Philippines stands to benefit from US tariff shake-up, but must address constraints, study shows
MANILA, April 24 (Reuters) - The Philippines stands to benefit from a sweeping U.S. tariff overhaul that has disrupted global trade flows, a new study showed, as the country emerges among the least exposed Southeast Asian economies to new U.S. duties targeting imports.
The Philippines has not been spared from the global trade wars triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs, but it faces a comparatively modest 17% tariff, the lowest among five regional economies covered by the study - Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines.
Still, the Philippines lacks the infrastructure and investment to take quick advantage, it said.
Vietnam and Thailand are subject to much steeper rates of 46% and 36%, respectively, though those have been paused until July.
The study by Philippine Institute for Development Studies created a Tariff Exposure Composite Index to assess how vulnerable each country is to the new U.S. levies. The Philippines and Indonesia both scored 2.2, placing them in the moderate risk category. But their positions differ significantly.
While both share the same risk score, Indonesia is considered more exposed due to its higher 32% tariff and a narrower exemption coverage - only about 10% of its exports to the U.S. are shielded, the study showed. Its main exports, such as palm oil and footwear, are also highly sensitive to price increases.
In contrast, the Philippines benefits from broader tariff exemptions, covering around 33% of its U.S.-bound exports, mostly in high-value sectors like semiconductors, memory chips, and storage devices. This, along with its lower tariff rate, places it in a stronger position to attract diverted trade and investment.
"The Philippines is strategically positioned to benefit,' the study authored by former Trade Undersecretary Rafaelita Aldaba said. "Its low tariff rate, strong exemptions for key exports, and moderate strategic exposure create an opportunity to attract trade and investment shifts."
Malaysia, with a slightly higher tariff of 24%, also ranked favourably, scoring 2.8. It has the highest exemption coverage in the region, protecting nearly 46% of its exports to the U.S., particularly in electronics and semiconductor equipment.
Vietnam and Thailand scored higher on the risk index - 3.4 and 3.0, respectively - reflecting deeper exposure. Both countries depend heavily on the U.S. market and have lower exemption coverage. Vietnam sends 35% of its total exports to the U.S., making it the most vulnerable among its peers, the study showed.
The study warned that while the Philippines has a relative advantage, it still lags behind Malaysia and Vietnam in manufacturing scale, logistics and readiness to absorb new investment.
"The Philippines' ability to convert this relative advantage into tangible economic gains will hinge on how swiftly it can mobilize responses in logistics, investment facilitation, and targeted export promotion," the study added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Keir Starmer's military expansion could boost Scottish economy
Keir Starmer's decision to embark upon a major military expansion could pay dividends for Scotland's economy. We already have a significant base to build from given existing ship building at BAE Systems on the River Clyde and Babcock Rosyth in Fife. The nuclear submarine fleet is, of course, based at Faslane and we have a major RAF base at Lossiemouth. Major weapons firms are already also based in Scotland with Leonardo in Edinburgh, Raytheon in Glenrothes and Livingston, and Thales in Govan. It is easy to see therefor the huge financial boost that could come our way from the UK Government ramping up military spending from around £65billion at the moment to £100billion as Nato would like. The reason for rearming is that the world appears to be an increasingly dangerous place with the main perceived threats coming from Russia and ultimately China as it establishes itself as a new global super power. To add to this, our traditional close ally the US appears to be anything but with the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House. Fiona Hill, an author of the strategic defence review and a former White House chief Russia adviser, believes Putin is already 'at war' with the UK. She pointed to poisonings, assassinations, sabotage operations, cyber-attacks, influence operations and efforts to cut subsea cables on UK soil as evidence of ongoing attacks. Hill, who produced the SDR along with Lord Robertson, a former Nato secretary general, and retired general Sir Richard Barrons, further asserts that the UK and Europe can no longer depend on America for support given Trump's unpredictable nature. These are valid points and Britain must be ready and able to defend itself. However, there is also an argument that all this talk of impending war runs the risk of become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Then there is the opportunity cost to spending billions of taxpayer cash on weapons that could go to the NHS and schools. War has provided a useful political crutch for many PMs. But diplomacy and building bridges with the international community – albeit from a position of strength – is a much better path to prosperity.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
White House warns Downing Street against letting China build 'super embassy' near sensitive financial sites
The Oval Office has urged Downing Street against giving a Chinese embassy the green light to be built near London financial centres. Previously, proposals for the 'super-embassy' were rejected by the Conservative government amid concerns from British intelligence. However, the plans have been reintroduced following lobbying from China 's very own President Xi Jinping. But fresh warning have since emerged, as due to the Royal Mint Court's locality to a sensitive hub of essential communication cables, it poses a great risk for an attack. The suggested site is also situated between several major financial hubs in Canary Wharf and the City as well as three crucial data centres. It is understood US President Donald Trump has warned Sir Keir Starmer against giving the embassy the go-ahead. The matter is believed to have been discussed during trade talks, as Britain and its Atlantic allies discuss how they will implement a trade deal to avoid UK steel producers being lumbered with 50 percent import tariffs by July 9. According to the Times, US diplomats would be trepidatious about sharing intelligence with Britain if the embassy went ahead. A senior US official told the publication: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' It comes after a claims 'dark cabling' running beneath the proposed site 'feeds the City of London' were given in a memo to the United States' National Security Council by members of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac). John Moolenaar, the Republican head of the House of Representatives' China committee said if these reports were 'accurate' that the site would 'pose an unacceptable risk' to both the UK and US. 'The Chinese Communist Party has a clear track record of targeting critical infrastructure.' he said. 'This development would raise serious concerns in the United States and could be viewed as an act of strategic overreach by Beijing and a curious error in judgment by London.' The executive director of IPAC, Luke de Pulford dubbed the matter as a 'flashpoint' in US-UK trade talks, adding that it was 'staggering' the White House had to corroborate the cabling risk to 'defend its own financial system. 'It's time to send Xi Jinping a clear message: no matter the pressure or coercion, the UK and US won't trade away national security, and this embassy isn't happening,' he said. China has been attempting to revise plans for the Royal Mint building, which neighbour the Tower of London, since they were purchased in 2018. It is believed the Chines foreign minister, Wang Yi, brought up the matter with foreign secretary, David Lammy, while visiting London last year. According to The Times, President Xi had also discussed the same issue with the Prime Minister in a phone conversation. The proposal for the embassy, which would be China's largest in Europe, was previously rejected by Tower Hamlets council in 2022. But two weeks after Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves came back from a visit to China earlier this year, both the council's and Scotland Yard's objections were dropped. Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, described China as a 'dangerous threat to the national and economic security of our country'. She said the Conservative party continued to stand 'firmly' against the embassy proposals, stating her party would never put the UK's 'financial centre or country at risk.' Next Monday, three of Trump's aides are scheduled to meet with their Chinese peers in London for discussions in a bid to solve the current trade war between the two economic powerhouses. The Treasury secretary Scott Bessent, the commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and the trade representative Jamieson Greer will act as representatives for the US, Trump has declared on Truth Social. Yesterday, China 's foreign ministry confirmed vice-premier He Lifeng will be on British shores from June 8 until June 13, adding that talks would with the US would take place. Previously, a Chinese embassy spokesperson has quashed spy allegations, stating: 'Anti-China elements are always keen on slandering and attacking China.' A government spokesman said: 'Applications for a new Chinese embassy in Tower Hamlets have been called in for ministers to decide. A final decision will be made in due course.'
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Donald Trump slams ‘big-time drug addict' Elon Musk as toxic feud intensifies
DONALD Trump called Elon Musk a 'big-time drug addict' as his spat with the world's richest man intensified. The US President is said to have blasted his billionaire ex-backer as reliant on ketamine in phone calls. 2 It came after the Tesla billionaire linked Mr Trump to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Their feud went public on Thursday night as both men used their own social media platforms — X and Truth Social — to insult each other. Mr Musk, 53, turned on the US leader, calling his Congressional spending bill a 'disgusting abomination' on Wednesday. The President, 78, has called it his 'big, beautiful bill', but Mr Musk believes it will increase national debt by an unsustainable amount. It triggered the ugly public bust-up, with Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and accusing him of being a close associate of Epstein. Yesterday, Mr Musk deleted the post, which was seen hundreds of millions of times. The Washington Post reported Mr Trump used private calls to urge his allies not to pour fuel on the fire and told Vice President JD Vance to be cautious. But the President, whose campaign took £250million from Mr Musk, is also said to have become weary with the tycoon's alleged drug use. He called Mr Musk an 'addict' in the calls and claimed he 'lost his mind' after leaving the administration. The businessman previously admitted using ketamine, but it is alleged he became so hooked last year it affected his kidneys. Trump insists Elon Musk is lashing out at 'big beautiful bill' for personal reason as he admits he's 'disappointed' in Tesla boss Mr Musk officially left the government last week but said he would remain as a 'friend and adviser' to Mr Trump. The President last night said he had 'no intention' of speaking to Mr Musk, adding: 'I think it's a very bad thing because he's very disrespectful'.
