Full list of people on PIP most at risk of losing payments under new DWP welfare reforms
New DWP analysis breaks down 18 most-claimed PIP conditions and daily living scores below four points.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) estimates that proposed eligibility rule changes to the daily living component of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) will result in 370,000 existing claimants losing their entitlement when their award is reviewed during the 2029/30 financial year.
The impact assessment, published in March, also estimates that 430,000 future PIP claimants will not qualify for the disability benefit once the reforms come into force, with an average loss of £4,500 each year.
The DWP has now conducted analysis of PIP claimants who did not score four points in at least one daily living activity in 18 of the most common disabling conditions. These conditions have been chosen as they make up the highest proportions of PIP caseloads.
Minister for Social Security and Disability Sir Stephen Timms, shared the analysis findings in a written response to Liberal Democrat MP Victoria Collins.
Sir Stephen said: 'A breakdown of the impact of the reforms on disability overall has been published as part of an Equality Analysis of the Spring Statement package of measures
'Data on the health conditions of Universal Credit claimants being placed in the LCWRA has been published and will continue to be taken into account in the future programme of analysis.'
The DWP Minister continued: 'Analysis of those who do not score four points in at least one daily living activity for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) has now been undertaken.'
He added that the table of findings 'shows the volume of claimants with the 18 most common disabling conditions in receipt of the PIP daily living component in January 2025, as well as the volume and proportion of these claimants who were awarded less than four points in all 10 daily living activities.'
DWP analysis of current daily living awards
DWP notes on the analysis state that the health condition category is based on primary health condition as recorded on the PIP Computer System at time of latest assessment. Many claimants have multiple health conditions but only primary condition is available for analysis.
The table below shows PIP health conditions, the number of comments in receipt of PIP daily living component and the number of claimants awarded less than four points in all daily living activities at the end of January 2025..
Back Pain
194,000
154,000 (79%)
Arthritis
279,000
13,000 (6%)
Other Regional Musculoskeletal Diseases
136,000
97,000 (71%)
Chronic Pain Syndromes
173,00
118,000 (68%)
Cardiovascular Diseases
61,000
38,000 (62%)
Respiratory Diseases
83,000
45,000 (55%)
Anxiety and Depression
587,000
282,000 (48%)
Multiple Sclerosis and Neuropathic Diseases
80,000,
38,000 (48%)
All Other Conditions
272,000
126,000 (46%)
Other Neurological Diseases
97,000
35,000 (36%)
Cerebrovascular Diseases
56,000
19,000 (34%)
Cancer
70,000
23,000 (33%)
Epilepsy
36,000
11,000 (30%)
Other Psychiatric Disorders
90,000
25,000 (28%)
Cerebral Palsy and Neurological Muscular Diseases
47,000
11,000 (24%)
Psychotic Disorders
112,000
26,000 (23%)
ADHD / ADD
75,000
14,000 (19%)
Autistic Spectrum Disorders
206,000
13,000 (6%)
Learning Disabilities
188,000
7,000 (3%)
Other disabling condition groups which cover smaller proportions of the PIP caseload are covered in the 'Other Conditions' category.
This includes:
Visual Diseases
Other General Musculoskeletal Diseases
Endocrine Diseases
Hearing Disorders
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Genitourinary Diseases
Skin Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases (Connective Tissue Disorders)
Infectious Diseases
Diseases of the Liver, Gallbladder or Biliary Tract
Haematological Diseases
Metabolic Diseases
Multisystem and Extremes of Age
Diseases of the Immune System
Anxiety and Depression
Anxiety disorders - Other / type not known
Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Stress reaction disorders - Other / type not known
Generalised anxiety disorder
Phobia - Specific
Phobia - Social
Agoraphobia
Panic disorder
Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)
Anxiety and depressive disorders - mixed
Conversion disorder (hysteria)
Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD)
Dissociative disorders - Other / type not known
Somatoform disorders - Other / type not known
Depressive disorder
Bipolar affective disorder (Hypomania / Mania)
Mood disorders - Other / type not known
Daily living component for PIP
You might get the daily living component of PIP if you need help with:
eating, drinking or preparing food
washing, bathing, using the toilet, managing incontinence
dressing and undressing
talking, listening, reading and understanding
managing your medicines or treatments
making decisions about money
mixing with other people
How difficulty with tasks is assessed
The DWP will assess how difficult you find daily living and mobility tasks.
For each task, the DWP will look at:
whether you can do it safely
how long it takes you
how often your condition affects this activity
whether you need help to do it, from a person or using extra equipment
The descriptors
Your ability to carry out each activity is measured against a list of standard statements describing what you can or cannot do.
These are known as the descriptors. The health professional will advise the DWP which descriptor applies to you for each activity.
The Citizen's Advice website has a whole section dedicated to this along with a downloadable guide to all the points awarded for each response - you can view this here. An example they use is there are six descriptors for 'Dressing and undressing', ranging from 'Can dress and undress unaided' to 'Cannot dress or undress at all'.
Each descriptor carries a points score ranging from 0 to 12.
Using aids or appliances
Your ability to carry out the daily living activities and the mobility activities will be assessed as if you were wearing or using any aids or appliances it would be reasonable for you to use.
This applies whether or not you normally use those aids or appliances. However, if you use or need aids and appliances, this can help you to score more points - find out more here.
Citizens Advice explains: 'An aid is any item which improves, provides or replaces impaired physical or mental function. It doesn't have to be specially designed as a disability aid. Examples include a stool you need to sit on when cooking, or a walking stick to help you stand.'
Daily living scores
Citizens Advice explains to get the daily living component of PIP, you must have a physical or mental condition that limits your ability to carry out some or all of the activities below.
The maximum amount of PIP points that can be awarded for that question are shown.
Daily living activity:
Preparing food - 8
Taking medication - 10
Managing therapy or monitoring a health condition - 8
Washing and bathing - 8
Managing toilet needs or incontinence - 8
Dressing and undressing - 8
Communicating verbally - 12
Reading and understanding symbols and words - 8
Engaging with other people face to face - 8
Making budgeting decisions - 6
Points and payment rates
After answering all the daily living activity questions:
If you get between 8 and 11 points in total - you will be awarded the standard rate of PIP
If you get at least 12 points in total - you will be awarded the enhanced rate of PIP
After answering all the mobility activity questions:
If you get between 8 and 11 points in total - you will be awarded the standard rate of PIP
If you get at least 12 points in total - you will be awarded the enhanced rate of PIP
The latest DWP figures show that at the end of January there were 3.7 million PIP claimants across Great Britain.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has previously said more than 1,000 PIP claims are being awarded per day, making the argument for welfare reforms to ensure the system is sustainable for the future.
The proposed changes will come into force in November 2026, subject to parliamentary approval.
Reforms also include increasing the number of face-to-face assessments. At present, most are being conducted remotely over the phone, by video call, or paper-based.
However, there will be no freeze on PIP payments, which will continue to be non-means-tested, and rise in-line with the September inflation rate.
There will be no changes to the mobility component.
You can complete the UK Government's consultation on proposed changes to PIP and the benefits system on GOV.UK here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
State pensioners born before certain date could claim £1,362 a month
Attendance Allowance and Pension Age Disability Payment (PADP) are paid independently of the state pension. They are not means-tested but can be a big help A total of 1.7 million individuals born prior to 1959 could potentially claim £1,362 each month through a combination of two DWP benefits. These are the Attendance Allowance and Pension Age Disability Payment (PADP), which are separate from the state pension. These two benefits offer additional financial assistance for older individuals suffering from a disability, long-term illness, or physical or mental health conditions. Both Attendance Allowance and PADP are not means-tested and are valued at either £73.90 for the lower rate or £110.40 for the higher rate each week. As these benefits are typically paid every four weeks, this equates to either £295.60 or £441.60 per pay period. The Pension Age Disability Payment (PADP) is Social Security Scotland's counterpart to the DWP's Attendance Allowance. It serves as the primary non-means tested benefit for those who become disabled after reaching pension age. The Scottish Government's policy is to maintain nearly all rules identical to the Attendance Allowance, but with improvements to administrative processes, reports Birmingham Live. The sum awarded via Attendance Allowance or the Pension Age Disability Payment (PADP) depends on the level of support an person requires. These benefits aim to assist State Pension age individuals with the additional daily living costs incurred due to a health condition or disability, potentially enabling them to maintain independence in their own homes for longer. It's crucial to remember that neither Attendance Allowance nor PADP includes a mobility component. The conditions outlined on the DWP website are derived from data from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) Attendance Allowance system, and PADP also assists individuals with these conditions. However, this list should not be viewed as a checklist for eligibility. Rather, it provides an understanding of the types of conditions frequently supported through these benefits. Comprehensive details on how to obtain the application form by post or over the phone can be located on the website online.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
I went to a DwP benefit cut consultation: here's what I found
'We should make the effort,' my wife said when the Department for Work & Pensions (DWO) announced public consultation events on its plans for arguably the biggest shake up to disability 'benefits' - I struggle with the word because I fail to see the benefit of being disabled - Britain has yet seen. The firm tone told me that I had best agree. But she was also right. Democracy withers on the vine if people aren't willing to participate in it while the government's current policy, and especially its rhetoric, could have a severe impact on our family and many like us. Given the chance, we should push back against that. So we signed up, even though the DWP seemed somewhat concerned about letting the public into its events. No location was provided and when it was finally revealed, it was accompanied by a stern instruction: 'Do not share these details with non-attendees, as they will not be allowed to enter the premises for this event.' Perhaps this was with an eye on the demonstration in Manchester that resulted in a stand off between protestors and the DWP staff doing the consulting. Police were ultimately called. The London event we attended - an extra date added to the DWP's disability world tour after the first was sold out - featured no such drama. We arrived a little late, thanks in part to the difficulty we faced in finding a blue badge space near the local tube stop. Note to Work & Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall: if you're concerned about getting disabled people into work, the ability to access the workplace is the first hurdle you have to overcome. Parking is a part of that. But at least my visions of besuited Sir Humphreys serving up fake smiles while wishing they were at their London clubs downing bottles of claret to help them get over dealing with the unwashed were proved false. Several tables were set out, each moderated by a casually dressed civil servant. The atmosphere was relaxed and informal, even if none of us attending felt at all relaxed about policies which could have a devastating impact on those at the sharp end. 'People will starve because of this," one disability benefits campaigner told the Manchester Evening News. This was a point we tried to make, albeit in a more nuanced way. The government has actually eschewed any consultations on changes to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which will make it much harder for those in need of support with daily living to claim. However, whoever organised these sessions was smart enough to realise that this was going to come up and that trying to shut down conversation on it would go down like a wheelchair with slashed tyres. We were thus allowed to make the point that if you cut support from people who can barely look after themselves at home, you're going to struggle to get them into work. The stated aim, even if the real motivation is to cut costs. Another reform will see employment linked disability benefits - PIP does not depend on one's job status and is not means tested - reduced and made harder to claim. We were asked how long the new contribution linked jobless benefit should last and we made the point that it takes disabled people a lot longer than non disabled people to find work. What about mandatory interviews with job coaches and suchlike? I told our moderator that Scope, the charity, says there are a million disabled people who desperately want to work but can't find it. Rather than forcing people who are probably too sick and/or disabled down to job centres - people whom employers don't want - shouldn't the DWP be focussing its resources on helping these people? Those who are desperate for opportunities, keen as mustard but who may send out hundreds of applications without so much as a single interview? I was throughly impressed with the people we were sat with. A range of disabilities were represented, but common to all was that they were knowledgeable and engaged. I couldn't help thinking that the government might get better results if these people were hired to work in policy. But, of course, the DWP has trouble with employing disabled people. According to an analysis by the Big Issue earlier this year, it lost more employment tribunals for disability discrimination over the last five years than any other employer. As well as criticising, we tried to offer up ideas. Our civil servant dutifully nodded along. They seemed keen to make us feel listened to, even if, by the end, they probably felt punch drunk. Time and again we were told how important our views were. Yet I was still left wondering whether what we said will end up getting dropped into an AI to be distilled before being left at the bottom of a junior minister's red box. And were we just patsies, there so the government could claim it has listened when decisions have already been made? That is my fear. chancellor Rachel Reeves in her flailing quest to balance the nation's books. It speaks volumes that we were given the number of the Samaritans on a handout. 'We understand that this can be distressing,' it said of the proposals. Well, yes. Perhaps think about why that might be?
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Benefits cheat mum who lied about MS battle to swindle £22k exposed by OWN running posts on Facebook
CAUGHT OUT Fraudster must now pay back cash or faces jail A BENEFITS cheat mum who lied about her MS fight to swindle more than £20,000 was caught out by her own running posts on Facebook. Sara Morris, 50, was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis in 2005 but exaggerated the extent of her condition in 2020. 3 3 The mum-of-three said she was unable to stand at her cooker or get out of a bath unassisted in order to claim Personal Independence Payment (PIP). Morris also claimed she was so anxious to leave the house that even a trip to the pharmacy would leave her in tears. She raked in £2,292.63 in PIP a month - totalling £20,528.83 in a three-year period. But Morris failed to mention to the DWP that she was a member of the Stone Master Marathoners and regularly ran 5km and 10km races. Her web of lies was exposed by her own Facebook posts that showed her competing in difficult races, Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard. A probe was launched and investigators found Morris had taken part in 73 races between May 2019 and December 2022. She previously was jailed for eight months after pleading guilty to dishonestly making a false statement to obtain a benefit. Morris now been ordered to pay back £22,386.02 within 28 days or serve nine months in prison in default. The court heard investigators carried out surveillance on Morris from February 5 to February 20, 2023. Prosecutor Regan Walters said: "On February 5 she took part in a five-mile race and was seen running without assistance and showed no signs of balance problems. "On February 11 she was seen running with the Stone Master Marathoners and showed no signs of discomfort." Morris was interviewed in May 2023 and claimed her MS had worsened and she was suffering from fatigue. But she admitted being a member of Stone Master Marathoners running club prior to making her claim. Paul Cliff, mitigating, said Morris was diagnosed with MS 19 years ago and the "severity of its impact ebbs and flows to a degree". He told the court she did not use the money for a lavish lifestyle but instead to "keep her head above water financially" when her marriage broke down. Mr Morris added: "The application did not give the full picture. She did say running was one of the ways she tried to manage her MS. "She has found it difficult to come to terms with her dishonesty." As well as the £22,000 the judge ordered her to pay, Morris must hand over a £187 surcharge. 3
