CM assures decision on Old Pension Scheme after committee report
Siddaramaiah
on Saturday assured govt employees that the state govt will decide on reintroducing the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) after receiving a committee's report.
Speaking at an event organised by the State Govt Employees' Association to honour talented children of govt employees, he emphasised the importance of delivering govt programmes effectively to the public.
The CM urged employees to avoid caste and religious biases, stating such actions dishonour their profession. "Society has a debt to us, as we live on taxpayers' money. We must serve with integrity to repay this debt," he said, encouraging employees to foster a humane and inclusive approach.
He stressed that talent is universal and flourishes with opportunity, urging parents and teachers to nurture children's potential with scientific and progressive thinking. The CM also highlighted the implementation of the
7th Pay Commission
's recommendations and assured action on the Arogya Sanjeevini health scheme. "The govt is open to addressing employees' demands," he said, calling on them to ensure welfare programmes reach beneficiaries efficiently.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Student unions as laboratories of citizenship
The Karnataka government's proposal to reintroduce student elections in colleges and universities has reignited a long-dormant debate about campus politics and the kind of citizens our educational institutions are shaping. After over three decades of a ban, the move is being considered following a proposal from the National Students' Union of India (NSUI) and a nudge from Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who reportedly urged the government to cultivate leadership among students. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar have signalled intent. However, university administrators remain wary, warning that the return of campus polls could bring back violence, groupism, and political interference. These concerns are not unfounded, but they also raise a deeper, more urgent question: What is lost when we silence student voices in the name of stability?.Student elections in Karnataka were banned in 1989, following a few violent incidents. But since then, the state has undergone massive political, social, and educational transformations. Today, the push for reintroducing student unions is not just nostalgic; it speaks to a growing recognition that student leadership is not a threat to academic life but potentially its most vital force. Many Indian states and cities, such as Kerala, Maharashtra, West Bengal, and particularly Delhi, have continued to hold student elections. Their experiences offer Karnataka both a cautionary tale and a case for reintroducing student elections rests on a foundational democratic principle: participation. A university is not merely a site for acquiring knowledge but also a space where students learn to negotiate power, voice dissent, and imagine a better society. Elections help institutionalise this spirit. In places like Jawaharlal Nehru University and Delhi University, student unions have historically played pivotal roles in defending academic freedom, improving student welfare, and demanding administrative accountability. For example, the JNU Students' Union has successfully intervened in policies around fee hikes, hostel allocations, and anti-discrimination measures. These student bodies often act as intermediaries between the administration and the student community, amplifying concerns, channelling grievances, and organising collective Student elections likely to return to campuses .Critics, however, highlight the risks and serious concerns: violence, politicisation, and academic disruption. In states like Rajasthan and Punjab, the return of student elections has sometimes led to aggressive factionalism, clashes, and even criminal allegations against candidates. In Delhi, the DU Students' Union elections have occasionally been marred by large-scale spending, mob clashes, and interference from major national parties. The 2015 DUSU elections saw such intense political rivalry that the university cancelled its presidential debates amid security does this mean we abandon campus democracy altogether? The challenge is not student politics per se, but its distortion. When student bodies become mere proxies for political parties, the educational purpose of their existence collapses. However, Karnataka can, and must, learn from these experiences to build a better, more accountable Lyngdoh Committee, set up by the Supreme Court in 2006, has already provided a robust framework to regulate student elections. It prescribes age limits, caps on campaign spending, and bans on candidates with criminal records, and insists on fair and peaceful campaigning. If effectively implemented and monitored, these guidelines can act as strong guardrails against the degeneration of student democracy into a power like West Bengal have gone further, experimenting with 'apolitical' student councils that ban political party names, symbols, and slogans. While such models have been critiqued for being over-sanitised or undemocratic, they offer one way to prevent external interference without silencing student representation. The key is not to depoliticise students but to allow them to develop their political consciousness organically, within ethical and civic bounds. After all, the purpose of education is not just to produce employable graduates but thinking citizens capable of engaging with democracy in all its complexities. .Today, campuses often feel colder. Many students express hesitation in raising their voices for fear of administrative reprisals. Activism is viewed with suspicion; leadership is seen as a disruption. The result is a generation of students who may be bright and qualified but less practiced in disagreement, negotiation, or civic this context, Karnataka's proposal can be seen not just as a political move but as an educational reform. With adequate safeguards, transparent monitoring, and a commitment to student welfare, campus elections could become training grounds for the next generation of India's democratic leaders. The goal is not to manufacture politicians but to cultivate informed, engaged citizens. To get there, universities must not act from fear but from vision. Vice chancellors and faculty have a critical role in regulating the process, mentoring student leaders, ensuring equity, and promoting a culture of dialogue over division. Faculty-guided debates, issue-based campaigns, and promoting civic values over party loyalty can help build a new grammar for student politics—one that is democratic, not the question is not whether student elections are risky; it is whether we believe our students can use voice over violence, ideas over ideology, and responsibility over rhetoric. The Karnataka government's rethink is a chance to trust students again—to let them participate, lead, and learn. In a democracy as young, noisy, and urgent as ours, that trust may be the best education we can offer..(The writer is a former professor and dean of a Bengaluru-based university)
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
After PM snub, OPS looks for options
Chennai: Denied an audience with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on his visit to Tamil Nadu over the weekend, former chief minister O Panneerselvam is considering moving out of NDA to some place where he may get more respect, if not assembly seats. Sources told TOI that OPS, facing pressure from his supporters to move out, would consult his advisor Panruti S Ramachandran before taking a decision in a couple of days. "An alliance with Vijay's TVK is a possibility," said a close OPS aide. "I don't think he will remain in NDA for long, but his legal battle to reclaim AIADMK from Edappadi Palaniswami will continue." OPS had sent a letter to Modi requesting permission to receive and see him off at Tuticorin airport. In the letter, he sought the "gracious approval" of Modi which would be "deeply valued and remembered with gratitude". The OPS camp believes that remaining in NDA would further diminish his standing. He had recently said it is regrettable that he wasn't invited during Amit Shah's repeated visits to Tamil Nadu. Shah also visited Chennai to revive the poll tie-up with AIADMK. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai "Even if we get to contest in a few seats in AIADMK-BJP alliance, AIADMK cadres will sabotage the prospects," said a OPS camp member. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How Much Time Could You Save with Clearer Writing? Grammarly Install Now Undo "Continuing here has become untenable." While some close associates still hope for a possible merger with AIADMK, a majority of OPS supporters feel this is unlikely. "EPS won't agree and will even quit the alliance if compelled to unite with the OPS group. The enmity is for all of you to see," said an AIADMK leader. The possibility of OPS and TVK joining hands hinges on an official announcement of severing ties with BJP, as the actor-politician has made his anti-BJP stance clear. OPS is likely to address media on Wednesday.
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Complaint against social media user for defamatory posts against Congress leaders
The Halasuru Gate police registered an FIR on Monday against a social media account for uploading derogatory posts against Congress leaders, including leader of opposition party Rahul Gandhi and Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. Based on the complaint by Kushal H., a Congress party worker, the police charged the accused holding the Facebook account, 'krimi keeta' under Section 353 (statements conducing to public mischief), and 192 (wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause riot) of BNS for further investigation. In his complaint, Kushal told the police that a social media account posted derogatory videos and fabricated audios against the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, his deputy D.K. Shivakumar, and other leaders, to defame them. The police are verifying the details of the account holder to summon him for questioning.
