logo
What is the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation? Israel-backed aid group blames Hamas for attacking workers; UN warns aid distribution is being militarised

What is the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation? Israel-backed aid group blames Hamas for attacking workers; UN warns aid distribution is being militarised

Time of India12-06-2025
A deadly attack on aid workers in southern Gaza has drawn sharp condemnation from a US- and Israel-backed relief group, which accused Hamas of targeting its Palestinian staff as they travelled to distribute humanitarian aid, reports the New York Times.
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which began operating in late May, said a bus carrying around two dozen of its workers came under fire on Wednesday night. At least five people were reportedly killed and others wounded, with some possibly taken hostage.
'We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms,' the group said in a statement. 'These were aid workers. Humanitarians. Fathers, brothers, sons, and friends, who were risking their lives every day to help others.'
The group is run by American contractors but is backed by Israeli authorities. It said it held Hamas "fully responsible" for the killing of its "dedicated workers who have been distributing humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people." It urged the international community to speak out against the assault. 'Tonight, the world must see this for what it is: an attack on humanity,' the foundation added.
The GHF has previously accused Hamas of threatening its staff and obstructing aid delivery.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
เทรด CFDs ด้วยเทคโนโลยีเทรดสุดล้ำ และ รวดเร็วกว่า
IC Markets
สมัคร
Undo
On Saturday, it reported that it was 'impossible to proceed' with its distribution because of Hamas interference. In turn, Hamas has rejected the accusations and questioned the group's neutrality, calling the foundation 'nothing more than a propaganda front for the Israeli occupation army.'
Violence near aid sites has also been reported. Earlier on Wednesday, shootings in central Gaza left several dead and dozens injured, according to health officials and emergency workers.
The incidents occurred near a distribution centre run by the GHF. The Israeli military said it had fired warning shots at potential threats before dawn but denied daytime fire on civilians.
The Palestine Red Crescent Society blamed Israeli gunfire for some of the casualties. 'Most victims had injuries from shell fragments, although some also had bullet wounds,' said spokesperson Nebal Farsakh. The actual death toll remains unclear.
GHF said its centre was closed at the time of the early morning shooting and it could not confirm what had occurred, but it did reopen later that day. The organisation has asked the media not to confuse its operations with military activity. 'Do not confuse the public by reporting on GHF operations in the same breath as Israeli military operations far removed from distribution sites,' it said.
The group's origins have added to the controversy.
GHF's close association with Israeli authorities has led to criticism from international humanitarian bodies. The United Nations and others have accused Israel of militarising aid distribution and said the foundation undermines the independence expected of humanitarian groups.
Israel has long accused Hamas of looting aid meant for civilians. However, the UN says there is no clear evidence of systematic diversion by the militant group. It has instead pointed to broader lawlessness and the impact of Israel's 80-day aid blockade earlier this year, which led to extreme food shortages and a collapse of basic services.
The foundation has vowed to continue working. 'Despite this heinous attack, we will continue our mission to provide critical aid to the people of Gaza,' it said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Initiatives like IMEC needed especially in times of volatility, uncertainty: Italy's envoy Talo'
Initiatives like IMEC needed especially in times of volatility, uncertainty: Italy's envoy Talo'

Hans India

timea few seconds ago

  • Hans India

Initiatives like IMEC needed especially in times of volatility, uncertainty: Italy's envoy Talo'

New Delhi: The ambitious India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor project was started with a "lot of hope" and such initiatives are needed especially in times of volatility and uncertainty driven by global security challenges, Italy's envoy for IMEC, Francesco Talo' said. In an exclusive interview to PTI Videos at the Italian Embassy here on Wednesday, he also said that less than a month after its launch in New Delhi in 2023, there was a "terrible attack" against Israel on October 7, and this impacted the project. "Therefore, things were slipping, frozen. But, now there is a renewed interest," the envoy said. The Israel-Hamas conflict still goes on, and the Middle East (or West Asia) region has seen wide-scale volatility and uncertainty over the last two years, including the recent twelve-day military confrontation between Israel and Iran in June. "I would say that especially in times of volatility or uncertainty, we need projects like this (IMEC). We need to have a differentiation. We need to be ready to play on different grounds. So, not to be conditioned only by one route, by one interlocutor," Talo' told PTI in the interview. Cautioning that in times of great inter-dependence today, he underlined that one needs to be on one hand "not too dependent" on any one option, and on the other hand, need to live in a system of inter-dependence. Talo', a seasoned diplomat, visited India earlier this week to take part in a meeting of representatives of countries which are partners in the IMEC initiative. He also met India's deputy National Security Advisor. "I have had meetings with part of the administration, especially with people in the National Security Council and the external affairs ministry. And I'm planning to meet other people today (Wednesday) in order to better understand the importance of our partner India," he added. So it's good that in this very city, the "first meeting" among the special envoys of IMEC was held, the diplomat said. "I was here when the initiative was launched in September 2023. I was with my Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. And, we had a clear vision of a great opportunity for our countries, for our shared interests," Talo' said, adding, IMEC was started with a "lot of hope" and it was very much linked to the idea of having important political and economic results. And, this is the moment really to have a "transition" from a phase of conferences, interviews, and some public events to a "more concrete phase of action", he asserted. Billed as a pathbreaking initiative, the IMEC envisages a vast road, railroad and shipping networks among Saudi Arabia, India, the US and Europe with an aim to ensure integration among Asia, Middle East and the West. The IMEC initiative was firmed up on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Delhi in September 2023. An agreement was signed by India, Saudi Arabia, the European Union, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the US and some other G20 partners for the corridor. EU signatories Italy, France, and Germany are partners in this transnational connectivity project. Many strategic affairs watchers have described the IMEC as perhaps an answer to China's massive Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a mega infrastructure and connectivity project that will involve a large number of countries. Asked about his views on BRI, Talo' described it as "another project" and different from IMEC. "They are different by nature. Their members are different. So, I don't want to.. I don't like the idea of presenting IMEC as something against them. It's something for us, for our partners, for our peoples. And, then there can be other initiatives," he said. Italy had joined BRI in 2019. According to international reports, it had announced its withdrawal from it, four years later. Talo' emphasised that when it comes to realising the IMEC vision, there are financial challenges and practical infrastructure challenges. "It involves several countries. We all know that it's not going to be simple," he said. "But it could be a great opportunity, because we see great prospects of growth for all of us," the envoy said. Talo' underlined that one cannot have real security and peace "when only one nation is rich". There is need for entire region to grow, and of course innovation can somehow be the lead for these changes for the better. "We are already seeing this in India," he said. The Gulf countries are also important protagonists, actors in innovation. "We can do it all together, and this will also benefit countries which have more problems," the envoy said, adding, this can somehow also "contribute to the peace process". During the interaction, he also shared the reasons for Italy pitching its coastal city of Trieste as a "possible principal hub" in this corridor. Also, India, the Middle East, and at least Italy and the Mediterranean countries in the same region, which "I like to call the Indo-Mediterranean region, we have a common interest that is an area of growing prosperity where, for instance, navigation and trade is free and open", Talo' said. Italy, along with three other IMEC partner countries are also part of the powerful G7. "Of course, the G7 countries can offer a contribution... Furthermore, I think it's important to take into account the role of the European Union with its Global Gateway initiative. So, the idea is that IMEC can be put under the umbrella of the Global Gateway," he said. In November 2024, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, in his address, on the occasion of inauguration of the new Chancery of the Embassy of India in Rome, had referred to the proposed India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). The minister had said that this connectivity corridor, which was agreed to in principle during India's presidency of the G20, will be a game changer between Europe and Asia.

More Ukrainians now want negotiated end to war with Russia, shows new survey
More Ukrainians now want negotiated end to war with Russia, shows new survey

Hindustan Times

timea few seconds ago

  • Hindustan Times

More Ukrainians now want negotiated end to war with Russia, shows new survey

After more than three years of war, Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a settlement that ends the fight against Russia's invasion, according to a new Gallup poll published Thursday — although only about a quarter of Ukrainians surveyed expect the guns to fall silent within the next 12 months. Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. (REUTERS) The enthusiasm for a negotiated deal is a sharp reversal from 2022 — the year the war began — when Gallup found that about three-quarters of Ukrainians wanted to keep fighting until victory. Now only about one-quarter hold that view, with support for continuing the war declining steadily across all regions and demographic groups. The findings were based on samples of 1,000 or more respondents ages 15 and older living in Ukraine. Some territories under entrenched Russian control, representing about 10% of the population, were excluded from surveys conducted after 2022 due to lack of access. Since the start of the full-scale war, Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. On the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line snaking from northeast to southeast Ukraine, where tens of thousands of troops on both sides have died, Russia's bigger army is slowly capturing more land. Also Read: Donald Trump plans to meet Vladimir Putin, Volodymyr Zelensky next week in a renewed bid to end Ukraine war The poll came out on the eve of US President Donald Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face heavy economic sanctions. In the new Gallup survey, conducted in early July, about 7 in 10 Ukrainians say their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month renewed his offer to meet with Russia's Vladimir Putin, but his overture was rebuffed as Russia sticks to its demands, and the sides remain far apart. Most Ukrainians do not expect a lasting peace anytime soon, the poll found. Only about one-quarter say it's 'very' or 'somewhat' likely that active fighting will end within the next 12 months, while about 7 in 10 think it's 'somewhat' or 'very' unlikely that active fighting will be over in the next year. Approval of US falls, approval of Germany rises Ukrainian views of the American government have cratered over the past few years, while positive views of Germany's leadership have risen, according to Gallup. Three years ago, about two-thirds of Ukrainians approved of US leadership. That's since fallen to 16% in the latest poll, reflecting new tensions between the two countries since Trump took office in January. But although the dip from last year was substantial — approval of US leadership was 40% in 2024 — positive views of US leadership were already dropping before Trump took office, perhaps related to the antipathy that prominent Republican politicians showed toward billions of dollars in US support for Ukraine. Germany has grown more popular among Ukrainians over the past few years, rising to 63% approval in the new poll. Hope for NATO, EU acceptance has fallen Ukrainians are much less optimistic that their country will be accepted into NATO or the European Union in the next decade than they were just a few years ago. In the new poll, about one-third of Ukrainians expect that Ukraine will be accepted into NATO within the next 10 years, while about one-quarter think it will take at least 10 years, and one-third believe it will never happen. That's down from 2022, when about two-thirds of Ukrainians thought acceptance into NATO would happen in the coming decade and only about 1 in 10 thought it would never happen. Hope for acceptance into the EU is higher but has also fallen. About half, 52%, of Ukrainians now expect to be part of the EU within the next decade, down from 73% in 2022.

Trump-Putin meeting agreed for ‘coming days', venue set: Kremlin
Trump-Putin meeting agreed for ‘coming days', venue set: Kremlin

The Hindu

timea few seconds ago

  • The Hindu

Trump-Putin meeting agreed for ‘coming days', venue set: Kremlin

The Kremlin said Thursday (August 7, 2025) that a summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin was set for the 'coming days', with the two sides already having agreed the venue 'in principle.' The summit would be the first between sitting U.S. and Russian Presidents since Joe Biden met Mr. Putin in Geneva in June 2021, and comes as Mr. Trump seeks to broker an end to Russia's military assault on Ukraine. Three rounds of direct talks between Moscow and Kyiv have failed to yield any progress towards a ceasefire, with the two sides appearing far apart in their demands to end the more than three-year-long conflict. Mr. Trump said Wednesday (August 6, 2025) he was likely to meet Putin face-to-face 'very soon.' 'At the suggestion of the American side, an agreement has been reached in principle to hold a bilateral summit in the coming days,' Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov was quoted as saying on Thursday (August 7, 2025) by Russian state news agencies. 'We are now starting to work out the details together with our American colleagues,' Mr. Ushakov said. Editorial | Dangerous turn: On Trump and the Ukraine war The Kremlin said a venue had been agreed 'in principle' but did not indicate where the summit could take place. 'Next week has been set as a target date,' Mr. Ushakov added. Zelenskyy calls for meeting Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia launched its military offensive on Ukraine in February 2022. Russian bombardments have forced millions for flee their homes and destroyed swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine. Mr. Putin has resisted multiple calls from the United States, Europe and Kyiv for a ceasefire. At talks in Istanbul, Russian negotiators have outlined hardline territorial demands if Ukraine wants Russia to halt its advance — calling for Kyiv to withdraw from territory it still controls and renounce Western military support. Moscow has also repeatedly sought to cast doubt on Mr. Zelenskyy's legitimacy and ruled out a meeting between the two leaders until after the terms of a peace deal have been agreed. The announcement of the upcoming summit comes a day after U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff met Mr. Putin in Moscow. Mr. Witkoff proposed a trilateral meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, but Russia did not respond to that proposal, Mr. Ushakov said. 'The Russian side left this option completely without comment,' he added. Mr. Zelenskyy earlier Thursday (August 7, 2025) had refreshed his call for a meeting with Mr. Putin — which he says is the only way to make progress towards peace. 'We in Ukraine have repeatedly said that finding real solutions can be truly effective at the level of leaders,' Mr. Zelenskyy wrote on social media. 'It is necessary to determine the timing for such a format and the range of issues to be addressed,' he added. The Ukrainian leader said Thursday (August 7, 2025) morning that he had planned to hold 'several' conversations throughout the course of the day, including with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, as well as French and Italian officials. 'There will also be communication at the level of national security advisors,' Mr. Zelenskyy added. 'The main thing is for Russia, which started this war, to take real steps to end its aggression,' Mr. Zelensky added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store