logo
Britain is no longer a civilised country

Britain is no longer a civilised country

Telegraph7 days ago
Good news for Middle England, for the strivers, the parents clobbered by Labour's pointlessly vicious VAT raid, the millions dragged into higher tax bands: the Government is now blaming you for the rise in shoplifting, too. According to the policing and crime minister, it's the middle classes who are responsible for pushing up store prices. But let's be honest, Sainsbury's aren't tagging wine, steaks and cheese to deter accountants, solicitors and members of the Rotary Club.
If this laughable deflection is Labour's answer to the scourge of shop theft, I expect rates will continue to shoot through the roof. There were over half a million such incidents in England and Wales in 2024, a 20 per cent jump on the previous year. Nearly a quarter of Brits admit to having shoplifted at some point in their lives.
But it's not just the headline data which are unsettling. It's not even that the police are patently failing to create a remotely credible deterrent, with just one in six incidents resulting in a charge in 2024, down from nearly 30 per cent in 2016. Too much policing is now purely reactive – squad cars and vans packed with coppers twiddling their thumbs waiting for the adrenaline buzz of performative action rather than being on boring neighbourhood patrols.
No, what's truly alarming is our collective loss of morality when it comes to these supposedly 'low level' crimes. When YouGov polled Londoners about fare-dodging recently – an offence which, as with shoplifting, too many deem 'victimless ' – a third said the authorities shouldn't bother to clamp down if the money recouped doesn't cover the cost of enforcement. While the money is certainly important, is there no concern over the ethics of this behaviour?
Granted, none of us is perfect. But our social order is now collapsing before our eyes. In the past, the strongest barrier to crime has been a sense of community. We should abide by the law not only because of the threat of punishment, but because we can distinguish between right and wrong. Long ago, Adam Smith wrote of an 'impartial spectator' in our heads, who judges our behaviour and fears that, if caught, we will be shamed. Or Jiminy Cricket, if you prefer.
Conscious attempts during the Victorian era to civilise the country – with schools, churches, charities, even trade unions competing to impose respectability – eventually succeeded.
There was a sharp fall in violent offences during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries; crime plunged to such low levels during the 1920s and 1930s that the government was able to close underutilised prisons. And yet a century later we are forced into implementing risky early release as a consequence of overcrowding. We now lack the space even to warehouse bad people who would probably, given squalid conditions across much of our estate, be made worse by the experience anyway.
How do we begin to explain what has happened to our country? Why did crime double between 1957 and 1967, and double again by 1977? During the Second World War, the men had been away, the children had run wild, and religious practice plummeted. Consider the shoplifter: the endeavour is almost entirely 'risk-free' if you believe there is no God to answer to. Antisocial behaviour soared in the second half of the 20th century, along with marriage breakdown. By 1991, a car was reported stolen on average once every minute across England and Wales. Aeroplanes made smuggling easier; computers created new kinds of offences. Then came unmonitored mass immigration, with roughly 12 per cent of our prison population now foreign nationals.
But we didn't just lose our personal moral infrastructure, we lost our leadership. There is no one at all to look up to now: everyone from the Archbishop of Canterbury down seems to have feet of clay.
Take a ride on our ludicrously named Overground lines and you will see people hunched over their phones, paying no attention to fellow passengers, or speaking a dozen different languages. Keir Starmer tried to put into words this general sense of detachment and malaise with his 'island of strangers' intervention, only to say weeks later that he 'deeply regretted ' his hurty words. He's the Prime Minister of a country which once ruled half the globe, for heaven's sake, yet he instantly capitulated in the face of gentle criticism from his halfwitted backbenchers and self-righteous quangocrats. It would be difficult to imagine Margaret Thatcher, Harold Macmillan or even Harold Wilson displaying such pitiful spinelessness.
Only when it fits into the woke agenda do we, as a society, display some pastiche of morality. When Netflix releases a documentary which hands politicians carte blanche to pillory the 'big tech' firms they've always loathed. When Met Chief Mark Rowley declares it ' shameful' that black boys in London are more likely to be dead by 18 than white boys, without mentioning that black youths are hugely over-represented amongst killers too. Or when the minister in charge of our policing spots an opportunity to blame middle class shoppers for the fact that losses from customer theft have reached a record £2.2 billion in a single year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK and India leaders Starmer and Modi set to sign a major trade deal
UK and India leaders Starmer and Modi set to sign a major trade deal

The Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • The Independent

UK and India leaders Starmer and Modi set to sign a major trade deal

British leader Keir Starmer and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi are set to sign a hard-wrought trade agreement Thursday that will slash tariffs on products including Scotch whisky and English gin shipped to India and Indian food and spices sent to the U.K. The two prime ministers are due to hold a signing ceremony at Chequers, the British leader's country residence outside London. The trade agreement between India and Britain, the world's fifth- and sixth-largest economies, was announced in May, more than three years after negotiations started, and stalled, under Britain's previous Conservative government. The U.K. government said the deal will reduce India's average tariff on British goods from 15% to 3%. Whisky and gin tariffs will be halved from 150% to 75% before falling to 40% by year 10 of the deal. Automotive tariffs will fall from over 100% to 10% under a quota. Britain said the deal is expected to increase bilateral trade by 25.5 billion pounds ($35 billion) annually from 2040 and add almost 5 billion pounds ($6.8 billion) a year to the British economy. Starmer said the agreement was 'a major win for Britain' and would create thousands of jobs. India's Trade Ministry said in May that 99% of Indian exports would face no import duty under the deal, which applies to products including clothes, shoes and food. Formal talks began in 2022 on a free trade agreement that then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson hailed as a key goal after Britain's departure from the European Union in 2020. Johnson famously promised to have a deal done by the Diwali holiday in October of that year. The two countries held 13 rounds of negotiations without a breakthrough before talks were suspended while both nations held general elections in 2024. Modi was re-elected and Britain replaced the Conservative government with one led by Starmer's center-left Labour Party.

AO chair Cooper interviewed for Channel 4 chair job
AO chair Cooper interviewed for Channel 4 chair job

Sky News

time26 minutes ago

  • Sky News

AO chair Cooper interviewed for Channel 4 chair job

The chairman of AO, the online electrical goods retailer, has been interviewed to become the next chair of state-owned broadcaster Channel 4. Sky News has learnt that Geoff Cooper, a former boss of the builders' merchant Travis Perkins, is among the candidates in the running to take on the post in the coming months. Whitehall insiders said that Mr Cooper was now one of the shortlisted contenders awaiting news of whether they would get the nod from Ofcom, the media regulator and culture secretary Lisa Nandy. In recent weeks, Sky News has revealed that those vying to replace Sir Ian Cheshire include Justin King, the former J Sainsbury boss; Wol Kolade, a private equity executive who has donated substantial sums of money to the Conservative Party; Debbie Wosskow, a start-up founder who already sits on the Channel 4 board. Simon Dingemans, a former Goldman Sachs banker who sits on the board of WPP, the marketing services group, has also been shortlisted, according to the Financial Times. Sir Ian stepped down earlier this year after just one term, having presided over a successful attempt to thwart privatisation by the last Tory government. He was replaced on an interim basis by Dawn Airey, the media industry executive who has occupied top jobs at companies including ITV, Channel 5 and Yahoo!. The race to lead the state-owned broadcaster's board has acquired additional importance since after the resignation of Alex Mahon, its long-serving chief executive. It has since been reported that Alex Burford, another Channel 4 non-executive director and the boss of Warner Records UK, is a possible contender to replace Ms Mahon. A vocal opponent of Channel 4's privatisation, which was abandoned by the last Conservative government, Ms Mahon is leaving to join Superstruct, a private equity-owned live entertainment company. The appointment of a new chair is expected to take place by the autumn, with the chosen candidate expected to lead the recruitment of Ms Mahon's successor.

Britain's porn crackdown begins TOMORROW: Users will have to prove they're over-18 to access hundreds of adult sites like Pornhub
Britain's porn crackdown begins TOMORROW: Users will have to prove they're over-18 to access hundreds of adult sites like Pornhub

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Britain's porn crackdown begins TOMORROW: Users will have to prove they're over-18 to access hundreds of adult sites like Pornhub

There's just one day to go before online pornography becomes a lot harder to watch in the UK. From tomorrow (July 25), porn sites available in the UK will have to perform stringent checks to ensure visitors are aged 18 or over. In an attempt to stop children accessing porn, adults will have to submit ID or even have their face scanned, depending on what site they access. Several porn providers have confirmed to online regular Ofcom that they will introduce these checks by tomorrow's deadline. They include Pornhub, BoyfriendTV, Cam4, FrolicMe, inxxx, Jerkmate, LiveHDCams, MyDirtyHobby, RedTube, Streamate, Stripchat, Tube8 and YouPorn. Other online platforms have also confirmed they will deploy age assurance - including Bluesky, Discord, Grindr, Reddit, and X. If any sites fail to do so, Ofcom can impose fines and in very serious cases apply for a court order to prevent the site or app from being available. 'We will be actively checking compliance from 25 July and, should it be necessary, we expect to launch any investigations into individual services next week,' Ofcom said. Why is the porn crackdown happening? According to Oliver Griffiths, Ofcom's group director of online safety, making life safer online 'is one of the defining challenges of our era'. 'Society has long protected youngsters from products that aren't suitable for them, from alcohol to smoking or gambling,' he said. 'But for too long children have been only a click away from harmful pornography online. 'Now, change is happening. These age checks will bring pornography into line with how we treat adult services in the real world, without compromising access and privacy for over-18s.' How will the age checks work? Ofcom has already listed seven methods that porn providers could use. Ultimately, which one they opt for is their decision, not Ofcom's, but their chosen method must be 'highly effective' at correctly determining if a user is under 18. Ofcom's seven suggested strategies are photo-ID matching, facial age estimation, mobile-network operator (MNO) age checks, credit card checks, email-based age estimation, digital identity services and open banking. Open banking works by accessing the information a bank has on record regarding a user's age, while photo-ID matching involves uploading a verified photo-ID document, like a PDF of a passport of driving licence. Facial age estimate works by analysing the features of a user's face from a photo to work their age, while MNO age checks involve mobile-network operators applying age-restriction filters themselves. Because you must be 18 to get a credit card in the UK, credit card checks are also listed as 'highly effective', as are email-based age estimations, which estimate your age based on other services where you've provided your email address. 'The process can be as simple as submitting an email address and will return an accurate result in seconds,' explained Lina Ghazal, head of regulatory and public affairs at safety tech firm Verifymy. What happens if porn sites don't comply? Ofcom says that many porn sites have already put their age checks in place. It stresses that the law applies to all sites and apps that allow pornography – whether they are dedicated adult sites or social media, search or gaming services. Fines for non-comply could be up to £18 million or 10 per cent of the platform's qualifying worldwide revenue, whichever is greater. The Online Safety Act The crackdown is part of the Online Safety Act 2023 – a set of laws that protects children and adults online. Mrs Ghazal said it is a 'great step forward for child safety', adding: 'It means some of the world's biggest sites will have highly effective age assurance in place that protects children and also preserves the privacy of users.' The idea of implementing age checks on pornography websites, and fining those sites that don't comply, has existed for several years now. Back in 2016, the UK government launched a public consultation over plans to implement age checks on pornography sites. It was then included in the Digital Economy Act 2017 – but the provision was delayed and eventually abandoned in October 2019. Government said at the time age checks would be delivered through its 'proposed online harms regulatory regime' – in other words, the Online Safety Bill. One criticism of age-checking technology for porn is regarding concerns about handing sensitive identification information – namely age or date of birth – to third parties. 'Everyone realised right from the start – 2016 – that users were not going to want to share their name, let alone a copy of their passport or driving licence, with a porn site,' said Iain Corby, director of Age Verification Providers Association. New research from Ofcom reveals the extent to which children are accessing porn online, and underlines the need for new measures to protect them. It found that eight per cent of children aged 8-14 in the UK visited an online porn site or app in a month – including around 3 per cent of 8–9-year-olds – the youngest children in the study. Ofcom's research tracked the use of websites and apps by 8–14-year-olds across smartphones, tablets and computers over a month. Boys aged 13-14 (19 per cent) were mostly likely to visit a porn service, significantly more than girls the same age (11 per cent).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store