Perth campaigners raise equality fears over Bell's Sports Centre plans
Bill Powrie, a member of Perth and Kinross Community Sports Network (PKCSN), wrote to local authority boss Thomas Glen about the proposal to turn the North Inch complex into an unheated arena.
The campaign group fear the plan could negatively impact groups most at risk of discrimination, like the elderly, women and disabled sports players.
Speaking about over 50s, Bill said: 'This group needs low impact sports like badminton and table tennis that can be played into your 80s.
'Women in the main do not play football and neither do the many disabled people who used to play wheelchair sports like boccia in Bell's.
'These people will be severely affected if the plans go ahead.'
The campaigners' complaint is not the first time the local authority has been accused of sacrificing sports that cater for the elderly and disabled in recent years.
It was also levelled at the council and Live Active Leisure (LAL) when they made the decision to axe indoor bowls from the city entirely when they moved the gym from Bell's to Dewars Centre.
A team of Perthshire international bowls players with disabilities stated the council were putting their future in the sport at risk while Age Scotland also criticised the move.
That was only 12 months ago, now the council is facing the same criticism again.
The latest census results on the council website states that the Perth and Kinross population is 'evidently aging', with a quarter of residents 65 or over.
Last year, The Courier revealed that LAL failed to carry out any consultation in their Equality and Fairness Impact Assessment (EIFA) regarding the move from Bell's.
In the section of the report set aside for outlining the findings of said consultation, LAL wrote: 'None.'
Under the Equality Act 2010, a public body or organisation is required to eliminate discrimination, advance equality of opportunity, and foster good relations between equality groups.
In their report, LAL was unable to find any positive outcomes for closing Bell's for those with disabilities and the single positive for the elderly was that there were good bus routes to Dewars.
To further his point, Bill told the chief executive that there are already other facilities within Perth that have, or will have, artificial pitches.
He said: 'There are plenty of 3G pitches coming on stream in the near future.
'St Johnstone Football Club, Jeanfield Swifts are building two, Tulloch and when Perth High School is knocked down there will be two more pitches created.
'The usages quoted for football are 20,000 but Bell's used to have 260,000 usages every year.'
The future of Bell's, alongside the much-maligned PH2O Thimblerow project, is set to go before council again next month.
A spokesperson for the local authority said: 'We recognise the value of sport and recreation for people's general wellbeing.
'We have met with the Perth and Kinross Community Sports Network and their proposals will be considered as part of our response to the consultation.
'Our plans for Bell's and the new PH20 facility, will, alongside our school estate, cater for sports such as badminton.
'These plans are also informed by the findings of our Leisure Assets Review, which looked at demand and usage across all our facilities in Perth and Kinross, and the available capital budget.'
The Courier was told that the chief executive, Mr Glen, will reply to Bill 'in due course'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
3 hours ago
- STV News
Trans lawyers take Supreme Court ruling on biological sex to European court
A group of transgender lawyers are taking the UK to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) over the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex. ITV News Reporter Sam Holder has the latest Words by Assistant Producer Robbie Boyd A group of transgender lawyers have officially sent a case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), claiming that the Supreme Court hearing on biological sex earlier this year breached their right to a fair trial, ITV News can reveal. In April, the UK Supreme Court ruled that transgender women are not women under the Equality Act 2010, including those holding gender recognition certificates (GRCs). During the process, the court heard from gender-critical groups such as Sex Matters and the LGB Alliance, but no one with a GRC was consulted. Campaigners argue that this omission amounts to a breach of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to a fair trial, and are now challenging it in the European courts. Filed last week, the application arrives at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg on Monday, where judges have six months to decide whether it will proceed. The group bringing the claim, the Trans Legal Clinic, is spearheaded by transgender and non-binary lawyers Olivia Campbell-Cavendish and Oscar Davies, as well as the UK's first transgender judge, Dr Victoria McCloud. Dr McCloud, who stepped down last year, had applied to intervene in the Supreme Court case brought by For Women Scotland against the Scottish government, claiming that it could significantly affect legal protections for transgender women with GRCs, but her application was rejected. Speaking with ITV News, Olivia Campbell-Cavendish said: 'The impact on trans people is horrendous, but actually this affects all of us. 'We need a society where decisions about us aren't made without us. We need a society that is fair and equitable, and so that's why we are doing what we are doing.' Olivia Campbell-Cavendish / Credit: The announcement follows For Women Scotland's decision to sue the Scottish government, accusing ministers of defying April's Supreme Court ruling on sex by failing to provide single-sex spaces in schools and prisons. A spokesperson from For Women Scotland said: 'As far as we understand it, it is the SC's prerogative whether to accept interventions or not, it obviously carefully considered McCloud's application and made a decision based on the value of its content. 'The court is solely concerned with statutory interpretation and does not hear personal testimony or take evidence, and rarely takes interventions from individuals. We will watch with interest whether McCloud's application is accepted by the ECtHR or even if it comes within the deadline to proceed.' The Scottish government claims it is awaiting the updated guidelines from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which the UK government is using to implement the Supreme Court's April ruling. However, the lack of current detailed guidance has left businesses and public bodies, including the NHS, unclear on how to comply. Minister for Care Stephen Kinnock told ITV News that the Labour government is 'absolutely dedicated to the rule of law', noting that the Supreme Court must abide by international legal frameworks such as the ECHR. 'If there are individuals who believe that something needs to be challenged, then they can bring an appeal; it is their right to do so,' he said. Subscribe free to our weekly newsletter for exclusive and original coverage from ITV News. Direct to your inbox every Friday morning. For Women Scotland's original challenge and the subsequent Supreme Court ruling have already sparked heated debate. Gender-critical campaigners argue the decision protects single-sex spaces and the rights of women and children, while trans rights advocates say it excludes transgender women from legal protections afforded to other women, creating uncertainty and potential discrimination. The ECHR will now consider whether the claim should proceed, a process that could take several months. If the court allows the case to go forward, it will open the first international legal challenge to the UK Supreme Court's definition of a 'woman' under the Equality Act 2010. From Westminster to Washington DC – our political experts are across all the latest key talking points. Listen to the latest episode below… Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
ITV News
4 hours ago
- ITV News
Trans lawyers take Supreme Court ruling on biological sex to European court
A group of transgender lawyers are taking the UK to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) over the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex. ITV News Reporter Sam Holder has the latest Words by Assistant Producer Robbie Boyd A group of transgender lawyers have officially sent a case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), claiming that the Supreme Court hearing on biological sex earlier this year breached their right to a fair trial, ITV News can reveal. In April, the UK Supreme Court ruled that transgender women are not women under the Equality Act 2010, including those holding gender recognition certificates (GRCs). During the process, the court heard from gender-critical groups such as Sex Matters and the LGB Alliance, but no one with a GRC was consulted. Campaigners argue that this omission amounts to a breach of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to a fair trial, and are now challenging it in the European courts. Filed last week, the application arrives at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg on Monday, where judges have six months to decide whether it will proceed. The group bringing the claim, the Trans Legal Clinic, is spearheaded by transgender and non-binary lawyers Olivia Campbell-Cavendish and Oscar Davies, as well as the UK's first transgender judge, Dr Victoria McCloud. Dr McCloud, who stepped down last year, had applied to intervene in the Supreme Court case brought by For Women Scotland against the Scottish government, claiming that it could significantly affect legal protections for transgender women with GRCs, but her application was rejected. Speaking with ITV News, Olivia Campbell-Cavendish said: "The impact on trans people is horrendous, but actually this affects all of us. "We need a society where decisions about us aren't made without us. We need a society that is fair and equitable, and so that's why we are doing what we are doing." The announcement follows For Women Scotland's decision to sue the Scottish government, accusing ministers of defying April's Supreme Court ruling on sex by failing to provide single-sex spaces in schools and prisons. A spokesperson from For Women Scotland said: "As far as we understand it, it is the SC's prerogative whether to accept interventions or not, it obviously carefully considered McCloud's application and made a decision based on the value of its content. "The court is solely concerned with statutory interpretation and does not hear personal testimony or take evidence, and rarely takes interventions from individuals. We will watch with interest whether McCloud's application is accepted by the ECtHR or even if it comes within the deadline to proceed." The Scottish government claims it is awaiting the updated guidelines from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which the UK government is using to implement the Supreme Court's April ruling. However, the lack of current detailed guidance has left businesses and public bodies, including the NHS, unclear on how to comply. Minister for Care Stephen Kinnock told ITV News that the Labour government is 'absolutely dedicated to the rule of law', noting that the Supreme Court must abide by international legal frameworks such as the ECHR. 'If there are individuals who believe that something needs to be challenged, then they can bring an appeal; it is their right to do so,' he said. For Women Scotland's original challenge and the subsequent Supreme Court ruling have already sparked heated debate. Gender-critical campaigners argue the decision protects single-sex spaces and the rights of women and children, while trans rights advocates say it excludes transgender women from legal protections afforded to other women, creating uncertainty and potential discrimination. The ECHR will now consider whether the claim should proceed, a process that could take several months. If the court allows the case to go forward, it will open the first international legal challenge to the UK Supreme Court's definition of a 'woman' under the Equality Act 2010.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
SNP members call for 'accurate' legal advice over Supreme Court ruling
A motion set to be heard at the upcoming party conference in Aberdeen in October, also calls on the Scottish Government to set up a working group to focus on the 'inclusion and protection' of those who have undergone gender reassignment. Sadie Matthews, the SNP's equalities convener, lodged the motion with backing from Out for Independence, the party's LGBT+ wing, and Young Scots for Independence. Members of the Preston, Seton, Gosford and Fa'side branch also backed the motion. The motion comes after the Supreme Court ruled that the definition of a woman under the Equality Act 2010 related to biological sex, not a transgender person with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC). READ MORE: MoD slammed after ministers not told about US troops on Scottish soil A GRC is a document which allows a transgender person to have their acquired gender legally recognised. Following the Supreme Court judgment in April, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issued interim guidance which amounted to a blanket ban on trans people using single-sex services of their acquired gender, such as bathrooms. For Women Scotland, who brought the case against the Scottish Government, are now set to take further legal action against ministers over policies on transgender pupils in schools and transgender prisoners. It comes as the UK's first transgender judge has launched a case against the UK Government over the Supreme Court ruling in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The motion, seen by The National, said that the Supreme Court ruling is being used by organisations and businesses to 'limit access to single sex spaces and services'. (Image: PA) It states: 'Conference acknowledges the legal capacity the UK Supreme Court has, however is concerned around the unprecedented risks posed by the UK Supreme Court rulings such as the reductionist definition of women, which rolls back progress for all women, including transgender, non-binary, intersex people and people with VSCs [Variations in Sex Characteristics]. 'Conference expresses concern that the ruling has allowed for horrific practices such as the now legalised strip-searches of transgender women by male police officers and the medical exclusion of transgender people in certain healthcare practices.' It goes on to call on the Scottish Government to 'seek accurate legal advice regarding how services can continue to include trans people in line with their lived genders within the bounds of the UKSC [Supreme Court] ruling.' READ MORE: Scots comedian to do one-off Fringe show while under house arrest The motion also called for working groups within the Scottish Government to focus on the recognition of intersex people, as well as a group focusing on the protection of those who have undergone gender reassignment. It also called for the party leadership to show a 'firm commitment' to a trans-inclusive conversion practices ban in the next parliamentary term. In May 2025, the Scottish Government announced it would not be pursuing a long-awaited conversion practices ban, as well as plans to criminalise misogyny.
