logo
Fears Donald Trump could be assassinated when he visits Scots golf courses being probed by security chiefs

Fears Donald Trump could be assassinated when he visits Scots golf courses being probed by security chiefs

Scottish Sun9 hours ago
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
FEARS Donald Trump could be assassinated when he comes to Scotland this week are being assessed by police and security services, a top cop representative has revealed.
David Threadgold, general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, said there 'is a huge amount of threat assessment and intelligence gathering' taking place ahead of the US President's visit.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt last year
3
Scottish Police Federation general secretary, David Threadgold
3
Donald Trump playing golf at his Trump Turnberry course in South Ayrshire in 2023
Mr Trump will visit both of his golf courses in Scotland at Turnberry in Ayrshire and Menie in Aberdeenshire between July 25 and 29.
He will meet with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Scottish First Minister John Swinney during the visit.
Mr Trump survived an assassination attempt at a rally in Pennsylvania last year when a bullet narrowly missed his head and grazed his right ear.
Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, fired eight rounds from a semi-automatic rifle, killing a member of the audience and injuring two others.
He was shot dead by a US secret service sniper.
Mr Threadgold told the BBC: 'There will be assessments of the terrorist risk and even the assassination threat. We will look at cyber threats and the planned protest activity.
'There will be a huge amount of coordination between Police Scotland, the UK Government, MI5, the US Secret Service, the Ministry of Defence, even, to pull together all of the intelligence that exists to try to provide a safe event for those that have an opinion politically and those who want to see the president going past.'
Mr Threadgold confirmed Police Scotland is stretched enough as it is without having to deal with Trump.
He said: 'We are facing increasing demand for our services against a backdrop of reducing police officers.
'As we try to deliver operational and business as usual policing, whilst we have an ongoing operation involving the planning and the logistical challenges and the deliver of this particular operation, plus others that are planned for Scotland during this period, whilst delivering business-as-usual policing for communities across Scotland it is shaping up to be a busy few weeks for myself and my colleagues.
Putin defies Trump's ultimatum and BOMBARDS Ukraine – as Kremlin mouthpiece warns Russia will 'turn Kyiv into Hiroshima'
'We are right in the midst of the school holidays with a peak abstraction rate of officers unavailable because they are on leave.
'This means shifts will be extended, days off will be cancelled, there should be little impact on leave that has already been granted.
'The logistical challenges of moving people from Scotland to the hubs, as well as the movement of equipment, food and the wellbeing support that my colleagues will need, not only during the visit of the president but post operation, will be huge challenges for the service."
He confirmed Police Scotland 'is strictly impartial' on political matters and urged demonstrators 'to act within the confines of the law'.
He said: 'Whether you accept Donald Trump as president or not, and whether you agree with these views, whether you consider him the most polarising man on earth, he is still the president and we have a duty to provide a safe environment for him and anyone who might protest.'
Ahead of his visit to the Scotland, Mr Trump described Britain as a 'great place' which is a 'true ally' of the US.
He urged the UK Government get behind the oil industry and 'get rid of the windmills'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin is living on borrowed time – and this is when the clock stops ticking
Putin is living on borrowed time – and this is when the clock stops ticking

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

Putin is living on borrowed time – and this is when the clock stops ticking

Vladimir Putin is living on borrowed time – at least if Donald Trump keeps his word and follows through on the threat he made last week to crash Russia 's economy if there is no ceasefire within 50 days. Over the last three years, 18 announcements of European Union sanctions have failed to make much of an economic dent in the Kremlin's war machine. That is because, despite its rhetoric around support for Ukraine, Europe still keeps the money flooding into Moscow. Russia is still its third-largest supplier of liquefied natural gas (LNG), and it increased its imports from Russia by 25 per cent in 2024. If Trump went ahead and imposed his threatened secondary sanctions on countries importing Russian oil, gas and uranium – a customer list headed by China, India, and the EU itself – then Putin would quickly find himself running out of money. Yet somehow, the Russian leader does not seem to be quaking in his boots. If anything, he seems to be upping the ante. Despite Trump's threats to impose sanctions that could cripple the Russian economy, Volodymyr Zelensky said on Monday morning that more than 420 drones and at least 20 missiles, including ballistic missiles, had been fired at cities and communities across Ukraine in waves of intense overnight attacks. While the UK defence secretary John Healey has used a meeting of the European Ukraine Defence Contact Group (UDCG) to back Trump's proposal and pledge that the UK will 'play our full part in its success to bolster Ukraine's immediate fight', Putin clearly does not take Trump's threat remotely seriously. Indeed, Russia's president hasn't deigned to comment on Trump's latest threats at all – and nor has Russia's state-controlled media given Trump's threat any serious airtime. The capital markets also barely twitched after the US president threatened to unleash a global trade war directed at Russia. Trump's sweeping new sanctions would, in theory, deprive the world of the 5 million barrels of oil a day that Russia exports – yet the price of crude did not move an inch. There are three sound reasons why Putin believes that Trump's words are hollow and feels he can confidently call his bluff. One is that Trump has barely implemented any of the punitive tariffs that he has threatened against most of the world over the last six months. An executive order Trump signed in March imposing 25 per cent tariffs on countries importing Venezuelan oil, for instance, has yet to be implemented. Then there's the question of the economic damage to the US itself if Trump actually followed through. Levelling 100 per cent tariffs against China, India, Turkey, Belgium, Spain and other major importers of Russian oil would quickly bring the world economy to a juddering halt. It would also wreck Washington's relationship with Delhi and force India and China into a closer partnership. Cutting off Europe from Russian oil and gas would trigger immediate economic chaos. Finally, actually imposing an effective embargo on Russian oil would take more than 10 per cent of world supply off the markets and precipitate a serious 1973-style price shock that would send energy costs through the roof and pitch the US and Europe into recession. You can see why Putin is hedging that it is inconceivable that Trump would pay that kind of price simply for ending what the American president often describes as 'a war that should never have happened'. Putin may be safe from Trump's secondary sanctions. However, that does not mean that his economy is in good shape. 'The remarkable resurgence the Russian economy has experienced since Putin's invasion of Ukraine is losing momentum,' observes Alexander Kolyandr, a senior fellow at the Centre for European Policy Analysis. 'The party is over.' For the first two years of the war, state spending on the military fuelled a runaway 4.3 per cent GDP growth rate. That's set to fall to a much more modest 1.4 per cent in 2025. For the first time in years, Russia has begun running a fiscal deficit of some 1.5 per cent of GDP. And most seriously of all, global oil prices have fallen a precipitous 35 per cent this year. As a result, Russia's Central Bank is set to print 15 trillion roubles (£142bn) in cash come October – the largest issuance since the hyperinflation of the 1990s, according to internal documents leaked by Ukrainian hackers. By winter, Russia may face a looming inflation shock. Pro-Ukrainian online warriors have gleefully shared videos of Russian holidaymakers sleeping on the floors of airports shut down because of drone threats, and angry passengers complaining that they have missed their onward flight to Venice. Yet interrupted luxury holidays don't really stack up against the near-nightly horrors that ordinary Ukrainians face as Russia steps up the intensity and frequency of its drone attacks. And while Russia's economy may face structural challenges, Russians are still managing to buy more luxury German cars than the Germans are. Car Industry Analysis reports that BMW sold 3,504 of its latest X7 SUVs in Russia in 2024 – compared to 3,323 in Germany. That's despite sanctions, which force importers to go via former Soviet neighbours, bumping the price to Russian consumers from $87,000 (£64,000) to $170,000 (£126,000). Putin, evidently, remains set on pursuing his obsession with subjugating Ukraine, apparently at any cost. This spring, Trump brusquely railroaded Zelensky into dropping most of Kyiv's red lines in pursuit of a ceasefire deal that would effectively have left Putin in undisputed control of the 22 per cent of Ukrainian territory he has already occupied. But Putin rejected that peace deal and still continued to demand regime change in Kyiv, plus a promise that Ukraine would never join Nato and restrictions on the size of the country's army. The polls suggest that the number of ordinary Russians who agree with their leader's dogged obsession is dwindling. According to a study by Levada, Russia's last independent pollster, in June, 64 per cent of respondents favoured peace talks, which is six percentage points up since March. At the same time, the number of people who wanted the war to continue fell to 28 per cent, down from 34 per cent in March. While there has been little to no sign of popular discontent with the regime, there is evidence that infighting among Russia's elites over cash flow and state resources is intensifying. Earlier this month, recently sacked minister of transport Roman Starovoit shot himself, becoming the latest high-ranking Russian to die in suspicious circumstances. A number of prominent individuals, including government officials, military officers and prominent businessmen, have now died in suspicious circumstances since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. For the time being, as long as the oil and gas money continues coming in, Putin faces no serious opposition to his rule. But it's also clear that there is no way that Russia can achieve the military and political subjugation of Ukraine of which Putin dreams. The war has been a colossal strategic mistake for Russia, objectively weakening its geopolitical position and costing hundreds of thousands of lives. Trump's 50-day ticking clock may be a transparent bluff. But it is clear that Washington is losing patience with Putin's stalling, and is ready to tighten the economic screws in small ways – even if the economic nuclear bomb that is secondary sanctions remains a boastful fantasy. This means that Putin's room for manoeuvre is shrinking, and the time he has left to bring the war to an end is running out. Crucially, Trump is willing to permit the Kremlin to keep its territorial winnings, which will in turn allow Putin to claim a kind of victory even as the majority of Ukraine remains independent and free. And it will mean that Trump, for all his flaws, might make good on his promise to end the war, if not in 24 hours, then at least within the first year of his presidency. Putin, meanwhile, must decide how much more blood is to be shed before he cuts his losses.

Stephen Colbert declares himself a 'martyr' and warns the 'gloves are off' in searing response to Trump
Stephen Colbert declares himself a 'martyr' and warns the 'gloves are off' in searing response to Trump

Daily Mail​

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Stephen Colbert declares himself a 'martyr' and warns the 'gloves are off' in searing response to Trump

Stephen Colbert jokingly referred to himself as a 'martyr' before delivering a crude, star-studded response to his cancellation and Donald Trump taking glee in his talk show's end. The comedian's decade-long run as the host of The Late Show will end next May, with many speculating that the top-rated show was canceled because it was losing tens of millions of dollars. Others - including long-time comedy partner Jon Stewart on his Daily Show Monday - suggested Paramount - who owns both CBS and Comedy Central - were doing it to appease Trump, who is often on the end of Colbert's quips. Colbert, who briefly addressed the move Friday, devoted much of his show to the controversy, eventually bringing on almost every other late-night talk show host, Adam Sandler and even Lin-Manuel Miranda. The 61-year-old comic opened by saying ' cancel culture has gone too far' and then joked that now that the show is ending, he can say whatever he feels. Colbert said sarcastically of Paramount: 'They made one mistake, they left me alive! For the next ten months, the gloves are off!' The Late Show host referenced Trump's post to Truth Social over the weekend, when the president wrote he 'absolutely love[s] that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings.' The comic immediately then turned to an 'Eloquence Cam' and said: 'Go f*** yourself.' The comic turned to an 'Eloquence Cam' and said 'Go f*** yourself' to Trump in response to the president's glee in his cancellation He then referenced Trump stating in the same post: 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next.' Colbert replied: 'Nope, no, no. Absolutely not. Kimmel, I am the martyr. There's only room for one on this cross. And the view is fantastic from up here. I can see your house!' He also said that cancellation he could finally admit what he felt about the president. In contrast to his often hysterical anti-Trump monologues, he dryly, quietly said: 'I don't care for him. Doesn't seem to have the skill set to be president. Just not a good fit, that's all.' He addressed his bosses at CBS - who he said 'have always been great partners' - before talking about Paramount's decision to cancel the show which he took over from David Letterman in 2015. 'How could it be a purely financial decision if The Late Show's is number onein ratings? A lot of folks are asking that question, mainly my staff's parents and spouses.' Colbert's axing came just days after he sniped at CBS bosses for settling with Trump, branding the deal a 'big fat bribe.' He referenced a story from The New York Post saying the show lost $40-$50million last year, though some have suggested its as high as $100million. 'I could see us losing $24 million but where would Paramount have possibly spent the other $16 million, oh...' he quipped, referencing the amount the company settled with Trump for over his 60 Minutes lawsuit. He went back to bashing Trump and the recent news accusing him of writing a letter to Jeffrey Epstein for his birthday. 'I'll have more to say about all this after the commercial break. The only other story is a small one... the president is buddies with a pedophile.' In the show's second segment, Colbert pulled out every name from his celebrity address book. He brought out Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda and long-time parody songwriter 'Weird Al' Yankovic. The show then parodied the recent Coldplay kiss cam scandal as the pair performed a take on the band's hit 'Viva la Vida' with Yankovic's trademark accordion in tow. He then cut to various famous people in pairs on the 'kiss cam,' including CNN anchor Anderson Cooper and Bravo stalwart Andy Cohen, who pretended to make out. Adam Sandler and Happy Gilmore co-star Christopher McDonald, Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers and John Oliver and Jon Stewart also appeared. Puck journalist Matthew Belloni revealed Colbert's astonishing lack of profitability Friday, hours after CNN first broke the news that the show was canceled because it was in the red. Belloni outlined how The Late Show - whose cancelation was announced Thursday - costs $100m a year to produce, with Colbert, 61, getting paid between $15 million and $20 million a year to host. Colbert beats ABC and NBC rivals Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon in the ratings, but that still wasn't enough to save him. Late night shows have slumped in profitability in recent years as viewers shun the format in favor of streaming services or watching content on their phones. Advertiser revenue has slumped sharply even in the last three years, Puck reported, making it harder to pull Colbert's show out of the red. Colbert was reported to be 'not angry, actually' about his cancelation and was chatting with his staff in a 'matter-of-fact' way before Thursday's show, Puck reported. Colbert, who will broadcast his final show in May 2026, was first informed his show was on the chopping block around July 4, it is claimed. Paramount Co-CEO George Cheeks made the decision, Puck reported. He the went on vacation, giving bosses at CBS time to plot behind his back, CNN reported. Colbert had news of his cancelation confirmed Thursday. He moved to share it as quickly as possible so that his staff would not learn of their impending unemployment via leaks to the press. All three major late night hosts - Colbert, Kimmel and Fallon - have become notorious for their regular rants about President Trump, which many viewers have complained are boring and off-putting. But Belloni said he didn't believe the famously anti-MAGA Colbert was axed to appease Donald Trump, who recently won a $15 million payout from CBS after suing them over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris he said was deceptively edited. The axing of Colbert has delighted Trump, who posted about it on his TruthSocial network earlier today. Colbert's ouster could also make it easier for CBS parent company Paramount's efforts to merge with media company Skydance in a deal that must be approved by Trump's Federal Communications Commission. The Late Show launched in 1993 under David Letterman to compete with longtime late night juggernaut The Tonight Show. Colbert took over from Letterman in 2015 after his retirement. More than three decades later, CBS's entry into the late night sphere sits at the top, with second-best Jimmy Kimmel Live! raking in an average of 1.772 million viewers. Colbert, by comparison, collects an average of 2.417 million. Colbert - who once played a conservative character on Comedy Central's satirical late night program The Colbert Report - often aired jokes at the conservative's expense. Trump celebrated the news of the show's cancellation as a result. 'I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings,' he wrote in a Friday Truth Social post. 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert,' he added, before talking up right-wing Fox New star Greg Gutfeld. '[He's] better than all of them combined, including the Moron on NBC who ruined the once great Tonight Show,' Trump added, referring to Jimmy Fallon.

Trump threatens to hold up stadium deal over Washington name change
Trump threatens to hold up stadium deal over Washington name change

Glasgow Times

time39 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Trump threatens to hold up stadium deal over Washington name change

Mr Trump also said that he wants Cleveland's baseball team to revert to its former name, the Indians, saying there was a 'big clamouring for this' as well. The Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians have had their current names since the 2022 seasons and both have said they have no plans to change them back. Mr Trump said the Washington football team would be 'much more valuable' if it restored its old name. The Cleveland Guardians sign above the scoreboard at Progressive Field (Ron Schwane/AP) 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original Washington Redskins, and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, Washington Commanders, I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington,' Mr Trump said on his social media site. His latest interest in changing the name reflects his broader effort to roll back changes that followed a national debate on cultural sensitivity and racial justice. The team announced it would drop the Redskins name and the Indian head logo in 2020 during a broader reckoning with systemic racism and police brutality. The Commanders and the District of Columbia government announced a deal earlier this year to build a new home for the football team at the site the old RFK Stadium, the place the franchise called home for more than three decades. Mr Trump's ability to hold up the deal remains to be seen. President Joe Biden signed a bill in January that transferred the land from the federal government to the District of Columbia. The provision was part of a short-term spending bill passed by Congress in December. While DC residents elect a mayor, a city council and commissioners to run day-to-day operations, Congress maintains control of the city's budget. US president Donald Trump (PA) Josh Harris, whose group bought the Commanders from former owner Dan Snyder in 2023, said earlier this year the name was here to stay. Not long after taking over, Mr Harris quieted speculation about going back to Redskins, saying that would not happen. The team did not immediately respond to a request for comment following Trump's statement. The Washington team started in Boston as the Redskins in 1933 before moving to the nation's capital four years later. The Cleveland Guardians' president of baseball operations, Chris Antonetti, indicated before Sunday's game against the Athletics that there were not any plans to revisit the name change. 'We understand there are different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago, but obviously it's a decision we made. We've got the opportunity to build a brand as the Guardians over the last four years and are excited about the future that's in front of us,' he said. Cleveland announced in December 2020 it would drop Indians. It announced the switch to Guardians in July 2021. In 2018, the team phased out 'Chief Wahoo' as its primary logo. The name changes had their share of supporters and critics as part of the national discussions about logos and names considered racist. Mr Trump posted on Sunday afternoon that 'The Owner of the Cleveland Baseball Team, Matt Dolan, who is very political, has lost three Elections in a row because of that ridiculous name change. What he doesn't understand is that if he changed the name back to the Cleveland Indians, he might actually win an Election. Indians are being treated very unfairly. MAKE INDIANS GREAT AGAIN (MIGA)!' Matt Dolan, the son of the late Larry Dolan, no longer has a role with the Guardians. He ran the team's charity endeavours until 2016. Matt Dolan was a candidate in the Ohio US Senate elections in 2022 and 2024, but lost.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store