Kelly Osbourne Is Engaged! Sid Wilson Proposes to the Star During Her Dad Ozzy Osbourne's Final Black Sabbath Show
The Slipknot rocker, 48, proposed to the former Fashion Police host, 40, during her dad Ozzy Osbourne's final concert with Black Sabbath at England's Villa Park on Saturday, July 5.
In a video of the moment shared on Instagram, Wilson can be seen grabbing his future bride's attention, telling her, "Kelly, you know I love you more than anything in the world," before Ozzy, 76, interjects, "F--- off, you're not marrying my daughter."
Laughing off the rocker's comment, Wilson continued, telling Kelly, 'Nothing would make me happier than to spend the rest of my life with you. So, in front of your family and all of our friends, Kelly, will you marry me?'
Looking around in shock, Kelly then nodded her head yes, before embracing Wilson in a long hug, as friends and family — including mom Sharon Osbourne and brother Jack Osbourne — cheered them on.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Kelly and Wilson first met and struck up a friendship in 1999, when Wilson's band was touring with Ozzfest, the music festival founded by her parents.
They officially began dating in January 2022. A source told PEOPLE at the time that they were "very happy together."
Kelly later reflected on their long history in an Instagram post celebrating their first Valentine's Day as a couple. "After 23 years of friendship I can't believe where we have ended up!" she wrote at the time, sharing a photo of the pair kissing. "You are my best friend, my soulmate and I am so deeply in love with you Sidney George Wilson."
Wilson also shared the love, reposting the photo on his own Instagram page with the message, "There is not enough colours to display the palette of Love I have for you in my Heart 💜 Happy Valentines Day my Love XoXo."
In May of that same year, the duo shared the big news that they had a baby on the way. Kelly made her pregnancy reveal by posting a photo of herself holding an ultrasound image.
"I know that I have been very quiet these past few months so I thought I would share with you all as to why… I am over the moon to announce that I am going to be a Mumma," she wrote on Instagram at the time. "To say that I am happy does not quite cut it. I am ecstatic! 🤰💜."
Their son made his arrival at the end of 2022, and while Kelly had hoped to keep his birth a secret for a while, Sharon — a very excited grandmother — spilled the beans during a January 2023 appearance on The Talk.
"[His name is] Sidney. [They're] doing so great. She won't let a picture go out of him," she said at the time.
Later that same day, Kelly posted a message on her Instagram Stories, reiterating her desire for privacy. "I am not ready to share him with the world," she wrote.
During a September 2023 episode of The Osbournes podcast, Kelly opened up about having "fully embraced mom life" and how much she and Wilson adore Sidney.
"He's the best thing that ever happened to me. The best, he's lovely," she said of their son. "I just love being a mom, It is everything to me."
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vogue
an hour ago
- Vogue
The Lavish Wedding of Consuelo Vanderbilt That Inspired The Gilded Age
At the end of The Gilded Age's latest episode, a deal is struck between the Duke of Buckingham and George Russell. The English aristocrat will receive an enormous sum to marry Gladys, the daughter of the railroad titan. In turn, Gladys will achieve a towering social rank. An upset Gladys confronts him about their arranged marriage, which was largely driven by the Duke's need to preserve his massive estate and his lifestyle. 'I hope that when you come to know me better, you'll agree that what I'm trying to preserve is worth preserving,' he says. Gladys accepts her fate, and a wedding is planned. The Gilded Age plotline of Gladys and the Duke echoes the real-life story of Consuelo Vanderbilt and the Duke of Marlborough, where the Duke received $100,000 yearly (around $3.2 million today) as well as $2.5 million in railroad stock (today, that would be around $81 million). In turn, Vanderbilt became the first American woman to hold the title of Duchess in history. Despite all the orchestration, the marriage was a failed one. They did, however, have an insanely lavish wedding. On November 6, 1895, the 18-year-old Consuelo Vanderbilt married Charles, the ninth Duke of Marlborough at St. Thomas's Church on 53rd Street and 5th Avenue in a morning ceremony. To say it was highly anticipated is an understatement: crowds gathered outside the church, as did the press, eager to see the high ranking British aristocrat wed one of the country's wealthiest women. In their dispatch from the nuptials, The New York Times called the inside of a church a 'fairyland.' 'Even those who are used to the most exquisite decorations were enchanted by the magnificent spectacle. The florist and his assistants worked diligently for days,' they added. The reporter then dedicated seven paragraphs alone to just the flowers: 'There was hardly an inch of stonework or an inch of woodwork that was not concealed by delicate and graceful vines or bunches of varicolored blossoms,' he wrote. From the church's dome hung garlands of flowers, lilies, roses, and chrysanthemums, which stretched all the way to the organ alcove, which was covered in climbing vines. Medallions of maple foliage adorned the galleries, whereas pews were accented by floral torches and feathery palms. Meanwhile, the choir stalls were covered in roses, lilies, and alpine violets. The writer also describes an abundance of pink and white cosmos, as well as holly.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oasis represent a self-confidence that is all but extinct in Britain today
Nostalgia, as they say, is a helluva drug. It is also freely available and widely consumed, especially now, as the Oasis concerts refill the air with an irresistible 1990s snarl. Who would begrudge anyone living their high old times at the moment? Certainly not me. There is no point, for instance, in arguing about whether Oasis are as good as they were 'back in the day' (as every hanger-on puts it). The Oasis reunion is selling a vibe that people clearly want to buy, even at ridiculous prices. The vibe is about something direct and uncomplicated, music from a simpler age. Or that is how many view the 1990s. Mass singalongs, blokey swagger, working-class lads on the rampage. Those, apparently, were the days. 'Please don't put your life in the hands/Of a rock'n'roll band/Who'll throw it all away' as the lyrics of Don't Look Back in Anger go. But they didn't throw it all away, did they? They cashed it in. Accompanying this tour are ads for sportswear. But no one minds about that kind of shameless commercialism when it comes to Oasis. In fact, it seems ridiculously purist to even think about it – even though so many working-class kids cannot get a break or earn any kind of living in the arts. The point is that Oasis broke through. This is about the joy of them. They were not grateful for their success – they owned it. Nothing like them could happen today. It's all different now. The same thought occurs watching the BBC's recent documentaries on Live Aid, which are full of incredible footage. It's 40 years since Bob Geldof and Midge Ure staged the huge concerts in Wembley and Philadelphia. This was an appeal for money for famine-stricken Ethiopia. Such a thing seems unimaginable these days. Unimaginable too, is Live 8, the string of benefit concerts that took place in the G8 countries and South Africa 20 years ago to coincide with the G8 summit being held at Gleneagles, Scotland. In retrospect, all of these concerts were remarkable in a number of ways. Geldof's absolute drive to do something after seeing the pictures of fly-ridden, starving children was immense. This drive seemed to cut through swathes of naysayers, of politicians, of cynics. The idea that back then we failed to see that a bunch of white-saviour pop stars trying to save famine-stricken Africans could possibly be iffy, paternalistic and politically naive is not true. There was always suspicion as well as acclaim around Live Aid. Geldof and, later on, Bono were educating themselves along the way. There was always a tension between pure emotion – Billy Connolly weeping in the studio at the images of dying children that David Bowie insisted be shown during his set – and what happened on the ground. Did the aid go to the people who needed it? Was the money raised being used by the Ethiopian former dictator Mengistu Haile Mariam to buy weapons from the Russians for his deadly civil war? The impulse to give and the righteousness of the cause remain admirable. The hard politics of interfering in a country that is crushing its own people are immensely complicated. Humanitarian aid groups such as Live Aid were accused by Médecins Sans Frontières of actually fuelling the crisis and the slaughter of the civil war. Geldof knew this and insists it was better to do something than not and it's hard not to agree. The older I get, the less cynical I become about such issues. All the criticisms thrown at Geldof would be amplified today. Detractors now would note there were not enough black artists in his line-ups. Does that diminish what he's done? Not when he has explained this by saying he simply wanted the biggest artists he could get, and there was no Stormzy in those days, no 'diversity hires'. Thankfully, back then, social media did not exist to slag off every politically incorrect move that Geldof made in his quest to get as much money as possible. Belief and pragmatism could win the day. Any nostalgia we may have for those times is surely for an era in which people could put aside 'the narcissism of small differences' (to use a phrase from Freud) for a larger goal. We are nostalgic for the kind of idealism this represents, whether it's Live Aid's desire to help those worse off than ourselves, or Oasis's unbridled, rebellious confidence. Such idealism now seems to be a thing of the past. The world we live in now is full of worries about the advance of AI, climate change, perpetual war. It is an anxious place to be and I am so tired of being told how terrible everything is. So who can blame those bouncing to Oasis, in communal bliss, escaping into the analogue times, the pre-cancellation times? When being mouthy and hedonistic was not a sin, and we were living for cigarettes and alcohol. Living forever. I want to Be Here Now. To live in the present, not to locate optimism squarely in the past. Oasis and the Live Aid nostalgia have made me realise how dependent we all are on each other and reminded me of the stoicism of our great country. We used to be able to hope. Can't we still? Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
Novak Djokovic's 11-year-old son, Stefan, is getting Wimbledon players' autographs. But not Dad's
LONDON (AP) — Novak Djokovic's 11-year-old son, Stefan, seems to be having the time of his life at Wimbledon , where he has been wearing a white hat with autographs of several players. One valuable signature he's missing? His father's. Djokovic said after his 1-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 victory over Alex de Minaur in the fourth round Monday that his kid did most of the work himself to gather the names scribbled on the cap. 'It was himself, independently of me, approaching and asking for autographs,' the 24-time Grand Slam champion said. 'I think I might have asked only Jannik (Sinner) or someone, but everyone else he's approached.' Stefan is even having fun on the court, hitting recently with Flavio Cobolli, the 22nd-seeded Italian who will take on Djokovic in the quarterfinals. 'He's over the moon. Obviously, he loves tennis. Yeah, he has everyone's signature, except mine,' Dad said. 'But that's OK. I'll accept that.' Djokovic and his wife, Jelena, also have a daughter, 7-year-old Tara, who got attention earlier in the tournament by doing a postmatch dance . ___ AP tennis:
