Secrets of Princess Eugenie's new toned look: How mother-of-two got into the best shape of her life - after admitting her struggle to 'shake baby weight'
Princess Eugenie ripped up the royal rule book in style at the weekend as she showed off her toned figure at Royal Ascot.
Instead of her usual flowing frocks, Eugenie chose to highlight her slim physique in somewhat of an unusual choice for a royal - a crop top.
The 35-year-old posed proudly in the short, brown top and cinched, high-waisted skirt in a photograph shared to Instagram.
Following the birth of her two children - August, four, in 2021, and Ernest, two, in 2023 - the art gallery director is seemingly redefining her style to highlight her increasingly toned figure.
While Eugenie tends to keep information on her fitness regime private, she has previously shared details regarding how she likes to stay healthy.
Ahead of her royal wedding to Jack Brooksbank in 2018, Eugenie embarked on a dedicated fitness regime that saw her get up every day at 6.45AM so she could start exercising by 7AM.
'I go to the park from seven to eight. I do circuits, which I love because they're quick: burpees, squat jumps, lunges, the whole lot,' she told Harper's Bazaar.
'It's much better, as I can't run for a long time. Or I go with my best friend to this amazing, women-only gym called Grace Belgravia.'
Eugenie is pictured with her husband Jack Brooksbank earlier this year - she previously opened up about her fitness regime ahead of their 208 wedding
Grace Belgravia in London's Knightsbridge offers everything from GP services to dinner and a massage under one roof, exclusively for women.
The very swanky club houses Britain's top celebrity facialist, leading nutritionists, personal trainers - and even gynaecologists - within its 11,500 square feet of serene surroundings.
In addition to working out, Eugenie reportedly once hired the help of a nutritionist for diet advice.
According to the Daily Mail's Consultant Showbusiness Editor, Katie Hind, Eugenie previously sought the expertise of nutritionist Gabriella Peacock.
Gabriella, a former model who has worked as a nutritional therapist for over a decade, is often considered to be high society's nutritionist, and Prince Harry also reportedly hired her ahead of his nuptials.
The nutritionist, based in the Cotswolds, offers a range of powders with names such as Slim Me, Clean Me, and Protein Me.
Elsewhere, in 2023, Eugenie opened up about the pressure to get her figure back after pregnancy in conversation with Jessie and Lennie Ware on the Table Manners podcast.
'On the post-baby body thing - it sends me mad, but I find it really hard to shake baby weight,' she said.
In conversation with Harper's Bazaar, Eugenie previously revealed that she enjoys doing exercise circuits to stay fit (seen during Paris Fashion Week in January, 2024)
She added, 'I guess society dictates that you have to shake your baby weight and all that stuff.'
The royal explained that she had given up dairy and gluten in support of her husband Jack Brooksbank who was advised to cut them from his diet by a gut specialist because he was suffering from migraines.
The couple now split their time between the UK and Portugal, which gives the family to live an outdoorsy lifestyle.
And just two years after she welcomed her youngest child into the world, Eugenie appears happier than ever, and put on an elegant display at Royal Ascot last week.
Her beaming mother, Sarah, Duchess of York, who was persona non grata among the Royals for years until King Charles softened the approach towards Prince Andrew's ex, looked fashionable in a trendy monochrome polka dot frock.
Not to be outdone, Camilla, 77, oozed glamour in a white chiffon dress with embroidered flowers from Anna Valentine, paired with a feathered Philip Treacy hat.
The King and Queen were joined by Camilla's old school friend Lady Cavendish and her husband Lord Cavendish in their coach during the traditional carriage procession along the course.
Among the guests travelling in the carriages were the former Emir of Qatar Sheikh Hamad, the Queen's Companion the Marchioness of Lansdowne and musical maestro Lord Lloyd-Webber.
Eugenie's husband Jack was also spotted in the parade ring alongside former defence secretary Ben Wallace when the royal procession arrived in the exclusive area.
The late Queen was a passionate owner and breeder of thoroughbreds and had more than 20 Royal Ascot winners during her 70-year reign.
Charles and Camilla have taken on her stable of horses and enjoyed their first Royal Ascot winner in 2023 when their horse Desert Hero triumphed in the King George V Stakes.
His Majesty's appearance came after the Princess of Wales sparked concern as she pulled out of attending the festival last Wednesday, apparently at the last minute.
But royal sources insisted there was nothing to worry about and that it was simply a case of crossed wires.
Aides also stressed that Catherine was continuing to 'balance her return to public life' following her cancer diagnosis last year, after which she made clear that she would resume her duties with a slow and measured approach.
The mini-drama came as her husband, Prince William, handed out the prize for the Prince of Wales stakes at the racecourse in Berkshire.
Executives at Ascot had expected the princess to join him, travelling down in the carriage procession from Windsor Castle with King Charles and Queen Camilla.
At 12pm they issued the procession list for the day, featuring the Prince and Princess of Wales in the second carriage after the King and Queen.
But 22 minutes later, guidance was issued which said Catherine would not be attending. It is understood an 'inaccurate version' of the list was 'issued in error'.
An updated list was circulated and Lord Soames – a good friend of the King – lost his seat to make way for William in the first carriage with Charles and Camilla. They were also joined by Saudi's Prince Saud bin Khalid Al-Saud.
Sources stressed there was 'no cause for alarm' and Catherine was following guidance palace aides have always given: that she would 'balance her return to public duties', following appearances at Trooping the Colour and the Order of the Garter service.
They added that she was 'disappointed' not to attend but 'has to find the right balance'.
Catherine, 43, had abdominal surgery last January, after which she was told cancer had been present, forcing her to undergo preventive chemotherapy.
At the beginning of this year she revealed she was in remission and would begin a slow and measured return to royal life.
While Catherine was not present at Ascot, Charles and Camilla were there for the second day running and plan to attend all week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
28 Years Later: political parallels, pregnant zombies and a peculiar ending
Danny Boyle and Alex Garland have done it again. In the early 2000s, 28 Days Later became the most popular and influential zombie movie in decades, with its fast-moving, virally infected, not-quite-undead marauders rampaging through a post-apocalyptic England. Now Boyle and Garland have reunited with 28 Years Later, easily the most talked-about horror movie since Sinners, and the biggest zombie movie since the PG-13 dilutions of World War Z back in 2013. Compared with the countless familiar zombie movies and TV shows that have popped up since the original movie, 28 Years Later is a thorny, challenging, unpredictable work, which means there's plenty to discuss now that it's spent a well-attended weekend in wide release. Here are some major spoiler-heavy topics related to the film's style, themes, sociological implications and, of course, that ending. The original 28 Days Later is notable for its zombie efficiency. Rather than the slow shuffling and gradual, varying levels of undead decay often seen in zombie classics from George A Romero (and the many movies influenced by his films Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead and so on), these zombies aren't technically zombies at all. They're victims of a lab-leaked 'rage' virus (with the hilariously dodgy origins of … showing monkeys violent news footage?!) that seems to be spread by virtually any exposure to an infected person's blood or saliva. Within a minute or two, the newly infected will be vomiting blood and attacking anyone around them in a deranged frenzy. The victims are analogous to zombies because of their seeming thirst for human carnage (though it's never clear whether they're truly 'feeding' on humans) and the mindlessness with which they pursue it, but they're a less supernatural variation than some of their ancestors. The same was true for the 2007 sequel 28 Weeks Later. That's still the case in 28 Years Later, but with the passage of time built into the story, Boyle and Garland introduce new variants on the post-viral populace. There are still mobs of rage-virus victims, often in rags or no clothing at all, roaming the countryside, which remains confined to the United Kingdom. But 12-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams) and his dad Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) also encounter infected who have been grotesquely swollen by the virus, and now lurch belly-down around in the dirt, often subsisting on worms. On the other end of the spectrum, our heroes are also menaced by an 'alpha' zombie who is bigger, stronger and craftier than the others. He also seems capable of reproducing, and not just because of his, ah, endowments. Later in the film, Spike and his ill mother Isla (Jodie Comer) encounter a woman who is both infected and pregnant – and is even distracted enough by the imminent arrival of her baby to allow Isla to lend a helping hand in the birth. Perhaps most surprisingly, the baby is born healthy, seemingly not infected with the virus. (The idea of an asymptomatic carrier, as seen in 28 Weeks Later, goes unmentioned, but it's a fair bet that if the baby were infected, the humans who carry her around for the next day-plus would probably get sick at some point, too.) The movie's resident philosophical doctor-recluse Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) chalks this up to the miracles of the human placenta, which seems … oversimplified. But these zombie variants raise a lot of interesting questions. Are the alpha zombies evolving closer to what we think of as humanity, regaining some of their intelligence while maintaining a capacity for brutal violence? (He's seen multiple times pulling off heads in tandem with spines, like something out of a Predator movie.) It's vaguely implied that the alpha is the father to this newborn, suggesting that the zombies procreated post-infection, which is something these movies (or any movies? Surely there must be one with zombie sex, but it's not a typical feature of the genre) haven't shown before. Zombie reproductive rates must still be low; Dr Kelson points out that a human baby can't really survive for more than a few days without milk, and if infected women can still breastfeed at all, it's hard to imagine how that would work on a practical level, especially in terms of not spreading the virus. Maybe this baby, saved by Isla and Spike, is the first zombie-born human to survive. Thematically, the baby's arrival fits with the complication of the seemingly functional isolated community where Jamie and Isla have raised Spike. The baby, who Spike ultimately delivers back to the community before striking out on his own, implies that the world that they've understandably cut themselves off from nonetheless keeps turning, and may even produce new humans without the easiest and most comforting signs of renewal. Quite the opposite: the zombie variations give that outside world its own strange new shape, rather than showing the virus simply burning itself out in quarantine. Viewers will probably be split on whether dirt-crawlers or alphas are too cheesy, too reminiscent of other zombie pictures, too far afield from the relatively grounded viral origins of the first film. But in a movie that some audiences will probably also find short on traditional thrills, these elements keep the landscape strange and unpredictable. As a director, Boyle has long been known by a certain degree of flash; 28 Years Later evolves his style even further. The original film made innovative use of early digital video, which has held up remarkably well even as the tech itself has degraded; few movies have reproduced the grimy low-res immediacy that sometimes smears into a kind of poetic abstraction. For the sequel, Boyle and returning cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle haven't reproduced this look, either. Instead, they've updated it, using inventive multi-iPhone rigs to capture similarly bracing images. Boyle and Mantle use this technology to shoot from Boyle's trademark extreme angles and unexpected vantages, add micro-freeze-frames to scenes of particularly tense action, and deftly utilize real locations, adding up to one the most distinctive-looking movies of the year and a major triumph for Mantle. For all of its wild swings, his work never feels overloaded or sensationalized. Instead, the visuals guide the audience through a series of expectations-bending shifts, including passages where the movie feels more akin to a dark fairytale (with the alpha looming in shadow on the horizon) than a traditional horror picture. As with 28 Days Later, it's easy to see how other film-makers might imitate some of these techniques on a superficial level. It's also hard to picture others bringing them together with such virtuosity. Digital cinematography is now the norm; Boyle belongs with Michael Mann, Steven Soderbergh and David Fincher as some of the few mainstream directors who are able to embrace its differences from celluloid, rather than trying to hide them. Somewhat more time has passed in the world of the movie than in our world; technically, they're five years further into the future than we are. In terms of release dates, the movies have taken us from an immediately post-9/11 world to one that still bears the scars and hears the echoes of the Covid pandemic, a rise of authoritarianism, and countless post-9/11 armed conflicts, including one unfolding in the Middle East right now. Boyle has specifically mentioned Brexit as a touchpoint in the development of 28 Years Later, which indeed sees Britain isolated – by force, rather than by choice – and festering. Though the movie doesn't underline any Covid parallels too boldly, it could be ready as a post-pandemic allegory, with Spike's desire to rejoin the world, regardless of how it's been altered from what his parents knew, conflicting with the strictness of the community he was born into – essentially a quarantine within a quarantine. Dr Kelson, in the meantime, is determined to memorialize the dead with his towering bone temple of skulls, rather than using his resources to move on or fortify his defenses (which also sets our sympathies apart from outright Covid denialism or the anti-vaccine crowd). It might be surprising for a sequel to a movie that came out in the shadow of 9/11 to traffic in messaging that could amount to 'never forget', but Boyle and Garland turn that mantra around to grapple with how we, as the collective human race, are expected to proceed as survivors of so many contemporary disasters. How many of those disasters came to pass in the rest of the world, which we're told has been cleared of the rage virus, is another one of the movie's enticing open questions. On paper, 28 Years Later ends on an infuriating sequel tease that leaves the movie largely unresolved. The reality is a bit more complicated than that. The film actually reaches a highly satisfying, if thoughtfully elegiac and open-ended, conclusion. After Dr Kelson makes an approximate diagnosis of terminal cancer for Isla, she asks him to be euthanized, and her son places her newly polished skull at the top of Kelson's monument. Eventually, Spike returns to his island community alone – but only long enough to drop off the infant and a note for his father. He then heads back out into the unknown, alone. This both continues the coming-of-age thread at the beginning of the film, when Spike makes his first trip to the infected-heavy mainland with his father, and rejects it, via Spike not just dabbling in zombieland for some real-life target practice, but deciding to actually explore the country at length. He has prioritized a less regimented, prescribed life over the ritual and safety that he's known, having accepted (at least to some degree) the role of death in life itself, through the loss of his mother. Then a bunch of chavs called Jimmy show up. The final scene of 28 Years Later actually picks up from its opening, set during the original rage outbreak, where a young lad named Jimmy escapes the zombies as his vicar father welcomes them, seeing the hordes as a harbinger of end times. Aaron Taylor-Johnson's Jamie is close enough to a homophone of 'Jimmy' to maybe mistake him as the grownup version of that survivor, but no: an adult version of the real and now tracksuited Jimmy (Jack O'Connell, who also played an interloper in Sinners) pops up to save Spike from another group of zombies. He's commanding a mini-army of imitators and seeming acolytes who gleefully, athletically dispatch the infected as if they've just run in from a Guy Ritchie movie. Then the movie ends, not exactly on a cliffhanger, but leaving the audience hanging on what's next for Spike and the Jimmys. This also involves a cultural touchstone most American audiences will miss, making the whole thing seem even more inexplicable: Jimmy and his gang are dressed like Jimmy Savile, a once-ubiquitous British TV presenter posthumously accused of widespread sexual abuse, including of children. Jimmy Savile died in 2011 and the allegations against him became well-known afterward, which means this Jimmy wouldn't be aware of his namesake's crimes. In the world of 28 Years Later, there's a good chance they never came to light at all. But for 2025 viewers (at least those aware of Savile), the surface goofiness of this sequence gives way to discomfort, and more thoughts about what gets preserved in a fallen world. Is this apparent religious cult formed around the image of a Top of the Pops host a grim joke on the accidental whitewashings of history, or are there more sinister parallels to be mined? Alongside that question, there's also some bonus confusion: the lead character of 28 Days Later, played by Cillian Murphy and unaccounted for in this film (and supposedly a lead in the as-yet-unfunded third film) is also named Jim. Well, Guy Ritchie hasn't directed 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple – and neither has Boyle. Nia DaCosta, who made the 2021 Candyman reboot as well as The Marvels and Little Woods, directed the already-filmed Garland-penned sequel, which is supposedly out in January (though sometimes ultra-short-gap sequels wind up pushed around the schedule, fearful of going out too soon). Its subtitle refers to something that's already been unveiled: Dr Kelson's monument, which the movie seems to have left behind as Spike makes his way in the world. The second film could well circle back to follow Dr Kelson, and leave the Jimmys for whatever Garland and Boyle have planned for the third movie with Murphy; that would certainly fit the new movie's repeated narrative swerves refocusing the who/what/where/when of survival. But Boyle and Garland have said that the Jimmys sequence does set up the second movie, and that Murphy will appear in a similar capacity to set up the third, so it's fair to assume Spike will remain the lead character for that installment. (This would make him, and whoever joins him, the first 28 Days Later series character to really carry over, as Days, Weeks and Years all followed different groups of people.) Maybe the Bone Temple is more of a symbolic reference than a literal one, referring to how Spike carries awareness of the dead with him on his journey, which seems like a pointed contrast to the uniform joviality of the Jimmys. One thing is clear: Boyle and Garland have set up a sequel not by obviously holding over-many characters and stories back for another movie, but by overflowing this post-apocalyptic world with ideas.
BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
The emotion of a Kenilworth Custard Corner marathon runner
Custard Corner is not for the street's yellow colour, hence its name, only the brave need apply - at least when running enough laps of it to cover the equivalent distance of a marathon. And in a heatwave no rather than "exhausted", what Ian Beasley had to say of Saturday's feat - on a jaundiced section of Station Road in Kenilworth - was "awesome" and "emotional".He was running in memory of his best friend and best man, known as Noggins, who took his own life in February 2024. Mr Beasley notched up roughly 600 laps of Custard Corner during the event he organised, raising money for the Samaritans charity as he said members of the public turned out to support him and fellow runners, with the marathon taking place against a backdrop of "Mexican waves, people singing along to buskers [and] bells ringing".He told BBC CWR that his Custard Corner challenge, which saw him run 26.2 miles, had raised more than £12,600 for the cause so far, and he would like to organise another one next year. Mr Beasley, an optometrist who lives in Kenilworth, has previously described Noggins as "a one-off" who was "adored by everyone".For the final 0.2 miles, Mr Beasley arranged for the group of participants to run in silence while he carried a photo of his friend. Noggins' favourite song, Find the River by REM, was played."I was in tears during that 0.2 of a mile," Mr Beasley said."That was really emotional." Mr Beasley said he was delighted that the marathon had raised thousands of pounds for charity, but his personal highlight of the day was seeing men open up about their mental health had three conversations at the event with men who spoke about the issues they faced, he added."I don't think that would have happened had we not created the environment [for it]," he said. Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
The Sun
39 minutes ago
- The Sun
Shoppers race to bag £22.50 Sainsbury's summer dress – mums and daughters both want it, and it's so flattering
SHOPPERS are in a frenzy trying to bag a flattering summer dress in Sainsbury's that's so versatile both mums and daughters want it. Tu Clothing is the supermarket's in-house fashion label and is beloved by fashion fans for its on-trend buys at affordable prices. 3 3 So if you want to look stylish on a budget, then this bargain frock is the one for you. Shoppers have hailed the blue and white Sainsbury's dress as the perfect "day to night" transition piece that looks good dressed up or down. And they've begged supermarket bosses to bring it out in more colours. The Blue Striped Poplin Combined Dress comes in sizes six to 24 and is priced at £22.50. It features a white ribbed vest top with a blue and white striped poplin midaxi skirt. Describing it on the website, the Sainsbury's team say: "An easy-to-wear option for summer outings and warmer days, our midaxi dress comes in a combined style. "Featuring a sleeveless, ribbed bodice in white, and a blue striped poplin skirt layer." But it's completely sold out online, so you'll need to be quick to nab it in your nearest store. And it has already racked up five-star reviews from impressed fashion fans. One gushed: "Really pleased with this dress. So comfortable to wear. Great length and it has pockets." I'm 5'3 and a size 10 - Tesco is killing it with their summer co-ords, my haul was amazing & I got 25% off everything too A second wrote: "Perfect for summer days and evenings! Great fit, flattering - wish there were more colour ways." "Really nice material not seen through on the skirt part and fits well true to size", chimed in a third. A fourth said: "I bought this a couple of weeks ago and my daughter liked it so much I bought her one too! "The poplin striped skirt has handy pockets , which is always a bonus!! I love the design as you can hide your legs and enhance your figure because of the elasticated waist . "Can be worn with flats, trainers or a heel. I love the modern design!! It was a real bargain and very happy with the quality." A fifth added: "Bought this a couple of weeks ago and have worn on holiday. Very comfortable, flattering and can be a casual outfit or dressed up a little. The pockets are a great addition too." Meanwhile, a sixth cried: "Stop! My bank can't take anymore and the lady behind the argos counter knows me by name with all my click and collects." Is supermarket fashion the new high street? DEPUTY Fashion Editor Abby McHale weighs in: The supermarkets have really upped their game when it comes to their fashion lines. These days, as you head in to do your weekly food shop you can also pick up a selection of purse-friendly, stylish pieces for all the family. Tesco has just announced a 0.7 per cent increase in the quarter thanks to a 'strong growth in clothing' and M&S has earnt the title of the number one destination for womenswear on the high street. Asda's clothing line George has made £1.5 million for the supermarket in 2023, 80 per cent of Sainsbury's clothes sold at full price rather than discounted and Nutmeg at Morrisons sales are also up 2 per cent in the past year. So what is it about supermarket fashion that is becoming so successful? Apart from the clothing actually being affordable, it's good quality too - with many being part of schemes such as the Better Cotton Initiative. A lot of the time they keep to classic pieces that they know will last the customer year after year. Plus because they buy so much stock they can turn around pieces quickly and buy for cheaper because of the volumes.
