DOJ receives Tulsi Gabbard's criminal referral alleging Obama era's 'treasonous conspiracy' to undermine Trump 2016 win
Gabbard accused former President Barack Obama and his top intelligence team — including former DNI James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, and FBI Director James Comey — of orchestrating a 'treasonous conspiracy.'
'Americans will finally learn the truth about how in 2016, intelligence was politicised and weaponised... to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Donald Trump,' Gabbard wrote.
Gabbard's referral cites a December 9, 2016, meeting at the Obama White House, attended by Clapper, Brennan, Comey, and other top officials. According to her, Obama directed the Intelligence Community (IC) to craft a new intelligence assessment on Russian election interference.
"The next day (December 9, 2016), top national security officials, including FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan and DNI James Clapper, gathered at the Obama White House to discuss Russia. Obama directed the IC to create a new intelligence assessment that detailed Russian election meddling, even though it would contradict multiple intelligence assessments released over the previous several months," Gabbard said in her statement.
Gabbard also accused Obama-era officials of orchestrating a media campaign to push the interference narrative. She claims classified details were leaked to major outlets to suggest that Russia hacked the election for Trump's benefit.
'Obama officials immediately leaned on their allies in the media to advance their falsehoods,' she stated. 'Anonymous IC sources leaked classified information... asserting Russia had intervened to hack the election in Trump's favor.'
In her statement, Gabbard demanded that 'every person involved in this conspiracy' be investigated and prosecuted by the DOJ.
'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,' she declared. 'The American people's trust in our democratic republic depends on it.'
She confirmed that all supporting documents had been sent to the DOJ, adding, this is about justice — for President Trump, his family, and the American people.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
3 minutes ago
- India.com
P Chidambaram's ‘Homegrown Terrorists' Remark Sparks Political Firestorm Ahead Of Op Sindoor Debate
New Delhi: A massive political storm has erupted ahead of the Operation Sindoor debate in Parliament, following remarks made by senior Congress leader and former Home Minister P. Chidambaram. In a recent interview with The Quint, Chidambaram questioned the official narrative surrounding the Pahalgam terror attack and suggested that the attackers could have been "homegrown terrorists." "Have they identified the terrorists? Where they came from? I mean, for all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan? There's no evidence of that," Chidambaram said, adding that the government has been unwilling to disclose what the National Investigation Agency (NIA) has found so far. His comments have drawn sharp criticism from the ruling BJP, which has accused the Congress of once again 'giving a clean chit' to Pakistan. Reacting to Chidambaram's remarks, BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya said on X, "P Chidambaram, former UPA-era Home Minister and the original proponent of the infamous 'Saffron Terror' theory, covers himself with glory yet again: Have they (NIA) identified the terrorists or where they came from? For all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume they came from Pakistan? There is no evidence of that." "Once again, the Congress rushes to give a clean chit to Pakistan, this time after the Pahalgam terror attack. Why is it that every time our forces confront Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, Congress leaders sound more like Islamabad's defence lawyers than India's opposition?" Malviya added. "When it comes to national security, there should be no ambiguity. But with the Congress, there never is – they always bend over backwards to protect the enemy," he said. P. Chidambaram, former UPA-era Home Minister and the original proponent of the infamous 'Saffron Terror' theory, covers himself with glory yet again: 'Have they (NIA) identified the terrorists or where they came from? For all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do… — Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) July 27, 2025 BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla echoed the criticism, saying, '26/11 to Surgical Strike to Pahalgam, Congress ka haath, Pakistan ke saath!' He accused the Congress of siding with Pakistan just hours before the crucial Parliament debate on Operation Sindoor. Chidambaram also alleged that the government is concealing details about India's counter-offensive, Operation Sindoor, launched after the Pahalgam massacre in which 26 civilians were killed in front of their families. He said the Centre was 'hiding the losses' India suffered during the operation. "They are also hiding the losses. I said it in a column that in a war, losses will occur on both sides. I understand that India would have suffered losses. Be upfront," Chidambaram said. Referencing World War II, he added: "Winston Churchill in World War II made a statement every other day. Whatever losses they suffered, Britain suffered; they made it plain. Therefore, they are reluctant to admit the losses. But losses are inevitable and natural in a war. So, admit the losses. I think they think they can put a large shroud on Operation Sindoor. It won't work." He further questioned the Prime Minister's silence on the issue: "And why is the Prime Minister not speaking on Operation Sindoor? Why do you think there's a reluctance to have a debate in the temple of democracy? That's what Parliament is. After all, Prime Minister Modi has addressed the nation. He's addressed various rallies." Chidambaram also raised questions about the ceasefire, implying that it wasn't initiated by India. "Because let's be honest, it was not the Indian government that announced it. It was Donald Trump," he claimed. Meanwhile, Congress MP Imran Masood backed Chidambaram's statements, turning the criticism back on the government. "You stopped the forces. You brought India and Pakistan to the same level on the global stage. The terrorists are still alive. Aren't you ashamed? If the Pahalgam killers are alive, every Indian should be ashamed," Masood said. As the Parliament debate on Operation Sindoor begins, Chidambaram's comments are expected to be a major flashpoint between the ruling party and the Opposition.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 minutes ago
- First Post
$750 bn of energy, $600 bn investment: 5 top things about Trump's EU deal
The US-EU trade agreement sets a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods entering the US, replacing a previously threatened 30 per cent rate. Here are the five key takeaways read more US President Donald Trump (R) shakes hands with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen (L) after agreeing on a trade deal between the two economies following their meeting, in Turnberry south west Scotland on July 27, 2025. Source: AFP The United States and the European Union on Sunday (July 27) struck a major trade agreement, averting a looming transatlantic trade war just days before an August 1 deadline. Announced by President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at Trump's Turnberry golf resort in Scotland, the deal sets a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods entering the US, replacing a previously threatened 30 per cent rate. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'It was a very interesting negotiation. I think it's going to be great for both parties,' Trump said, while von der Leyen emphasised, 'It will bring stability. It will bring predictability. That's very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.' Here are the five key takeaways from this landmark agreement. EU to purchase $750 billion in US energy A cornerstone of the deal is the EU's commitment to buy $750 billion worth of US energy over three years, aligning with the bloc's strategic shift away from Russian energy supplies. Von der Leyen confirmed the EU will purchase $250 billion annually in liquified natural gas, oil, and nuclear fuels during Trump's term. This move supports the EU's energy diversification goals, reducing reliance on Russia amid geopolitical tensions. Trump described the deal as 'a good deal for everybody,' noting its potential to boost US energy exports while providing the EU with stable, non-Russian energy sources. $600 billion EU investment in the US economy The EU has pledged an additional $600 billion in investments into the US economy, though specifics on sectors and timelines remain unclear. Trump claimed this would open 'all of the European countries, which I think I could say were essentially closed,' despite the EU already importing over $400 billion in US goods annually, including pharmaceuticals, autos, and aircraft parts. However, analysts caution that similar investment clauses in the US-Japan deal faced pushback, with Japanese officials denying claims that 90% of profits would remain in the US. EU to procure 'vast amounts' of US military equipment In a significant shift, the EU agreed to purchase 'a vast amount of military equipment' from US defence firms, moving away from its traditional focus on indigenous defence production. Trump highlighted this as a key component of the deal, though no specific dollar amount was disclosed. This commitment could benefit American defence companies, but it may spark debate within the EU, where leaders have prioritised building local defence capabilities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD General tariff reduced to 15%, averting trade war The deal establishes a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods entering the US, including automobiles, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors, down from a threatened 30 per cent rate. This reduction averts a potential trade war that could have disrupted the $975 billion in goods exchanged between the US and EU in 2024, according to US Commerce Department data. The 15 per cent rate, while higher than the pre-Trump average of 1.2 per cent, offers relief to EU exporters and US consumers facing higher prices for goods like French cosmetics and German cars. The agreement also includes zero tariffs on select goods, such as aircraft, plane parts, certain chemicals, generic drugs, and some agricultural products. Steel and aluminium tariffs remain at 50% Despite the broader tariff reduction, the Trump administration maintained a 50 per cent tariff on EU steel and aluminium imports. Von der Leyen suggested further negotiations might address these rates, but Trump insisted, 'Steel is staying the way it is. That's a worldwide thing.' This decision continues to challenge European steel exporters and could increase costs for US industries reliant on these materials.
NDTV
20 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Clean Chit To Pak": BJP Slams P Chidambaram's "Homegrown Terrorists" Remark
New Delhi: Ahead of the Operation Sindoor debate in Parliament, a massive political row has erupted over Congress veteran P Chidambaram's remarks in an interview, in which he said "homegrown terrorists" could be involved in the Pahalgam terror attack and questioned what evidence proves that the killers came from Pakistan. The BJP has accused the Opposition party of giving a clean chit to Pakistan and said the Congress always bends over backwards to "protect the enemy". During an interview with The Quint, the former Home Minister said the government is unwilling to disclose the work NIA has done in the aftermath of the terror attack. "Have they identified the terrorists? Where they came from? I mean, for all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan? There's no evidence of that," he said. The Centre and the security establishment have maintained that the Pahalgam killers, who murdered 26 innocents in cold blood in front of other families, were Pakistan nationals. Mr Chidambaram also accused the government of "hiding the losses" during Operation Sindoor, India's counterstrike after the Pahalgam attack. "They are also hiding the losses. I said it in a column that in a war, losses will occur on both sides. I understand that India would have suffered losses. Be upfront." "Winston Churchill in World War II made a statement every other day. Whatever losses they suffered, Britain suffered, they made it plain. Therefore, they are reluctant to admit the losses. But losses are inevitable and natural in a war. So, admit the losses. I think they think they can put a large shroud on Operation Sindoor. It won't work." P. Chidambaram, former UPA-era Home Minister and the original proponent of the infamous 'Saffron Terror' theory, covers himself with glory yet again: 'Have they (NIA) identified the terrorists or where they came from? For all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do… — Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) July 27, 2025 Mr Chidambaram asked why the government was "ducking" questions. "And why is the Prime Minister not speaking on Operation Sindhu? Why do you think there's a reluctance to have a debate in the temple of democracy? That's what Parliament is. After all, Prime Minister Modi has addressed the nation. He's addressed various rallies," he said. The Congress leader asked if the government was uncomfortable with the idea that they would be asked about how the ceasefire came about. "Because let's be honest, it was not the Indian government that announced it. It was Donald Trump," he said. The senior Congress MP's remarks have drawn a sharp response from the ruling BJP. "P Chidambaram, former UPA-era Home Minister and the original proponent of the infamous 'Saffron Terror' theory, covers himself with glory yet again: Have they (NIA) identified the terrorists or where they came from? For all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume they came from Pakistan? There is no evidence of that," senior BJP leader Amit Malviya has said on X. "Once again, the Congress rushes to give a clean chit to Pakistan - this time after the Pahalgam terror attack. Why is it that every time our forces confront Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, Congress leaders sound more like Islamabad's defence lawyers than India's opposition?" Mr Malviya added. "When it comes to national security, there should be no ambiguity. But with the Congress, there never is - they always bend over backwards to protect the enemy," he said. Hours before debate on Op Sindoor in Parliament- Congress rushes to clean chit Pakistan again 26/11 to Surgical Strike to Pahalgam Congress ka haath Pakistan ke saath ! — Shehzad Jai Hind (Modi Ka Parivar) (@Shehzad_Ind) July 28, 2025 BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla, too, accused the Congress of giving a clean chit to Pakistan hours ahead of the Parliament debate. "26/11 to Surgical Strike to Pahalgam, Congress ka haath, Pakistan ke saath!" As the government and the Opposition prep for the big debate that begins today, Mr Chidambaram's remarks are likely to be raised on the House floor. Congress MP Imran Masood has backed Mr Chidambaram. Targeting the BJP, he said it was the government that gave a clean chit to Pakistan by agreeing to a ceasefire. "You stopped the forces. You brought India and Pakistan to the same level on the global stage. The terrorists are still alive. Aren't you ashamed? If the Pahalgam killers are alive, every Indian should be ashamed," he said.
