logo
Yeah but no but yeah but no but surrender. Life's just one big betrayal for Kemi and co

Yeah but no but yeah but no but surrender. Life's just one big betrayal for Kemi and co

The Guardian22-05-2025

I fear for Kemi Badenoch's sanity. She may need a little respite care. From herself. Little more than 24 hours after one of her by now customary car-crash outings at prime minister's questions in which she didn't appear to have noticed that Keir Starmer had U-turned on the winter fuel allowance, KemiKaze was emailing Tory party members to tell them the exciting news. She had had the prime minister on the rack and it was only down to her that Labour had done their reverse ferret.
Where do you even begin to start with this level of denial? Is it the assumption at Conservative party HQ that anyone left supporting the Tories must be technically braindead so won't have a clue what is going on? To be fair, that may not be a bad shout.
But what does it say about party bosses that they are still trying to rewrite history a day later? Trying to make out this was Kemi's finest hour. 'Congrats, Kemi. I've got to hand it to you. You really nailed PMQs today. Keir Starmer didn't know where to look.' It's kind of embarrassing. Not least because Labour's U-turn owed nothing to Kemi and the Tories. They are an irrelevance. It was the discontent among Labour MPs and voters what swung it.
As for Robert Jenrick, Kemi's main rival for the leadership, he was making a rare appearance in the Commons – he never comes to PMQs to offer Kemi amoral support – to reply to the lord chancellor's statement on the independent sentencing review (ISR) conducted by former Tory justice secretary David Gauke. Someone you would have thought might attract crossparty support.
Back in the day, Gauke was something of a Tory legend. Uncork the Gauke! As a Treasury minister during the early days of the Brexit negotiations, he would often be sent out by the chancellor to field awkward urgent questions as the government got increasingly muddled. And Dave would do it with good grace. Never afraid to make an idiot of himself in pursuit of a higher goal.
But somewhere along the way, during the time he was justice secretary, Gauke got fed up with being the fall guy. Decided that he couldn't keep silent while some of the self-radicalised leavers in his own government cheerfully advocated a no-deal Brexit. So he spoke out and was kicked out of the party by Boris Johnson.
That alone should have booked Dave a place among the pantheon of good guys. Only not for Honest Bob. For Jenrick, Gauke's centrism marked him out as a wrong 'un. A cheese-eating surrender monkey. And Honest Bob had had enough of surrender this week after Labour's EU deal that had undone a few nano particles of Boris's Brexit agreement.
So Jenrick was spitting blood. The government's ISR was yet another betrayal in a long history of betrayal. Labour had gone soft on criminals. Why couldn't Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, and Gauke have adopted the Texas model? There was a US state that knew how to execute crims. Even if they were innocent. Wait. What was that? Labour had used the Texas model? In which case, why not something more like Russia or Saudi Arabia. They took no prisoners. Or rather they did.
Everything was wrong, said Honest Bob. Violent criminals were going to be running around on the street, raping women and slaughtering children. We needed to get offenders to build their own jails. Preferably underwater. All foreigners should be drowned at birth. He had always known Labour was soft on crime.
Take Lord Timpson. A bleeding heart liberal who believed in rehabilitation. It was time to lock people up for life on suspicion of not being English. Mostly, Honest Bob wanted politicians who had waved through a planning application from a party donor that had been turned down by the local authority to face the firing squad. Whoever could he have in mind?
Tory Desmond Swayne rather agreed. He was worried that people weren't serving enough of their sentences. It was time that criminals learned that a 20-year sentence actually meant 25. Otherwise, it was hard to guess which of his MPs he was trying to appeal to. Those like John Glen and Mark Pritchard have wised up that a kneejerk lurch to the right on every issue is not a good look. They were more or less behind the government's review.
As for Mahmood, she just told it as it was. The Tories had left the prison system on the verge of collapse. Had only built 500 new spaces in 14 years. Labour would do better. Was doing better. Had deported more foreigners than the Tories. But still something needed to give. Hence early release and better tagging. Especially for women. Chemical castration for some sex offenders. This went down very well with Mike Tapp. He is the Alan B'Stard of Labour's 2024 intake. Draped in a flag, standing on the White Cliff and having it in for foreigners. What's not to love?
That just left Kemi and the rest of the Tories to grumble about one further act of surrender. Not another one! For, after a 12-hour delay in the high court, the government's Chagos deal was finally concluded. And even though most Conservative MPs had never been able to locate the Chagos Islands on a map before they became newsworthy, they were adamant this was a capitulation of the highest order.
Never mind that the Tory government had started the negotiations a while back. Never mind that the international and UK courts had approved the deal. Never mind that all our allies had given the deal their blessing. Somehow the Tories – and presumably Nigel Farage, if he hadn't been busy lying on a 'sunbed' in France – knew best. As Starmer and John Healey were quick to point out in their hastily arranged press conference, it was Russia, China and Iran who were opposed to the deal. Whose side would you rather be on.
Yeah but no but yeah but no but surrender, mumbled Kemi. Always surrender. A life lived in a permanent state of betrayal. Mainly a betrayal of her own intelligence. Recess can't come soon enough.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE Fears for Britain's elderly over digital landline switchover...as minster admits he can never get hold of his father on the phone
EXCLUSIVE Fears for Britain's elderly over digital landline switchover...as minster admits he can never get hold of his father on the phone

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Fears for Britain's elderly over digital landline switchover...as minster admits he can never get hold of his father on the phone

A government minister has warned he cannot guarantee that all elderly and vulnerable people will be safely switched over to digital landlines - as he revealed he can never get hold of his own father on the phone. Minister for the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology Sir Chris Bryant exclusively told MailOnline he'd be 'fibbing' if he promised every household will be transferred to internet-based landlines safely, with telecare devices still working. His comments coincide with a new government campaign aimed at raising awareness about the switchover, to encourage vulnerable and elderly people to get in touch with their landline provider for assistance. Telecoms firms including BT, Sky and Virgin are currently switching every household in Britain to new internet-based landlines, as ageing copper wires are increasingly unreliable and at risk of failure. The transition is expected to be completed by early 2027. The tech giants are moving to the final phase of turning off the UK's old copper wire system, and forced migrations to a new digital service have resumed. After previously telling MailOnline the fear of people being left with telecare devices - alarms that call for help in the case of an emergency - kept him up at night, Sir Chris says he is now more confident the correct support systems are in place to transition people safely. Asked if he could guarantee everyone would always be able to call emergency services after being switched over to the new phone line, he said: 'I can't guess what terrible set of circumstances there might be in one particular street. 'Sometimes if you're in an area where mobile connectivity is very poor, and obviously some older people won't have a mobile phone. I can never persuade my father to have a mobile phone which is really irritating, it makes him very difficult to get hold of. 'I can't say 100 percent, I'd be fibbing, but what we've tried to do is put in as many different measures to make sure that as many different people in as many sets of circumstances are protected. 'It might be that the cable's down, or all sorts of different things that might arise, and you want to mitigate against all of those, but it's impossible to get to 100 percent.' He added that his department had written to every local authority to request details of vulnerable people in their area to be passed onto telecoms firms - and that 95 percent have provided this information. This leaves five percent of councils which have not. In 2023, telecoms firms were forced to halt non-voluntary upgrades following several incidents of personal alarms failing in emergencies. Some 1.8 million people in the UK rely on life-saving telecare devices to sound the alarm in the case of a medical emergency or fall. The devices function by being linked to a wearer's landline or mobile phone. There have been concerns for years over the transition to digital as, while traditional landline phones continue working in the case of a blackout or internet outage, internet-based phonelines do not. Ofcom, the industry regulator, ruled that telecoms firms must provide a back-up to the landline lasting at least one hour to all vulnerable people in case they need assistance during an outage. But Sir Chris said this is not enough, and the majority of firms have agreed to provide between four and seven hours. But amid data published last year that revealed millions of people still have no idea about the ongoing transition, he added that he doesn't think elderly people 'actually need to understand' what is being done to their landline, as long as it happens. The minister said: 'Two thirds of people have already been done. And probably they don't even know that that's what's happened. 'I don't care about that, what I care about is whether the telecare device around somebody's auntie's neck still works when they go from one system to another. 'That's what I care about and that's what we're making sure happens. And it may be that some elderly people don't actually need to understand what's happening to the cable outside their home as long as the system works.' He told MailOnline the firms 'needed help' with the transition: 'On almost day one of me arriving in post I said [the switchover] is one of the things I want to focus on, and within weeks we had a meeting of all the operators and they were really responsive. 'I think they all wanted to move together, they wanted a sense of where government wanted them to go, they needed some help actually. 'They wouldn't know who the vulnerable people are with telecare devices, the only people who know that are the social care departments of local authorities. 'I could help get that information so we could work together and I think it felt like a very productive round table that we had.' But the minister also warned that severe weather events and local disasters could still pose a major risk to vulnerable people who rely on landlines. 'A few years ago in one of the big storms, we had big flooding in one of my areas in the Rhondda. 'Now in that situation you're not going to have any kind of electricity, nothing's going to work, it's probably going to be out for several days and there's nothing you can do about that.' He told how, before the last election, a lorry drove straight into a telephone cabinet in his constituency, knocking out services for a week. 'I was very angry just as a constituency MP, this was before the last election, I didn't feel that the operators were actually sorting that out, responding quickly enough. But that was a massive accident, the lorry had gone straight into the cabinet, and the entire village was out. 'And I know there was an incidence there where somebody was not able to make a phone call to get an ambulance.' A checklist - which telecoms giants are understood to have signed up to during Sir Chris' first meeting with firms last summer - means all 'vulnerable' customers will be able to have an engineer visit their household to support them through the transition. The engineer will then test any telecare devices before leaving to ensure they are still working. If any issue occurs, there is the option to return the household to their old landline until this can be fixed, if no alternative is available. And vulnerable households will be given back-up devices to protect them in the case of a power cut or internet outage - with firms pledging to ensure this exceeds Ofcom's minimum recommendation that such devices provide one hour of battery power. Firms have been instructed to ensure that no telecare user will be migrated to digital landline services without the communication provider, the customer, or the telecare service provider confirming that the user has a compatible and functioning telecare solution in place.

The AI copyright standoff continues - with no solution in sight
The AI copyright standoff continues - with no solution in sight

BBC News

time31 minutes ago

  • BBC News

The AI copyright standoff continues - with no solution in sight

The fierce battle over artificial intelligence (AI) and copyright - which pits the government against some of the biggest names in the creative industry - returns to the House of Lords on Monday with little sign of a solution in sight.A huge row has kicked off between ministers and peers who back the artists, and shows no sign of abating. It might be about AI but at its heart are very human issues: jobs and highly unusual that neither side has backed down by now or shown any sign of compromise; in fact if anything support for those opposing the government is growing rather than tailing off. This is "unchartered territory", one source in the peers' camp told me. The argument is over how best to balance the demands of two huge industries: the tech and creative sectors. More specifically, it's about the fairest way to allow AI developers access to creative content in order to make better AI tools - without undermining the livelihoods of the people who make that content in the first sparked it is the uninspiringly-titled Data (Use and Access) proposed legislation was broadly expected to finish its long journey through parliament this week and sail off into the law books. Instead, it is currently stuck in limbo, ping-ponging between the House of Lords and the House of bill states that AI developers should have access to all content unless its individual owners choose to opt out. Nearly 300 members of the House of Lords disagree. They think AI firms should be forced to disclose which copyrighted material they use to train their tools, with a view to licensing Nick Clegg, former president of global affairs at Meta, is among those broadly supportive of the bill, arguing that asking permission from all copyright holders would "kill the AI industry in this country". Those against include Baroness Beeban Kidron, a crossbench peer and former film director, best known for making films such as Bridget Jones: The Edge of says ministers would be "knowingly throwing UK designers, artists, authors, musicians, media and nascent AI companies under the bus" if they don't move to protect their output from what she describes as "state sanctioned theft" from a UK industry worth £ asking for an amendment to the bill which includes Technology Secretary Peter Kyle giving a report to the House of Commons about the impact of the new law on the creative industries, three months after it comes into force, if it doesn't change. Mr Kyle also appears to have changed his views about UK copyright once said copyright law was "very certain", now he says it is "not fit for purpose".Perhaps to an extent both those things are Department for Science, Innovation and Technology say that they're carrying out a wider consultation on these issues and will not consider changes to the Bill unless they're completely satisfied that they work for creators. If the "ping pong" between the two Houses continues, there's a small chance the entire bill could be shelved; I'm told it's unlikely but not it does, some other important elements would go along with it, simply because they are part of the same bill. It also includes proposed rules on the rights of bereaved parents to access their children's data if they die, changes to allow NHS trusts to share patient data more easily, and even a 3D underground map of the UK's pipes and cables, aimed at improving the efficiency of roadworks (I told you it was a big bill).There is no easy answer. How did we get here? Here's how it all started. Initially, before AI exploded into our lives, AI developers scraped enormous quantities of content from the internet, arguing that it was in the public domain already and therefore freely available. We are talking about big, mainly US, tech firms here doing the scraping, and not paying for anything they hoovered they used that data to train the same AI tools now used by millions to write copy, create pictures and videos in seconds. These tools can also mimic popular musicians, writers, artists. For example, a recent viral trend saw people merrily sharing AI images generated in the style of the Japanese animation firm Studio founder of that studio meanwhile, had once described the use of AI in animation as "an insult to life itself". Needless to say, he was not a has been a massive backlash from many content creators and owners including household names like Sir Elton John, Sir Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa. They have argued that taking their work in this way, without consent, credit or payment, amounted to theft. And that artists are now losing work because AI tools can churn out similar content freely and quickly Elton John didn't hold back in a recent interview with the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg. He argued that the government was on course to "rob young people of their legacy and their income", and described the current administration as "absolute losers".Others though point out that material made by the likes of Sir Elton is available worldwide. And if you make it too hard for AI companies to access it in the UK they'll simply do it elsewhere instead, taking much needed investment and job opportunities with opposing positions, no obvious compromise. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.

UK politics live: Labour reveals new nuclear programme and submarines ahead of Starmer defence review
UK politics live: Labour reveals new nuclear programme and submarines ahead of Starmer defence review

The Independent

time44 minutes ago

  • The Independent

UK politics live: Labour reveals new nuclear programme and submarines ahead of Starmer defence review

Britain will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and invest £15 billion in its warhead programme, Sir Keir Starmer is set to announce. The government will unveil its strategic defence review today. Significant investment in the UK warhead programme this parliament and maintaining the existing stockpile are among the 62 recommendations that the government is expected to accept in full. Building the new submarines, which is part of the Aukus partnership with the US and Australia, will support 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years, the Ministry of Defence said. The £15 billion investment into the warhead programme will back the government's commitments to maintain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent, build a new fleet of Dreadnought submarines and deliver all future upgrades. From the late 2030s, the fleet of up to 12 SSN-Aukus conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines will replace seven Astute-class attack submarines the UK is due to start operating. UK to build up to 12 new attack submarines and invest £15bn in warheads The UK will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and invest £15 billion in its warhead programme, the prime minister will announce today as the government unveils its strategic defence review. Significant investment in the UK warhead programme this parliament and maintaining the existing stockpile are among the 62 recommendations that the government is expected to accept in full. Building the new submarines, which is part of the Aukus partnership with the US and Australia, will support 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years, the Ministry of Defence said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store