logo
US to ban foreign officials over 'flagrant censorship' on social media

US to ban foreign officials over 'flagrant censorship' on social media

RNZ News3 days ago

By
Simon Lewis
, Reuters
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says it is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants for social media posts made on US soil.
Photo:
DREW ANGERER / AFP
The US will impose visa bans on foreign nationals it deems to be censoring Americans, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, and he suggested the new policy could target officials regulating US tech companies.
Rubio did not name any specific instances of censorship. But US tech companies and the Trump administration have challenged US allies in Europe, alleging censorship of social media platforms, but restricting officials from visiting the US appeared to be an escalation by Washington.
Rubio said in a statement that a new visa restriction policy would apply to foreign nationals responsible for censorship of protected expression in the US. He said it was unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants for social media posts made on US soil.
"It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States," Rubio said.
Some foreign officials have taken "flagrant censorship actions against US tech companies and US citizens and residents when they have no authority to do so," Rubio said.
US social media companies like Facebook and Instagram parent Meta have said an EU content moderation law, the Digital Services Act, amounts to censorship of their platforms. The Trump-appointed chairman of the US Federal Communications Commission in March warned the EU Digital Services Act excessively restricts freedom of expression.
EU officials have defended the law, which is meant to make the online environment safer and fairer by compelling tech giants to do more to tackle illegal content including hate speech and child sexual abuse material.
In a social media post on Wednesday, Rubio added, "Whether in Latin America, Europe, or elsewhere, the days of passive treatment for those who work to undermine the rights of Americans are over."
Rubio did not name specific countries or individuals that would be targeted. Brazil has clashed
with the platform X, owned by Trump ally Elon Musk, over compliance with orders to take down accounts accused of spreading misinformation. The Trump administration has repeatedly called out European nations for supposed censorship of online content.
Vice President JD Vance denounced content moderation while in Paris in February, calling it "authoritarian censorship".
In April, Rubio shut down a State Department office that had sought to counter foreign disinformation, accusing it of censorship and wasting US taxpayer money.
Announcing that move, he said freedom of expression was vital to US ties with Western European nations, and warned that those who threaten free speech "are attacking one of the pillars of our shared interest, our shared culture, our shared values".
Free speech issues would be raised in diplomacy with the EU and had been raised separately with Britain's prime minister, Rubio added.
- Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MoneyHub Unveils The Fleeced Kiwi Awards: Exposing New Zealand's Worst Financial Rip-Offs
MoneyHub Unveils The Fleeced Kiwi Awards: Exposing New Zealand's Worst Financial Rip-Offs

Scoop

timean hour ago

  • Scoop

MoneyHub Unveils The Fleeced Kiwi Awards: Exposing New Zealand's Worst Financial Rip-Offs

Auckland, NZ – 1 June 2025 – MoneyHub today launches the inaugural Fleeced Kiwi Awards 2025, affectionately dubbed The Fleecys, a bold initiative to expose and shame the most egregious financial rip-offs plaguing New Zealanders. From sneaky surcharges to predatory scams, The Fleecys spotlight practices that drain wallets and betray trust, demanding accountability and reform in a cost-of-living crisis. Since 2018, MoneyHub has saved Kiwis millions by advocating for fairer financial products. Now, The Fleecys turn up the heat, naming and shaming the worst offenders in 2025. 'New Zealanders deserve a financial system that rewards trust, not exploits it,' says Christopher Walsh, MoneyHub's Head of Research. 'The Fleecys are our rallying cry to expose rip-offs—like a $10.50 ATM fee for a $20 withdrawal or $2.3 billion lost to scams on Meta's platforms—and spark a movement for fairness.' The 2025 Fleecys Winners: A Roll Call of Rip-Offs The Fleecys call out six practices that fleece Kiwis with hidden costs, deceptive tactics, and unchecked scams: Debit and Credit Card Surcharges, including PayWave – For slapping 1–3% fees on everyday transactions, turning a $100 restaurant bill into $102.50. 'Paying extra just to tap your card is a rort,' Walsh fumes. 'Shops must show fees upfront, and regulators need to outlaw these wallet-draining tricks.' Extended Warranties – For pushing $200+ add-ons on a $1,000 TV, duplicating free protections under the Consumer Guarantees Act (CGA). 'Retailers scare Kiwis into buying peace of mind they already have,' says Walsh. 'Know your CGA rights and save your money.' Ticketing Fees – For ambushing fans with 8% 'booking' and 'service' fees, inflating a $200 concert ticket to $218+. 'Fans deserve transparent pricing for the events they love,' Walsh insists. 'These fees should be outlawed.' Administration Fee on Road User Charges (RUC) for Electric Vehicles – For charging EV drivers $12.44 to print a sticker, a 16% markup on a $76 eco-friendly commute. 'This fee is a tax on a tax,' Walsh argues. 'NZTA must modernise RUC to stop fleecing green drivers.' Private ATM Fees – For extortionate charges like $10.50 to withdraw $20, a 52.5% markup. Walsh recounts a personal sting: 'Stranded in Kapiti, I paid $10.50 for $30 cash to catch a bus. That's not an error—it's a rip-off. Operators must lower fees to $2–3.' Meta Platforms – For profiting from scam ads on Facebook and Instagram, costing Kiwis $200 million to $2.3 billion annually. 'Meta's inaction is a scandal,' Walsh declares. 'They must verify advertisers like in Australia to protect vulnerable Kiwis from financial ruin.' A Movement for Change Advertisement - scroll to continue reading The Fleecys aren't just about naming names—they're a call to action. MoneyHub invites Kiwis to nominate 2026 candidates, share stories with #FleecedKiwiAwards, and report rip-offs anonymously via their secure form. 'Every nomination fuels our fight for a fairer New Zealand,' says Walsh. 'Together, we can force businesses to prioritise transparency and value.' The awards highlight systemic issues, from redundant warranties to scams devastating pensioners, like a Taranaki retiree who lost $220,000 to a Facebook crypto ad. 'These aren't inconveniences—they're obstacles to financial stability,' Walsh notes. 'In a cost-of-living crisis, every dollar counts. The Fleecys empower Kiwis to fight back with knowledge, like checking CGA protections or reporting scam ads.' Why The Fleecys Matter With living costs squeezing households, The Fleecys expose practices that hit hardest when budgets are tight. 'A dairy charging 40 cents for a debit tap or an 8% fee on a family's concert tickets isn't just annoying—it's a betrayal of fairness,' says Walsh. MoneyHub's research, backed by Commerce Commission guidelines and Netsafe data, ensures The Fleecys target widespread, evidence-based rip-offs. Looking ahead, MoneyHub is developing resources to tackle supermarket pricing, a complex issue warranting deeper scrutiny. 'We're committed to transparency at the checkout and beyond,' Walsh promises. 'The Fleecys are a stand against complacency, driving honest conversations between consumers, businesses, and regulators.' Join the Fight Kiwis can shape the 2026 Fleecys by emailing nominations, posting on social media, or submitting anonymous tips. Monthly reviews will culminate in updates by mid-2026. 'Financial literacy is power,' Walsh concludes. 'By exposing The Fleecys, we're arming New Zealanders to reclaim control and build a financial system that works for everyone.' About MoneyHub: Since 2018, MoneyHub has empowered New Zealanders with guides and tools to save millions through fairer financial products. The Fleeced Kiwi Awards continue this mission, exposing rip-offs and advocating for a transparent, consumer-focused financial landscape.

Elon Musk denies reported drug use
Elon Musk denies reported drug use

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Elon Musk denies reported drug use

The New York Times has reported Elon Musk used so much ketamine that he developed bladder problems. Photo: AFP Elon Musk has denied a report that he used ketamine and other drugs extensively last year on the 2024 campaign trail. The New York Times reported Friday (local time) that the billionaire adviser to US President Donald Trump used so much ketamine, a powerful anaesthetic, that he developed bladder problems. The newspaper said the world's richest person also took ecstasy and mushrooms and travelled with a pill box last year, adding that it was not known whether Musk also took drugs while heading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after Trump took power in January. In a post Saturday (local time) on X, Musk said: "To be clear, I am NOT taking drugs! The New York Times was lying their ass off." He added: "I tried 'prescription' ketamine a few years ago and said so on X, so this not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then." Also, to be clear, I am NOT taking drugs! The New York Times was lying their ass off. I tried *prescription* ketamine a few years ago and said so on , so this not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then. Musk first dodged a question about his drug use at a bizarre farewell appearance Friday with Trump in the Oval Office in which the Tesla and SpaceX boss sported a noticeable black eye as he formally ended his role as Trump's main cost-cutter at DOGE, which fired tens of thousands of civil servants. News of the injury drew substantial attention as it came right after the Times report on his alleged drug use. The daily recalled erratic behaviour such as Musk giving an enthusiastic Nazi-style salute last year. Musk said he got the injury while horsing around with his young son, named X, when he told the child to hit him in the face. "And he did. Turns out even a five-year-old punching you in the face actually is..." he added, before tailing off. Elon Musk gestures to his eye during a news conference with US President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 30 May. 2025. Photo: ALLISON ROBBERT / AFP Later Friday, when a reporter asked Trump if he was aware of Musk's "regular drug use," Trump responded: "I wasn't." "I think Elon is a fantastic guy," he added. Musk has previously admitted to taking ketamine, saying he was prescribed it to treat a "negative frame of mind" and suggesting his use of drugs benefited his work. - AFP Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Google makes case for keeping Chrome browser
Google makes case for keeping Chrome browser

RNZ News

time8 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Google makes case for keeping Chrome browser

By Thomas Urbain , AFP Photo: AFP / Anadolu Agency Google has urged a US judge to reject the notion of making it spin off its Chrome browser to weaken its dominance in online search. Rival attorneys made their final arguments on Friday (local time), before US District Court Judge Amit Mehta, who is considering imposing "remedies", after a landmark decision last year that Google maintained an illegal monopoly in search . US government attorneys have called on Mehta to order Google to divest itself of Chrome browser, contending that artificial intelligence is poised to ramp up the tech giant's dominance as the go-to window into the internet. They also want Google barred from agreements with partners like Apple and Samsung to distribute its search tools, which was the focus of the suit against the Silicon Valley internet giant. Three weeks of testimony ended early in May, with Friday devoted to rival sides parsing points of law and making their arguments before Mehta in a Washington courtroom. John Schmidtlein, an attorney for Google, told Mehta no evidence was presented showing people would have opted for a different search engine without the exclusivity deals in place. Schmidtlein noted that Verizon installed Chrome on smartphones, even though the US telecom titan owned Yahoo! search engine and was not bound by a contract with Google. Of the 100 or so witnesses heard at trial, not one said "if I had more flexibility, I would have installed Bing" search engine from Microsoft, the Google attorney told the judge. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney David Dahlquist countered that Apple, which was paid billions of dollars to make Chrome the default browser on iPhones, "repeatedly asked for more flexibility", but was denied by Google. Google contends that the US has gone way beyond the scope of the suit by recommending a spinoff of Chrome and holding open the option to force a sale of its Android mobile operating system. "Forcing the sale of Chrome or banning default agreements wouldn't foster competition," said Cato Institute senior fellow in technology policy Jennifer Huddleston. "It would hobble innovation, hurt smaller players and leave users with worse products." Google attorney Schmidtlein noted that more than 80 percent of Chrome users are outside the US, meaning divestiture would have global ramifications. "Any divested Chrome would be a shadow of the current Chrome," he contended. "Once we are in that world, I don't see how you can say anybody is better off." The potential of Chrome being weakened or spun off comes as rivals like Microsoft, ChatGPT and Perplexity put generative artificial intelligence (AI) to work, fetching information from the internet in response to user queries. The online search antitrust suit was filed against Google some five years ago, before ChatGPT made its debut, triggering AI fervour. Google is among the tech companies investing heavily to be a leader in AI, and is weaving the technology into search and other online offerings. Testimony at trial included Apple Vice President of Services, Eddy Cue, revealing that Google's search traffic on Apple devices declined in April for the first time in more than two decades. Cue testified that Google was losing ground to AI alternatives like ChatGPT and Perplexity. Mehta pressed rival attorneys regarding the potential for Google to share data as proposed by the DOJ in its recommended remedies. "We're not looking to kneecap Google, but we are looking to make sure someone can compete with Google," DOJ attorney Adam Severt told the judge. Schmidtlein contended that data Google is being asked to share contains more than just information about people's online searches, saying it would be tantamount to handing over the fruit of investments made over the course of decades. "There are countless algorithms that Google engineers have invented that have nothing to do with click and query data," Schmidtlein said. "Their remedy said we want to be on par with all of your ingenuity and, respectfully your honour, that is not proportional to the conduct of this case." - AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store