Two weeks' jail for man caught smuggling over 1,800 vapes and pods into Singapore
But the authorities discovered the loot and foiled his plan.
Officers from the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) then raided his flat and found more vapes and pods from a previous smuggling attempt, which had gone undetected.
On July 16, James Wong Jun Jie, 36, was sentenced to two weeks' jail after he admitted to one charge under the Tobacco (Control of Advertisements and Sale) Act.
Three similar charges were taken into consideration for his sentencing.
The court heard that Wong met a man named Raj in 2024 at Mid Valley Southkey, a shopping mall in Johor Baru.
Raj asked Wong if he was interested in smuggling vapes and pods from Johor to Singapore, adding that he could earn RM600 (S$181) for a one-way trip.
Wong gave it a try on Sept 10, 2024, and brought the illicit items into Singapore without being detected.
Two days later, on Sept 12, Wong made his second attempt. He drove to Johor Baru at about 8am, parked his car at Mydin Mall and left to have breakfast.
He deliberately left his car unlocked so Raj's workers could load the illegal goods in the boot and bonnet.
At about 11am, Wong drove back to Singapore and was asked to stop his vehicle at Woodlands Checkpoint.
Immigration and Checkpoints Authority officers discovered 1,086 pods and 732 vapes hidden in his car, and handed the items to HSA for investigations.
That night, HSA officers searched Wong's home at a Housing Board block in Sin Ming Road. They found another 1,320 pods and 679 vapes.
These were stocks from his first smuggling trip. Wong said he was waiting for Raj to inform him when to deliver them.
They had agreed that Wong would drive to an open carpark in Woodlands, leave his vehicle unlocked and return two hours later after the goods had been unloaded.
District Judge Wong Li Tein said in response to Wong's mitigation letter, which was not read out in court, that community-based sentences were not appropriate for him.
Such sentences, which include a community work order or short detention order, do not result in a criminal record.
Judge Wong said: 'The problem of vaping in Singapore is a serious one. So community-based sentences are not suitable.'
Wong's case comes on the back of increased enforcement efforts to tackle a looming vape crisis in Singapore.
HSA and the Ministry of Health (MOH) said in a joint statement in May that close to 18,000 people were caught between January 2024 and March 2025 for possessing and using e-vaporisers.
During that time, HSA seized $41 million worth of vapes – nearly fivefold the reported value seized from 2019 to end-2023, according to numbers compiled by The Straits Times.
HSA said in the May statement that it prosecuted 27 offenders for failing to pay their composition fines. It took another 60 people to court for selling e-vaporisers, including two people linked to an e-vaporiser syndicate case that involved more than $5 million worth of the devices.
Ivan Sin was fined $16,000 and given 10 months' jail, while Toh Wee Leong was fined $14,000 and given the same jail term. These were the harshest sentences given for smuggling e-vaporisers so far.
ST launched its anti-vaping campaign, Vaping: The Invisible Crisis, on July 13 to raise awareness about the issue in Singapore.
On July 12, MOH and the Ministry of Home Affairs said in a joint statement that they were looking at tightening the laws around vaping after the increased detection of electronic vaporisers containing substances such as etomidate and other controlled drugs.
Both ministries described vaping as a serious issue, noting that etomidate, which is classified as a poison and regulated under the Poisons Act, may cause adverse effects like seizures and psychosis.
Used in hospitals to induce sedation during medical procedures, etomidate is meant to be injected into the veins under clinical supervision and never intended to be inhaled.
When vaped, it enters the lungs directly and may trigger spasms, breathing difficulties, seizures and even psychosis. - The Straits Times/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Singapore's Tipsy Collective sues former directors, HR head; alleges S$14mil lost from misconduct, poor decisions
SINGAPORE: The legal battle over control of home-grown hospitality group Tipsy Collective has taken another turn. The company – now led by its majority shareholders, who gained control after a boardroom shake-up in 2024 – has filed a lawsuit against its former leadership, seeking to recover more than S$14 million in losses and damages from a string of alleged wrongful payments, mismanagement and unauthorised deletions of company records. In its statement of claim filed on June 12, the plaintiffs – Tipsy Collective and three of its subsidiaries (Tipsy Bird, Social Room Concepts and Tipsy Collective Singapore) – are alleging breaches of fiduciary and contractual duties by three former directors, David Gan Jia Liang, Derek Ong and Reuben Low Kok Cherng, and former human resources manager Avril Lim Qian Jun. Gan, who was the former chief executive of the group, founded Tipsy Collective with Ong in 2019. Following internal disputes, the bloc of investors and shareholders who oppose Gan has increased its collective stake from 59.39 per cent to 97.3 per cent, according to the latest shareholder records from the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. Gan currently owns 1.66 per cent of the company's shares, and Low holds 1.03 per cent. As Ong died in August 2023, his wife, Melody Huang Bao'er, who is the administrator of his estate, was named as the second defendant in the lawsuit. This new lawsuit follows an earlier court battle reported by The Straits Times in September 2024, in which Gan had sued eight parties – including investors and shareholders – claiming they had breached a shareholders' agreement and tried to unlawfully seize control of the company. The defendants – Indonesian investors Reino Ramaputra Barack and Santosa Kadiman, Singaporean Rudy Hartono Widjaja and four shareholder entities – rejected Gan's claims. Instead, they pointed to alleged financial mismanagement under his leadership. They cited mounting debts and lack of financial transparency, and questioned the $6 million spent developing Tipsy Unicorn beach club in Sentosa. They claimed Gan had caused the company to take out $8.7 million in loans, of which $6 million remained outstanding, and that the company owed $5.2 million to suppliers and nearly $1 million to Sentosa Development Corporation. Gan failed to get an interim injunction to retain control of the company's board and subsequently lost his lawsuit against the investors and shareholders. On Nov 6, 2024, the board terminated his role as chief executive and removed Low as director. On the same day, Barack was appointed the chairman of the board of directors of Tipsy Collective. Gan resigned from the board on Nov 15, 2024, while Lim's last day with the company was Nov 17 of the same year. By December 2024, the financial toll of the leadership struggle had affected ground operations. More than 100 employees had faced delays in salary payments since October 2024. The company managed to settle overdue Central Provident Fund contributions and salaries only after four shareholders injected emergency funding. The group, which once operated 13 outlets, has since scaled down. At least four outlets have been shut since October 2024, and it is now left with five outlets. Now, led by its new management, Tipsy Collective is turning the tables on its former leadership with this latest suit. The first set of allegations involves unauthorised payments made. The plaintiffs allege that Gan and Ong caused the companies to transfer more than $4.2 million to themselves and Low, or between entities, without justification. These included $1.49 million in payments, made in December 2020, and $2.8 million disbursed between June 2020 and May 2024. The suit alleged that the payments had no commercial justification and brought no benefit to the companies, and that the three former directors failed to recover the funds, causing significant losses to the group. The lawsuit also cited a string of poor business decisions that allegedly harmed the group financially. The development of Tipsy Unicorn – a 19,000 sq ft beach club on Sentosa's Siloso Beach that opened in September 2023 – is at the centre of these claims. The construction cost of the project ballooned from $4 million to more than $6.1 million due to lack of due diligence and planning. Court documents also noted that the claimants did not have sufficient resources to undertake the construction of Tipsy Unicorn. Despite the fact that Tipsy Collective was 'in financial difficulties and needed monies from shareholders to sustain its operations', Gan and Ong allegedly continued to undertake more projects, the court documents noted. Another alleged mishap flagged in court documents was the group's investment in Tipsy Flamingo Malaysia. The plaintiffs claimed the venture led to a loss of more than $1.3 million. The renewal of leases for underperforming outlets, such as Tipsy Penguin, Tipsy Bunny and Tipsy Flamingo, was also highlighted. These new leases apparently involved higher rents and service charges, further straining the group's finances. The lawsuit further accused Gan and Lim of destroying and withholding company records. Gan allegedly deleted more than 4,000 files from the company's Google Drive and continued accessing company systems without authorisation after his departure. Lim is alleged to have erased nearly 5,000 files and formatted her company-issued laptop, erasing all stored data. Both of them are being held liable for damages linked to the data loss, with the plaintiffs also seeking an injunction to prevent Gan from using any confidential company information that may have been retained. Separately, the Ministry of Law's website showed Gan was declared bankrupt on June 19, in proceedings separate from the civil suit. - The Straits Times/ANN
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Singapore catering couple fined over RM235,000 each after failing to pay staff more than RM1.4m
SINGAPORE, July 26 — A married couple who ran several catering businesses, including Royal Cuisine Group and Tingkat Singapore, have each been fined S$72,000 (RM237,283) for failing to pay salaries to over 100 employees in Singapore, The Straits Times reported. Wu Wenchun, 37, and Sim Ling Zhen, 31, pleaded guilty to 12 charges under the Employment Act. Each faces 66 weeks' jail if the fines are not paid. An additional 13 charges, including failure to report their change of residence, were taken into consideration during sentencing. According to Singapore's Ministry of Manpower (MOM), the couple's companies — Royal Cuisine Group, Yanxi and Healthy Meals Catering — owed 103 employees a total of S$432,870.63 in unpaid salaries. Only S$73,420 has been recovered to date, The Straits Times said. Sim was listed as the director, while Wu was the general manager. They were actively involved in running various food service brands, including Angel Confinement Meals, Happy Mamapapa Catering, Vegetarian Buffet, and the now-defunct Yanxi restaurant in Chin Swee Road. Public complaints about the companies surfaced in 2022, when customers began reporting unfulfilled meal orders. MOM received its first formal complaint on July 20, 2022, from a Royal Cuisine employee about unpaid wages, The Straits Times reported. Investigations revealed that the businesses were initially supported by investor Low Ting Hui, who helped fund operations and payroll. However, Low withdrew financial support in October 2022 following disputes over the companies' direction and use of funds, said MOM senior prosecuting officer Justine Loh. 'Despite meeting cash-flow issues and knowing that there would be difficulty in paying salaries to the employees, Wu and Sim decided to continue operating the companies, continue the employment of the employees, and opening other new businesses,' said Loh in court, as quoted by The Straits Times. By December 2022, landlords had shut down the companies' premises due to unpaid rent. MOM said Wu and Sim failed to properly inform employees about the situation and left them without pay for up to three months. The couple were also uncooperative with authorities, skipping mediation sessions, missing appointments, and failing to provide updated residential addresses during investigations, The Straits Times reported. 'Despite being provided with ample time to make salary restitutions to the affected employees, Sim and Wu did not make appreciable efforts to do so,' MOM said. Most affected workers have since found new employment with assistance from the Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management (TADM) and the NTUC Employment and Employability Institute, according to The Straits Times. Under Singapore's Employment Act, employers who fail to pay salaries may face up to six months in jail, a fine of between S$3,000 and S$15,000, or both. Repeat offenders face stiffer penalties.
Daily Express
9 hours ago
- Daily Express
Man charged with trafficking 57.8gm syabu
Published on: Saturday, July 26, 2025 Published on: Sat, Jul 26, 2025 By: Jo Ann Mool Text Size: The charge, framed under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act (DDA) 1952, carries the mandatory death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a minimum of 15 strokes of the cane, upon conviction. Kota Kinabalu: A 40-year-old was tentatively charged at the Magistrate's Court here with trafficking 57.82gm of syabu. No plea was recorded from Ag Rizwan Lasikan when the charge was read before Magistrate Marilyn Kelvin. Rizwan is accused of committing the offence at 2.50pm on July 12 by the roadside of Puri Warisan, Inanam. The charge, framed under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act (DDA) 1952, carries the mandatory death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a minimum of 15 strokes of the cane, upon conviction. The court set Sept 18 for mention, pending the chemist's report. Rizwan was ordered to remain in custody as the offence is non-bailable. In another case, a 48-year-old man was jailed six weeks and fined RM100 or one week's jail for failing to provide a reasonable explanation for having a stolen laptop. Rudy Wong pleaded guilty before Magistrate Dzul Elmy Yunus to being found in possession of a laptop, for which he failed to provide a satisfactory explanation of how he obtained it, at 3.15pm on July 18 at the car park of Block A, Lido Four Seasons, Jalan Lintas Kepayan. Wong was charged under Section 22A(1) of the Minor Offences Ordinance (Chapter 80) of Sabah. The court heard from the prosecution that the complainant discovered her home had been broken into on July 12, with her belongings, including a laptop, missing. Wong was arrested on July 18 at the car park of Block A of the residency for the offence. Unrepresented, Wong pleaded for leniency and apologised to the court, saying he had an ageing mother to care for. The prosecution, however, urged the court to impose a deterrent sentence and also informed that the estimated loss suffered by the complainant was RM1,000. Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Kareena Kaur Gill Karamjit Singh and Inspector Yusdi Basri prosecuted. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
