logo
Business slams plan to enshrine right to work from home

Business slams plan to enshrine right to work from home

A legal right to work from home would be divisive and likely send jobs elsewhere, business groups say.
A state government has revealed plans to enshrine the right to work from home for both public and private-sector employees.
The premier behind the Australian-first push hails its as the next frontier in worker rights that would benefit working parents.
The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 for the right to work from home on two days per week, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office.
The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home.
Details are yet to be worked through and Premier Jacinta Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws.
Ms Allan promoted the plan as beneficial to both the economy and families, likening it to other significant workplace changes in recent decades including more women entering the workforce.
"There's been many, many gains over many, many generations that have supported women's opportunity to increase their workforce participation, this is just another important, big step," she told reporters.
Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process.
Ms Allan said the decision had gone through cabinet and brushed off suggestions it could trigger a court challenge.
The plan drew sharp criticism from business groups, with Australian Industry Group Victorian head Tim Piper describing it as serious government overreach that undermines business autonomy.
He described it as "pure political theatre" designed to wedge the opposition while also running counter to both global trends and business best practice.
"These policies foster an 'us versus them' dynamic, privileging some white-collar workers while leaving blue-collar employees with no choice," he said.
"It's divisive, disruptive, and dangerous."
Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Paul Guerra claimed businesses would move interstate and jobs would be lost if Victoria moved away from the legislated national system.
"(Work from home) certainly works well in some contexts, but that should be determined by the employer in consultation with the employee," he said.
Ms Allan promised to introduce the law in 2026 prior to the state election.
Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Ms Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader.
Mr Battin said working from home was a valuable option for many workers and families.
"We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice," he said.
The federal coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day.
NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices.
More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
A legal right to work from home would be divisive and likely send jobs elsewhere, business groups say.
A state government has revealed plans to enshrine the right to work from home for both public and private-sector employees.
The premier behind the Australian-first push hails its as the next frontier in worker rights that would benefit working parents.
The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 for the right to work from home on two days per week, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office.
The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home.
Details are yet to be worked through and Premier Jacinta Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws.
Ms Allan promoted the plan as beneficial to both the economy and families, likening it to other significant workplace changes in recent decades including more women entering the workforce.
"There's been many, many gains over many, many generations that have supported women's opportunity to increase their workforce participation, this is just another important, big step," she told reporters.
Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process.
Ms Allan said the decision had gone through cabinet and brushed off suggestions it could trigger a court challenge.
The plan drew sharp criticism from business groups, with Australian Industry Group Victorian head Tim Piper describing it as serious government overreach that undermines business autonomy.
He described it as "pure political theatre" designed to wedge the opposition while also running counter to both global trends and business best practice.
"These policies foster an 'us versus them' dynamic, privileging some white-collar workers while leaving blue-collar employees with no choice," he said.
"It's divisive, disruptive, and dangerous."
Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Paul Guerra claimed businesses would move interstate and jobs would be lost if Victoria moved away from the legislated national system.
"(Work from home) certainly works well in some contexts, but that should be determined by the employer in consultation with the employee," he said.
Ms Allan promised to introduce the law in 2026 prior to the state election.
Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Ms Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader.
Mr Battin said working from home was a valuable option for many workers and families.
"We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice," he said.
The federal coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day.
NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices.
More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
A legal right to work from home would be divisive and likely send jobs elsewhere, business groups say.
A state government has revealed plans to enshrine the right to work from home for both public and private-sector employees.
The premier behind the Australian-first push hails its as the next frontier in worker rights that would benefit working parents.
The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 for the right to work from home on two days per week, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office.
The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home.
Details are yet to be worked through and Premier Jacinta Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws.
Ms Allan promoted the plan as beneficial to both the economy and families, likening it to other significant workplace changes in recent decades including more women entering the workforce.
"There's been many, many gains over many, many generations that have supported women's opportunity to increase their workforce participation, this is just another important, big step," she told reporters.
Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process.
Ms Allan said the decision had gone through cabinet and brushed off suggestions it could trigger a court challenge.
The plan drew sharp criticism from business groups, with Australian Industry Group Victorian head Tim Piper describing it as serious government overreach that undermines business autonomy.
He described it as "pure political theatre" designed to wedge the opposition while also running counter to both global trends and business best practice.
"These policies foster an 'us versus them' dynamic, privileging some white-collar workers while leaving blue-collar employees with no choice," he said.
"It's divisive, disruptive, and dangerous."
Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Paul Guerra claimed businesses would move interstate and jobs would be lost if Victoria moved away from the legislated national system.
"(Work from home) certainly works well in some contexts, but that should be determined by the employer in consultation with the employee," he said.
Ms Allan promised to introduce the law in 2026 prior to the state election.
Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Ms Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader.
Mr Battin said working from home was a valuable option for many workers and families.
"We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice," he said.
The federal coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day.
NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices.
More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
A legal right to work from home would be divisive and likely send jobs elsewhere, business groups say.
A state government has revealed plans to enshrine the right to work from home for both public and private-sector employees.
The premier behind the Australian-first push hails its as the next frontier in worker rights that would benefit working parents.
The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 for the right to work from home on two days per week, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office.
The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home.
Details are yet to be worked through and Premier Jacinta Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws.
Ms Allan promoted the plan as beneficial to both the economy and families, likening it to other significant workplace changes in recent decades including more women entering the workforce.
"There's been many, many gains over many, many generations that have supported women's opportunity to increase their workforce participation, this is just another important, big step," she told reporters.
Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process.
Ms Allan said the decision had gone through cabinet and brushed off suggestions it could trigger a court challenge.
The plan drew sharp criticism from business groups, with Australian Industry Group Victorian head Tim Piper describing it as serious government overreach that undermines business autonomy.
He described it as "pure political theatre" designed to wedge the opposition while also running counter to both global trends and business best practice.
"These policies foster an 'us versus them' dynamic, privileging some white-collar workers while leaving blue-collar employees with no choice," he said.
"It's divisive, disruptive, and dangerous."
Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Paul Guerra claimed businesses would move interstate and jobs would be lost if Victoria moved away from the legislated national system.
"(Work from home) certainly works well in some contexts, but that should be determined by the employer in consultation with the employee," he said.
Ms Allan promised to introduce the law in 2026 prior to the state election.
Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Ms Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader.
Mr Battin said working from home was a valuable option for many workers and families.
"We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice," he said.
The federal coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day.
NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices.
More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big business quick to veto productivity tax reform
Big business quick to veto productivity tax reform

Sydney Morning Herald

timea minute ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Big business quick to veto productivity tax reform

Well, you can forget about Treasurer Jim Chalmers' three-day roundtable discussions leading to any improvement in the economy's productivity and growth, let alone getting the budget back under control. Late last week, the Business Council of Australia (BCA) persuaded all of Canberra's many other business lobby groups to join it in rejecting out of hand the Productivity Commission's proposal for reform of the company tax system which, the commission argued, would increase businesses' incentive to invest more in productivity-enhancing plant and equipment, without any net reduction in company tax collections. The proposal is for the rate of company tax to be cut for all but our biggest 500 companies, while introducing a 5 per cent tax on the net cash flow of all companies. The join statement by 24 business lobby groups says that 'while some businesses may benefit under the proposal, it risks all Australian consumers and businesses paying more for the things they buy every day – groceries, fuel and other daily essentials'. Get it? This is the lobbyists' oldest trick: 'We're not concerned about what the tax change would do to our profits, dear reader, we're just worried about what it would do you and your pocket. It's not us we worry about, it's our customers.' Loading Suddenly, their professed concern about the lack of productivity improvement and slow growth is out the window, and now it's the cost of living they're deeply worried about. They've been urging governments to increase the GST for years, but now they don't want higher prices. Yeah, sure. Bet you didn't know there are as many as 24 different business lobby groups in the capital. Their role is to advance the narrowly defined interests of their paying clients back in the rest of Oz by means fair or foul. They're not paid to help the government reach a deal we can all live with, nor to suggest that their clients worry about anything other than their own immediate interests. Canberra calls this lobbying. Economists call it rent-seeking. You press the government for special deals at the expense of someone else, while ensuring you contribute as little as possible. This, apparently, is the way democracy is meant to work.

Big business quick to veto productivity tax reform
Big business quick to veto productivity tax reform

The Age

timea minute ago

  • The Age

Big business quick to veto productivity tax reform

Well, you can forget about Treasurer Jim Chalmers' three-day roundtable discussions leading to any improvement in the economy's productivity and growth, let alone getting the budget back under control. Late last week, the Business Council of Australia (BCA) persuaded all of Canberra's many other business lobby groups to join it in rejecting out of hand the Productivity Commission's proposal for reform of the company tax system which, the commission argued, would increase businesses' incentive to invest more in productivity-enhancing plant and equipment, without any net reduction in company tax collections. The proposal is for the rate of company tax to be cut for all but our biggest 500 companies, while introducing a 5 per cent tax on the net cash flow of all companies. The join statement by 24 business lobby groups says that 'while some businesses may benefit under the proposal, it risks all Australian consumers and businesses paying more for the things they buy every day – groceries, fuel and other daily essentials'. Get it? This is the lobbyists' oldest trick: 'We're not concerned about what the tax change would do to our profits, dear reader, we're just worried about what it would do you and your pocket. It's not us we worry about, it's our customers.' Loading Suddenly, their professed concern about the lack of productivity improvement and slow growth is out the window, and now it's the cost of living they're deeply worried about. They've been urging governments to increase the GST for years, but now they don't want higher prices. Yeah, sure. Bet you didn't know there are as many as 24 different business lobby groups in the capital. Their role is to advance the narrowly defined interests of their paying clients back in the rest of Oz by means fair or foul. They're not paid to help the government reach a deal we can all live with, nor to suggest that their clients worry about anything other than their own immediate interests. Canberra calls this lobbying. Economists call it rent-seeking. You press the government for special deals at the expense of someone else, while ensuring you contribute as little as possible. This, apparently, is the way democracy is meant to work.

Level of concern for Palestine is ‘rising, not falling' in Australia
Level of concern for Palestine is ‘rising, not falling' in Australia

Sky News AU

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Level of concern for Palestine is ‘rising, not falling' in Australia

Former Labor advisor Darrin Barnett discusses the pro-Palestine march which took place in Sydney, temporarily shutting down the Harbour Bridge. 'There's a lot to unpack here, but today was significant … Sydney was 100,000 people,' Mr Barnett told Sky News host Paul Murray. 'This was a big deal … there are people who have genuine concerns at a humanitarian level of what's occurring. 'That level of concern, I think, is rising, not falling.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store