Google Messages adds sensitive content warning feature to protect users from nudity
How sensitive content warnings feature works
Automatic Detection & Blurring: Images flagged as containing nudity are blurred before being displayed.
On-Device Privacy: All image classification happens locally using Android's SafetyCore system—no data is sent to Google servers.
User Controls: When receiving such images, users can:
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Top 15 Prettiest Icons In The History
The Noodle Box
Tap to learn why nude images may be harmful
Block the sender
Choose to view or ignore the image
In case a user tries to send or forward a flagged image,
Google Messages
will prompt a warning about potential risks. Users must also confirm their intention before the image is being sent, adding a layer of protection against accidental sharing.
Parents can also manage the feature for children via the Family Link app, ensuring that young users are shielded from inappropriate content.
User Type
Default Setting
Can Be Changed?
Managed Through
Adults (18+)
Off
Yes
Messages Settings
Unsupervised Teens (13–17)
On
Yes
Google Account Settings
Supervised Accounts (Children)
On
No
Family Link App2
This rollout is part of Google's broader push to create a safer digital messaging environment. By combining AI-powered detection with user autonomy and strict privacy safeguards, Google Messages is setting a new standard for responsible communication tools.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
20 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Australian regulator sues Google over anti-competitive Search deals
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) said Google Asia Pacific reached "understandings" with Telstra and Optus between December 2019 and March 2021 to pre-install only Google Search on Android phones they sold. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Alphabet's Google was taken to court by Australia's regulator on Monday over the company's "anti-competitive" Google Search deals with telecom operators Telstra and Singapore Telecommunications-owned Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) said Google Asia Pacific reached "understandings" with Telstra and Optus between December 2019 and March 2021 to pre-install only Google Search on Android phones they sold."In return, Telstra and Optus received a share of the revenue Google generated from ads displayed to consumers when they used Google Search on their Android phones," the ACCC said in a has cooperated with the regulator, admitted liability and agreed to jointly submit to the Federal Court that it should pay a total penalty of A$55 million ($35.8 million), the ACCC regulator has accepted an undertaking from Google Asia Pacific and its parent company, Google LLC, committing to removing certain pre-installations and default search engine restrictions from contracts with Android phone makers and telcos."Today's outcome... created the potential for millions of Australians to have greater search choice in the future, and for competing search providers to gain meaningful exposure to Australian consumers," ACCC Chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb said in a Telstra and Optus did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Australian regulator sues Google over anti-competitive Search deals
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Alphabet's Google was taken to court by Australia's regulator on Monday over the company's "anti-competitive" Google Search deals with telecom operators Telstra and Singapore Telecommunications-owned Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) said Google Asia Pacific reached "understandings" with Telstra and Optus between December 2019 and March 2021 to pre-install only Google Search on Android phones they sold."In return, Telstra and Optus received a share of the revenue Google generated from ads displayed to consumers when they used Google Search on their Android phones," the ACCC said in a has cooperated with the regulator, admitted liability and agreed to jointly submit to the Federal Court that it should pay a total penalty of A$55 million ($35.8 million), the ACCC regulator has accepted an undertaking from Google Asia Pacific and its parent company, Google LLC, committing to removing certain pre-installations and default search engine restrictions from contracts with Android phone makers and telcos."Today's outcome... created the potential for millions of Australians to have greater search choice in the future, and for competing search providers to gain meaningful exposure to Australian consumers," ACCC Chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb said in a Telstra and Optus did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Taxman sets out to draw up a crypto code
MUMBAI: India's apex tax body has asked the cryptocurrency players whether the country needs a new law on virtual digital assets (VDA), which agency should administer such a statute, and whether the present tax regime has driven out traders and businesses to foreign shores. Crypto platforms have been also asked by the Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT ) if the 1% tax-deducted-at-source (TDS) on every sale was too high, what should be the preferred TDS rate and why, and whether traders should be allowed to set off VDA losses to make the levy more equitable. A flurry of such questions, raising several other issues on the travails of the trade, have stoked hopes in the crypto industry which has been battered by stiff taxes, regulatory void, and Reserve Bank of India's customary aversion towards cryptos. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo Not only are crypto gains taxed at the income tax rate of 30% (unlike the lower capital gains tax on stock profits), VDA traders can't offset profits with losses to lower the tax outgo. Many high-street banks are reluctant to offer accounts dedicated to pay or receive funds from crypto trades following central bank senior officials occasionally voicing their reservations on VDAs. Besides, there is no clarity under RBI rules and the Foreign Exchange Management Act ( FEMA ) on whether residents can buy and sell cryptos on offshore platforms. Crypto Tracker TOP COIN SETS Web3 Tracker 2.75% Buy BTC 50 :: ETH 50 2.16% Buy Crypto Blue Chip - 5 1.09% Buy AI Tracker 0.52% Buy DeFi Tracker -0.71% Buy TOP COINS (₹) BNB 74,638 ( 1.46% ) Buy Solana 16,660 ( 0.79% ) Buy Ethereum 389,703 ( 0.75% ) Buy Bitcoin 10,268,224 ( -0.04% ) Buy XRP 270 ( -0.59% ) Buy A combination of such factors has caused many large crypto investors to shift their trades-and in some cases even relocate-to Dubai which plans to position itself as the world's crypto capital. Did you Know? The world of cryptocurrencies is very dynamic. Prices can go up or down in a matter of seconds. Thus, having reliable answers to such questions is crucial for investors. View Details » Chances are India too may change tack, thanks to the crypto adaptation by advanced markets and the digital coins emerging as an asset class and underliers of US mutual funds. Live Events According to Purushottam Anand, advocate and founder of Crypto Legal, a blockchain and crypto-focused law firm, "Considering the G20 Synthesis Paper, Finance Track Communique, and the recent Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance announcement selecting VDAs for a detailed examination this year, it is likely that the government will introduce a comprehensive VDA regulation. India has consistently emphasised that regulation or banning can be effective only with significant international collaboration." Since China remains the only major economy to impose a blanket ban, the global consensus today clearly leans towards regulation rather than prohibition, said Anand. SEBI , RBI, MeitY , or FIU-IND? Crypto platforms were asked to share their views by mid-August to the data analytics cell of CBDT. Here are some of the specific questions raised by CBDT: (a) Do you think the current VDA regulation in India is adequate or a comprehensive VDA law is required and the agency which you consider should be authorised to administer it (e.g, Sebi, RBI, MeitY, FIU-IND)? (b) What percentage of trading volumes has moved offshore, and under what circumstances (eg tax concerns, regulation, liquidity)? Which are the jurisdictions where users/businesses are shifting? (c) How would you compare India's VDA tax framework with major jurisdictions? (d) Have you observed any market impact due to the disallowance of loss set-off or carry-forward? In your view, how has the 30% flat tax affected volumes, liquidity etc? (e) What is the biggest challenge in implementing the TDS-identifying counterparty's residency status, calculating the market value of VDA, handling peer-to-peer transactions, or reporting to the income tax department's centralised processing centre? (f) Should there be different TDS treatment for market makers, or retail or institutional transactions? (g) What measures could be considered to ensure a level playing field between domestic and offshore VDA exchanges, particularly in relation to tax compliance for Indian customers? Since two years some exchanges have begun offering derivative products like crypto futures and more recently crypto options where the TDS impact is considerably lower. CDBT in its questionnaire has asked whether there was lack of legal clarity in derivatives, cross-border VDA transactions, and even in the very definition of VDA. Platforms have to also spell out whether they are ready for OECD's crypto-asset reporting framework (CARF)-a global plan to curb tax evasion and money-laundering.
