
Israel shatters the ceasefire with Hamas
People walk amid the rubble of a building destroyed in an overnight Israeli strike in Jabalia, in the northern Gaza Strip, on Tuesday. (Bashar Taleb/AFP/Getty Images)
More than 400 people were killed and hundreds more wounded in Tuesday's attacks, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, making it one of the deadliest days of the 17-month war.
Host Colby Itkowitz talks with Miriam Berger, who has been covering the conflict for The Post, about what it's like in Gaza right now and what this means for the possibility of a ceasefire in the future.
Today's show was produced by Rennie Svirnovskiy with help from Bishop Sand. It was edited by Lucy Perkins with help from Reena Flores, and mixed by Sam Bair.
Subscribe to The Washington Post here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
11 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Iran Gives Position on New Nuclear Talks With US
Iran's foreign minister has ruled out any imminent return to nuclear negotiations with the United States, calling talk of renewed diplomacy after the war with Israel "speculation" and insisting that "there has not even been talk of negotiations." Abbas Araghchi's comments came after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between the two countries and suggested that discussions with Tehran could resume as early as next week. Newsweek has reached out to the State department for comment. Why It Matters The pause in direct conflict has not eased global concerns as Iran's refusal to resume nuclear talks signals a major setback. Tehran's rejection shows that U.S. pressure has hardened its stance, narrowing oversight after damage to its nuclear sites and suspended inspections. For Washington, this undermines months of diplomacy and weakens efforts to contain nuclear risks. The international community now faces fewer tools to prevent Iran's nuclear advancement, setting a troubling precedent where military action, not dialogue, shapes engagement limits. In an interview with Iranian state TV, Araghchi denied any agreement to restart nuclear negotiations, pushing back on Washington's expectations. The conflict, sparked by Israeli strikes on June 13 and followed by U.S. attacks on Iran's nuclear sites, abruptly ended talks aimed at reviving a deal. "The situation has completely changed and it is not possible to reach an agreement as easily as in the past," he said. Araghchi accused the U.S. and Israel of deliberately provoking the conflict despite ongoing diplomacy. When European mediators urged Iran to halt the fighting and return to talks, he responded, "What do you mean? We were in the middle of diplomacy! They were the ones who started the war." Despite rejecting formal negotiations, Araghchi stressed that diplomatic channels remain open. Messages continue to pass through mediators like Oman's Foreign Minister, who led the previous five rounds of talks. A planned sixth round in Oman was canceled after the outbreak of conflict. Araghchi also acknowledged that the U.S. strikes inflicted "serious harm" on its nuclear facilities. "This damage has not been minor-serious harm has been done to our facilities," he said, noting that Iran's Atomic Energy Agency is conducting a thorough assessment of the destruction. In the U.S., debate continues over the strikes' effectiveness. President Trump declared the attacks "obliterated" their targets, but some senior Democrats remain skeptical about how much was truly destroyed. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: "No agreement has been made to restart negotiations, and there has not even been talk of negotiations. There is no point in negotiating now." President Donald Trump: "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." Democrat Senator Chris Murphy: "The president was deliberately misleading the public when he said the program was obliterated." The U.S. faces a tough path as Iran rejects talks and hardens its stance after recent strikes. Washington must balance pressure on Tehran with regional concerns, risking further instability. How the U.S. handles this will impact the future of the nuclear deal and Middle East security Related Articles Pete Hegseth Trashing Former Fox News Colleague Sparks Fury from CriticsGreen Card Holder Detained by ICE for Over 4 Months After Making Wrong TurnVisualizing What Iran's 'Missing' Uranium Would Look LikeFormer CIA Director Says Pete Hegseth 'Reflects Paranoia' 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.


Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
Energy Insecurity Threatens Food Production
TOPSHOT - In this picture taken on April 23, 2022, farmer Jinadasa Paranamana works in a paddy field ... More in Tissamaharama, Hambantota district. - Farmers were once big supporters of the Rajapaksas, but a bungled fertiliser ban withered their crops along with their backing for Sri Lanka's previously powerful and popular political clan. - TO GO WITH SriLanka-agriculture-economy-politics-unrest,FOCUS by Aishwarya KUMAR (Photo by Ishara S. KODIKARA / AFP) / TO GO WITH SriLanka-agriculture-economy-politics-unrest,FOCUS by Aishwarya KUMAR (Photo by ISHARA S. KODIKARA/AFP via Getty Images) Prior to Israel's recent attacks on Iran, energy prices and supplies were buffeted by the continuing war between Ukraine and Russia. Following the American bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites, Iran threatened to close the Straits of Hormuz, but quickly backed off. Following the Middle East ceasefire declare June 24, energy prices, which did not soar as might have been expected, stabilized, but remain high by recent standards. Brent crude is up more than 10% to over $76/barrel, and diesel in Europe has risen nearly 15%. Like Iran, which targeted the Ashdod power station and the Haifa refinery during its most recent hostilities with Israel, Russia and Ukraine have also made it a point to target each other's vital infrastructure, especially after Ukraine terminated Russian transshipments of natural gas to other parts of Eastern Europe. (Source). Indeed, Ukraine has intensified drone, missile, and bomb attacks on critical Russian infrastructure, from energy depots and logistics railways in Bryansk to major fertilizer plants in the Tula and Stavropol regions. At the same time, Russia has ramped up its bombardment of Ukrainian Black Sea ports and agricultural logistics hubs. Shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, those two nations, along with Turkey and the United Nations, negotiated the 'Black Sea Grain Initiative' in July 2022 as a way to protect the export of grain to the world. (Source). That deal, however, has not kept the cost of the inputs of food production stable. Russia has continued to strike the Ukrainian ports of Odesa, Pivdennyi, and Chornomorsk, which according to media reports have been widely used to launch drones attacking Russian warships. In doing so, they also have hit grain elevators and storage facilities, which had the exact opposite impact from the Black Sea Grain Initiative. Globally, fertilizer prices already have risen 11% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to last year, per World Bank data. (Source). Nitrogen fertilizers like urea, essential for crops, jumped over 20%, with potash and phosphate up 18% and 20%, respectively. The recent Ukrainian drone strikes on the Novomoskovsk Azot plant and the Nevinnomyssk Azot plant, which have a combined output comparable to the annual nitrogen fertilizer consumption of France and Germany, have reportedly caused a temporary suspension of operations at these two facilities. While many are arguing (or speculating) about the true reason behind the attacks, as Ukraine had not attacked fertilizer plants before Russia did so, the global food security and fertilizer markets are likely to suffer severe collateral damage no matter what the reasons for the attacks may be. European farmers are now confronting winter planting decisions against a backdrop of tightened supply and renewed market premiums. It appears that Vladimir Putin may be trying to rerun the disaster that befell Sri Lanka in 2021, only this time caused by an outside stimulus. In Sri Lanka, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa decided to ban synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, forcing millions of Sri Lanka's farmers to go organic. The decision, while wrapped in a concern for the environment, was ill-advised. It wound up precipitating a famine that ultimately destroyed Sri Lanka's economy and caused the overthrow of President Rajapaksa himself. (Source). Meanwhile, in Ukraine, Putin is striking grain elevators and storage facilities. It is anybody's guess what happens now if Moscow targets Ukrainian fertilizer plants like those in Rivne in retaliation for Ukraine's strikes on Russian fertilizer plants. Beyond disrupting production, such an escalation risks an environmental catastrophe on the EU's doorstep. The Tula and Stavropol strike already has pushed up prices on nitrogen-based products like urea and UAN by 6-10% in recent weeks, and threatens to add 20-40% to broader fertilizer costs. Commodity markets already are impacted. In agricultural futures trading, wheat has jumped by 50-70% in some contracts during similar past disruptions. (Source). Analysts warn that any renewed Black Sea export interruption could trigger an equivalent surge within months. Corn, with Ukraine responsible for some 15% of all global exports, could spike another 30-50%, assuming U.S. and South American producers do not immediately ramp up acreage. The sunflower-oil market, dominated by Ukraine (50%) and Russia (17%), is particularly vulnerable: March 2022 saw a one-month price jump of 23% alone, and experts now predict possible increases of 40-60% during an export halt, with ripple effects raising palm and soy oil by 20-30%, as well. Earlier this year, Ukraine had to shut down one of its main sunflower plants at Kernel due to a raw material shortage. (Source). Having brokered a ceasefire in the 12-day conflict in the Middle East, the United States has secured considerable diplomatic momentum and might use it to put the brakes on Russia and Ukraine's escalating attacks on critical food and fertilizer infrastructure. For President Trump, the goal of averting a global famine would earn him high marks.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israeli strikes hit Hezbollah infrastructure in southern Lebanon
The Israeli army said on Friday that it had carried out a series of airstrikes on Hezbollah facilities in southern Lebanon. According to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), the facility, used by the militia to 'manage its fire and defence array,' was part of an underground Hezbollah site that was previously targeted in Israeli strikes. 'In recent days, the IDF identified attempts by the Hezbollah terror organization to restore the site and therefore the terror infrastructure in the area was struck,' the military said. The IDF added that the 'presence of this site and the attempts to re-establish it constitute a blatant violation of the understandings between Israel and Lebanon.' Lebanese media broadcast footage showing columns of thick smoke rising from the targeted hills near the city of Nabatiyeh area, which is 54 kilometres south of Beirut. Lebanese security sources confirmed to dpa that at least five heavy airstrikes struck the area. There were no immediate reports of casualties. Local media said residents in Nabatiyeh sought shelter amid the sound of loud explosions. Coinciding with the strikes, Lebanese security sources said an Israeli drone hit an apartment in Nabatiyeh al-Fawka. There was no immediate details on the incident from the Israeli army. At the end of November, Israel and Hezbollah agreed to a ceasefire following more than a year of mutual cross-border fire. The agreement stipulated, among other things, that Hezbollah withdraw behind the Litani River, roughly 30 kilometres north of the Israeli-Lebanese border.