logo
The Futile Quest to Build a 'Liberal Joe Rogan'

The Futile Quest to Build a 'Liberal Joe Rogan'

The Intercept2 days ago

For months, pundits have decried the absence of a 'Joe Rogan of the left' — an online media figure who can galvanize young men to support Democrats in the way that popular right-wing creators like Rogan, Adin Ross, and the NELK Boys have done for President Donald Trump. Now, it appears that Democratic operatives have a $20 million plan to build such a figure.
The proposal, titled 'Speaking With American Men: A Strategic Plan,' from Ilyse Hogue, the former president of the abortion rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America, and John Della Volpe, polling director for the Harvard Kennedy School's Institute of Politics, is one of several pitches floating around in Democratic policy spaces aimed at making up ground with demographics the party lost in 2024. The plan was immediately panned online by critics who argued that young men would view this type of approach as inauthentic.
In the last election, young white men swung aggressively in the direction of Trump, voting for him by a 28-point margin, after supporting Joe Biden in the last election.
Online media has largely been credited with the shift, particularly among young white men.
In an analysis of 320 of the most popular online shows across platforms such as Youtube, Rumble, and TikTok, Media Matters found that right-leaning shows were significantly more popular, accounting for roughly 82% percent of the total following of online shows analyzed. It also found that 9 out of 10 of the most followed online shows were right-leaning. Evidence suggests that young men are absorbing what these far-right streamers are sharing. A survey ahead of the election from the Equimundo Center for Masculinities and Social Justice found that more than 40 percent of young men trust one or more misogynistic voices online.
The plan would raise $20 million from Democratic donors, which the project's leadership has reportedly already begun to collect, to study the 'syntax, language, and content' that's popular among young men in online spaces, then develop content that spreads an 'aspirational vision of manhood that aligns with Democratic values without alienating other core constituencies' and partner with influencers.
Experts on masculinity and gender in politics argue that while it's good to research why young men left the party, investing millions to recreate a 'Joe Rogan of the left' fundamentally misunderstands why young men moved so rapidly to the right — and misses an opportunity to woo them back.
'To try to create the next Joe Rogan, it's [misguided],' said Gary Barker, president and CEO of Equimundo Center for Masculinities and Social Justice. 'Because it's going to come across as preaching and a kind of lab-designed android.'
Last year, Barker and Equimundo released a report on the 'Manosphere,' tracking how young men engage in online communities and why. Barker's research suggests that young men are attracted to these spaces out of a desire for community and for someone to speak directly to them about their social, political, and economic anxieties.
Right-wing influencers and Republicans fill that void, stoking those anxieties and creating a useful scapegoat in women, minorities, and immigrants. 'They've talked to men about their feeling of anxiety and said, 'You're right to feel anxious. You're not the problem. Tear it all down,'' said Barker.
However, Barker said that Democrats shouldn't be trying to recreate that strategy even if it would work for them. 'You don't want a Democratic Mr. Beast,' he said. 'It's horribly manipulative. It's exploitative of people. I'm not sure if we can get something so big online that doesn't follow a playbook that's either exploitative, exaggerated, or harm-inducing. And if we do, I think it's going to feel like it's preaching to you.'
If Democrats want to win back young men, they'll have to prove to them that their economic and social issues matter to them, said Melissa Deckman, CEO of the Public Religion Research Institute and author of 'The Politics of Gen Z: How the Youngest Voters Will Shape Our Democracy.'
Deckman's research found that young men's political shift toward Republicans was heavily influenced by the economy. 'A lot of young men feel that the American Dream is increasingly out of reach for them. And the Democratic Party certainly didn't have an answer for how their policies or their vision might help them get a better paying job,' she said.
While Deckman's research suggests that young men felt chided by the Democratic Party instead of helped, nostalgia for the economy under Trump was a significant factor in their shift. 'For a lot of young men, especially those that don't pay a lot of attention to politics, they remember the economy being better under the first Trump administration,' she said.
A more populist economic message could resonate with this group of voters, argued Deckman. 'There's an economic blueprint that can emerge that is less elitist and less about giving tax breaks to billionaires. I think that has a broader reach, but for whatever reasons, I think a lot of young men aren't hearing that message from Democrats, and I kind of struggle with it. Is it a messenger issue, or is it they're just not receptive to it?' she said.
Barker argues that the real problem is that Democrats have been trying to sell a 'piecemeal' approach to economic issues that feels automatically inadequate for the issues we're facing.
'Piecemeal compensatory social policies don't work. I mean, they work for some segments of the population, but they don't take on the root of what's driving so much of the inequality, which is leading to white men's death of despair, and has always been part of people of color's economic challenges,' said Barker.
Nina Smith, a Democratic strategist and former senior adviser to Stacey Abrams, said instead of propping up a creator who checks the perfect ideological boxes, Democrats should embrace the online spaces for young men that already exist.
For example, creators like Hasan Piker, a left-leaning creator with over 5.5 million subscribers on Twitch and broad popularity among young men, has largely been ignored by the Democratic establishment. Piker's political content leans farther left, sharing a populist economic message paired with strong criticism of U.S. foreign policy in Israel.
'There is a tendency to shy away from those spaces because our favorite thing to do in the Democratic Party is to, pardon my language, shit on the left,' said Smith.
Aside from entering authentic online spaces that already connect with men, both Smith and Barker said the most important way to reach young voters is in person. 'We get the best out of young men [when] we actually go and see them face to face,' said Barker.
Smith pointed toward the success of youth conservative movements like Turning Point USA as an example of how ground game can make a huge difference with the groups Democrats are trying to win back.
'I honestly believe it would be better for us to have a bus tour than to spend a bunch of money on research that is cold,' she said, 'Turning Point did that sort of investment where they did a tour to different college campuses, and that's how they got in contact with these young people.'
Republicans have created a space for young men to blow off steam, Barker said. Now, Democrats need to find a way to offer them something better.
'Trump did not offer men anything that will make their life better,' he said. 'What he did is he offered them a place to yell at the wind for a little while. It doesn't seem like it should be that tough for us on the left to at least pull them in, out of a space where they're just yelling at the wind.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bill Clinton Says Trump Is Paying ‘a Price' for His Actions
Bill Clinton Says Trump Is Paying ‘a Price' for His Actions

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bill Clinton Says Trump Is Paying ‘a Price' for His Actions

Former President Bill Clinton says President Donald Trump is paying a price for his bullying. 'We've never seen anything like this before in my lifetime,' Clinton said of the Trump administration in an interview on CBS News Sunday Morning. 'Somebody that says, 'Whatever I want should be the law of the land. It's my way or the highway.' And most Americans don't agree with that,' Clinton said. 'But I like to think that he's paid a price for this, you know, name-calling and throwing his weight around. I think it's made him less popular.' Trump has led a MAGAworld feud against the judiciary, labeling judges 'radical leftists' in numerous rants for issuing rulings that block the implementation of his divisive policies. A poll earlier found that about 6 in 10 American adults believe Trump has 'gone too far' in using his presidential power to enact his sweeping agenda. Clinton also said Democrats should focus on gubernatorial races and winning back the House of Representatives to counter the Trump agenda. 'Look, only elections are going to change this,' Clinton said. 'Someone needs to stand up and say, 'Damn it, what we have in common matters more. We cannot throw the legacy of this country away. We cannot destroy other people's trust in us.'' Clinton said the court system was the most effective method of stopping Trump, even as Trump has taken a battering ram to the judiciary. 'He is looking for ways to basically defy all these court orders,' Clinton said. 'But I think he'll have a hard time doing that. And if he does, I think it will hurt him in America.' 'I do think the courts are getting their dander up. I think that him shutting law firms out of representing their clients before federal agencies and in federal buildings because he doesn't agree with their position—that ain't America," he added. 'We've never done that. The whole purpose of having a legal system is to have both sides be heard.' Clinton also came to the defense of Joe Biden amid widespread concerns about the state of his mental fitness following the release of Original Sin, a book by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson that delved into Biden's cognitive decline. Clinton said he had no interest in reading the bombshell book because Biden was 'in good shape' the last time they saw each other. 'The book didn't register with me because I never saw him that way,' he said. 'He's not president anymore, and I think he did a good job, and I think we are facing challenges today without precedent in our history, and some people are trying to use this as a way to blame him for the fact that Trump was reelected.' Biden earlier touted that he could take on Tapper and Thompson in a fight after their book triggered bipartisan criticism of his mental capabilities. 'You can see that I'm mentally incompetent, and I can't walk, and I can beat the hell out of both of them,' he said, seemingly referring to Tapper and Thompson.

Michelle Obama couldn't be more wrong about women Trump voters
Michelle Obama couldn't be more wrong about women Trump voters

New York Post

time43 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Michelle Obama couldn't be more wrong about women Trump voters

I'm a pro-choice feminist — and a Democrat — who just happened to vote for Donald Trump for president. And I resent Michelle Obama's sneering, demeaning, strangely ignorant and massively sexist remarks about women, our reproductive systems and, especially, our vote. In the latest episode of the podcast, 'IMO with Michelle Obama & Craig Robinson,'' the former first lady and lefty pro-abortion activist mounted her high horse and disgracefully disparaged a woman's decision to exercise her right to choose what to do with her body. That is, when that choice is to have a baby. On the podcast she shares with her celebricat brother, the 61-year-old mother of two daughters, insanely breathed strength into the pro-life crowd by declaring bizarrely that creating life is 'the least' of what a woman's reproductive system does. Advertisement 'I attempted to make the argument on the campaign trail this past election was that there's just so much more at stake and because so many men have no idea about what women go through,' Obama said, delving treacherously close to Democratic-style word salad. 'Women's reproductive health is about our life. It's about this whole complicated reproductive system that the least of what it does is produce life.' When does a reproductive system have nothing to do with reproduction? Willful ignorance Mrs. O showed stupendously willful ignorance about her fellow ladies' inner workings. Advertisement 'It's a very important thing that it does, but you only produce life if the machine that's producing it — if you want to whittle us down to a machine — is functioning in a healthy, streamlined kind of way,' Obama added. I guess she missed that day in biology class. Speaking with OB/GYN Dr. Sharon Malone, whose husband, Eric Holder, served as attorney general under former President Barack Obama, Michelle then took aim at the male of the species. Advertisement She attacked guys who, she said, 'sit on their hands' over abortion and are choosing to 'trade out women's health for a tax break or whatever it is.'' But the crescendo came when she denounced women like me of handing the election to President Trump because — get this — we were too stupid or timid to vote for the worst candidate ever to grace a ballot, simply because she is female. In Obama's world, we voted for Trump to please men. Seriously? Advertisement 'There are a lot of men who have big chairs at their tables, there are a lot of women who vote the way their man is going to vote,'' she actually said. 'It happened in this election.' So there it is. Michelle Obama, pretend women's rights warrior, is so condescending to the fairer sex, she insults millions of people bearing XX chromosomes by claiming they were merely trying to please 'their'' man by going for Trump. Hey Michelle — sorry to stick a fork into your Trump Derangement Syndrome — but I, for one, simply voted my mind, my heart, my pocketbook and, yes, my reproductive organs. Despite Democratic hysteria, it's clear to me that the president has no intention of eliminating abortion rights throughout this country. Own opinions There also exist many other issues that concern me. These include runaway crime, the largesse afforded by the previous presidential administration to countless numbers of illegal immigrants, including violent criminals. There's also epic inflation and unchecked antisemitism on college campuses and elsewhere. There's more, but that's a start. In each case, things got so out of hand, I believed Trump had the best chance of saving this nation. Advertisement He couldn't do any worse. I'm no shrinking violet, Michelle. I believe in equal rights — for everyone. And I believe my man is entitled to his own opinions.

Campaign Finance Board's voter-guide fiasco errors are no laughing matter
Campaign Finance Board's voter-guide fiasco errors are no laughing matter

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Campaign Finance Board's voter-guide fiasco errors are no laughing matter

A near-$7 million bungle by the city Campaign Finance Board is fresh sign that an outfit with huge power over city elections is in dire need of overhaul — if not elimination. The CFB's voter-outreach arm, NYC Votes, last month spent $6.85 million of taxpayer money mailing 3.5 million 'voter information' guides that were riddled with huge errors, from listing Mayor Eric Adams and four other non-candidates as on the ballot in the Democratic primary to falsely 'informing' the public about a Republican primary that doesn't exist. It also left out two entire City Council races. 'It's an interesting error from a system that demands absolute perfection from candidates, where a one letter typo can cost a campaign tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees or even removal from the ballot entirely,' fumed Corinne Fisher to PoliticoNY; she's one of the candidates the guide falsely lists as on the ballot. NYC Votes also managed to advertise the wrong date for the primary during at least four games at CitiField, Gothamist discovered. Maybe they think Mets fans shouldn't vote? Or maybe the CFB should adopt a slogan from Casey Stengel's verdict on the Amazins: 'Can't anybody here play this game?' The board says it'll mail out new guides with the correct info to all 3 million potential Democratic primary voters; we guess it won't worry about Republicans who rely on its bad info and head to the polls for a fictional race. All this would be easier to laugh at if the Campaign Finance Board didn't have such vast and unaccountable power over city campaigns. On Friday, it airily slammed the Andrew Cuomo campaign with a $675,000 penalty because it disapproves of the Cuomo website, following a $622,000 fine two weeks before over the same issue — namely, how an independent pro-Cuomo superPAC can use the site to figure out his chief issues. And of course the board has summarily refused to allow the mayor any matching funds at all, crippling his re-election campaign over federal charges that have now been permanently deep-sixed. Reminder: Back 2013, the CFB all but anointed Bill de Blasio the next mayor by denying funds to his most-similar competitor, John Liu. And in 2001, it imperiously declared that there would be no additional campaigning in the primary elections after they had to be rescheduled when the planes hit the towers on the original Primary Day — a completely arbitrary decision that was conceivably key to Mike Bloomberg's victory that November. If you're keeping score, that's two mayors out of the last three who arguably won thanks to this elected board whose decisions can at best be contested in court cases that won't be settled until long after any given Election Day — and it has already played a huge role in this year's contest, too. Yet it can't even produce a reliable voters' guide: Surely, the Charter Reform Commission should be at least looking at some proposal to oversee or eliminate the CFB and the entire corrupt 'public campaign finance' system? For the record: Primary Day is June 24, even for Mets fans.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store