logo
Story behind 28 Years Later's terrifying 'Boots' poem: How 110-year-old recording of Rudyard Kipling verses that scared viewers is used in US military training

Story behind 28 Years Later's terrifying 'Boots' poem: How 110-year-old recording of Rudyard Kipling verses that scared viewers is used in US military training

Daily Mail​7 hours ago

When the first trailer for 28 Years Later was released last year, fans were immediately struck by the theme of sheer terror that ran through it.
And part of what made it so scary was its use of a 1915 recording of one of Rudyard Kipling's lesser-known poems.
The rendition of Boots by American actor Taylor Holmes sends a chill down the spine of anyone who listens to it - a fact that explains why it has featured for decades in the US Navy's training programme.
Last week, it received more exposure with the release of Danny Boyle 's 28 Years Later.
It reveals what has become of Britain nearly three decades on from the outbreak of the 'Rage Virus' first seen in 2002 film 28 Days Later.
Holmes' Boots recording is played at the start of the film, when Jamie and his son Spike - played by Arron Taylor-Johnson and Alfie Williams - arrive on mainland Britain after leaving the sanctuary of the virus-free island of Lindisfarne.
Reflecting the repetitive actions and thoughts of a British soldier marching in South Africa during the Boer War, Kipling's poem was published in 1903 - the year after the conflict had ended.
It builds from a calm, monotonous repetition of 'boot, boot, boot, boot', to a crescendo of screaming.
The final verses include a plea to 'keep from goin' lunatic' and the poem ends with the words: 'There's no discharge in the war!'
In full: Rudyard Kipling's poem 'Boots'
We're foot—slog—slog—slog—sloggin' over Africa
Foot—foot—foot—foot—sloggin' over Africa --
(Boots—boots—boots—boots—movin' up and down again!)
There's no discharge in the war!
Seven—six—eleven—five—nine-an'-twenty mile to-day
Four—eleven—seventeen—thirty-two the day before --
(Boots—boots—boots—boots—movin' up and down again!)
There's no discharge in the war!
Don't—don't—don't—don't—look at what's in front of you.
(Boots—boots—boots—boots—movin' up an' down again);
Men—men—men—men—men go mad with watchin' em,
An' there's no discharge in the war!
Count—count—count—count—the bullets in the bandoliers.
If—your—eyes—drop—they will get atop o' you!
(Boots—boots—boots—boots—movin' up and down again) --
There's no discharge in the war!
We—can—stick—out—'unger, thirst, an' weariness,
But—not—not—not—not the chronic sight of 'em,
Boot—boots—boots—boots—movin' up an' down again,
An' there's no discharge in the war!
'Taint—so—bad—by—day because o' company,
But night—brings—long—strings—o' forty thousand million
Boots—boots—boots—boots—movin' up an' down again.
There's no discharge in the war!
I—'ave—marched—six—weeks in 'Ell an' certify
It—is—not—fire—devils, dark, or anything,
But boots—boots—boots—boots—movin' up an' down again,
An' there's no discharge in the war!
Try—try—try—try—to think o' something different
Oh—my—God—keep—me from goin' lunatic!
(Boots—boots—boots—boots—movin' up an' down again!)
There's no discharge in the war!
When Kipling wrote the poem, the loss of more than 20,000 British troops was still very fresh in the memory.
The poem's precise metre - the first four words of each line are read at a rate of two per second - matched the time to which soldiers marched.
American actor Holmes, who died in 1959, appeared in more than 100 Broadway plays.
His delivery in the 1915 recording begins relatively measured, but then ramps up to wild, terrifying abandon.
For decades, it has been used in the US Navy's Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) course.
Recruits are subjected to it as part of efforts to put them under pressure.
Former naval aviator Ward Carroll previously said: 'Anyone who has ever attended the US Navy's Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) school will never forget the poem.'
Holmes' rendition was also used last year in the marketing campaign for video game Call of Duty: Black Ops 6.
Fellow British poet T.S. Eliot chose to include Boots in his 1941 collection A Choice of Kipling's Verse.
For every year from an initial holiday in 1898, Kipling visited South Africa.
The author wrote several poems to support the British cause in the Boer War.
Britain won the conflict but more than 20,000 British troops were killed.
Kipling's most famous works include the Jungle Book and his Just So stories.
His 1910 poem If— also remains hugely well-known.
The author died in 1936 aged 70.
He was left bereft after his son Jack was killed in the First World War.
The first trailer for 28 Years Later was released last December.
It sparked a flurry of publicity in large part because of the appearance of what appeared to be a zombified Cillian Murphy, who starred as lead character Jim in 28 Days Later.
However, it later emerged that the figure was not Murphy but art dealer Angus Neill, who was given a part as an extra by Boyle after being talent-spotted.
Murphy, 49, is though an executive producer on the new film and is set to star in upcoming sequel 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple.
The Mail's Brian Viner gave the new film five stars in his review.
He wrote: 'With the terrifying and electrifying 28 Years Later, director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have delivered the best post-apocalyptic survivalist horror-thriller film I have ever seen.
'Which sounds like limited praise, yet it's a much more crowded field than you might think.
'Boyle also made the 2002 film 28 Days Later, setting up the story (written by Garland) of a terrible virus rampaging through Britain, which in those days was more the stuff of science-fiction than it seems now.
British troops seen aboard Cunard liner SS Catalonia as they arrive in South Africa during the Boer War, 1899
'There was a sequel, 28 Weeks Later (2007), but that had a different director and writer.
'Now, Boyle and Garland have reunited to mighty effect.
'There's no need to have seen the first two films – this one stands alone.'
Boyle's original film famously showed Murphy's character walking through a deserted London after waking up from a coma in hospital.
The director opened up earlier this month about how the scenes were shot.
Admitting the crew did not have the money to be able to afford to formally close the road, he said that he instead enlisted his daughter to help.
He told The Times: 'We didn't have the money to close the bridge, but had a plan to be there at 4am.
'The police can't ask the traffic to stop, but they will allow you to ask drivers.
'So we hired a lot of girls, including my own daughter, who was 18.
'Anybody driving at that time is a bloke, so we had the girls lean in, saying, "Do you mind?" And it worked fine.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The best new crime and thriller books to read this year
The best new crime and thriller books to read this year

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

The best new crime and thriller books to read this year

'Romantasy' gets TikTokers talking; sci-fi sales are strong; literary fiction has many enthusiasts. But crime fiction remains the UK's best-selling genre. The British appetite for blood and bafflement is even more voracious now than it was when I started reviewing crime novels for the Telegraph 20 years ago. The genre has been subject to fads and fashions over the past two decades. Back in the mid-2000s, the police procedural dominated, with every publisher hoping that the latest new cop would have a shelf-life to match Morse or Rebus. Hannibal Lecter still cast a baleful influence, and the imaginatively nasty serial killer was in vogue. The Scandinavians were in their chilly pomp. But nowadays the fashion has shifted away from 'doorstops of unrelenting grimness' – in the words of the late novelist and critic Christopher Fowler – and the success of Richard Osman has to some extent cosy-fied the genre. Wit and ingenuity of plot are once again prized. The spy thriller, in the doldrums 20 years ago, is searingly relevant again: equal credit goes, perhaps, to the literary skills of the likes of Mick Herron and the machinations of the likes of Vladimir Putin. But speaking as an addict who enjoys dozens of crime and thriller novels every year, I've noticed that whatever fashion dominates, the genre still encompasses a splendid diversity of moods and modes. My selection below will show you where the riches are to be found. Paperboy by Callum McSorley

Starmer offers BBC rivals chance to join forces
Starmer offers BBC rivals chance to join forces

Telegraph

time5 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer offers BBC rivals chance to join forces

Sir Keir Starmer has opened the door to mergers between the BBC's commercial rivals as they come under mounting pressure from streaming. The Government on Monday set out plans to remove barriers to allow broadcasters such as ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 to join forces as part of its new Industrial Strategy. Ministers said they would examine 'possible consolidation between broadcasters which may benefit their financial sustainability and audiences', as well as 'closer strategic partnerships'. The Competition and Markets Authority and Ofcom will be asked to review their definitions of the TV and advertising markets to include, for instance, YouTube and Netflix. Such moves would reduce the market share of broadcasters, making it much more likely that regulators could approve a merger of their advertising sales operations, or even an ITV takeover of Channel 5 and Channel 4. 'Economies of scale' Investors and television industry leaders are increasingly arguing for such consolidation to cut costs as audiences and advertisers migrate to streamers. Less radical steps are already being taken in that direction. ITV, Channel 4 and Sky last week struck a deal to pool their online advertising spots to mount a stronger challenge to the massive scale of YouTube. The three broadcasters currently each operate their own television advertising sales house. Bringing them together would be an obvious next step, but would require regulators to agree that streaming competition means it would not be too powerful a monopoly. The Government pointed to broadcasters in other countries pursuing mergers to 'increase economies of scale'. It added: 'We must take active steps to ensure our domestic broadcasters can adapt to this changing market, and continue their support for independent producers of all sizes so that IP [intellectual property] remains in the UK. 'The financial sustainability of our PSBs [public service broadcasters] is under pressure as they compete for content and advertising revenues with global media and technology companies.' TV troubles It comes as ITV is locked in discussions over a deal that could result in either a sale of the broadcaster or a deal to spin off its lucrative production business. Banijay, the French production powerhouse behind Big Brother and Peaky Blinders, has reportedly held discussions with ITV over a potential bid. All3Media, the UAE-owned group behind shows including The Traitors and Race Across the World, has also been linked to a possible deal. ITV, which has struggled with an advertising downturn in recent years, has been viewed as ripe for a break-up as a sharp decline in its share price has pushed its valuation to just £3bn, down from a peak of more than £11bn in 2015.

28 Years Later's incendiary Jimmy Savile twist: All your questions, answered
28 Years Later's incendiary Jimmy Savile twist: All your questions, answered

Telegraph

time6 hours ago

  • Telegraph

28 Years Later's incendiary Jimmy Savile twist: All your questions, answered

Contains spoilers for 28 Years Later Now then, now then. When I attended a press screening for 28 Years Later the week before release, a note sent with the tickets asked us not to spoil the ending in our reviews. This is a common ploy by publicists seeking to build buzz and intrigue, and often the result is disappointing. (Think a Marvel character you've never heard of appearing for 15 seconds.) However, when Danny Boyle and Alex Garland's excellent zombie epic ends with the introduction of Jack O'Connell's character Sir Jimmy Crystal and his band of murderous desperadoes, all of whom are dressed in colour-coded outfits that come over as a cross between the Power Rangers and the infamous Jimmy Savile, to the accompaniment of the Teletubbies ' 'One, two, three, four!' on the soundtrack, it is a jaw-droppingly provocative and incendiary ending. For once, it really did need to be left for audiences to discover it for themselves, rather than having it spoilt by critics. The film makes great play of (specifically British) audiences' knowledge of the chilling spectacle of Savile, a DJ, presenter of the wish-fulfilment show Jim'll Fix It and, we now know, notorious rapist, paedophile and suspected necrophile. He has become rightly despised as one of the most evil men that Britain has ever seen since his death in 2011. Even during his lifetime, and fame, there was clearly something not right about him. Savile would make black humoured jokes about how he had only evaded detection for his many crimes because of his charity work – jokes that no longer seem very funny – and took an almost perverse pride in how his closeness to the establishment allowed him to groom and assault his victims with impunity. Overseas audiences will inevitably know less about him, and so should probably watch the comprehensive 2022 Netflix documentary Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story, which explores his crimes in sickening depth. Perhaps surprisingly, he has been largely kept out of fiction. A recent Steve Coogan drama, The Reckoning, explored his grim life and depraved antics, and it was also suggested in series three of Line of Duty that the character was somehow involved with the (fictitious) details of child sexual abuse as depicted in the show. However, film-makers know that accusations of opportunism and bad taste might be made if he was to be included in mainstream drama. These accusations have now indeed been levelled, in some quarters, against 28 Years Later and its makers. To say that the ending has proved divisive, especially in the United States, would be an understatement. (Not that the twist has hurt the film's box office performance; half its $60 million opening weekend haul has come from the US.) Yet Boyle and Garland have never been film-makers who have taken the easy option – think about the various outrageous and shocking scenes in their films, encompassing everything from Trainspotting and Ex Machina to their previous collaborations, Sunshine and 28 Days Later – and so this full-strength conclusion to the picture not only sets up next year's sequel, The Bone Temple, very intriguingly, but also leaves audiences with numerous questions which deserve answering. Who are Sir Jimmy Crystal and his gang? The introduction of the presumably villainous Sir Jimmy in the closing moments of 28 Years Later gives an already unsettling film a horrific jolt. As he and his companions – also all referred to as 'Jimmy' – set about murdering a group of 'infected', as the film terms its zombies, with extreme, gleeful prejudice, it's a grim and shocking moment that brings A Clockwork Orange – a clear Boyle touchstone throughout his career – to mind. Yet the most disturbing aspect of the scene is that Sir Jimmy, and the other Jimmys, are all attired in hideous-coloured tracksuits, lengthy blonde wigs and have their hands festooned with jewellery: a clear homage to Savile. O'Connell – who, with his appearance as a sadistic Irish vampire in Ryan Coogler's Sinners, is surely becoming 2025's go-to villain for horror films – is too big a star to appear for as small a role as this. Audiences are promised that the Jimmys will return in a big way for The Bone Temple. When Sir Jimmy says to Alfie Williams's young protagonist Spike 'Let's be friends', the moment is chilling, not least because it seems quite clear that the Jimmys are not the kind of people anyone would want to be friends with. Yet the film has already teased his introduction with enormous sophistication. It's the young Jimmy who we meet in the terrifying prologue, set, appropriately enough, 28 years before the rest of the film. The boy is the sole survivor of the Teletubbies-inflected infected massacre and the recipient of his fanatical clergyman father's crucifix, which he's seen holding when he's reintroduced. There are lots of hints as to his reappearance, too, which many viewers may only pick up on with a second viewing. When Spike and his father Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) head to the mainland for Spike's first kill of an infected, they find the body of a tortured figure hung up upside-down in an abandoned farmhouse, with the word 'Jimmy' carved onto it; the same word is scrawled all over the outside walls. From these little clues, it's quite clear that the Jimmy gang is a bunch of murderous sadists who are intent on causing as much mayhem and torment as they can. How and why, and how they've managed to survive for so long amidst the infected, will (presumably) be explained in the second film. Why are the Jimmys in thrall to Jimmy Savile? Although the Jimmy characters are not named in the film, the end credits reveal that they all have a suitably grim collection of surnames. We can expect to meet Jimmy Fox, Jimmy Snake, Jimmy Jones, the unimaginatively named Jimmy Jimmy, the more imaginatively named Jimmy S___e and their female equivalent, Jimmina. No doubt all of them are going to play a greater role in the sequel, but the small clues that we are given about their dispositions in 28 Years Later are that they're violent, have hideous taste in clothes and are all followers of O'Connell's Sir Jimmy: a self-bestowed title, unlike the knighthood bestowed upon Savile. It isn't made clear in this picture as to why they should all be fascinated by the ghoulish disc jockey and TV presenter, but Boyle and Garland have suggested in interviews that it all fits with the film's warped sense of England and Englishness. As Boyle told Business Insider: '[Savile is] as much to do with pop culture as he is to do with sportswear, to do with cricket, to do with the honours system. It's all kind of twisting in this partial remembrance, clinging onto things and then recreating them as an image for followers.' (Incidentally, Boyle himself was offered a knighthood after directing the opening ceremony for the 2012 Olympics, and turned it down, saying 'it was insensitive of them to ask me, to be honest.') 🎬 | Bts photo of Erin Kellyman with the Jimmy gang on the set of '28 Years Later'. — Erin Kellyman Updates (@updateskellyman) June 23, 2025 Yet there's another telling detail that has been picked up on by eagle-eyed viewers who have been swift to disseminate it on Reddit forums. The film's prologue takes place around the same time that the first film was released, in the early years of the millennium, when Savile may have been regarded with suspicion (see the 2000 Louis Theroux documentary When Louis Met Jimmy) but was still seen by many (at least publicly) as a noble figure who had given his life, and fortune, to charity. Therefore, in this alternative world, Savile was never unmasked as a predator, but instead continued to be regarded as a hero by many, meaning that the 'Jimmys' are not following in the footsteps of a disgraced and evil man, but instead believe him to be a secular saint of sorts. That the audience knows differently is all part of the intrigue. As one commenter observed, 'I like the theory that they think Jim will fix it as per the TV show and save them from the infected.' What is the point of the Savile allusion? When the Jimmys appear, it's a deliberately shocking moment, both in terms of the violence and then the realisation that there might be worse things out there than the infected. This is something of a homage to the original 28 Days Later, when it becomes clear that Christopher Eccleston's demented army major and his men want to force female survivors of the infected into sexual slavery for their own perverse ends. Yet Boyle and Garland are both careful film-makers who would never include a detail as provocative as this simply to elicit a shocked reaction. Instead, Garland has argued that the ending is of a piece with the rest of the film's themes. He suggested that Savile was a 'trippy, f----- up kaleidoscope', which chimes with the film's similarly phantasmagorical evocation of Englishness, visual throwbacks to Olivier's Henry V and Agincourt included. Yet it's also because the Jimmy character – who has obviously been traumatised from a young age by seeing his friends and family torn to pieces by infected – has created his own version of reality from a mixture of half-remembered pop culture allusions, just as Alex in A Clockwork Orange is inspired in his ultraviolence by everything from Beethoven to Singin' in the Rain. 'The thing about looking back is how selective memory is,' Garland has said. 'It cherry picks and it has amnesia, and crucially, it also misremembers. We are living in a time right now which is absolutely dominated by a misremembered past.' Why is the ending so controversial? In the United States, where Savile is barely known, if at all, the ending has caused significant confusion and even disappointment amongst audiences, who have been mystified as to who these shell-suit wearing, blonde wigged antagonists are supposed to be. As one cinemagoer sighed on X, 'I personally don't appreciate having to do some homework to appreciate a sequence that's otherwise random to end a film.' It is also a (deliberately?) confusing aspect of the picture that the Aaron Taylor-Johnson character's name of 'Jamie' is close enough to 'Jimmy' for many viewers initially to believe that he is the grown-up version of the boy in the opening scene, safely escaped and now living in what seems to be comparative safety. The other argument against the ending, and what it sets up for the next film, is simply that the appropriation of Savile as a pop-cultural feature is inappropriate and tasteless. Certainly, the film's anti-Brexit subtext, suggesting that Britain is an isolated, backwards island that has been cut off from Europe by force, is unlikely to endear it to those who continue to think Brexit was a good and necessary idea. (Boyle and Garland are clearly not Brexiteers.) Hinting that this isolation has led to the creation of Savile cultists is a provocative and deeply controversial way to conclude the film. Finally, the jolt of black humour that comes moments after the deeply affecting conclusion of the storyline involving Spike's dying mother Isla (Jodie Comer) is an incongruous way to conclude the film that will be a true love-hate development. There will be those who believe that its kamikaze insanity ruins an otherwise thoughtful and serious film, and others who applaud its audacity. What does all this mean for the sequel? The choice of Candyman and the Marvels film-maker Nia DaCosta to direct the sequel, The Bone Temple – which has already been filmed and will be released in January – is an intriguing decision, given that DaCosta is a New York-raised American director who is tackling the follow-up to a film about Britain and Britishness. However, the idea that DaCosta will bring an outsider's eye to a film that Boyle has already teased is about 'the nature of evil' can only be a good thing. Just as Boyle brought his own inimitable perspective to the Oscar-winning Slumdog Millionaire (a film that, for understandable but regrettable reasons, he now claims he would not direct if he was offered the opportunity), so DaCosta has a chance to take the Savile-heavy mythology that The Bone Temple will inevitably be imbued with and make it not only comprehensible to American audiences but terrifying. Savile may be a British phenomenon but the traits that he embodied – the manipulation of power and what evil can be unchecked if those in positions of authority look the other way – are truly universal ones, and this brief tease should be a curtain-raiser for something extraordinarily dark and provocative, coming our way in a few months.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store