Clock ticking: Debt fears, Medicaid cuts stall Trump's US$2.8t ‘Big Beautiful Bill' ahead of July 4 deadline
Trump, US Senate Republicans face test as 'Big Beautiful Bill' deadline looms
Republicans face resistance over tax-cut bill due to debt concerns
Senate parliamentarian's decision crucial for bill's passage
Medicaid cuts in bill opposed by some Senate Republicans
WASHINGTON, June 23 — US President Donald Trump and his allies in the Senate face a political free-for-all over passage of his sweeping tax-cut and spending legislation, which Republican congressional leaders hope to enact in coming days despite growing resistance from different party factions.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Speaker Mike Johnson and administration officials are pressing Republican lawmakers to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act so Trump can sign it into law before the July 4 US Independence Day holiday.
But hardline Republicans have redoubled their push for additional spending cuts after an official forecast that the bill would add at least US$2.8 trillion (RM12 trillion) to the US$36.2 trillion US debt. Other lawmakers, looking to minimise the impact of cuts on social programmes including Medicaid, have also voiced adamant opposition to the bill's language.
Republicans control the Senate by a 53-47 majority and the House by 220-212. One Republican from each chamber has opposed the legislation from the beginning due to the debt.
Thune aims to begin Senate action by the middle of this week and complete passage by the weekend, sending the bill back to the House for final approval.
Trump is expected to turn up the heat on senators this week, according to Republican lawmakers who view him as 'the closer.'
'Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done,' Trump said in a social media post on Sunday.
Lawmakers are still waiting for the Senate parliamentarian, the chamber's nonpartisan gatekeeper, to decide whether the legislation qualifies for the privileged status needed to circumvent Democrats and the 60-vote Senate filibuster and pass it with only 51 votes.
'The Senate Republican bill is, simply put, bigger cuts, bigger betrayal,' Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said.
'It makes even deeper cuts to healthcare. It destroys American clean energy. It raises costs on working and middle-class families. And it rewards those at the very top,' he said.
Pushback
Some Republicans are pushing back on Thune's schedule in hopes of gaining more time to negotiate bigger savings.
'There's no way. There's no way,' Senator Ron Johnson, a leading fiscal hawk who wants to cut federal spending back to pre-Covid pandemic levels, said when asked if he could support the bill this week.
The Wisconsin Republican said he is coordinating with fellow hardline Senators Mike Lee and Rick Scott, who want to glean additional savings from green tax credits and the Medicaid healthcare programme for lower-income Americans, respectively.
'If we had all the money in the world, why would you make a change? We don't. We're running US$2 trillion deficits,' Scott told reporters.
The legislation has yet to pass muster with the Senate parliamentarian, a nonpartisan referee who has said Republican efforts to restrict food assistance, curtail the ability of judges to block government policies, slash funding for financial watchdogs and reverse Biden vehicle policy, violate budgetary rules.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said last week the House version of the bill could lead to a US$2.8 trillion increase in the federal deficit over the next decade.
The deficit hike would reach a total of US$3.4 trillion, if the cost of rising interest payments due to increased borrowing needs were included, according to the agency, which took into account the bill's potential impact on economic activity.
The report contradicted Republican claims that tax cuts would lead to buoyant economic growth and pay for themselves by generating higher revenues from increased business activity.
In a Senate floor speech last week, Thune cited a White House Council of Economic Advisers projection the legislation would increase federal revenue by US$4.1 trillion, saying it would more than offset the CBO's deficit estimate.
Medicaid hit
A revised Senate version of the legislation would reduce Medicaid provider taxes from 6 per cent to 3.5 per cent by 2031 in states that expanded the programme to able-bodied recipients under the Affordable Care Act. That provision is opposed by several Senate Republicans who say it would undercut funding for rural hospitals.
'They cannot defund rural hospitals,' said Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican who has positioned himself in the debate as a champion of Medicaid.
But Republicans signaled the time for negotiations would soon come to an end and predicted that wavering members would ultimately support the legislation.
'Some people are going to have to settle for a ham and egg sandwich without the ham. That's just the way it is,' said Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana. — Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
US urges China to dissuade Iran from closing Strait of Hormuz
US secretary of state Marco Rubio said that Beijing heavily depends on the Strait of Hormuz for its oil. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : US secretary of state Marco Rubio on Sunday called on China to encourage Iran to not shut down the Strait of Hormuz after Washington carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Rubio's comments on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo' show came after Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which around 20% of global oil and gas flows. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil,' said Rubio, who also serves as national security adviser. 'If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours.' Rubio said a move to close the strait would be a massive escalation that would merit a response from the US and others. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately provide comment. US officials said it 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites using 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. The strikes mark an escalation in the ongoing Middle Eastern conflict. Tehran has vowed to defend itself. Rubio on Sunday warned against retaliation, saying such an action would be 'the worst mistake they've ever made'. He added that the US is prepared to talk with Iran.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Trump ‘still interested' in Iran diplomacy: White House
WASHINGTON: Donald Trump thinks Iranians should overthrow their government if it refuses to negotiate on its nuclear program, but the US president is 'still interested' in diplomacy, the White House said Monday. 'If the Iranian regime refuses to come to a peaceful diplomatic solution, which the president is still interested and engaging in, by the way, why shouldn't the Iranian people take away the power of this incredibly violent regime that has been suppressing them for decades?' Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Fox News. US bombers attacked Iran's heavily guarded and secretive nuclear enrichment sites over the weekend, joining Israel's military campaign to destroy the Iranian nuclear program. Top officials have repeatedly insisted the US goal is not regime change in Iran, but Trump veered off that messaging Sunday with a social media post saying 'why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' The risky bombing mission was a complete success, according to the White House, with Trump announcing in another post that 'Monumental Damage was done' to the sites. However, there is no independent verification of how much Iran's nuclear program has been set back. Iran is accused by Israel, the United States and other Western powers of seeking to build nuclear weapons under the cover of a civilian power program, something Tehran has always denied.

Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
No spike in radiation — but what risks do Iran nuclear site strikes really pose?
LONDON, June 23 — President Donald Trump said Iran's main nuclear sites had been 'obliterated' in military strikes overnight, including on the deeply buried Fordow facility, as the US joined attacks launched by Israel on June 13. Experts have said military strikes on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities pose limited risks of contamination, and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said yesterday no increased off-site radiation levels had been reported following the US attacks. Which Iranian nuclear sites have been hit so far? The US military struck sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Trump said Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been 'completely and totally obliterated'. The attacks follow previously announced Israeli attacks on nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran itself. Israel says it aims to stop Iran building a nuclear bomb and the US says Tehran would not be allowed to get such weapons. Iran denies ever seeking nuclear arms. The international nuclear watchdog IAEA has previously reported damage to the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, the nuclear complex at Isfahan that includes the Uranium Conversion Facility and to centrifuge production facilities in Karaj and Tehran. Israel has also attacked Arak, also known as Khondab. The IAEA said Israeli military strikes hit the Khondab Heavy Water Research Reactor, which was under construction and had not begun operating, and damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy water. The IAEA said it was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so there were no radiological effects. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom bomb. What risks do these strikes pose? Speaking to Reuters before the US strikes took place, experts said Israel's attacks had posed limited contamination risks so far. Darya Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at London think-tank RUSI, said attacks on facilities at the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle — the stages where uranium is prepared for use in a reactor — pose primarily chemical, not radiological risks. At enrichment facilities, UF6, or uranium hexafluoride, is the concern. 'When UF6 interacts with water vapour in the air, it produces harmful chemicals,' she said. 'In low winds, much of the material can be expected to settle in the vicinity of the facility; in high winds, the material will travel farther, but is also likely to disperse more widely. The risk of harmful chemicals being dispersed is lower for underground facilities.' Simon Bennett, who leads the civil safety and security unit at the University of Leicester in Britain, said risks to the environment were minimal when subterranean facilities are hit because you are 'burying nuclear material in possibly thousands of tonnes of concrete, earth and rock'. James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that before uranium goes into a nuclear reactor it is barely radioactive. 'The chemical form uranium hexafluoride is toxic ... but it actually doesn't tend to travel large distances and it's barely radioactive,' he added. Attacks on enrichment facilities were 'unlikely to cause significant off-site consequences', he said, while stating his opposition to Israel's campaign. Satellite image shows the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, in Bushehr Province, Iran, May 26, 2025. — 2025 Planet Labs PBC handout pic via Reuters What about nuclear reactors? The major concern would be a strike on Iran's nuclear reactor at Bushehr on the Gulf coast. Fears of catastrophe rippled through the Gulf on June 19 when the Israeli military said it had struck a site in Bushehr, only to say later that the announcement was a mistake. Israel says it wants to avoid any nuclear disaster. Richard Wakeford, honorary professor of epidemiology at the University of Manchester, said that while contamination from attacks on enrichment facilities would be 'mainly a chemical problem' for the surrounding areas, extensive damage to large power reactors 'is a different story'. Radioactive elements would be released either through a plume of volatile materials or into the sea, he added. Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said an attack on Bushehr 'could cause an absolute radiological catastrophe'. Why are Gulf states especially worried? For Gulf states, the impact of any strike on Bushehr would be worsened by the potential contamination of Gulf waters, jeopardising a critical source of desalinated potable water. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is on high alert to monitor for any possible environmental contamination after the attacks, said a source with knowledge of the matter. There have been no signs of radiological contamination so far, the source said, adding that the GCC had emergency plans in place in case of a threat to water and food security in the Gulf. In the United Arab Emirates, desalinated water accounts for more than 80 per cent of drinking water, while Bahrain became fully reliant on desalinated water in 2016, with 100 per cent of groundwater reserved for contingency plans, authorities say. Qatar is also 100 per cent dependent on desalinated water. In Saudi Arabia, a much larger nation with a greater reserve of natural groundwater, about 50 per cent of the water supply came from desalinated water as of 2023, according to the General Authority for Statistics. While some Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia, Oman and the UAE have access to more than one sea to draw water from, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait are crowded along the shoreline of the Gulf with no other coastline. 'If a natural disaster, oil spill, or even a targeted attack were to disrupt a desalination plant, hundreds of thousands could lose access to freshwater almost instantly,' said Nidal Hilal, professor of engineering and director of New York University Abu Dhabi's Water Research Centre. 'Coastal desalination plants are especially vulnerable to regional hazards like oil spills and potential nuclear contamination,' he said. — Reuters