Two nurses in Australia suspended for reportedly making antisemitic comments
Summary
Companies
Nurses suspended for antisemitic threats in TikTok video
Police anti-semitic taskforce investigates video
NSW Health Minister vows nurses won't work again
Australian PM condemns video as vile and shameful
SYDNEY, Feb 12 (Reuters) - Two nurses in a Sydney hospital have been suspended from work for threatening to kill Jewish patients and refusing to treat them in a video on TikTok, triggering an investigation by police, authorities said on Wednesday.
The video was shared by a TikTok user named Max Veifer, who says he is from Israel, and shows him talking to a man and woman wearing medical scrubs.
"I'm so upset that you're Israeli ... eventually you're going to get killed and go to (hell)", the man in medical scrubs said, after Veifer mentioned he is from Israel in a video chat.
When asked why he would be killed, the woman in medical scrubs said: "It's Palestine's country, not your country" and used an obscenity.
The woman said she would not treat any Jewish patients and instead kill them. The man, with a threatening gesture, said he had already send many Israelis, who visited the hospital, to "Jahannam", the term for Islamic hell in Arabic.
Reuters could not independently verify the footage and it was not immediately clear if the full video of the conversation had been uploaded by the user. Some of the woman's words have been beeped out in the video.
Reuters could not immediately contact the two nurses.
New South Wales state Health Minister Ryan Park said the nurses have been "stood down immediately", pending an investigation.
"Obviously, the investigative process now takes place. I do not want to leave a sliver of light to allow any of them to be able to think that they will ever work for New South Wales Health again," Park told reporters.
New South Wales state police said its antisemitic taskforce is investigating a social media video depicting alleged health workers making antisemitic threats. Police said the individuals involved were now assisting detectives.
Max Veifer, who regularly posts videos mostly about the Middle East on TikTok, has 102,000 followers and his videos have been liked by 4.2 million users.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the Australian federal police has offered "whatever assistance" to New South Wales state police.
"I have seen this antisemitic video. It's driven by hate and it's disgusting. The comments are vile, the footage is sickening and it is shameful," Albanese said in parliament.
Australia has seen an escalating series of attacks on synagogues, buildings and cars since the Israel-Gaza war began in October 2023, sparking fear among Australia's nearly 115,000 Jewish people.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
I went from 18st to 8.5st on Mounjaro, there's a dark side coming off no-one talks about – I've gone back on it 3 times
Plus, the financial worries that come with being on the jab JAB SNAG I went from 18st to 8.5st on Mounjaro, there's a dark side coming off no-one talks about – I've gone back on it 3 times A WOMAN has shared how she lost a staggering 9.5 stone being on Mounjaro, but said there was a dark side that no one talks about when you come off. Shannon revealed she went from 18 stone to 8.5 stone on the popular weight loss jab, and she's been on it three times after 'failing' to ditch it. Advertisement 4 Shannon went from 18 stone to 8.5 stone on weight loss jab Mounjaro Credit: TikTok/@shanmacxo 4 She now feels more confident, but claims the jab is 'addictive' Credit: TikTok/@shanmacxo On her @shanmacxo account, she insisted that it was 'genuinely the best thing I ever did for myself' and said 'it will change your life.' However, coming off the injections is extremely tough - and she claims she is now an 'addict' of its effects. In a video that has 85,000 views, she shared: 'I've been taking Mounjaro now for 16 months. I have gone from 18 stone, and I weigh 8 stone 5 now." She shared how she had come off the weight loss jab three times 'cold turkey' and each time has 'completely failed and got back on it.' Advertisement Shannon said she'd been on a maintenance dose of 7.5 and had been injecting herself every week or every other week. But when it came to stopping, she faced a big obstacle. Shannon explained: 'The last week or so has been like I have been an addict. My brain has been like, I need it, I need to order it. 'I'm eating far too much. I've got this severe, sickening worry that I'm gonna put weight on, checking the scales all of the time.' Advertisement Shannon said she thinks her issues come from her feeling like she was 'big' her whole life. She said that she's been really worried about putting on a single pound and caved about bought more of the weight loss jab, although the decision left her "disappointed in myself." I was depressed and exhausted before Mounjaro - I've lost 4 stone but have had FOUL side effects, including eggy burps RELIANT FOR LIFE? And it's not just her who finds the weight loss method 'addictive.' She explained: 'And friends do the same as well, where they've come off it, lost so much weight, and then they're just like, 'I need— I need it back.'' Advertisement Due to her reliance on the controversial weight loss jab, she wondered if she will now be reliant on it 'for life'. She continued: 'Is it a life thing? It's not sustainable financially for life. 'I feel like this isn't talked about enough, and how we are supposed to manage the weight loss after— and the food noise—it's a real struggle." 4 More and more people buying Mounjaro through online pharmacies, without sufficient checks Credit: Alamy Advertisement JAB WARNING Mounjaro (tirzepatide) - which can have negative side effects for some users - became available in the UK in February 2024, primarily for private use. But access to the weight loss jab through the NHS has gradually been rolled out. Is it a life thing? It's not sustainable financially for life Shannon By activating GIP and GLP-1 receptors, Mounjaro slows down the emptying of the stomach, making you feel fuller for longer and reducing appetite. This can lead to eating less food overall. Advertisement In addition to nasty side effects, those debating whether to begin using Mounjaro should know that it can also have fatal consequences. Everything you need to know about fat jabs Weight loss jabs are all the rage as studies and patient stories reveal they help people shed flab at almost unbelievable rates, as well as appearing to reduce the risk of serious diseases. Wegovy – a modified version of type 2 diabetes drug Ozempic – and Mounjaro are the leading weight loss injections used in the UK. Wegovy, real name semaglutide, has been used on the NHS for years while Mounjaro (tirzepatide) is a newer and more powerful addition to the market. Mounjaro accounts for most private prescriptions for weight loss and is set to join Wegovy as an NHS staple this year. How do they work? The jabs work by suppressing your appetite, making you eat less so your body burns fat for energy instead and you lose weight. They do this my mimicking a hormone called GLP-1, which signals to the brain when the stomach is full, so the drugs are officially called GLP-1 receptor agonists. They slow down digestion and increase insulin production, lowering blood sugar, which is why they were first developed to treat type 2 diabetes in which patients' sugar levels are too high. Can I get them? NHS prescriptions of weight loss drugs, mainly Wegovy and an older version called Saxenda (chemical name liraglutide), are controlled through specialist weight loss clinics. Typically a patient will have to have a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher, classifying them as medically obese, and also have a weight-related health condition such as high blood pressure. GPs generally do not prescribe the drugs for weight loss. Private prescribers offer the jabs, most commonly Mounjaro, to anyone who is obese (BMI of 30+) or overweight (BMI 25-30) with a weight-related health risk. Private pharmacies have been rapped for handing them out too easily and video calls or face-to-face appointments are now mandatory to check a patient is being truthful about their size and health. Are there any risks? Yes – side effects are common but most are relatively mild. Around half of people taking the drug experience gut issues, including sickness, bloating, acid reflux, constipation and diarrhoea. Dr Sarah Jarvis, GP and clinical consultant at said: 'One of the more uncommon side effects is severe acute pancreatitis, which is extremely painful and happens to one in 500 people.' Other uncommon side effects include altered taste, kidney problems, allergic reactions, gallbladder problems and hypoglycemia. Evidence has so far been inconclusive about whether the injections are damaging to patients' mental health. Figures obtained by The Sun show that, up to January 2025, 85 patient deaths in the UK were suspected to be linked to the medicines. The injections are licensed for patients with type 2 diabetes and are administered every seven days. They are also available to assist those who are clinically obese (with a Body Mass Index of 30 or over). Advertisement The drugs, which have been widely regarded as 'fat jabs', can be prescribed by a practitioner - such as a doctor, nurse or a pharmacist-independent prescriber. But increasingly, we are seeing more and more people buying them through online pharmacies, without sufficient checks. Not only this, but recently, figures from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency revealed that fat jabs had been linked to 82 deaths across the UK. 4 Mounjaro slows down the emptying of the stomach, making you feel fuller for longer Credit: Alamy
New Statesman
3 hours ago
- New Statesman
Australia is no model for assisted dying
Photo by Kelly Barnes / AAP Image via Alamy Australian laws on voluntary assisted dying (VAD) are deemed so similar to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that three quarters of overseas witnesses invited to give evidence to MPs were from Australia. 'This is not a revolutionary law reform,' Alex Greenwich, a politician from New South Wales, told the bill's scrutiny committee earlier this year. 'It has been tried and tested, we have appropriate safeguards in place throughout Australia, and they work.' Although Australian states extend the six-month life expectancy requirement to a year for those with neurodegenerative conditions, in terms of eligibility, process and safeguards, their laws are similar to the UK's bill. The two differ only in that self-administration of life-ending drugs would be permitted here, and a multidisciplinary panel would review cases. So when Kim Leadbeater, Labour MP and the bill's sponsor, responded with a heart emoji and '#ChoiceAtTheEndOfLife' to a Guardian article published on 7 June that showed the Australian system being abused, eyebrows were raised. An elderly couple had been granted VAD when neither were terminally ill; medics in New South Wales effectively greenlit their suicide pact. 'Looks like the safeguards didn't work,' Mark Taubert, an NHS consultant and the vice-president of the European Association for Palliative Care, responded on X. According to the palliative care doctor Rachel Clarke, the story 'could not highlight more starkly the dangers of the law we are currently debating'. MPs hearing evidence on the bill had little time with six Australian witnesses, all of whom were supportive of VAD. Their arguments didn't always stand up to scrutiny. 'The medications are completely effective. I have not experienced any failures,' said Chloe Furst, a palliative care doctor from South Australia and board member of Voluntary Assisted Dying Australia and New Zealand. But, MPs pointed out, there is no requirement that a doctor be present when someone self-administers, nor is there provision for reporting complications. In Western Australia, where this information is collected, complications were recorded in 4.3 per cent of deaths in 2023-24. Asked if it was a concern that a 'large proportion of people who opted for assisted dying cited being a burden as their reason', another witness, Meredith Blake from the University of Western Australia, replied this was 'not the evidence that we have got'. Except it is. Official state figures showed 35 per cent of those seeking VAD cited being a burden on family, friends or carers as their reason for doing so. Blake replied: 'If there are people who are saying they are a burden, that does not mean that their decision is not voluntary.' While MPs were told Australian palliative care doctors had 'embraced' VAD, I have spoken with medics in Australia who are troubled by how the legislation operates. Academics and politicians are, too. Robert Clark, a former attorney-general and MP in Victoria wrote to the committee twice with his observations: the second time after his fellow Australians had addressed MPs. Numerous aspects of their evidence were 'factually incorrect or incomplete', Clark claimed. There was not adequate palliative care available to all terminally ill patients in Australia. Evidence didn't show any reduction in non-medically assisted suicide. The right of doctors to object to VAD was not respected. Many doctors 'feel unable to raise concerns about VAD… lest they suffer adverse professional or career consequences, or else they are leaving the hospital system altogether', he said. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe British palliative care doctor Alex Hughes recently relayed his experience of assisted dying while working in Australia. Hughes, who is neutral on VAD in principle, described a borderline case in which it seemed the patient had chosen to die because of poor alternative care options. In another, he suspected the man may have been influenced by depression, but this had gone unexplored in assessment. Were assisted dying to come to the UK, doctors would be 'at a heightened risk of unconscious bias… [and] may lean towards giving patients the 'benefit of the doubt', granting assisted dying to individuals who, in reality, have more than six months to live.' The events described in the Guardian confirm that risk is not merely hypothetical. Ahead of its return to the Commons on 13 June, 1,000 doctors urged MPs to vote against the assisted dying bill. They argued it is 'deeply flawed' and unsafe. Similar statements have been made by the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Psychiatrists, which say they cannot support the legislation as it stands. Such concerns are not 'noise', as Leadbeater has suggested. Many critics have no issue with the principle of safe VAD. But the passage of the bill has revealed law-making at its worst: rushed debate, the views of the vulnerable ignored or downplayed, and crucial information on how the bill would work absent. Supporters say there will be time to iron out details later. That is too risky. Under current plans, some vulnerable people will be helped – in Hughes's words – to have 'an inappropriate assisted death'. He now poses two critical questions for MPs: how many vulnerable people slipping through the net is acceptable? And can adequate safeguards be put in place 'without creating a system so cumbersome that it becomes unworkable'? It's time for MPs to be honest with themselves and the public: enabling some an autonomous death through assisted dying will inevitably put others at risk of harm. [See also: Has any Chancellor faced a challenge this daunting?] Related
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Mum sparks debate after revealing why she NEVER washes new clothes, bedding or charity buys – but whose side are you on?
FROM how many times you wash the sheets to the number of times you wash your clothes and at what temperature – it's been a debate among many people. But one mum has got people talking after revealing her routine when buying new products. 1 Taking to TikTok, the mum-of-four shared a video on her social media page @ livsmeh, which currently has 10.9K followers. Livvy responded to someone who commented on a previous video of hers saying: 'you must wash new bedding.' However, the mum responded with something slightly different, and it has very much got people talking. She explained that she 'never' washes new bedding and has never washed her new clothes either. Livvy also added: 'I sometimes don't even wash clothes I get from the charity shop. That's gross isn't it?' She explained to her followers that she didn't understand why people would wash their new bedding or new clothes. The mum then went on to explain that she didn't even wash the brand-new newborn clothes she bought. Livvy then asked her followers: 'What am I doing wrong here? Why? They're new.' Before then telling her followers that she didn't want to know the answer to those questions. After 24 hours of the video being shared, Livvy's video received over 10.2k views, with 90 people rushing to the comments section to share their thoughts. I got Ringworm working in the changing room of a major high street store - it's why you should always wash new clothes Some were mixed. One wrote: 'Same here. Mum-of-five, new bedding straight on, new clothes straight in the drawers, charity shop clothes sniff test will decide whether it gets washed or not. 'If it smells like the person smokes it goes through the washer twice, if not in the drawer they go!' A second added: 'If you wash them, then you have to dry them and then you have to put them away. No thank you.' A third said: 'Not gross in my opinion.' However, others didn't agree. One commented: 'Always wash before use. "One of my kids got hives from the factory finishings on a body warmer.' A second said: 'You lost me at a charity shop.' Whilst someone else wrote: 'Oh I'm more than fine with new clothes and bedding, but the charity shop clothes not being washed has been scratching all over a little bit.' Another added: 'The charity shop non-washing has kinda given me the ick.' Laundry tips Catherine Green, sustainable cleaning expert at smol shared her laundry tips. How often should you be remaking your bed? When it comes to your bed, maintaining a hygienic sleep setup can actually improve your sleep quality, helping you start every day better. Most people shed 500 million skin cells per day and a lot of that ends up in bed for dust mites to feed on. And those with asthma or allergies might see symptoms worsen by sleeping on dirty sheets! You want to be washing your sheets once a week - or every 10 days if you don't suffer from allergies and wear nightclothes. Bedding builds up with sweat, skin cells and oils quickly, even if it doesn't look dirty. Using an effective detergent like smol's will still give you a great clean on a 20°C cycle - that's better for the planet and your energy bills! What temperature do smol recommend then? For your regular weekly washes I recommend washing most loads at 20°C for 30 minutes. It's gentler on fabrics, slashes energy use, and still delivers excellent stain removal with the right detergent. A colder wash can actually be more effective if you opt for a bio detergent as its enzymes need cooler water; too hot and they lose their ability to digest stains. A wash at 60°c (unless you have silk sheets) every now and again can help kill off dust mites and other nasties. What's the difference between bio and non-bio detergent? Bio detergents contain enzymes, which are especially good at breaking down tough stains like food, grass, or sweat. It's best used in mid to low temperature washes (ideally between 20-40°C) as anything hotter can cause them not to work effectively. Non-bio skips the enzymes, which in turn makes it more suitable for those with sensitive skin or allergies. Although non-bio doesn't contain enzymes, it's still great at removing stains and keeping your clothes clean, you just may need to use a slightly higher temperature setting to aid with the cleaning process.
