Lebanon seeks deal to send overcrowded prison inmates to Syria
At Lebanon's largest jail of Roumieh, authorities have also reopened a court – which had last been active during the Covid-19 pandemic – as they seek to speed up the judicial process for suspects from Lebanon, Syria or elsewhere.
The idea of a treaty with Syria was formulated by Justice Minister Adel Nassar, who came into the position earlier this year in a new Lebanese government seeking to bring about reform in a country long plagued by institutional malaise.
Mr Nassar has also pushed forward with a draft law for enhanced judicial independence in a country where courts have long suffered from political interference. It is part of a wider push for an overhaul of the judicial system that includes its digitisation. A raft of new judges has also been appointed.
'When the Prime Minister went to Syria I addressed this issue with him,' Mr Nassar said, referring to the April visit to Damascus by Nawaf Salam, himself a former judge who headed the International Court of Justice until the start of the year.
'He addressed this to the Syrian authorities regarding the possibility to enter in to a treaty that would allow Syrian detainees in Lebanon to continue their sentence in Syria,' Mr Nassar told The National from his office at the Justice Ministry in Beirut.
'But this would not apply to people who were condemned for terrorism or for killing Lebanese citizens and soldiers – or [other] major crimes. It would apply for the majority, which are people who are sentences for stealing, for fraud etc. Not for killing Lebanese citizens,' added the minister, a Harvard-educated lawyer.
Lebanon's prisons are notorious for their overcrowding and cramped conditions, with a population hovering around 8,500. Last year, about 80 per cent of them were yet to have their case go to trial.
About 2,000 Syrian detainees are believed to be housed in Lebanese jails. The Lebanese government estimates about 1.5 million Syrian
Some of them, however, are held on terrorism charges for fighting against the Lebanese Army. In one case in 2014 in the border town of Arsal in the north-west reaches of Lebanon, fighters from ISIS and Jabhat Al Nusra – which included Syrian nationals – engaged in deadly clashes with the Lebanese Army for about a week.
Mr Nassar has not had direct contact with his Syrian counterpart, but insists the conversations are continuing between authorities in Beirut and Damascus.
Pressure on Lebanon
Last week SyriaTV reported that authorities were seeking to pressure Lebanon through political and diplomatic measures to address the issue of Syrian detainees – although that report was later denied by the Ministry of Information in Damascus, which said it sought to address the issue through official channels.
Nonetheless, a high-level Syrian delegation is expected in Beirut in the near future – with the prison situation expected to be on the agenda, even if the visit has not been officially confirmed.
The treaty idea was floated by Mr Nassar, and awaits a response and action from the Syrian side.
'I hope that the Syrian authorities will follow up on that because we opened the door and we are willing co-operate with them,' Mr Nassar said.
'I welcome a visit from the Syrian minister of justice to discuss the possibility to sign a treaty in order to have the issue addressed.'
Roumieh, an otherwise picturesque town overlooking Beirut, is home to by far the largest prison in Lebanon with about 3,400 detainees despite the buildings being built for 1,200.
Raja Abi Nader, the judge that heads the prisons directorate at the Ministry of Justice, said the Roumieh courts were relaunched on June 3, with 500 detainees having their case heard. By reopening the courts in Roumieh, the logistical time for suspects for be transferred has been dramatically cut, authorities say.
'Syrians, like Lebanese detainees, are suffering from the fact that prisons are overcrowded,' Mr Nassar said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Tunisia: Mass convictions in ‘Conspiracy Case 2' deepen rule of law crisis
The mass conviction of opposition figures in Tunisia's 'Conspiracy Case 2' is a new example of the Tunisian authorities' ongoing restrictions on civic space and erosion of judicial independence and fair trial guarantees, Amnesty International said today. The case, based on vague terrorism and state security charges, is the latest in a series of politically motivated prosecutions that appear designed to silence peaceful dissent and intimidate and crackdown on critics of President Kais Saied's government. 'This case illustrates how Tunisia's criminal justice system is being misused to suppress peaceful dissent and persecute people simply for exercising their human rights. The expanding use of counter-terrorism legislation to punish peaceful dissent is a deeply troubling pattern that Amnesty International has been documenting since 2023,' said Sara Hashash, Amnesty International's Deputy Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa. 'The convictions in 'Conspiracy Case 2' are a grave injustice and a blatant assault on Tunisia's human rights obligations. All individuals detained solely for peacefully exercising their rights to freedom of expression, association, and political activity must be immediately released. 'Authorities must immediately end the ongoing crackdown on human rights including the targeting of critics under the guise of national security and restore judicial independence and the rule of law and put in place effective safeguards to prevent the abuse of counter-terrorism and national security laws as tools of repression.' Amnesty International calls on the Tunisian authorities to quash all sentences issued in 'Conspiracy Case 2' and immediately release those arbitrarily detained. Authorities must ensure that any new trials are held in full compliance with international human rights law. This includes ensuring that future trials are open to the public, with full access granted to family members, lawyers, journalists, and independent monitors. Tunisia is a state party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and is legally bound to uphold the rights to a fair trial, freedom of expression, association and liberty. The trial took place amid an ongoing rule of law crisis in Tunisia. Since President Saied's power grab in July 2021, the country has witnessed an erosion of the rule of law, including through the dismantlement of judicial independence guarantees that have resulted in increased interference by the executive in the judiciary and a wave of prosecutions targeting opposition figures, journalists, civil society activists, and former officials, further constricting the space for fundamental human rights and freedoms. Mass sentences following a politically motivated trial The trial opened on 24 June 2025 and concluded with mass conviction on 8 July of 21 out of 24 individuals including senior political leaders from Ennahdha Party, former government and security officials, lawyers, and other opposition party members. Sentences ranged from 12 to 35 years imposed on 21 individuals. Only one defendant was acquitted while two others are still waiting on the decision to appeal their indictment. Among those convicted was Rached Ghannouchi, the leader of the Ennahda party, who received a 14-year sentence in absentia after refusing to participate in the trial. Other Ennahdha senior members, including Habib Ellouz, Samir Hanachi and Fathi Elbedoui, were sentenced to 12 years, while exiled Ennahdha members Mouadh Kheriji, Lotfi Zitoun, were among those sentenced in absentia to 35 years. Flawed evidence and due process violations The investigation originated in May 2023, following a report from an anonymous informant who claimed the existence of a covert network led by Ghannouchi aimed at 'changing the structure of the state,' with the assistance of former Ministry of Interior official Kamel Ben El Bedoui. The informant also alleged the recruitment of security personnel and coordination with other defendants. These allegations were later supplemented by additional statements from security officials, one of whom was also anonymous. The charges were based on allegations of 'conspiracy against state security,' largely relying on anonymous witness testimony, intercepted communications, and documents seized during police raids. Much of the material consisted of political criticism and private communications critical of President Saied dating back to between 2011 and 2022, but with no concrete evidence of criminal conduct. The authorities' central claim that certain opposition politicians operated a clandestine 'security apparatus' remains unsubstantiated by any independently verifiable evidence. The prosecution relied heavily on anonymous allegations amplified by state-aligned media and security unions, yet failed to present material documentation, institutional investigation, or independent verification to back this claim. No formal inquiry into alleged wrongdoing has been presented, including during the cross examinations of the defendants. Trial marred by serious due process violations The trial was marred by serious violations of due process and fair trial rights. In late February, the Tunis Court of First Instance decided that upcoming terrorism trials would proceed with detainees attending online from prison, citing the existence of unspecified 'real dangers.' The court proceeded to later renew the decision, without further elaboration. Hence, the defendants held in pre-trial detention were forced to participate via remote video link, severely limiting their ability to communicate with legal counsel or engage with the court, according to their lawyers. Similar to other high-profile cases, access to the courtrooms was tightly restricted under security pretexts, with independent journalists, families, and independent observers barred from attending the proceedings, severely undermining the transparency of the trial. 'These trials lack fairness, credibility and transparency. The heavy reliance on anonymous sources and secretive procedures makes the trials a sham and the convictions and sentences a travesty of justice,' said Sara Hashash. 'The Tunisian authorities must end their misuse of the judiciary to target political opponents, respect the rule of law and uphold the human rights of everyone in the country.' Broader crackdown on peaceful dissent The trial took place amid an ongoing rule of law crisis in Tunisia. Since President Saied's power grab in July 2021, the country has witnessed an erosion of the rule of law, including through the dismantlement of judicial independence guarantees that have resulted in increased interference by the executive in the judiciary and a wave of prosecutions targeting opposition figures, journalists, civil society activists, and former officials, further constricting the space for fundamental human rights and freedoms. Background Since July 2021, when President Kais Saied consolidated power, Amnesty International has consistently documented an escalating crackdown on dissent in Tunisia. The organization has previously documented how authorities have abused the justice system, including their reliance on vague charges, and severe fair trial violations in cases against opposition figures. This includes a series of politically motivated prosecutions, arbitrary detentions, and harassment targeting political opponents, independent journalists, lawyers, activists and human rights defenders. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Amnesty International.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Houthis parade missing crew of Eternity C cargo ship after sinking it in Red Sea
Yemen 's Houthis released footage on Monday of missing crew members from a cargo ship the rebels sank three weeks ago, saying 11 sailors had been 'rescued'. Many of the Eternity C 's crew were unaccounted for after the Houthis attacked the ship in the Red Sea, where the group has declared a 'blockade' in solidarity with the Palestinian cause. Several are believed dead. The Houthis said on Monday that the Liberia-flagged ship had been heading for the Israeli port of Eilat – a day after announcing their attacks would now extend to all companies 'dealing with Israeli ports'. The US has condemned what it called the kidnapping of the surviving crew members. Houthi naval forces were 'able to rescue 11 of the ship's crew at sea, including two wounded who were provided with medical care', the group said in a statement carried by the news agency Saba. It said the ship was sunk on June 9 'as a result of violating the naval embargo against the enemy entity', meaning Israel. It said one person was found dead onboard the Eternity C before it sank, and that their body was taken to a hospital morgue. Three to four people have previously been reported dead. The Houthi video appeared to be showing the moment the mostly Filipino crew were pulled from the sea wearing life jackets, although the footage was taken at night and the ship sank during the daytime. The captive crew members were shown saying the ship was heading for Eilat, and said at the end: 'We are sorry, Palestinians.' It wasn't clear if they were speaking under duress. One man the Houthis said was an electrician was shown lying in bed and speaking in English. An EU naval force had said a Russian electrician onboard the ship lost his leg. The attack on the Eternity C came a day after the Houthis sank another cargo ship, the Magic Seas. On that occasion a UAE rescue mission brought all 22 crew members to safety. Human Rights Watch has condemned the attacks as a breach of the laws of war. 'The Houthis have sought to justify unlawful attacks by pointing to Israeli violations against Palestinians,' Niku Jafarnia, a researcher on Yemen and Bahrain for the organisation, said last week. 'The Houthis should end all attacks on ships not taking part in the conflict and immediately release the crew members in their custody,' she said. The Houthis announced on Sunday that they had 'decided to escalate their military support operations' into what they called a fourth phase, extending their attacks to all companies dealing with Israel's ports. Vessels may be attacked regardless of their destination, they added. The attacks on Red Sea vessels have damaged trade in one of the world's most important shipping lanes. Operators have taken longer routes around the southern tip of Africa, adding to costs and delaying journeys.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Democrats ask US State Department to stop funding GHF and return to UN-led aid delivery
More than 20 Democratic senators are urging President Donald Trump 's administration to end its support for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) in the wake of the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians at or near aid sites under its control. Since May 27, the GHF has been solely in charge of aid distribution in Gaza, where in recent weeks dozens of Palestinians have starved to death. Several reports have alleged that the GHF's private guards or the Israeli military have shot desperate Palestinians as they have sought food at aid sites. 'We urge you to immediately cease all US funding for GHF and resume support for the existing UN-led aid co-ordination mechanisms with enhanced oversight to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches civilians in need,' the senators, led by Chris Van Hollen, said in a letter addressed to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly denied starvation is occurring in Gaza, but President Donald Trump on Monday conceded that what is happening in the enclave is ' real starvation '. 'I see it, and you can't fake that,' Mr Trump said while on a visit to Scotland. 'We have to get the kids fed.' He said the UK and other European countries would join in providing aid to Gaza 'so we're going to set up food centres where people can walk in with no boundaries', he said. Shocking images of malnourished children have emerged in recent days, prompting accusations that Israel is using starvation as a weapon of war. Since May, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed while waiting for food near GHF centres, according to the UN. That number prompted the senators to ask whether the State Department had its own assessment of the number of Palestinians killed since GHF took over aid distribution in the enclave. 'Does the State Department assess that civilians have been killed in or around the GHF distribution sites?' the senators wrote. 'If so, how many have been killed and who was responsible for their deaths? Has the State Department requested information from the Israeli government or from GHF and contractors on the ground concerning any incidents of civilian harm?'
