logo
It's a common workplace problem: Things got heated during a disagreement. Now what?

It's a common workplace problem: Things got heated during a disagreement. Now what?

Last week saw Elon Musk and President Donald Trump go from bromance to breakup.
The scale and potential repercussions of the argument between the commander in chief and the world's richest man, who was until recently a special government employee and White House advisor, were much different than those of the average person.
But, while the pair's relationship is not analogous to the everyday superior and subordinate, the conflict raises the familiar question: how do you navigate a tense relationship at work?
Business Insider spoke with five experts in workplace culture and conflict resolution, from career coaches to behavioral neurologists, to get their best tips.
"First things first: to the extent that you can, take a walk around the block, get a cup of coffee, draft an angry email — but don't send it, because you'll probably regret it the next day," Kathryn Landis, an executive coach and New York University professor of marketing and public relations, told Business Insider.
Then, as soon as you've cooled down, set a time on the calender to talk face-to-face. Letting a workplace conflict fester is a common mistake, Marlo Lyons, a career coach, told BI.
"That creates awkwardness, it creates distance, and it's never going to end well, so you just have to ask for a quick one-on-one," Lyons said. "It doesn't have to be a long, drawn-out conversation, but you really want to show that you respect the relationship by having that conversation sooner than later."
Don't pretend there's not a problem
Once you've started the conversation, it's important to avoid "the tendency to over-apologize because you're understandably anxious about your job," negotiation expert and senior fellow at Harvard Law School Robert Bordone told Business Insider.
But, while you want to cool things off, you should still try to " manage up" and speak your mind about what's bothering you, each of the experts agreed.
"The danger in just saying mea culpa is you might get out of the situation, but you're in something that's unhealthy — and from your boss's perspective, they don't even know how unhappy you are because you never told them," Bordone said. "Then you're setting up a longer-term bad pattern that doesn't serve you, the boss, or the organization's interest."
Ryan Leak, an executive coach and the author of "How to Work With Complicated People: Strategies for Effective Collaboration with (Nearly) Anyone," suggested rehearsing a few phrases to overcome the tension.
The first is practicing some intellectual humility and acknowledging out loud, "I could be wrong," Leak said.
"When you subscribe to the 'I could be wrong' mantra, what you're saying is, 'Hey, I've got a story in my head that I fully believe, but I'm also going to make space for your story, because I realized that my story feels very true to me, but at the same time, it's only one side of story,'" Leak said.
You want to strike a collaborative tone and "focus on the 'in-group' element," said behavioral neurologist Joel Salinas, because you're both on the same team. Bordone, the Harvard negotiation expert, and Salinas are coauthors of the book "Conflict Resilience: Negotiating Disagreement Without Giving Up or Giving In."
Salinas added that it's also important to show that you're interested in learning from the experience to do better in the future and that you want to work on a resolution together.
Leak suggested making that desire explicit with the phrase "I want us to have a thriving working relationship."
"It's OK to be a little bit vulnerable and say, 'Hey, let's have this really awkward conversation that I've been ignoring for a very long time, because I do want to have a thriving working relationship with you. And so, how do we move forward with that?'" Leak said.
From there, you can lay out what bothered you in the initial conflict and what you need from the relationship, Leak added.
From there, let it go — or plan for your exit
While the initial conversation may be challenging, the really difficult part comes next, said career coach Lyons. You've got to try to let it go.
"You've got to start that conversation, but then you need to continue the relationship without harping on it," Lyons said. "You don't want to harp on it in every one-on-one. You're trying to reconnect with them, reconnect with the mission, reconnect with what the performance expectations are."
Just because you've cleared the air doesn't mean this time there won't be tension in the future. So when you find yourself getting riled up again, try to take your emotions out of it and turn your boss's bad habits into a game.
"If you know the other person is going to come back at you with some kind of dig or loaded comment, turn it into a game," Landis, the NYU professor, said. "Try to count how many digs it takes for her to say something nice. Make it a game and it becomes less personal."
Of course, if it gets to that point, you should probably also brush up your résumé — and always stay networking, Landis added. Going scorched earth may feel good in the short term, but depending on your industry, you may need that person later, so think long-term when planning your exit, and try to keep your composure even if you find the differences irreconcilable.
At the end of the day, remember conflicts are "very natural" and some disagreement is inevitable in any relationship, said Salinas.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Voters Sue Elon Musk, Say They Were Defrauded by $1M Petition Giveaway
Voters Sue Elon Musk, Say They Were Defrauded by $1M Petition Giveaway

Newsweek

time35 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Voters Sue Elon Musk, Say They Were Defrauded by $1M Petition Giveaway

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal judge has ordered Elon Musk to face a proposed class-action lawsuit from voters who say they were misled into signing a petition in the buildup to the 2024 election by promises of a chance to win $1 million in a daily giveaway. The lawsuit, brought in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, invokes the Class Action Fairness Act and alleges that the total value of all class members' claims exceeds $5 million. It seeks damages and injunctive relief on behalf of petition signers who say they were wrongly induced to provide personal identifying information when signing the petition. Newsweek contacted lawyers for Musk and America PAC for comment via email on Thursday outside regular office hours. Why It Matters The case centers on whether Musk's America PAC promotion—announced in the run-up to the election to support Donald Trump's 2024 campaign in seven battleground states—was a genuine, random lottery or whether signers suffered harm when they supplied contact details later used for political targeting. Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has faced several legal challenges over America PAC and the $1 million petition giveaway. In October, the Department of Justice warned Musk that the promotion might violate federal election laws. If the lawsuit succeeds, Musk could face millions in damages, and the case could spur similar suits in other states where voters signed the petition. Donald Trump, left, and Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk at a campaign event at the Butler Farm Show in Butler, Pennsylvania, on October 5, 2024. Donald Trump, left, and Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk at a campaign event at the Butler Farm Show in Butler, Pennsylvania, on October 5, 2024. Alex Brandon/AP What To Know The complaint names Arizona resident Jacqueline McAferty as lead plaintiff and alleges that America PAC and Musk induced voters in seven battleground states—Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin and North Carolina—to sign a petition supporting free speech and Second Amendment positions by promising $1 million daily prizes chosen "randomly" until Election Day. The suit said petition signers were required to provide names, addresses, emails and phone numbers and that the defendants benefited by driving traffic to X, Musk's social platform, and by collecting valuable political contact data. It also alleges that the lottery was not random, giving voters no real chance to collect. In November, Musk's lawyers told a Pennsylvania judge that winners were not chosen at random but were selected in advance—contradicting Musk's own statements when he launched the contest. U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman ruled that McAferty plausibly alleged that she had been misled and that an expert could testify about the commercial value of battleground voters' contact information. What People Are Saying U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman told Reuters on Wednesday: "It is plausible that plaintiff justifiably relied on those statements to believe that defendants were objectively offering her the chance to enter a random lottery—even if that is not what they subjectively intended to do." Jarrett L. Ellzey of EKSM LLP told Newsweek: "We are pleased with the Court's ruling and agree with Judge Pitman's careful reasoning. This decision affirms that our client and the proposed class have viable claims and deserve the opportunity to pursue justice." Elon Musk said at a Trump campaign event in Pennsylvania on October 19: "We are going to be awarding $1 million randomly to people who have signed the petition, every day, from now until the election." Christopher Peterson, a University of Utah law professor, told NBC News on November 5, 2024: "You cannot lawfully lie to the public about conducting a random sweepstakes, lottery, or contest and then rig the results to hand-select the winners. It really is not complicated. This is just fraud; a simple, ugly fraud on the public." What Happens Next The case, McAferty v. Musk et al., remains before the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Pitman has denied dismissal, allowing discovery and further proceedings to go forward.

Your Chats With AI Chatbot Grok May Be Visible to All
Your Chats With AI Chatbot Grok May Be Visible to All

CNET

time37 minutes ago

  • CNET

Your Chats With AI Chatbot Grok May Be Visible to All

If you've ever had a conversation with AI assistant Grok, there's a chance it's available on the internet, for all to see. According to a report by Forbes, Elon Musk's AI assistant published more than 370,000 chats on the Grok website. Those URLs, which weren't necessarily intended by users for public consumption, were then indexed by search engines and entered the public sphere. While many of the conversations with Grok were reportedly benign, some were explicit and appeared to violate its own terms of service, including offering instructions on manufacturing illicit drugs like fentanyl and methamphetamine, constructing a bomb, and methods of suicide. It wasn't just chats. Forbes reported that uploaded documents, such as photos, spreadsheets and other documents, were also published. Representatives for xAI, which makes Grok, didn't respond to a request for comment. The publishing of Grok conversations is the latest in a series of troubling reports that should spur chatbot users to be overly cautious about what they share with AI assistants. Don't just gloss over the Terms and Conditions, and be mindful of the privacy settings. Earlier this month, 404 Media reported on a researcher who discovered more than 130,000 chats with AI assistants Claude, Chat GPT and others were readable on When a Grok chat is finished, the user can hit a share button to create a unique URL, allowing the conversation to be shared with others. According to Forbes, "hitting the share button means that a conversation will be published on Grok's website, without warning or a disclaimer to the user." These URLs were also made available to search engines, allowing anyone to read them. There is no disclaimer that these chat URLs will be published for the open internet. But the Terms of Service outlined on the Grok website reads: "You grant, an irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, sublicensable, royalty-free, and worldwide right to xAI to use, copy, store, modify, distribute, reproduce, publish, display in public forums, list information regarding, make derivative works of, and aggregate your User Content and derivative works thereof for any purpose..." But there is a measure of good news for users who accidentally hit the share button or were unaware their queries would be shared far and wide. Grok has a tool to help users manage their chat histories. Going to will present a history of your shared chats. Simply click the Remove button to the right of each chat to delete it from your chat history. It's wasn't immediately clear if that would have any affect on what's already indexed in search engines. Protect your privacy E.M Lewis-Jong, director at the Mozilla Foundation, advises chatbot users to keep a simple directive in mind: Don't share anything you want to keep private, such as personal ID data or other sensitive information. "The concerning issue is that these AI systems are not designed to transparently inform users how much data is being collected or under which conditions their data might be exposed," Lewis-Jong says. "This risk is higher when you consider that children as young as 13 years old can use chatbots like ChatGPT." Lewis-Jong adds that AI assistants such as Grok and ChatGPT should be clearer about the risks users are taking when they use these tools. "AI companies should make sure users understand that their data could end up on public platforms.," Lewis-Jong says. "AI companies are telling people that the AI might make mistakes -- this is just another health warning that should also be implemented when it comes to warning users about the use of their data." According to data from SEO and thought leadership marketing company First Page Sage, Grok has 0.6% of market share, far behind leaders ChatGPT (60.4%), Microsoft Copilot (14.10%) and Google Gemini (13.5%).

Musk Relies on AI to Breathe Life Into X's Ad Business
Musk Relies on AI to Breathe Life Into X's Ad Business

Bloomberg

time38 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Musk Relies on AI to Breathe Life Into X's Ad Business

Welcome to Tech In Depth, our daily newsletter about the business of tech from Bloomberg's journalists around the world. Today, Kurt Wagner reports on Elon Musk's first public discussion in months on the business of his social media site, X. OpenAI's cloud capacity: The artificial intelligence company may let other businesses tap into its data centers and physical infrastructure needed for AI work, Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar said in an exclusive interview with Bloomberg.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store