager Andrew Luck fired Taylor, who was Stanford's coach for two seasons, six days after ESPN's March 19 report. That story alleged Taylor 'bullied and belittled female athletic staffers,' citing a pair of previously undisclosed third-party investigations in 2023 and 2024 after 'multiple employees filed official complaints regarding Taylor's behavior.' Taylor's complaint alleges a follow-up story ESPN published a month later said Stanford's initial investigation began 'in response to a single complainant who alleged gender bias and 'a culture problem in football,'' and that the investigator found 'insufficient evidence' regarding the original complaint. The actual April 16 article contained that language but also noted that the investigation ultimately included interviews 'with at least 20 Stanford athletic department staffers regarding four allegations against Taylor. Three of the allegations regarding belittling and inappropriate behavior toward multiple women were deemed to have merit.' ESPN did not retract its original story. An ESPN spokesperson declined to comment on the lawsuit. Luck, Stanford's former All-American quarterback, took over as general manager last November and became Taylor's direct boss at the time. A person briefed on the decision to fire Taylor told The Athletic in March that Luck knew some details of Taylor's situation with the school before accepting the GM job and received a briefing once he started. He did not take action, however, until the ESPN report came out just ahead of spring practice. 'It has been clear that certain aspects of the program need change,' Luck said in a statement at the time. 'Additionally, in recent days, there has been significant attention to Stanford investigations in previous years related to Coach Taylor. After continued consideration it is evident to me that our program needs a reset. In consultation with university leadership, I no longer believe that Coach Taylor is the right coach to lead our football program. Advertisement Taylor, 57, led Sacramento State to FCS playoff appearances in each of his three seasons. Stanford's then-athletic director Bernard Muir hired him in December 2022, following consecutive 3-9 seasons and the subsequent departure of longtime coach David Shaw. Taylor went 3-9 in each of his two seasons as well. Following Taylor's dismissal, Luck hired Frank Reich, his former Indianapolis Colts coach, as Stanford's interim head coach for the 2025 season, with the condition that Reich would not be a candidate for the permanent job.
TechCrunch
14 hours ago
- TechCrunch
PlayerZero raises $15M to prevent AI agents from shipping buggy code
As Silicon Valley races toward a future where AI agents do most of the software programming, a new problem is created: finding the AI-generated bugs before they are put into production. Even OpenAI is dealing with such issues, a former employee has described. Newly funded startup PlayerZero has created a solution: use AI agents trained to find and fix problems before the code is put into production, the startup's CEO and sole founder, Animesh Koratana, tells TechCrunch. Koratana created PlayerZero while he was at the Stanford DAWN lab for machine learning under his adviser and lab founder, Matei Zaharia. Zaharia is, of course, a famed developer and the co-founder of Databricks; he created its foundational technology while working on his own doctorate. PlayerZero on Wednesday announced that it raised a $15 million Series A led by Foundation Capital's Ashu Garg, an early Databricks backer. This follows a $5 million seed led by Green Bay Ventures and several noteworthy angels including Zaharia, Dropbox CEO Drew Houston, Figma CEO Dylan Field, and Vercel CEO Guillermo Rauch. During his time at Stanford DAWN, Koratana, now 26, was working on AI model compression technology and 'got exposed to language models really early on,' he says. He met the developers who crafted some of the first AI coding assistance tools. It hit him then that 'there's this world in which computers are going to write the code. It's not going to be humans anymore,' Koratana told TechCrunch. 'What's the world going to look like at that point?' He knew before the term 'AI slop' was even coined that these agents were going to produce code that broke things just as their human overseers do. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW That problem would also be exacerbated by so many agents cranking out so much more code than has ever been written before. It won't always be practical for humans to check all AI-written code for bugs or hallucinations. And the issue becomes even more intense for the large, complex code bases that enterprises rely upon. ProjectZero trains models 'that really deeply understand code bases, and we understand the way they're built, the way they're architected,' Koratana says. His tech studies the history of an enterprise's bugs, issues, and solutions. When something breaks, his product can then 'figure out why and fix it, and then learn from those mistakes to prevent them from ever happening again,' Koratana says. He likens his product to an immune system for large code bases. Landing Zaharia, his adviser, as an angel was a first step to fundraising, but the moment that really validated his idea was when he showed a demo to another famous developer: Rauch. Rauch is founder of triple unicorn developer tool company Vercel and creator of the popular open-source JavaScript framework Rauch watched Koratana's demo with interest but skepticism, asking how much of it was 'real.' Koratana replied that this was code 'running in production. Like, this is a real instance. And he was quiet,' Koratana says. Then his soon-to-be-angel investor responded, 'If you can actually solve this the way that you're imagining, it's a really big deal.' Of course, PlayerZero isn't alone in attempting to solve the AI-generated bug problem. Just last week, Anysphere's Cursor launched Bugbot to detect coding errors, as just one example. Still, PlayerZero is already gaining traction for its emphasis on large codebases. While it was conceived for a world where agents are the coders, it is currently being used by several large enterprises that use coding co-pilots. For instance, subscription billing company Zuora is one of the startup's marquee customers. Zuora is using the tech across its engineering teams, including to watchdog its most precious code, its billing systems, it said.
