Family 'broken' by teen killer's sentence reduction
The boy, who cannot be named as he was aged 17 at the time of the offences, fatally stabbed Emma Lovell in the heart after he broke into her family's house north of Brisbane about 11.30pm on Boxing Day in 2022.
Following a successful appeal on Friday, the teen will now serve a minimum of about eight years and four months in detention instead of about nine years and nine months before he is released under supervision.
Victims of youth crime ambassador Lyndy Atkinson, who had worked with the Lovells since before the original sentencing, said the family now felt additional trauma.
"They are a broken family ... (the teen defendant) will be able to get out and live his best life," she said.
"Lee Lovell has lost a wife, his two girls have lost a mother. To me, it is still on the side of the offender and victims are continually being left behind."
Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington said the appeal was an unacceptable outcome and claimed it was caused by the previous Labor government's "weak laws".
"I am now looking at my options to make an appeal to the High Court," she said.
Queensland opposition leader Steven Miles said he did not want to "score cheap political points" but was shocked by the decision and thinking of the family.
Mrs Lovell's husband Lee, who was wounded during the home invasion, was unable to attend court on Friday when the appeal decision was handed down.
The home invasion led to "adult crime, adult time"' changes in Queensland law that allow for youth offenders to face a mandatory life sentence for murder with a minimum 20 years before parole.
"The murder of Emma Lovell rocked the state and Queenslanders made it very clear enough is enough and change needed to occur," Ms Frecklington said.
"The community and Emma's family will be devastated by this outcome and our thoughts are with them on another very difficult day they should never have had to endure."
Justice Tom Sullivan in May 2024 sentenced the teen, then aged 19, to a maximum of 14 years with a requirement to serve 70 per cent of that time in detention, after he found the crime to be "particularly heinous".
The Court of Appeal on Friday allowed the teen's appeal against the length of his sentence, with two of the three judges agreeing it was "manifestly excessive".
In his dissenting opinion, Justice John Bond stated he was "respectfully" not able to find the sentence unjust or plainly unreasonable.
Justice David Boddice found the 14-year sentence should stand but reduced the detention period to 60 per cent.
He cited the teen's guilty plea, "genuine remorse and prospects of rehabilitation" as special circumstances justifying his release from detention after serving less than the statutory 70 per cent.
The teen had appealed Justice Sullivan's "particularly heinous" finding in a bid to get his overall sentence reduced to 10 years.
However, Justice Boddice found Justice Sullivan's decision to impose the maximum overall sentence available at the time was correct as the offences were "properly described as provoking a sense of outrage".
The teen now has five years left to serve in detention after 500 days of pre-sentence custody in May 2024 were recognised as time served.
The teen's male co-offender, also a juvenile, was acquitted of murder at a judge-only trial in October.
He was found guilty of burglary and assaulting Mr Lovell, and in December he was sentenced to 18 months' detention - time he has served.
The family of a woman murdered during a home invasion have been left "broken" by the teen killer's sentence being reduced by almost 18 months on appeal.
The boy, who cannot be named as he was aged 17 at the time of the offences, fatally stabbed Emma Lovell in the heart after he broke into her family's house north of Brisbane about 11.30pm on Boxing Day in 2022.
Following a successful appeal on Friday, the teen will now serve a minimum of about eight years and four months in detention instead of about nine years and nine months before he is released under supervision.
Victims of youth crime ambassador Lyndy Atkinson, who had worked with the Lovells since before the original sentencing, said the family now felt additional trauma.
"They are a broken family ... (the teen defendant) will be able to get out and live his best life," she said.
"Lee Lovell has lost a wife, his two girls have lost a mother. To me, it is still on the side of the offender and victims are continually being left behind."
Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington said the appeal was an unacceptable outcome and claimed it was caused by the previous Labor government's "weak laws".
"I am now looking at my options to make an appeal to the High Court," she said.
Queensland opposition leader Steven Miles said he did not want to "score cheap political points" but was shocked by the decision and thinking of the family.
Mrs Lovell's husband Lee, who was wounded during the home invasion, was unable to attend court on Friday when the appeal decision was handed down.
The home invasion led to "adult crime, adult time"' changes in Queensland law that allow for youth offenders to face a mandatory life sentence for murder with a minimum 20 years before parole.
"The murder of Emma Lovell rocked the state and Queenslanders made it very clear enough is enough and change needed to occur," Ms Frecklington said.
"The community and Emma's family will be devastated by this outcome and our thoughts are with them on another very difficult day they should never have had to endure."
Justice Tom Sullivan in May 2024 sentenced the teen, then aged 19, to a maximum of 14 years with a requirement to serve 70 per cent of that time in detention, after he found the crime to be "particularly heinous".
The Court of Appeal on Friday allowed the teen's appeal against the length of his sentence, with two of the three judges agreeing it was "manifestly excessive".
In his dissenting opinion, Justice John Bond stated he was "respectfully" not able to find the sentence unjust or plainly unreasonable.
Justice David Boddice found the 14-year sentence should stand but reduced the detention period to 60 per cent.
He cited the teen's guilty plea, "genuine remorse and prospects of rehabilitation" as special circumstances justifying his release from detention after serving less than the statutory 70 per cent.
The teen had appealed Justice Sullivan's "particularly heinous" finding in a bid to get his overall sentence reduced to 10 years.
However, Justice Boddice found Justice Sullivan's decision to impose the maximum overall sentence available at the time was correct as the offences were "properly described as provoking a sense of outrage".
The teen now has five years left to serve in detention after 500 days of pre-sentence custody in May 2024 were recognised as time served.
The teen's male co-offender, also a juvenile, was acquitted of murder at a judge-only trial in October.
He was found guilty of burglary and assaulting Mr Lovell, and in December he was sentenced to 18 months' detention - time he has served.
The family of a woman murdered during a home invasion have been left "broken" by the teen killer's sentence being reduced by almost 18 months on appeal.
The boy, who cannot be named as he was aged 17 at the time of the offences, fatally stabbed Emma Lovell in the heart after he broke into her family's house north of Brisbane about 11.30pm on Boxing Day in 2022.
Following a successful appeal on Friday, the teen will now serve a minimum of about eight years and four months in detention instead of about nine years and nine months before he is released under supervision.
Victims of youth crime ambassador Lyndy Atkinson, who had worked with the Lovells since before the original sentencing, said the family now felt additional trauma.
"They are a broken family ... (the teen defendant) will be able to get out and live his best life," she said.
"Lee Lovell has lost a wife, his two girls have lost a mother. To me, it is still on the side of the offender and victims are continually being left behind."
Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington said the appeal was an unacceptable outcome and claimed it was caused by the previous Labor government's "weak laws".
"I am now looking at my options to make an appeal to the High Court," she said.
Queensland opposition leader Steven Miles said he did not want to "score cheap political points" but was shocked by the decision and thinking of the family.
Mrs Lovell's husband Lee, who was wounded during the home invasion, was unable to attend court on Friday when the appeal decision was handed down.
The home invasion led to "adult crime, adult time"' changes in Queensland law that allow for youth offenders to face a mandatory life sentence for murder with a minimum 20 years before parole.
"The murder of Emma Lovell rocked the state and Queenslanders made it very clear enough is enough and change needed to occur," Ms Frecklington said.
"The community and Emma's family will be devastated by this outcome and our thoughts are with them on another very difficult day they should never have had to endure."
Justice Tom Sullivan in May 2024 sentenced the teen, then aged 19, to a maximum of 14 years with a requirement to serve 70 per cent of that time in detention, after he found the crime to be "particularly heinous".
The Court of Appeal on Friday allowed the teen's appeal against the length of his sentence, with two of the three judges agreeing it was "manifestly excessive".
In his dissenting opinion, Justice John Bond stated he was "respectfully" not able to find the sentence unjust or plainly unreasonable.
Justice David Boddice found the 14-year sentence should stand but reduced the detention period to 60 per cent.
He cited the teen's guilty plea, "genuine remorse and prospects of rehabilitation" as special circumstances justifying his release from detention after serving less than the statutory 70 per cent.
The teen had appealed Justice Sullivan's "particularly heinous" finding in a bid to get his overall sentence reduced to 10 years.
However, Justice Boddice found Justice Sullivan's decision to impose the maximum overall sentence available at the time was correct as the offences were "properly described as provoking a sense of outrage".
The teen now has five years left to serve in detention after 500 days of pre-sentence custody in May 2024 were recognised as time served.
The teen's male co-offender, also a juvenile, was acquitted of murder at a judge-only trial in October.
He was found guilty of burglary and assaulting Mr Lovell, and in December he was sentenced to 18 months' detention - time he has served.
The family of a woman murdered during a home invasion have been left "broken" by the teen killer's sentence being reduced by almost 18 months on appeal.
The boy, who cannot be named as he was aged 17 at the time of the offences, fatally stabbed Emma Lovell in the heart after he broke into her family's house north of Brisbane about 11.30pm on Boxing Day in 2022.
Following a successful appeal on Friday, the teen will now serve a minimum of about eight years and four months in detention instead of about nine years and nine months before he is released under supervision.
Victims of youth crime ambassador Lyndy Atkinson, who had worked with the Lovells since before the original sentencing, said the family now felt additional trauma.
"They are a broken family ... (the teen defendant) will be able to get out and live his best life," she said.
"Lee Lovell has lost a wife, his two girls have lost a mother. To me, it is still on the side of the offender and victims are continually being left behind."
Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington said the appeal was an unacceptable outcome and claimed it was caused by the previous Labor government's "weak laws".
"I am now looking at my options to make an appeal to the High Court," she said.
Queensland opposition leader Steven Miles said he did not want to "score cheap political points" but was shocked by the decision and thinking of the family.
Mrs Lovell's husband Lee, who was wounded during the home invasion, was unable to attend court on Friday when the appeal decision was handed down.
The home invasion led to "adult crime, adult time"' changes in Queensland law that allow for youth offenders to face a mandatory life sentence for murder with a minimum 20 years before parole.
"The murder of Emma Lovell rocked the state and Queenslanders made it very clear enough is enough and change needed to occur," Ms Frecklington said.
"The community and Emma's family will be devastated by this outcome and our thoughts are with them on another very difficult day they should never have had to endure."
Justice Tom Sullivan in May 2024 sentenced the teen, then aged 19, to a maximum of 14 years with a requirement to serve 70 per cent of that time in detention, after he found the crime to be "particularly heinous".
The Court of Appeal on Friday allowed the teen's appeal against the length of his sentence, with two of the three judges agreeing it was "manifestly excessive".
In his dissenting opinion, Justice John Bond stated he was "respectfully" not able to find the sentence unjust or plainly unreasonable.
Justice David Boddice found the 14-year sentence should stand but reduced the detention period to 60 per cent.
He cited the teen's guilty plea, "genuine remorse and prospects of rehabilitation" as special circumstances justifying his release from detention after serving less than the statutory 70 per cent.
The teen had appealed Justice Sullivan's "particularly heinous" finding in a bid to get his overall sentence reduced to 10 years.
However, Justice Boddice found Justice Sullivan's decision to impose the maximum overall sentence available at the time was correct as the offences were "properly described as provoking a sense of outrage".
The teen now has five years left to serve in detention after 500 days of pre-sentence custody in May 2024 were recognised as time served.
The teen's male co-offender, also a juvenile, was acquitted of murder at a judge-only trial in October.
He was found guilty of burglary and assaulting Mr Lovell, and in December he was sentenced to 18 months' detention - time he has served.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
18 hours ago
- The Advertiser
State celebrates major milestone for women in politics
August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71. August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71. August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71. August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71.
Perth Now
a day ago
- Perth Now
State celebrates major milestone for women in politics
August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 of that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Millicent Preston-Stanley died in June 1955, aged 71.
News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
Police search for alleged 1974 rapist George Karakis
An elderly woman has waited more than 50 years for justice after being raped in her Melbourne home, as police renew efforts to solve the 'brutal crime'. Victoria Police this week made a public appeal for information about their suspect, 78-year-old George Karakis, who was arrested over the incident but vanished after being granted bail. It is alleged the woman, then 30, was asleep in her Fitzroy home 'when she was awoken and raped and by a stranger' early on July 22, 1974. Mr Karakis, then 27, at the time lived on Gore St, Fitzroy with his wife, sister and brother-in-law. He was arrested nine days after the incident and charged with rape, burglary and indecent assault, before being released on bail on a $1000 surety put up by his wife. But he has now been missing since October 9, 1974, when he failed to appear at Fitzroy Magistrates Court. Now, more than 51 year later, Yarra Crime Investigation Unit Detective Senior Constable Ruby Roberts said police were still intent on bringing him before the courts. 'Our victim survivor is now in her 80s and been forced to live most of her adult life knowing this man has not faced court for the brutal crime he is accused of,' she said. 'This crime changed her life forever and 50 years is a long time to live without the justice we would so dearly like to give her. 'There will absolutely be people out there who know where Karakis fled and may even know where he is now residing.' Little publicity has been made over the mystery of Mr Karakis' whereabouts in the half century since he went missing. Images of Mr Karakis' 1974 mugshot and a computer-generated image of what he could look like today were released on Monday. He was described as being about 162cm tall with brown eyes and had a 2cm scar over his left eyebrow. Police in NSW believed they had located him in Sydney's eastern suburbs in 1990, but he again fled before an arrest warrant could be executed. Mr Karakis, who was born in Turkey in 1947, was previously named among Crime Stoppers' '20 Most Wanted' list as part of its Operation Roam appeal in 2014. Former Crime Stoppers chief executive Sam Hunter said at the time that fugitives crossed state boarders and assumed normal lives. 'They may be your mechanic, your neighbour, or catch the same train as you do each day,' she said. 'They have not just disappeared, the community holds to key to finding out where they are living.' The fresh appeal was shared by Red Heart campaign founder Sherele Moody who hoped the victim could find justice before she dies. 'For 51 years, she's lived in fear and without closure after a man broke into her home as she slept – and raped her,' she wrote. 'The woman he raped is now 81 years old.' Snr Const Roberts said: 'Given the length of time, there is also the possibility he has passed away – we just want to find answers so we can close this chapter in our victim's life'. 'Sometimes the smallest piece of information is all we need to get that breakthrough lead that could result in an arrest.'
