&w=3840&q=100)
Mamdani's NYC mayoral primary win leaves South Asians, Muslims electrified
The success of Zohran Mamdani in New York City's Democratic primary for mayor is euphoric for Hari Kondabolu, a stand-up comedian who's been friends with the candidate for 15 years.
Mamdani stunned the political establishment when he declared victory in the primary on Tuesday, a ranked choice election in which his strongest competition, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, conceded defeat.
When he launched his campaign, the unabashed democratic socialist ranked near the bottom of the pack. Now, the 33-year-old state assemblyman has a chance to be New York City's first Asian American and Muslim mayor.
Mamdani's family came to the United States when he was 7, and he became a citizen in 2018. He was born to Indian parents in Kampala, Uganda.
For Kondabolu, this moment is not just exciting, but emotional.
I think so many of us have had those experiences in New York of being brown and in a city that has always been really diverse and feels like ours. But after 9/11, like you start to question it like, is this our city too, Kondabolu said.
And 25 years later ... it's surreal, like this is the same city but it's not because we've elected this person.
Mamdani's campaign has piqued the interest of many Indian, Pakistani and other South Asian Americans, as well as Muslims even those who may not agree with Mamdani on every issue. Despite that opposition, some still see his rise as a sign of hope in a city where racism and xenophobia erupted following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
South Asians and Muslims riveted by primary in New York, and beyond Many of New York City's over 300,000 South Asian residents have been inspired by Mamdani's extraordinary trajectory.
My mom was texting her friends to vote for him. I've never seen my mother do that before, Kondabolu said. So the idea that it's gotten our whole family activated in this way this is, like, personal.
Snigdha Sur, founder and CEO of The Juggernaut, an online publication reporting on South Asians, has been fascinated by the response from some people in India and the diaspora.
So many global South Asians ... they're like, 'Oh, this guy is my mayor and I don't live in New York City,' Sur said.
At the same time, some are also concerned or angered by Mamdani's past remarks about Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who he publicly called a war criminal.
In Michigan, Thasin Sardar has been following Mamdani's ascent online. When he first heard him, he struck him as genuine and he felt an instant connection, he said.
As a Muslim American, this victory puts my trust back in the people, said Sardar, who was born and raised in India. I am happy that there are people who value the candidate and his policies more than his personal religious beliefs and didn't vote him down because of the colour of his skin, or the fact that he was an immigrant with an uncommon name.
New York voter Zainab Shabbir said family members in California, and beyond, have also excitedly taken note.
My family in California, they were very much like, 'Oh, it's so nice to see a South Asian Muslim candidate be a mayor of a major city,' she said. A brother told her Mamdani's rise is a great example for his kids, she said.
But the 34-year-old who donated, voted and canvassed for Mamdani said it was his vision for New York City that was the draw for her. She and her husband briefly chatted with Mamdani at a fundraiser and she found him to be very friendly and genuine.
She suspects that for some who aren't very politically active, Mamdani's political ascent could make a difference.
There's a lot of Muslim communities like my parents' generation who are focused a lot more on the politics back home and less on the politics here in America, said Shabbir. Seeing people like Zohran Mamdani be in office, it'll really change that perspective in a lot of people.
Embracing Indian and Muslim roots Supporters and pundits agree that Mamdani's campaign has demonstrated social media savvy and authenticity. He visited multiple mosques. In videos, he speaks in Hindi or gives a touch of Bollywood. Other South Asian American politicians such as Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna praised that.
I love that he didn't run away from his heritage. I mean, he did video clips with Amitabh Bachchan and Hindi movies, Khanna said, referencing the Indian actor. He shows that one can embrace their roots and their heritage and yet succeed in American politics.
But his triumph also reflects the urgency of the economic message, the challenge that people are facing in terms of rent, in terms of the cost of living, and how speaking to that is so powerful, the progressive California Democrat added.
Tanzeela Rahman, a daughter of Muslim immigrants from Bangladesh, said she grew up very low income in New York.
I felt seen by him in a way politicians have not seen me ever, the 29-year-old financial systems analyst said. I think very few people in government understand how hard it is to survive in New York City.
She found Mamdani to be unabashedly Muslim and also a voice, who, literally, to me sounds like a New Yorker who's stepping in and saying, hey, let's reclaim our power, she said.
While Mamdani has been speaking to the working class, he had a somewhat privileged upbringing. His mother is filmmaker Mira Nair and his father, Mahmood Mamdani, is a professor at Columbia University.
He lived in Queens but attended The Bronx High School of Science. Even as a teen, he cared about social justice, Kondabolu, the comedian, recalled.
His campaign messaging on issues such as affordable housing and free bus rides might not resonate with South Asian households in New York City who have income levels above the median. But, the irony is that his campaign and great kind of soundbites earned support from that demographic, too, according to Sur.
It was, I think, a surprise that he did so well among the wealthiest, including his own community, Sur said.
Mamdani's outspoken support for Palestinian causes and criticism of Israel and its military campaign in Gaza resonated with pro-Palestinian residents, including Muslims, but caused tension in the mayor's race. Some of his positions and remarks on the charged issue have drawn recriminations from opponents and some Jewish groups, though he's also been endorsed by some Jewish politicians and activists.
Racism and xenophobia Mamdani's success immediately elicited strong anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant rhetoric from some high-profile conservatives on social media, including conservative media personality Charlie Kirk who posted that legal immigration can ruin your country.
In response, Democratic Congressman Maxwell Frost, the youngest member of Congress, tweeted For years they sold people the lie of we have no problem if you come the right way!' His supporters aren't concerned that racism and Islamophobia will distract from Mamdani's campaign. Those feelings clearly weren't enough for him to lose the primary, Kondabolu said.
There's a new generation that wants their voice heard and that generation came out in full force, not just by voting, but by, like, getting all these other people to be emotionally invested in this candidate, Kondabolu said. That's extraordinary.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade war: 'Not planning to extend tariff pause after July 9', says Donald Trump; India's trade team extends US stay
US President has said he does not plan to extend the 90-day pause on additional global tariffs beyond July 9, even as India's trade delegation extended its stay in Washington in a final push to iron out differences before the deadline. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The in-person negotiations between Indian and US officials, initially scheduled to run through June 27, were extended by a day, raising hopes of an interim trade agreement, Bloomberg reported, quoting officials. India is seeking full exemption from the additional 26 per cent reciprocal tariff announced by the US on April 2. While the tariff was suspended for 90 days, the 10 per cent baseline tariff imposed by Washington remains in place. Meanwhile Trump, in an interview with Fox News said he does not plan to extend the pause. "I don't think I'll need to," he said. "I could, no big deal." Letters notifying countries of the upcoming tariffs will begin going out "pretty soon," he said. "We'll look at how a country treats us — are they good, are they not so good — some countries we don't care, we'll just send a high number out," Trump told Fox News. Those letters, he said, would state: "Congratulations, we're allowing you to shop in the United States of America, you're going to pay a 25 per cent tariff, or a 35 per cent or a 50 per cent or 10 per cent." The high tariffs, first announced on April 2, are set to be enforced unless individual countries reach trade agreements with the US. "There's 200 countries, you can't talk to all of them," Trump said. The Trump administration had set a goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days Meanwhile, the Indian side continues to resist key US demands, including Washington's push to open India's agricultural market to genetically modified crops — an ask New Delhi has rejected, citing risks to farmers. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now India is also unwilling to sign a deal that doesn't address both sectoral access and reciprocal tariffs on its exports, Bloomberg earlier reported. Despite the challenges, Trump said last week that "a very big" deal with India was likely soon. Why deal matters For India, the goal is to protect sensitive sectors while gaining entry into the US market, the largest for global consumers. For the United States, the focus is on narrowing trade deficits, increasing its exports, and strengthening ties with a strategic partner as trade frictions with China continue. What are USA's demands The United States is urging India to open up sectors such as agriculture, dairy, and energy, and to reduce tariffs on products like soy, wheat, corn, ethanol, and apples, many of which are significant US exports to China. Washington is also seeking market access for genetically modified (GM) crops in India. India, however, is resisting these demands, particularly in agriculture and dairy, citing the importance of safeguarding farmers and maintaining the Minimum Support Price (MSP) mechanism. Negotiations have at times been marked by tension, as TOI reported earlier. What India wants At the beginning of the negotiations, the Indian government aimed to secure zero-duty access for several key export items, including textiles, leather products, pharmaceuticals, certain engineering goods, and auto parts. As TOI reported earlier that while American negotiators have shown interest in concluding the deal, they have conveyed to their Indian counterparts that the Trump administration is not in a position to offer zero tariffs immediately. Separately, India has also sought protection from any future tariff measures once an agreement is reached. Moreover, agriculture and dairy sectors are difficult and challenging areas for India to give duty concessions to the US. India has not opened up dairy in any of its free trade pacts signed so far.

Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian Embassy clarifies Navy officer's remark on IAF ‘losses' during Operation Sindoor: ‘Misrepresented'
The Indian Embassy in Indonesia issued a clarification on Sunday, addressing reports concerning comments made by its Defence Attaché, Navy Captain Shiv Kumar, regarding Indian Air Force losses during Operation Sindoor. The embassy stated that the captain's remarks had been taken out of context and misrepresented by the media. In a statement posted on X, the embassy emphasised that the presentation delivered by Captain Kumar at a recent seminar was misunderstood. 'We have seen media reports regarding a presentation made by the Defence Attaché at a seminar. His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker,' the embassy said. The statement further clarified that the presentation highlighted the principle that the Indian Armed Forces operate under civilian political leadership, unlike some other countries in the region. It also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure, and that India's response was deliberately non-escalatory. During a presentation on 10 June, India's Defence Attaché to Indonesia, Captain Shiv Kumar of the Indian Navy, disclosed that the Indian Air Force (IAF) lost 'some aircraft' during Operation Sindoor, the May 7 strikes targeting terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). He claimed that these losses occurred because the political leadership had instructed the armed forces not to target Pakistani military infrastructure or air defences in the initial strike. 'Only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defences,' Captain Kumar said, clarifying why the IAF suffered fighter jet losses. He further stated that following these losses, the Indian armed forces adjusted their tactics. 'We went for the military installations... we first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then... all our attacks could easily go through using BrahMos missiles,' he added. The Defence Attaché's candid remarks sparked criticism from the opposition Congress party, which accused the BJP-led government of misleading the nation. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh questioned, 'Why is the PM refusing to preside over an all-party meeting and take the Opposition into confidence? Why has the demand for a special session of Parliament been rejected?' Senior Congress leader Pawan Khera also took to X, calling the defence attaché's comments a 'direct indictment.' He asserted, 'They know they've compromised national security, and they're terrified of what the Congress Party will expose before the people of India.' Captain Kumar's statements came during a seminar titled 'Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power'.


Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The crisis before the crisis — how a failing economy was one of the triggers for the Emergency
While a swelling Opposition campaign and an Allahabad High Court order setting aside Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's election to the Lok Sabha in 1971 were the immediate trigger for the imposition of Emergency, trouble had been brewing for the better part of a decade in the non-political sphere. After a strong 1963-64 and 1964-65, over which GDP growth averaged 6.7%, the Indian economy was hit by a phenomenon not seen in 75 years of official data — two consecutive years of decline in overall economic activity. In 1965-66, India's GDP shrunk by 2.6%. This was followed by a 0.1% decline in 1966-67. It was because of another rare occurrence — consecutive droughts. According to a 2005 India Meteorological Department paper, the previous 130 years had only seen one such other case, in 1904 and 1905. Inflation, as a result, shot up to nearly 16% in 1966-67. The twin droughts came at a time when India was already a huge importer of foodgrain. With grain output crushed by a fifth, India leaned heavily on the US's PL-480 scheme for grain – under which the US distributed foreign food aid – and was soon the programme's biggest beneficiary. Not helping matters was the tension with Pakistan, with the Budget for 1965-66 estimating that of the total revenue expenditure of Rs 2,116 crore, Rs 749 crore or roughly 35% would be spent on defence services. 'With two wars (1962 and 1965), a series of poor harvests including two droughts, and an unstable external environment, the 1960s were years of severe strain for the Indian economy,' as per the second volume of the History of The Reserve Bank of India (RBI). India also required significant financial assistance from Western countries and the World Bank. As its current account deficit rose to 3.7% of GDP in 1966-67 and foreign exchange reserves declined, there were concerns about how India would meet its external debt repayments. In June 1966 — just a few months after taking over as PM – Mrs Gandhi had already approved the devaluation of the rupee by 36.5%, to Rs 7.50 per dollar from Rs 4.76 per dollar. In the 10 years starting 1965-66, the economy averaged just 2.6% growth. The share of the biggest employer, agriculture, in India's GDP fell to 31.5% in 1966-67 from over 40% a decade ago. Come 1974-75, agriculture's share had changed little, being about 31.1%, while the share of manufacturing had edged up by 60 basis points to 13.8%. To say that Mrs Gandhi inherited a flailing economy in January 1966 would be an understatement. But the years that followed were not easy either, with her government's first challenge being the peasant movement in Naxalbari, which hit its peak in May 1967. While growth somewhat recovered in the late 1960s and averaged 5.7% in the four years ending 1970-71, by then Mrs Gandhi, having survived a split in the Congress, had nationalised banks, abolished privy purses and privileges and hiked income tax rates to above 90%. Her government had also approved a licence for her son Sanjay Gandhi to manufacture an 'Indian Volkswagen'. Amid all the tumult, Indira announced that the next general elections would be held a year early, in 1971. 'The millions who demand food, shelter, and jobs are pressing for action. Power in a democracy resides with the people. That is why we have decided to go to our people and seek a fresh mandate from them,' she said in December 1970 in a broadcast to the nation. As the Opposition came up with the slogan 'Indira Hatao', she countered with 'Garibi Hatao (remove poverty)'. While this worked, the tide was already turning before an old foe struck again – India saw another drought in 1972. 'As famine loomed in rural India, Indira's slogan 'Garibi Hatao'…came back to haunt her. She told her growing chorus of critics that poverty could not be eradicated overnight. They said she was not removing poverty; she was removing the poor,' American biographer Katherine Frank wrote in her 2001 book Indira: The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi. The domestic unrest was fuelled further by the 1973 oil crisis, which pushed up wholesale inflation to more than 20%. The government responded by cutting expenditure and enforcing mandatory savings on salaries. Corruption was rife, factories shut down, and strikes became regular. Pressure further increased against the Indira Gandhi government with the successful Navnirman Andolan in Gujarat and a 1974 Railway strike led by George Fernandes, then president of the All India Railwaymen's Federation. The rail strike was cited by Mrs Gandhi as an attempt by the Opposition to paralyse the country for political gains. It was crushed with wide-scale firings and evictions from staff quarters, among other measures. However, the end was nigh. June 12, 1975, was a particularly difficult day for Indira. First, her confidant and then Ambassador to the Soviet Union, D P Dhar, died in hospital. Then came the results of the Gujarat Assembly elections, with a united Opposition under the Janata Morcha defeating the Congress. Finally, in the afternoon, came the Allahabad High Court order. Less than two weeks later, the Emergency was declared.